A Prospective Observational Study of Preoperative Anaemia Management Aided by Bedside Haemoglobin Testers in a Low-Resource Setting.

AIM: Paediatric-preoperative anaemia management is challenging in settings where clinical judgment is used to diagnose anaemia owing to a lack of timely, affordable preoperative haemoglobin testing. We analysed anaemia management in such a setting after the introduction of point-of-care bedside haemoglobin testers. METHOD: 1033 children who underwent surgery at a hospital in Bangladesh were included in this study. 569 underwent major surgery, and 464 underwent minor surgery and belonged to predominantly ASA category 1 or 2. RESULTS: 940/1033 children underwent preoperative anaemia testing. Average haemoglobin was 11.7 g/dL. 103/1033 children were deemed clinically anaemic. However, 285 children were found to have anaemia based on bedside testing. Sensitivity of clinical judgement was 33.68% (95 % CI 28.22%-39.49%), and the specificity was 99.08% (95 % CI 98.02%-99.66%). 63/1033 had preoperative anaemia treatment, of whom 60 underwent transfusion. Subgroup analysis of children with haemoglobin <10 g/dL (n = 124) was done to compare conservative vs liberal transfusion strategy. 43/124 of this subset was transfused. Average length of stay for those transfused was 11.7 days, and those who weren't was 9.9 days (p = 0.087). 4 patients in the transfused subgroup required post-op ICU, and only 1 patient in the conservatively managed arm required ICU (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the positive impact of bedside haemoglobin testers as they have resulted in a significantly higher proportion of children diagnosed with anaemia at a fraction of the cost and logistics involved in laboratory testing. Further research on haemoglobin thresholds is required to understand the safety and long-term impact of restrictive transfusion in the surgical context. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c (Grading as per the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine).

An Observational Study of Paediatric Preoperative Transfusion Practice in a Resource-Limited Setting.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric anaemia is highly prevalent in low-middle-income countries and can negatively impact postoperative outcomes. Currently, there are no guidelines for the management of paediatric preoperative anaemia. To ensure optimal care in resource-limited settings: balancing the risks of anaemia and using resources such as blood transfusion, we first need to understand current practices. To address this, a joint UK-Bangladesh team conducted an observational study at a paediatric surgical centre in Bangladesh. METHODS: A total of 464 patients ≤16 years who underwent elective and emergency surgery were categorised into major (351/464), moderate (92/464) and minor (21/464) surgery groups according to anticipated blood loss. Preoperative anaemia testing and transfusion was assessed retrospectively through patient notes. RESULTS: Median age was 4 years and 73% were male. 32.5% (151/464) patients had preoperative blood testing for anaemia. 17.5% (81/464) children were transfused preoperatively. Of those children transfused, 40.7% (33/81) underwent transfusion solely based on visible signs of anaemia on clinical examination. Seventy-five percentage (36/48) of children who underwent transfusion after blood testing had haemoglobin ≥80 g/L. Major surgery category had the highest proportion of children who were transfused and tested for anaemia. CONCLUSION: A liberal transfusion approach is evident here. Discussion with local clinicians revealed that this was due to limitations in obtaining timely blood results and reduction in laboratory costs incurred by families when clinical suspicion of anaemia was high. Further research is needed to analyse the potential of using bedside haemoglobin testers in conjunction with patient blood management strategies to limit blood transfusions and its associated risks.

Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate COVID-19 infections and deaths in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a global perspective during the early phases of the pandemic. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Two parallel searches of academic bibliographic databases and grey literature were undertaken until 8 May 2020. Governments were also contacted for further information where possible. There were no restrictions on language, information sources used, publication status and types of sources of evidence. The AACODS checklist or the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools were used to appraise each source of evidence. OUTCOME MEASURES: Publication characteristics, country-specific data points, COVID-19-specific data, demographics of affected HCWs and public health measures employed. RESULTS: A total of 152 888 infections and 1413 deaths were reported. Infections were mainly in women (71.6%, n=14 058) and nurses (38.6%, n=10 706), but deaths were mainly in men (70.8%, n=550) and doctors (51.4%, n=525). Limited data suggested that general practitioners and mental health nurses were the highest risk specialities for deaths. There were 37.2 deaths reported per 100 infections for HCWs aged over 70 years. Europe had the highest absolute numbers of reported infections (119 628) and deaths (712), but the Eastern Mediterranean region had the highest number of reported deaths per 100 infections (5.7). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 infections and deaths among HCWs follow that of the general population around the world. The reasons for gender and specialty differences require further exploration, as do the low rates reported in Africa and India. Although physicians working in certain specialities may be considered high risk due to exposure to oronasal secretions, the risk to other specialities must not be underestimated. Elderly HCWs may require assigning to less risky settings such as telemedicine or administrative positions. Our pragmatic approach provides general trends, and highlights the need for universal guidelines for testing and reporting of infections in HCWs.

Surgical decision making around paediatric preoperative anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries.

Prevalence of anaemia is high among children in low-income and middle-income countries. Anaemia is an important factor to consider preoperatively as low haemoglobin concentrations can have a negative effect on surgical outcomes and can also lead to surgeries being cancelled or postponed, which can have adverse health implications and stretch already limited resources in these countries. Additionally, blood transfusions to correct anaemia exposes children to safety issues. Therefore, where anaemia is known to be prevalent and resources are scarce, a contextually appropriate and relatively safe minimum haemoglobin concentration for proceeding to surgery could substantially improve patient management and efficiency of the health system. In this Review, we consider why paediatric anaemia is a major public health issue in low-income and middle-income countries, the value of preoperative testing of anaemia, and methods of optimising haemoglobin concentrations in the context of paediatric surgeries taking place in resource-limited settings.

A comparative evaluation of spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser doppler imaging in the assessment of adult and paediatric burn injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical assessment of mid-dermal burns can be challenging. Currently, laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is the gold standard adjunct in the assessment of burn injuries. Although LDI has demonstrated reliable accuracy, it poses various limitations in routine use including cost and ease of use. In comparison, spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis (SIA) is a relatively cheaper technique, which can be carried out using a modified digital camera that enables easy image acquisition. We aim to compare the accuracy of the two modalities in the assessment of mid-dermal burn injuries. METHODS: We recruited 29 patients with mid-dermal burns presenting within 2 to 5 days post burn. Forty-five burn regions of interest were identified, and the patients underwent imaging using both the modalities. Subsequent clinical outcome was followed up and showed that treatment remained unaffected by participation. Two clinicians then independently predicted the healing potential of each burn region retrospectively as per images from either modality. RESULTS: McNemar's test indicated that there is no significant difference between the accuracy of the two modalities (p = 0.61). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the accuracy of SIA is comparable to that of LDI. Our experience with SIA indicates its potential as a cost-effective and user-friendly adjunct in decision-making.