OCT-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation in Complex Lesions: An ILUMIEN IV Substudy.

BACKGROUND: ILUMIEN IV was the first large-scale, multicenter, randomized trial comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided vs angiography-guided stent implantation in patients with high-risk clinical characteristics and/or complex angiographic lesions. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to specifically examine outcomes in the complex angiographic lesions subgroup. METHODS: From the original trial population (N = 2,487), high-risk patients without complex angiographic lesions were excluded (n = 514). Complex angiographic lesion characteristics included: 1) long or multiple lesions with intended total stent length ≥28 mm; 2) bifurcation lesion with intended 2-stent strategy; 3) severely calcified lesion; 4) chronic total occlusion; or 5) in-stent restenosis. The study endpoints were: 1) final minimal stent area (MSA); 2) 2-year composite of serious major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction [MI], or stent thrombosis); and 3) 2-year effectiveness, defined as target-vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization. RESULTS: The postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) MSA was larger in the OCT-guided (n = 992) vs angiography-guided (n = 981) group (5.56 ± 1.95 mm2 vs 5.26 ± 1.81 mm2; difference, 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14-0.47; P < 0.001). Compared with angiography-guided PCI, OCT-guided PCI resulted in a lower risk of serious MACE (3.1% vs 4.9%; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99; P = 0.04). TVF was not significantly different between groups (7.3% vs 8.8%; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59-1.12; P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: In complex angiographic lesions, OCT-guided PCI led to a larger MSA and reduced the serious MACE, the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, or stent thrombosis, compared with angiography-guided PCI at 2 years, but did not significantly improve TVF. (Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Coronary Stent Implantation Compared to Angiography: A Multicenter Randomized Trial in PCI; NCT03507777).

Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Functional Stenosis Assessment: FUSION-A Prospective Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular imaging and intracoronary physiology may both be used to guide and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention; however, they are rarely used together. The virtual flow reserve (VFR) is an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based model of fractional flow reserve (FFR) facilitating the assessment of the physiological significance of coronary lesions. We aimed to validate the VFR assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenoses. METHODS: FUSION (Validation of OCT-Based Functional Diagnosis of Coronary Stenosis) was a multicenter, prospective, observational study comparing OCT-derived VFR to invasive FFR. VFR was mathematically derived from a lumped parameter flow model based on 3-dimensional lumen morphology. Patients undergoing coronary angiography with intermediate angiographic stenosis (40%-90%) requiring physiological assessment were enrolled. Investigational sites were blinded to the VFR analysis, and all OCT and FFR data were reviewed by an independent core laboratory. The coprimary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of VFR against FFR as the reference standard, each of which was tested against prespecified performance goals. RESULTS: After core laboratory review, 266 vessels in 224 patients from 25 US centers were included in the analysis. The mean angiographic diameter stenosis was 65.5%±14.9%, and the mean FFR was 0.83±0.11. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of VFR versus FFR using a binary cutoff point of 0.80 were 82.0%, 80.4%, and 82.9%, respectively. The 97.5% lower confidence bound met the prespecified performance goal for sensitivity (71.6% versus 70%; P=0.01) and specificity (76.6% versus 75%; P=0.01). The area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: OCT-derived VFR demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for predicting invasive FFR. Integrating high-resolution intravascular imaging with imaging-derived physiology may provide synergistic benefits as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04356027.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding clinical outcomes after optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with angiography-guided PCI are limited. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, single-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with medication-treated diabetes or complex coronary-artery lesions to undergo OCT-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. A final blinded OCT procedure was performed in patients in the angiography group. The two primary efficacy end points were the minimum stent area after PCI as assessed with OCT and target-vessel failure at 2 years, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: The trial was conducted at 80 sites in 18 countries. A total of 2487 patients underwent randomization: 1233 patients were assigned to undergo OCT-guided PCI, and 1254 to undergo angiography-guided PCI. The minimum stent area after PCI was 5.72±2.04 mm2 in the OCT group and 5.36±1.87 mm2 in the angiography group (mean difference, 0.36 mm2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.51; P<0.001). Target-vessel failure within 2 years occurred in 88 patients in the OCT group and in 99 patients in the angiography group (Kaplan-Meier estimates, 7.4% and 8.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.19; P = 0.45). OCT-related adverse events occurred in 1 patient in the OCT group and in 2 patients in the angiography group. Stent thrombosis within 2 years occurred in 6 patients (0.5%) in the OCT group and in 17 patients (1.4%) in the angiography group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing PCI, OCT guidance resulted in a larger minimum stent area than angiography guidance, but there was no apparent between-group difference in the percentage of patients with target-vessel failure at 2 years. (Funded by Abbott; ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03507777.).

Safety and efficiency of percutaneous coronary intervention using a standardised optical coherence tomography workflow.

BACKGROUND: While intravascular imaging guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes, routine intravascular imaging usage remains low, in part due to perceived inefficiency and safety concerns.  Aims: The LightLab (LL) Initiative was designed to evaluate whether implementing a standardised optical coherence tomography (OCT) workflow impacts PCI safety metrics and procedural efficiency. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, observational study, PCI procedural data were collected over 2 years from 45 physicians at 17 US centres. OCT-guided PCI incorporating the LL workflow (N=264), a structured algorithm using routine pre- and post-PCI OCT imaging, was compared with baseline angiography-only PCI (angio) (N=428). Propensity score analysis identified 207 matched procedures. Outcomes included procedure time, radiation exposure, contrast volume, device utilisation, and treatment strategy. RESULTS: Compared with angiography alone, LL workflow OCT-guided PCI increased the median procedural time by 9 minutes but reduced vessel preparation time (2 min LL workflow vs 3 min angio; p<0.001) and resulted in less unplanned additional treatment (4% LL workflow vs 10% angio; p=0.01). With LL workflow OCT guidance, fewer cineangiography views were needed compared to angiography guidance, leading to decreased radiation exposure (1,133 mGy LL workflow vs 1,269 mGy angio; p=0.02), with no difference in contrast utilisation between groups (p=0.28). Furthermore, LL workflow OCT guidance resulted in fewer predilatation balloons and stents being used, more direct stent placement, and greater stent post-dilatation than angiography-guided PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of a standardised pre- and post-PCI OCT imaging workflow improves procedural efficiency and safety metrics, at a cost of a modestly longer procedure time.

ISR vs De Novo Lesion Treatment During OCT-Guided PCI: Insights From the LightLab Initiative.

Background: Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) are poor, yet limited granular procedural data exist evaluating lesion assessment, vessel treatment, and acute procedural outcomes. Methods: The LightLab Initiative was a multicenter, prospective, observational study with contemporaneous procedural data collection during PCI procedures. Data were collected during PCIs performed by 48 interventional cardiologists at 17 US hospitals (2019-2021). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed pre-PCI for lesion assessment and post-PCI for stent optimization, and results were compared between ISR and de novo lesion PCI. Results: In total, 2592 OCT-guided PCIs involving 2944 lesions were included, of which 458 procedures (17.7%) were ISR PCI. Compared with de novo lesion PCI, ISR lesions were more commonly type C (64.8% vs 52.9%) and performed via femoral artery access (46.4% vs 37.7%). Use of OCT changed operator assessment and treatment decisions more frequently in ISR PCI (94.2% vs 85.2%; P = .002). Scoring balloons (21.8% vs 2.5%), cutting balloons (16.4% vs 3.4%), and atherectomy (26.3% vs 9.9%) were used more commonly in ISR PCI (all P < .0001), and ISR PCI procedures were longer (62 vs 51 min). Moreover, the final achieved minimum stent area and percent expansion (4.4 vs 5.1 mm2 and 80% vs 83%, respectively; both P < .0001) were lower in ISR PCI. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients who underwent OCT-guided PCI, ISR procedures were longer and final minimum stent area and percent expansion were lower despite greater use of advanced lesion modification. OCT frequently altered physician decision making, emphasizing its utility in potentially reducing recurrent stent failure in this high-risk population.

Decision-Making During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography: Insights From the LightLab Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Use of intracoronary imaging is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Yet, the impact of intracoronary imaging on real-time physician decision-making during PCI is not fully known. METHODS: The LightLab Initiative is a multicenter, prospective, observational study designed to characterize the use of a standardized optical coherence tomography (OCT) workflow during PCI. Participating physicians performed pre-PCI and post-PCI OCT in accordance with this workflow and operator assessments of lesion characteristics and treatment plan were recorded for each lesion based on angiography alone and following OCT. Physicians were categorized as having low (n=15), intermediate (n=13), or high (n=14) OCT use in the year preceding participation. RESULTS: Among 925 patients with 1328 lesions undergoing PCI, the prescribed OCT workflow was followed in 773 (84%) of patients with 836 lesions. Operator lesion assessment and decision-making during PCI changed with OCT use in 86% (721/836) of lesions. Pre-PCI OCT use changed operator decision-making in 80% of lesions, including lesion assessment (45%), vessel preparation strategy (27%), stent diameter (37%), and stent length (36%). Post-PCI OCT changed stent optimization decision-making in 31% of lesions. These findings were consistent across strata of physician prior OCT experience. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized OCT workflow impacted PCI decision-making in 86% of lesions, with a predominant effect on pre-PCI lesion assessment and planning of treatment strategy. This finding was consistent regardless of operator experience level and provides insight into mechanisms by which intravascular imaging might improve PCI outcomes.

Improving efficiency and operator proficiency during percutaneous coronary interventions utilizing a standardized optical coherence tomography workflow.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare efficiency and quality metrics between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures using optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided by a variable workflow versus a standardized workflow in a real-world population. BACKGROUND: The LightLab (LL) Initiative was designed to evaluate the impact of a standardized OCT workflow during PCI to address barriers to adoption. METHODS: The LL Initiative was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. PCI efficiency data were collected from 1/21/19 to 1/8/21 from 45 physicians at 17 US centers. OCT-guided PCIs were compared between baseline phase (variable workflow; N = 383) and the LL workflow utilization phase (N = 447). The LL workflow uses OCT to assess lesion Morphology, Length and Diameter, and then optimize outcomes by correcting for Medial dissection, stent mal-Apposition, and under-eXpansion (MLD MAX). Matching based on propensity scores was used to control for differences between PCIs. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 291 paired procedures were included. Integration of the LL versus variable workflow resulted in no difference in procedure time (51 min vs. 51 min, p = 0.93). There was a reduction in radiation exposure (1124 mGy vs. 1493 mGy, p < 0.0001) and contrast volume (160 cc vs. 172 cc, p < 0.001). The LL workflow decreased the proportion of underexpanded lesions (34% vs. 54%, p < 0.0001) and improved minimum stent expansion (85% vs. 79%, p < 0.0001). Number of noncompliant balloons used was reduced with the LL workflow. (2.0 vs. 1.7, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that standardizing imaging with the LL workflow may overcome barriers to imaging and improve PCI outcomes without prolonging procedures.

OCT utilization: Summary statistics from the LightLab clinical initiative.

OBJECTIVES: The study describes the evolution of optical coherence tomography (OCT) adoption and performance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following implementation of a standardized LightLab (LL) workflow. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the LL Clinical Initiative was to evaluate the impact of a standardized workflow on physician efficiency, decision making, and image quality. METHODS: The LL Clinical Initiative is a multicenter, prospective, observational clinical program. Data were collected from 48 physicians at 17 U.S. centers from 01/21/19 to 06/08/21. The study included 401 OCT-guided PCIs during the baseline phase and 1898 during the LL workflow phases. The baseline phase consisted of physicians utilizing OCT at their discretion. After completing the baseline phase, the workflow progressed through multiple phases culminating in the expansion phase, which focused on addressing greater procedural complexity. The LL workflow utilized OCT to assess plaque Morphology, lesion Length, and vessel Diameter before PCI, and optimized results by treating Medial edge dissection, stent mal-Apposition, and stent under-eXpansion (MLD MAX). High-level summary statistics were generated to elucidate trends. RESULTS: After program implementation, there was a rise in the number of PCIs where the LL workflow was utilized compared to the baseline phase (68% during the expansion phase vs. 41% at baseline; p for trend <0.0001). Adoption of the LL workflow was associated with progressively greater procedural and lesion complexity when OCT was performed pre- and post-PCI (87% vs. 52%, p < 0.0001; 55% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In addition, the quality of OCT imaging obtained improved after LL workflow introduction, with over 95% of pre- and post-PCI pullback quality considered usable during the expansion phase. Finally, there was a reduction in time spent on OCT interpretation, both pre-PCI (4.6 min vs. 7.5 min, p < 0.0001) and post-PCI (2.9 min vs. 5.3 min, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After completion of the standardized OCT-guided workflow, there was greater uptake of OCT imaging, incorporation in more complex procedures, procedural efficiency, and image quality.

Investigating real-world impact of optical coherence tomography workflow-guided coronary interventions: Design and rationale of the LightLab Clinical Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: The LightLab Clinical Initiative was designed to examine adoption of optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging during routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice, and enable identification and reduction of barriers to broader adoption of intracoronary imaging in real-world practice. BACKGROUND: Intracoronary imaging guidance during PCI has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and features as a recommendation in societal guidelines, yet widespread routine adoption remains low. Perceived barriers to utilization include familiarity with, and ability to interpret imaging, concerns over added procedure time and contrast load, alongside a lack of actionable outcome data. METHODS AND RESULTS: LightLab was a multicenter prospective observational data-gathering project, conducted between January 2019, and June 2021, with 17 participating hospitals and physicians. Data were gathered in real-time, where OCT guidance was employed during PCI using a standardized OCT-guided workflow algorithm, MLD MAX (where MLD stands for plaque Morphology, lesion Length, vessel Diameter and MAX for Medial dissection, stent Apposition, stent eXpansion) which was developed to simplify and integrate information from OCT throughout the PCI procedure. Integration of this workflow/algorithm was implemented through a series of phases, focusing on physician decision-making, efficiency, and safety improvements during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Through real-time, prospective procedural data acquisition in the cardiac catheterization laboratory setting, the LightLab Clinical Initiative demonstrates the impact of a standardized OCT-guided workflow on procedural metrics, including time, contrast use, radiation exposure, as well as financial efficiencies such as device utilization. These results can potentially mitigate underlying concerns over the utility of adoption of intracoronary imaging guidance during PCI.