Angle Accuracy of Intramedullary Bone Resection Guides for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The importance of proper prosthetic placement has been confirmed in numerous studies. The objective of this study was to compare the planned resection angles to the verified intraoperative angles of femoral and tibial varus/valgus, tibial slope, and femoral flexion for each total knee performed using intramedullary (IM) cut guides for both distal femur and proximal tibia cuts. A total of 1,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were evaluated for this study. Intraoperative cut-check technology was used to show real-time validation of these resection angles. Assuming an acceptable range of within 2° of the planned cuts, results show the femoral varus/valgus angles were 75% accurate, the femoral flexion angles were 50.8% accurate, the tibial cuts were 95.2% accurate in the coronal plane, and the tibial slope was the least accurate with only 50.3% within the acceptable range. This showed that IM guides are reasonably accurate in producing desired angles in the coronal plane but less accurate in the sagittal plane, with a greater number of outliers in femoral flexion and posterior slope. Surgeons need to be aware of potential cutting errors when using IM guides as they affect the overall alignment of the implant, and real-time verification technology is available to verify the accuracy of the cuts.

Investigation of Biomechanical Differences in Level Walking between Patients with Bilateral and Unilateral Total Knee Replacements.

Due to the high risk of a bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKR) following unilateral TKR, this study was performed to investigate bilateral TKR patients. Specifically, we examined biomechanical differences between the first replaced and second replaced limbs of bilateral patients. Furthermore, we examined bilateral TKR effects on hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics, compared to the replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients. Eleven bilateral patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and fifteen unilateral TKR patients (65.67 ± 6.18 years, 1.73 ± 0.10 m, 87.72 ± 15.70 kg) were analyzed while performing level walking. A repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze between-limb differences within the bilateral TKR group. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) ANOVA was used to determine differences between bilateral and unilateral patients. Our results showed that the second replaced limb exhibited a lower peak initial-stance knee extension moment than the first replaced limb. No other kinematic or kinetic differences were found. Bilateral patients exhibited lower initial-stance knee extension moments, knee abduction moments, and dorsiflexion moments, compared to unilateral patients. Bilateral patients also exhibited lower push-off peak hip flexion moments and vertical GRF. The differences between the first and second replaced limbs of bilateral patients may indicate different adaptation strategies used following a second TKR. The significant group differences indicate that adaptations are different between these groups, and it is not recommended to use patients with unilateral and bilateral TKR together in gait analyses.

Feasibility of Stationary Cycling with Pedal Force Visual Feedback Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty: Implications for Inter-Limb Deficits in Knee Joint Biomechanics.

The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical adaptations prompted by stationary cycling paired with visual feedback of vertical pedal reaction forces during both stationary cycling and overground walking for patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Specifically, an emphasis on the inter-limb deficits in knee joint biomechanics were examined. Ten patients who underwent a TKA took part in an acute intervention with pre- and post-testing measurements of kinematics (240 Hz) and kinetics (1200 Hz) during stationary cycling and overground walking. The intervention phase consisted of six cycling sessions during which participants were provided with visual feedback of their bilateral peak vertical pedal reaction force, with instructions to maintain a symmetrical loading between limbs. A 2 × 2 (work rate/speed × time) repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05) was conducted on key outcome variables. Peak knee extension moment asymmetry during stationary cycling significantly improved (p = 0.038, η2p = 0.610) following the acute intervention. Walking velocities for both preferred (p = 0.001, d = 0.583) and fast (p = 0.002, d = 0.613) walking speeds displayed improvements from pre- to post-testing. Significant improvements in the total score (p = 0.009, d = 0.492) and ADL subscale score (p = 0.041, d = 0.270) for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were present following the acute intervention. Stationary cycling with visual feedback may be beneficial post-TKA; however, further investigation is merited.

Effects of different slopes on hip and ankle biomechanics of replaced and non-replaced limbs of patients with total knee arthroplasty during incline ramp walking.

Although knee biomechanics has been examined, hip and ankle biomechanics in incline ramp walking has not been explored for patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hip and ankle joint kinematic and kinetic biomechanics of different incline slopes for replaced limbs and non-replaced limbs in individuals with TKA compared to healthy controls. Twenty-five patients with TKR and ten healthy controls performed walking trials on four slope conditions of level (0°), 5°, 10° and 15° on a customized instrumented ramp system. A 3x4 (limb x slope) repeated analysis of variance was used to evaluate selected variables. The results showed a greater peak ankle dorsiflexion angle in the replaced limbs compared to healthy limbs. No significant interactions or limb main effect for other ankle and hip variables. The peak dorsiflexion angle, eversion angle and dorsiflexion moment were progressively higher in each comparison from level to 15°. The peak plantarflexion moment was also increased with each increase of slopes. Both the replaced and non-replaced limbs of patients with TKA had lower hip flexion moments than the healthy control limbs. Hip angle at contact and hip extension range of motion increased with each increase of slopes. Peak hip loading-response internal extension moment increased with each increase in slope and peak hip push-off internal flexion moment decreased with each increase of slope. Our results showed increased dorsiflexion in replaced limbs but no other compensations of hip and ankle joints of replaced limbs compared to non-replaced limbs and their healthy controls during incline walking, providing further support of using incline walking in rehabilitation for patients with TKA.

Can Asymmetry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Design Lead to More Normal-Like Postoperative Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the effects of symmetrical versus asymmetrical implant designs, more specifically the femoral condyles, trochlear groove, joint line, and bearing surfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate multiple posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs influencing factors related to TKA asymmetry, and to investigate whether asymmetry can improve postoperative knee kinematics. METHODS: In vivo tibio-femoral kinematics for 99 subjects was evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a nonimplanted, normal knee, and 89 subjects had 1 of 3 PCR TKAs with varying degrees of asymmetry within their femoral and tibial components (PCR #1 = 30, PCR #2 = 29, PCR #3 = 30). All TKAs were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend. RESULTS: At full extension, all 3 PCR TKAs experienced a more posteriorized position of the femoral condyles compared to the normal knee, with the 2 asymmetrical PCR TKAs experiencing more anteriorization compared to the third, symmetrical PCR TKA. Both the normal knee and the PCR TKA with greatest amount of asymmetry experienced statistically more posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle than the other 2 PCR TKAs. The PCR TKA with greater asymmetry also experienced statistically greater range of motion than the other 2 PCR TKAs. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing flexion, the design with the most asymmetry also experienced the most posterior femoral rollback, axial rotation, and greatest range of motion. The results in this study seem to suggest that the inclusion of asymmetry in a TKA could be beneficial for achieving more normal-like kinematics and greater weight-bearing knee flexion.

Knee biomechanics of patients with total knee replacement during downhill walking on different slopes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare knee biomechanics of the replaced limb to the non-replaced limb of total knee replacement (TKR) patients and healthy controls during walking on level ground and on decline surfaces of 5°, 10°, and 15°. METHODS: Twenty-five TKR patients and 10 healthy controls performed 5 walking trials on different decline slopes on a force platform and an instrumented ramp system. Two analyses of variance, 2 × 2 (limb × group) and 2 × 4 (limb × decline slope), were used to examine selected biomechanics variables. RESULTS: The replaced limb of TKR patients had lower peak loading-response and push-off knee extension moment than the non-replaced and the matched limb of healthy controls. No differences were found in loading-response and push-off knee internal abduction moments among replaced, non-replaced, and matched limb of healthy controls. The knee flexion range of motion, peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force, and peak knee extension moment increased across all slope comparisons between 0° and 15° in both the replaced and non-replaced limb of TKR patients. CONCLUSION: Downhill walking may not be appropriate to include in early stage rehabilitation exercise protocols for TKR patients.

Altered biomechanics in bilateral total knee replacement patients during stair negotiation.

BACKGROUND: Many total knee replacement (TKR) patients need to have a contralateral knee replacement. Biomechanical differences between first and second replaced limbs of bilateral TKR have not been examined during stair negotiation. Additionally, it is unknown whether hip and ankle biomechanics of bilateral patients are altered. We examined hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics of first and second replaced limbs bilateral patients, as well as replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients, during stair ascent and descent. METHODS: Eleven bilateral TKR patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and 15 unilateral TKR patients (64.93 ± 5.11 years, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 89.18 ± 17.55 kg) were recruited. Patients performed three to five trials of stair ascent and descent. The second step, during ascent, was the step of interest when analyzing each limb. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) analysis of variance was performed to determine differences between limbs and groups. RESULTS: During ascent, bilateral patients exhibited decreased peak loading-response knee extension (KEM) and push-off plantarflexion moments. Unilateral replaced limb KEM was lower than non-replaced limbs. During descent, bilateral patients descended the staircase significantly slower, had lower peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force and KEM, and push-off KEM. Bilateral patients had higher peak loading-response hip extension and push-off plantarflexion moments, and increased knee adduction ROM, compared with unilateral TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral patients exhibited similar hip, knee, and ankle joint moments between first and second replaced limbs. Substantial differences in hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics during stair negotiation in bilateral patients compared with unilateral patients may indicate a more complex adaptation strategy present in these patients.

Principal Component Analysis of Knee Joint Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Total Knee Replacement Patients During Level Walking.

Many unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) patients will need a contralateral TKR. Differences in knee joint biomechanics between bilateral patients and unilateral patients are not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine knee joint differences in level walking between bilateral and unilateral patients, and asymptomatic controls, using principal component analysis. Knee joints of 1st replaced limbs of 15 bilateral patients (69.40 ± 5.04 years), 15 replaced limbs of unilateral patients (66.47 ± 6.15 years), and 15 asymptomatic controls (63.53 ± 9.50 years) were analyzed during level walking. Principal component analysis examined knee joint sagittal- and frontal-plane kinematics and moments, and vertical ground reaction force (GRF). A one-way analysis of variance analyzed differences between principal component scores of each group. TKR patients exhibited more flexed and abducted knees throughout stance, decreased sagittal knee range of motion (ROM), increased early-stance adduction ROM, decreased loading-response knee extension and push-off knee flexion moments, decreased loading-response and push-off peak knee abduction moment (KAbM), increased KAbM at midstance, increased midstance vertical GRF, and decreased loading-response and push-off vertical GRF. Additionally, bilateral patients exhibited reduced sagittal knee ROM, increased adduction ROM, decreased sagittal knee moments throughout stance, decreased KAbM throughout stance, an earlier loading-response peak vertical GRF, and a decreased push-off vertical GRF, compared to unilateral patients. TKR patients, especially bilateral patients had stiff knee motion in the sagittal-plane, increased frontal-plane joint laxity, and a quadriceps avoidance gait.

Overground Walking Biomechanics of Dissatisfied Persons With Total Knee Replacements.

Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement (TKR) procedures is likely influenced by both subjective and objective aspects. Increased pain and reduced performance on clinical tests have been shown in persons who are dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery. However, it is unknown how overground walking kinematics and kinetics might differ in the dissatisfied versus satisfied patients following TKR surgery. This study compared the lower-extremity walking kinematics and kinetics of patients dissatisfied with their TKR to that of satisfied patients and healthy controls. Thirty nine subjects completed walking trials, including nine dissatisfied and 15 satisfied TKR patients and 15 healthy controls. A 2 × 3 repeated -measures analysis of variance was used to assess differences between groups and limbs (P < .05). Dissatisfied persons showed significantly reduced loading-response and push-off peak vertical ground reaction forces, flexion range of motion, loading-response extension moments, and loading-response abduction moments compared to the controls. Peak loading-response and push-off vertical ground reaction forces and flexion range of motion were reduced in the replaced limb of dissatisfied patients compared with their nonreplaced limb. Push-off plantar flexion moments were reduced in the dissatisfied patients compared with the satisfied and healthy controls. Dissatisfied patients also reported increased knee joint pain and reduced preferred gait speed. Moreover, dissatisfied patients experienced mechanical limb asymmetries not present in those satisfied with their surgery result. Thus, patients dissatisfied with their total knee replacement outcome were found to be experiencing significant negative physiological changes.

In Vivo Knee Kinematics: How Important Are the Roles of Femoral Geometry and the Cruciate Ligaments?

BACKGROUND: While posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) implants are a more common total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, newer bicruciate-retaining (BCR) TKAs are now being considered as an option for many patients, especially those that are younger. While PCR TKAs remove the ACL, the BCR TKA designs keep both cruciate ligaments intact, as it is believed that the resection of the ACL greatly affects the overall kinematic patterns of TKA designs. The objectives of this study are to assess the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with either a PCR or BCR TKA and to compare the in vivo kinematic patterns to the normal knee during flexion. These objectives were achieved with an emphasis on understanding the roles of the cruciate ligaments, as well as the role of changes in femoral geometry of nonimplanted anatomical femurs vs implanted subjects having a metal femoral component. METHODS: Tibiofemoral kinematics of 50 subjects having a PCR (40 subjects) or BCR (10 subjects) TKA were analyzed using fluoroscopy while performing a deep knee bend activity. The kinematics were compared to previously published normal knee data (10 subjects). Kinematics were determined during specific intervals of flexion where the ACL or PCL was most dominant. RESULTS: In early flexion, subjects having a BCR TKA experienced more normal-like kinematic patterns, possibly attributed to the ACL. In mid-flexion, both TKA groups exhibited variable kinematic patterns, which could be due to the transitional cruciate ligament function period. In deeper flexion, both TKA functioned more similar to the normal knee, leading to the assumption that the PCL was properly balanced and functioning in the TKA groups. Interestingly, during late flexion (after 90°), the kinematic patterns for all three groups appeared to be statistically similar. CONCLUSION: Subjects having a PCR TKA experienced greater weight-bearing flexion than the BCR TKA group. Subjects having a BCR TKA exhibited a more normal-like kinematic pattern in early and late flexion. The normal knee subjects achieved greater lateral condyle rollback and axial rotation compared to the TKA groups.

Increased knee loading in stair ambulation in patients dissatisfied with their total knee replacement.

BACKGROUND: Total knee replacement patients have shown reductions in knee flexion range of motion, knee extensor moments, and gait speed during stair ascent and stair descent. However, it is unknown how patients dissatisfied with their total knee replacement differ from those who are satisfied during more difficult activities such as stair negotiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare knee biomechanics of patients who are dissatisfied with their joint replacement to those who are satisfied and healthy participants during stair negotiation. METHODS: Nine dissatisfied, fifteen satisfied patients and fifteen healthy participants participated, completing stair ascent and descent trials on an instrumented staircase. A 2 × 3 ANOVA was used to analyze biomechanical differences between groups and limbs during both activities. FINDINGS: The dissatisfied group showed reduced 2nd peak vertical GRF (P ≤ 0.0040) and loading-response knee extension moments (P ≤ 0.0041) in their operated limb compared to their non-operated limb and to satisfied and healthy groups during stair ascent. First peak vertical GRF (P < 0.0088) and both loading-response (P < 0.0117) and push-off abduction moments (P < 0.0028) showed reduced values in operated limbs compared to non-operated limbs for all groups. During stair descent, the dissatisfied group showed reduced loading-response and push-off knee extension moments (P ≤ 0.006) in their operated limb compared to their non-operated limb and the healthy group. The loading-response knee extension (P < 0.0379) and abduction moments (P ≤ 0.0048) were also reduced in the dissatisfied group compared to the satisfied group. INTERPRETATION: Patients who were dissatisfied showed asymmetrical loading of the knees in conjunction, which may have contributed to their dissatisfaction.

Midterm Performance of a Guided-Motion Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee System: Results From the International Study of Over 2000 Consecutive Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: The JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilizing Total Knee System (BLINDED) is a second-generation guided-motion knee implant that has been used in over 100,000 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) worldwide. However, performance information is limited. METHODS: Data for 2059 primary TKAs were abstracted at 7 US and 3 European sites. Estimates of cumulative incidence of revision were compared with registry data for cemented posterior-stabilized implants. RESULTS: Average age was 64.3 years (range, 18-91); 58.5% were females; and 12.3% TKAs were in subjects younger than 55 years. Patellae were resurfaced in 95.9%. Median time since primary TKA was 4.2 years; longest was 6.1 years; and 78.9% were 3 years or more since primary TKA. Of 67 revisions (3.2%), 20 (30%) involved femoral or tibial component removal compared to 42% in the Australian Joint Registry (Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry). All-component revisions accounted for 15 of 67, femoral component only for 2 of 67, tibial component only for 3 of 67, patellar component with/without tibial insert exchange for 17 of 67, and isolated tibial insert exchange for 30 of 67. In addition, there were 18 reoperations without component exchange. Component revision indications were infection (33%), mechanical loosening (21%), fracture of bone around the joint (16%), and instability (15%). Kaplan-Meier revision estimate was 3.1 and 3.6 per 100 TKAs at 3 and 5 years, respectively, compared to Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry estimates of 3.1 and 4.1 per 100 TKAs. CONCLUSION: The revision rate for the second-generation implant was similar to cemented posterior-stabilized registry controls.

Is knee biomechanics different in uphill walking on different slopes for older adults with total knee replacement?

The purpose of this study was to investigate knee biomechanics in uphill walking on slopes of 5°, 10° and 15° for total knee replacement (TKR) patients. Twenty-five post-TKR patients and ten healthy controls performed five walking trials on level ground and different slopes on an instrumented ramp system. A 2 × 2 × 4 (limb × group × incline slope) mixed model ANOVA was used to examine selected variables. The peak knee extension moment (KEM) was greater in 15° uphill walking compared to level, 5° and 10° uphill walking. TKR patients had lower peak KEM and smaller knee extension range of motion than healthy controls in all walking conditions. The Replaced Limb showed lower peak KEM in 10° and 15° uphill walking than the Non-replaced Limb and smaller knee extension range of motion (ROM) in 10° uphill walking. Knee extension and abduction ROM increased with increased incline angles. The greater peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force was found in level walking compared to three levels of uphill walking. The peak loading-response knee abduction moment was greater in level walking compared to 10° and 15° uphill walking. However, the medial knee contact force was greater in non-replaced limb compared to replaced limb in 10° and 15° uphill walking. The results suggest 5° uphill walking may have the potential to become a safe exercise for unilateral TKR patients.

What Is the Incidence of Cobalt-Chromium Damage Modes on the Bearing Surface of Contemporary Femoral Component Designs for Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of metal release in contemporary total knee arthroplasty and the patient-related factors associated with this release. METHODS: In total, 256 retrieved cobalt-chromium femoral components were collected through a multi-institutional orthopedic implant retrieval program (implanted: 1-15 years). Implants were mainly revised for loosening (84/256), instability (62/256), and infection (46/256). Third-body damage was assessed using a semiquantitative scoring method. Microscale electro-corrosion damage (MECD) was evaluated using digital optical microscopy. Radii of curvature were measured from representative components to calculate anterior-posterior and medial-lateral ratios. Femoral component surface roughness was measured using a white light interferometer. Using a multivariable linear model, associations between damage score, implant, and patient factors were tested. Spearman's ρ correlation tests were performed to determine the association between roughness measurements and damage score. RESULTS: Mild to severe damage was observed in 52% (134/256) of the components. In the multivariable linear model, anterior-posterior ratio (ß = -8.07; P < .001), loosening (ß = -0.52; P = .006), and patient weight (ß = 0.01; P = .007) were associated with damage score. Suspected MECD damage was observed in 82% (209/256) of components. The Ra value (ρ = 0.196; P = .002) and Rq value (ρ = 0.157; P = .012) increased as the damage score increased. CONCLUSION: The findings of this retrieval study support that similar damage mechanisms exist in contemporary and long-term total knee arthroplasty devices. Additionally, we observed associations between loosening, anterior-posterior conformity, and patient weight with increased surface damage.

In Vivo Kinematic Comparison of a Bicruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty and the Normal Knee Using Fluoroscopy.

BACKGROUND: The bicruciate stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) features asymmetrical bearing geometry and dual substitution for the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Previous TKA designs have not fully replicated normal knee motion, and they are characterized by lower magnitudes of overall rollback and axial rotation than the normal knee. METHODS: In vivo kinematics were derived for 10 normal knees and 40-second generation BCS TKAs all implanted by a single surgeon. Mobile fluoroscopy and three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional registration was used to analyze anterior-posterior motion of the femoral condyles and femorotibial axial rotation during weight-bearing flexion. Statistical analysis was conducted at the 95% confidence level. RESULTS: From 0° to 30° of knee flexion, the BCS subjects exhibited similar patterns of femoral rollback and axial rotation compared to normal knee subjects. From 30° to 60° of knee flexion, BCS subjects experienced negligible anterior-posterior motions and axial rotation while normal knees continued to rollback and externally rotate. Between 60° and 90° the BCS resumed posterior motion and, after 90°, axial rotation increased in a normal-like fashion. CONCLUSION: Similarities in early flexion kinematics suggest that the anterior cam-post is supporting normal-like anterior-posterior motion in the BCS subjects. Likewise, lateral femoral rollback and external rotation of the femur in later flexion provides evidence for appropriate substitution of the PCL via the posterior cam-post. Being discrete in nature, the dual cam-post mechanism does not lend itself to adequate substitution of the cruciate ligaments in mid-flexion during which anterior cruciate ligament tension is decreasing and PCL tension is increasing in the normal knee.

Effects of toe-in and toe-in with wider step width on level walking knee biomechanics in varus, valgus, and neutral knee alignments.

BACKGROUND: Increased peak external knee adduction moments exist for individuals with knee osteoarthritis and varus knee alignments, compared to healthy and neutrally aligned counterparts. Walking with increased toe-in or increased step width have been individually utilized to successfully reduce 1st and 2nd peak knee adduction moments, respectfully, but have not previously been combined or tested among all alignment groups. The purpose of this study was to compare toe-in only and toe-in with wider step width gait modifications in individuals with neutral, valgus, and varus alignments. METHODS: Thirty-eight healthy participants with confirmed varus, neutral, or valgus frontal-plane knee alignment through anteroposterior radiographs, performed level walking in normal, toe-in, and toe-in with wider step width gaits. A 3×3 (group×intervention) mixed model repeated measures ANOVA compared alignment groups and gait interventions (p<0.05). RESULTS: The 1st peak knee adduction moment was reduced in both toe-in and toe-in with wider step width compared to normal gait. The 2nd peak adduction moment was increased in toe-in compared to normal and toe-in with wider step width. The adduction impulse was also reduced in toe-in and toe-in with wider step width compared to normal gait. Peak knee flexion and external rotation moments were increased in toe-in and toe-in with wider step width compared to normal gait. CONCLUSION: Although the toe-in with wider step width gait seems to be a viable option to reduce peak adduction moments for varus alignments, sagittal, and transverse knee loadings should be monitored when implementing this gait modification strategy.

Fretting and Corrosion Damage in Taper Adapter Sleeves for Ceramic Heads: A Retrieval Study.

BACKGROUND: During revision surgery with a well-fixed stem, a titanium sleeve can be used in conjunction with a ceramic head to achieve better stress distribution across the taper surface. In vitro testing suggests that corrosion is not a concern in sleeved ceramic heads; however, little is known about the in vivo fretting corrosion of the sleeves. The purpose of this study was to investigate fretting corrosion in sleeved ceramic heads in retrieved total hip arthroplasties. METHODS: Thirty-seven sleeved ceramic heads were collected during revision. The femoral heads and sleeves were implanted 0.0-3.3 years. The implants were revised predominantly for instability, infection, and loosening. Fifty percent of the retrievals were implanted during a primary surgery. Fretting corrosion was assessed using the Goldberg-Higgs semiquantitative scoring system. RESULTS: Mild-to-moderate fretting corrosion scores (score = 2-3) were observed in 92% of internal tapers, 19% of external tapers, and 78% of the stems. Severe fretting corrosion was observed in 1 stem trunnion that was previously retained during revision surgery and none of the retrieved sleeves. There was no difference in corrosion damage of sleeves used in primary or revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The fretting corrosion scores in this study were predominantly mild and lower than reported fretting scores of cobalt-chrome heads in metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Although intended for use in revisions, we found that the short-term in vivo corrosion behavior of the sleeves was similar in both primary and revision surgery applications. From an in vivo corrosion perspective, sleeves are a reasonable solution for restoring the stem taper during revision surgery.

Do Stem Taper Microgrooves Influence Taper Corrosion in Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Matched Cohort Retrieval Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies identified imprinting of the stem morphology onto the interior head bore, leading researchers to hypothesize an influence of taper topography on mechanically assisted crevice corrosion. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether microgrooved stem tapers result in greater fretting corrosion damage than smooth stem tapers. METHODS: A matched cohort of 120 retrieved head-stem pairs from metal-on-polyethylene bearings was created controlling for implantation time, flexural rigidity, apparent length of engagement, and head size. There were 2 groups of 60 heads each, mated with either smooth or microgrooved stem tapers. A high-precision roundness machine was used to measure and categorize the surface morphology. Fretting corrosion damage at the head-neck junction was characterized using the Higgs-Goldberg scoring method. Fourteen of the most damaged heads were analyzed for the maximum depth of material loss and focused ion beam cross-sectioned to view oxide and base metal. RESULTS: Fretting corrosion damage was not different between the 2 cohorts at the femoral head (P = .14, Mann-Whitney) or stem tapers (P = .35). There was no difference in the maximum depths of material loss between the cohorts (P = .71). Cross-sectioning revealed contact damage, signs of micro-motion, and chromium-rich oxide layers in both cohorts. Microgroove imprinting did not appear to have a different effect on the fretting corrosion behavior. CONCLUSION: The results of this matched cohort retrieval study do not support the hypothesis that taper surfaces with microgrooved stems exhibit increased in vivo fretting corrosion damage or material release.

Knee Joint Loads and Surrounding Muscle Forces during Stair Ascent in Patients with Total Knee Replacement.

Total knee replacement (TKR) is commonly used to correct end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, difficulty with stair climbing often persists and prolongs the challenges of TKR patents. Complete understanding of loading at the knee is of great interest in order to aid patient populations, implant manufacturers, rehabilitation, and future healthcare research. Musculoskeletal modeling and simulation approximates joint loading and corresponding muscle forces during a movement. The purpose of this study was to determine if knee joint loadings following TKR are recovered to the level of healthy individuals, and determine the differences in muscle forces causing those loadings. Data from five healthy and five TKR patients were selected for musculoskeletal simulation. Variables of interest included knee joint reaction forces (JRF) and the corresponding muscle forces. A paired samples t-test was used to detect differences between groups for each variable of interest (p<0.05). No differences were observed for peak joint compressive forces between groups. Some muscle force compensatory strategies appear to be present in both the loading and push-off phases. Evidence from knee extension moment and muscle forces during the loading response phase indicates the presence of deficits in TKR in quadriceps muscle force production during stair ascent. This result combined with greater flexor muscle forces resulted in similar compressive JRF during loading response between groups.

Influence of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Gait Mechanics of the Replaced and Non-Replaced Limb During Stair Negotiation.

This study compared biomechanics during stair ascent in replaced and non-replaced limbs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients with control limbs of healthy participants. Thirteen TKA patients and fifteen controls performed stair ascent. Replaced and non-replaced knees of TKA patients were less flexed at contact compared to controls. The loading response peak knee extension moment was greater in control and non-replaced knees compared with replaced. The push-off peak knee abduction moment was elevated in replaced limbs compared to controls. Loading and push-off peak hip abduction moments were greater in replaced limbs compared to controls. The push-off peak hip abduction moment was greater in non-replaced limbs compared to controls. Future rehabilitation protocols should consider the replaced knee and also the non-replaced knee and surrounding joints.