RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the nation's health care system, including on graduate medical education (GME) training programs. Traditionally, residency and fellowship training program applications involve in-person interviews conducted on-site, with only a minority of programs offering interviews remotely via a virtual platform. However, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is anticipated that most interviews will be conducted virtually for the 2021 application cycle and possibly beyond. Therefore, GME training programs need to prepare for the transition to virtual interviews using evidence-based practices. At the University of California, San Francisco, a multidisciplinary task force was convened to review existing literature about virtual interviews and determine best practices. This article summarizes these findings, first discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the virtual interview format and then providing evidence-based best practices for GME training programs. Specifically, the authors make the following recommendations: develop a detailed plan for the interview process, consider using standardized interview questions, recognize and respond to potential biases that may be amplified with the virtual interview format, prepare your own trainees for virtual interviews, develop electronic materials and virtual social events to approximate the interview day, and collect data about virtual interviews at your own institution. With adequate preparation, the virtual interview experience can be high yield, positive, and equitable for both applicants and GME training programs.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Internado y Residencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Becas , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMEN
Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) patients are at increased risk of peritonitis following elective colonoscopy and other potentially invasive dental or gynecological procedures. The increased risk of iatrogenic peritonitis is attributed to procedure-related factors such as instrumentation, biopsies, tissue injury, and peri-procedural bacterial contamination. Also contributory are patient-related factors such as the effect of the immunocompromised status of end-stage renal disease and the presence of intraperitoneal dialysate on the disruption of natural host defense mechanisms. We propose the use of standard peri-procedure protocols, including procedure-specific prophylactic antibiotics, and discuss the enhanced defense rationale for a dry abdomen during and sometimes after procedures. Depending on the procedure and its inherent risk of causing peritonitis, as well as the patient's ability to withhold PD for up to 3 days, we sometimes increase the intensity of PD before the procedure. We conclude that it is imperative that proceduralists and nephrologists be aware of and proactive about how to mitigate postprocedure PD complications.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Peritonitis/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate of < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 body surface area. The availability of high-quality randomized controlled trial data to guide management for the population with CKD and ASCVD is limited. Understanding current practice patterns among providers caring for individuals with CKD and CVD is important in guiding future trial questions. METHODS: A qualitative survey study was performed. An electronic survey regarding the diagnosis and management of CVD in patients with CKD was conducted using a convenience sample of 450 practicing nephrology and cardiology providers. The survey was administered using Qualtrics® (https://www.qualtrics.com). RESULTS: There were a total of 113 responses, 81 of which were complete responses. More than 90% of the respondents acknowledged the importance of CVD as a cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. Outside the kidney transplant evaluation setting, 5% of the respondents would screen an asymptomatic patient with advanced CKD for ASCVD. Outside the kidney transplant evaluation scenario, the respondents did not opt for invasive management strategies in advanced CKD. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results reveal a lack of consensus among providers caring for patients with advanced CKD about the management of ASCVD in this setting. Future randomized controlled trials will be needed to better inform the clinical management of ASCVD in these patients. The limitations of the study include its small sample size and the relatively low response rate among the respondents.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Cardiólogos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Nefrólogos , Prevalencia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a widely accepted and increasingly popular form of dialysis. The invention and technological advancement of the PD cycler further makes PD a convenient option. Prescription-specific parameters are entered into the cycler, which then automatically carries out the steps involved in continuous cycling PD. We review the basics, technical aspects, challenges, and advancements of the cycler.