Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Radiol ; 78(5): 323-332, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36849280

RESUMEN

Fat necrosis of the breast is a commonly encountered condition in daily practice. It is a benign pathology, but it can have variable manifestations and patterns that may sometimes mimic malignancy, depending on its stage of evolution and its underlying cause. This review demonstrates the wide spectrum of appearances of fat necrosis on mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron-emission tomography (PET). Sequential follow-up images are included in some cases to illustrate the temporal change of the findings. The typical location and distribution of fat necrosis from a comprehensive list of aetiologies are discussed. Improved knowledge of the multimodality imaging features of fat necrosis could enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management, thus avoiding unnecessary invasive investigations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Necrosis Grasa , Humanos , Femenino , Necrosis Grasa/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis Grasa/patología , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Mamografía/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología
2.
Clin Radiol ; 77(7): 503-513, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35365295

RESUMEN

Physiological and pathological processes arising from the breast and anterior chest wall may share similar clinical presentations because of the small volume of male breasts. Therefore, imaging is frequently required to localise and characterise the lesion and guide biopsy when radiological findings are equivocal or suspicious. Mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound are the mainstays of breast imaging work-up. Other imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography (PET) can sometimes augment the investigation and aid treatment planning. This article reviews the key imaging features of a wide spectrum of benign and malignant conditions that involve the male breast and anterior chest wall across various age groups. Familiarisation with the salient radiological findings is essential for reaching an accurate diagnosis and optimising management.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Pared Torácica , Adolescente , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Mamografía/métodos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Pared Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto Joven
3.
Hong Kong Med J ; 26(6): 500-509, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303700

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A magnetic seed marker system (Magseed, Endomagnetics, Cambridge, United Kingdom) is used as a localisation method for non-palpable breast lesions in the United States, Europe, and Hong Kong. It overcomes many limitations of conventional techniques and allows scheduling flexibility. We sought to evaluate its efficacy and safety in the Chinese population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all Chinese women who underwent magnetic seed marker-guided breast lesion excision from June 2019 to February 2020 at a single institution. Placement success (final target-to-seed distance <10 mm) was evaluated by imaging on the day of surgery. Specimen radiographs and pathology reports were reviewed for magnetic seed markers and target removal. Margin clearance and re-excision rates were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty two magnetic seed markers were placed in 21 patients under sonographic or stereotactic guidance to localise 21 target lesions. One target lesion required two magnetic seed markers for bracketing. There was no migration of nine markers placed 6 to 56 days before the day of surgery. Placement success was achieved in 20 (90.9%) cases. Mean final target-to-seed distance was 3.1 mm. Two out of 21 (9.5%) lesions required alternative localisation due to marker migration ≥10 mm, while 19 (90.5%) lesions underwent successful magnetic seed marker-guided excision. Three of these 19 lesions (15.8%) were excised with therapeutic intent, one of which (33%) required re-excision due to a close margin. All 22 magnetic seed markers were successfully removed. No complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Magnetic seed markers demonstrated safety and efficacy in Chinese women for breast lesion localisation and excision.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Magnetometría/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , China , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Fenómenos Magnéticos , Magnetometría/instrumentación , Imanes , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
BJR Open ; 1(1): 20180039, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33178926

RESUMEN

Neuropathic arthropathy, also known as Charcot arthropathy, refers to progressive and occasionally rapid joint destruction that results from underlying disorders of the nervous system. This pictorial essay aims to illustrate various radiologic findings in neuropathic arthropathy using various examples in the upper and lower limbs and in the spine. Pearls for radiologic diagnosis, clinical differential considerations and possible complications are discussed individually for each joint. MR imaging techniques for differentiating infection and neuropathic arthropathy are explained with examples. Management issues are outlined.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA