Selection of Medications to Prevent Stroke Among Individuals With Atrial Fibrillation : Update on Prevention of Stroke in Patients with AF.

OPINION STATEMENT: Vitamin K antagonists have been the only available orally active anticoagulants for decades. Although effective, their numerous limitations have driven the introduction of new oral anticoagulants (NOAs) that showed effectiveness at fixed doses without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. However, the safety and efficacy observed in controlled clinical trials may be hard to translate in clinical practice. Clinical conditions as well as drug interactions may considerably impact on patient outcomes. Moreover, the inability to monitor the pharmacological activity of NOAs and the absence of any antidote in the setting of bleeding or emergent invasive procedures may limit their use. Vitamin K antagonists will be still used in many circumstances, including patients with an optimal control of the INR, with mechanical heart valves, and other indications for which these new agents have not been investigated. Nevertheless, these new agents will reduce the burden of anticoagulation management at the patient as well as Health Care level.

Right subclavian approach as a feasible alternative for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve ReValving System.

AIMS: Arterial access selection is crucial during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. When traditional femoral access has been deemed unfeasible the left subclavian artery has been used successfully. In cases where even the latter was ineligible, we opted, despite the lack of any data, for the right subclavian approach. We hereby present the results of the first series available. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and performance of the CoreValve ReValving System (CRS) implantation via the right subclavian artery in patients with contraindication to femoral and left subclavian accesses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 300 patients who have undergone CRS implantation, 70 (23%) have been treated via the subclavian approach, 10 via the right subclavian artery and 60 via the left. Demographic features were quite similar except for the presence of significant left subclavian disease in all patients treated via the right subclavian artery. The success rate was 100% for both groups. At 30-day follow-up, there was no significant difference in terms of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality between right vs. left subclavian approach (0% vs. 6.6% and 0% vs. 6.6%, respectively). Consistent results were observed at a mean follow-up of 12±7.9 months (all-cause mortality: 10% vs. 15%). Incidences of new AV block requiring PM implantation were also statistically equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: CRS implantation via the right subclavian artery was as feasible and safe as the left subclavian approach. It poses very particular technical issues but should be considered when more conventional approaches are inadequate in order to provide patients with a further chance to be treated effectively.

[Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice]. / Il monitoraggio ambulatoriale della pressione arteriosa nella pratica clinica.

Traditionally, diagnosis and management of arterial hypertension are based on blood pressure (BP) measurements taken in the physician's office. However, 24-h noninvasive ambulatory BP monitoring is increasingly used in patients with essential hypertension. Several prospective studies provided unequivocal evidence of an independent association between ambulatory BP and risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population and hypertensive patients. Ambulatory BP is a better predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than office BP after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as age, sex, smoking status, baseline office BP, and use of antihypertensive drugs. The more accurate prognostic value of ambulatory BP may be related to the closer association with hypertension-related organ damage such as left ventricular mass, intima-media thickness, and microalbuminuria. The superiority of ambulatory over clinic BP in predicting clinical outcome and the most appropriate way of interpreting results of ambulatory BP monitoring will be discussed in this review.