Permissive Intrapartum Glucose Control: An Equivalence Randomized Control Trial (PERMIT).

BACKGROUND: There is limited high quality data to determine best practices for maternal blood glucose management during labor. OBJECTIVE: We compared permissive care (target maternal blood glucose 70-180 mg/dL) to usual care (blood glucose 70-110 mg/dL) among laboring individuals with diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a two-site equivalence randomized control trial for individuals with diabetes (pregestational or gestational) at ≥ 34 weeks in labor. Individuals were randomly allocated to usual care or permissive care. Maternal blood glucose was evaluated by capillary blood glucose monitoring in latent and active labor every 4 and 2 hours. Insulin drip was initiated if maternal blood glucose exceeded the upper bounds of the allocated target. The primary outcome was first neonatal heel stick glucose within two hours of birth before feeding. We assumed a mean first neonatal blood glucose of 50 ±10 mg/dL. To ensure that the use of permissive care did not increase or decrease the first neonatal blood glucose >10 mg/dL (two-tailed, α= 0.05, ß= 0.1), 96 total participants were required. We calculated adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in an intention-to-treat analysis. A Bayesian analysis was preplanned to estimate the probability of equivalence with a neutral informative prior. RESULTS: Of 511 deliveries with diabetes assessed for eligibility (10/2022 - 6/2023), 280 (54.8%) met eligibility criteria, and 96 (34.3%) agreed and were randomized. In the usual care group, 17% required an insulin drip compared to none in permissive care. There was equivalence in the primary outcome between usual and permissive care (57.9 vs. 57.1 mg/dL, adjusted mean difference -0.72, 95% CI -8.87,7.43). Bayesian analysis indicated 98% posterior probability of mean difference not being greater than ±10 mg/dL. The rate of neonatal hypoglycemia was 25% in the usual care group and 29% in permissive group (adjusted relative risk 1.14, 95% CI 0.60, 2.17). There was no difference in other neonatal or maternal outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this randomized control trial, while almost 1 in 6 individuals with diabetes required an insulin drip with usual intrapartum maternal blood glucose care, permissive care was associated with equivalent neonatal blood glucose.

Optimizing Opioid Prescription Quantity After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether an individualized opioid-prescription protocol (IOPP) with a shared decision-making component can be used without compromising postcesarean pain management. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial, we compared IOPP with shared decision making with a fixed quantity of opioid tablets at hospital discharge. We recruited at 31 centers participating in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Study participants had uncomplicated cesarean births. Follow-up occurred through 12 weeks postdischarge. Individuals with complicated cesarean births or history of opioid use in the pregnancy were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to IOPP with shared decision making or fixed quantity (20 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone). In the IOPP group, we calculated recommended tablet quantity based on opioid use in the 24 hours before discharge. After an educational module and shared decision making, participants selected a quantity of discharge tablets (up to 20). The primary outcome was moderate to severe pain (score 4 or higher [possible range 0-10]) on the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) at 1 week after discharge. A total sample size of 5,500 participants was planned to assess whether IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to the fixed quantity of 20 tablets. RESULTS: From September 2020 to March 2022, 18,990 individuals were screened and 5,521 were enrolled (n=2,748 IOPP group, n=2,773 fixed-quantity group). For the primary outcome, IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to fixed quantity (59.5% vs 60.1%, risk difference 0.67%; 95% CI, -2.03% to 3.37%, noninferiority margin -5.0) and resulted in significantly fewer tablets received (median 14 [interquartile range 4-20] vs 20, P<.001) through 90 days postpartum. CONCLUSION: Compared with fixed quantity, IOPP with shared decision making was noninferior for outpatient postcesarean analgesia at 1 week postdischarge and resulted in fewer prescribed opioid tablets at discharge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04296396.

Well-Child Visits for Early Detection and Management of Maternal Postpartum Hypertensive Disorders.

Importance: Innovative approaches are needed to address the increasing rate of postpartum morbidity and mortality associated with hypertensive disorders. Objective: To determine whether assessing maternal blood pressure (BP) and associated symptoms at time of well-child visits is associated with increased detection of postpartum preeclampsia and need for hospitalization for medical management. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a pre-post quality improvement (QI) study. Individuals who attended the well-child visits between preimplementation (December 2017 to December 2018) were compared with individuals who enrolled after the implementation of the QI program (March 2019 to December 2019). Individuals were enrolled at an academic pediatric clinic. Eligible participants included birth mothers who delivered at the hospital and brought their newborn for well-child check at 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months. A total of 620 individuals were screened in the preintervention cohort and 680 individuals were screened in the QI program. Data was analyzed from March to July 2022. Exposures: BP evaluation and preeclampsia symptoms screening were performed at the time of the well-child visit. A management algorithm-with criteria for routine or early postpartum visits, or prompt referral to the obstetric emergency department-was followed. Main Outcome and Measures: Readmission due to postpartum preeclampsia. Comparisons across groups were performed using a Fisher exact test for categorical variables, and t tests or Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables. Results: A total of 595 individuals (mean [SD] age, 27.2 [6.1] years) were eligible for analysis in the preintervention cohort and 565 individuals (mean [SD] age, 27.0 [5.8] years) were eligible in the postintervention cohort. Baseline demographic information including age, race and ethnicity, body mass index, nulliparity, and factors associated with increased risk for preeclampsia were not significantly different in the preintervention cohort and postintervention QI program. The rate of readmission for postpartum preeclampsia differed significantly in the preintervention cohort (13 individuals [2.1%]) and the postintervention cohort (29 individuals [5.6%]) (P = .007). In the postintervention QI cohort, there was a significantly earlier time frame of readmission (median [IQR] 10.0 [10.0-11.0] days post partum for preintervention vs 7.0 [6.0-10.5] days post partum for postintervention; P = .001). In both time periods, a total of 42 patients were readmitted due to postpartum preeclampsia, of which 21 (50%) had de novo postpartum preeclampsia. Conclusions and Relevance: This QI program allowed for increased and earlier readmission due to postpartum preeclampsia. Further studies confirming generalizability and mitigating associated adverse outcomes are needed.

Trends and Outcomes among Pregnancy and Nonpregnancy-Related Hospitalizations with Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

OBJECTIVE: The study's primary objective was to evaluate adverse outcomes among reproductive-age hospitalizations with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), comparing those that are pregnancy-related versus nonpregnancy-related and evaluating temporal trends. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with DKA among reproductive-age women (15-49 years) in the United States (2016-2020). DKA in pregnancy hospitalizations was compared with DKA in nonpregnant hospitalizations. Adverse outcomes evaluated included mechanical ventilation, coma, seizures, renal failure, prolonged hospital stay, and in-hospital death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Annual percent change (APC) was used to calculate the change in DKA rate over time. RESULTS: Among 35,210,711 hospitalizations of reproductive-age women, 447,600 (1.2%) were hospitalized with DKA, and among them, 13,390 (3%) hospitalizations were pregnancy-related. The rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased over time (APC = 3.8%, 95% CI = 1.5-6.1). After multivariable adjustment, compared with pregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA, the rates of mechanical ventilation (aRR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.18-2.06), seizures (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.72-2.97), renal failure (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 2.05-2.50), coma (aRR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.68-3.83), and in-hospital death (aRR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.06-5.36) were higher among nonpregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA. CONCLUSION: A nationally representative sample of hospitalizations indicates that over the 5-year period, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased among reproductive age women, and a higher risk of adverse outcomes was observed when compared with pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations. KEY POINTS: · Over 5 years, the rate of pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations was stable.. · Over 5 years, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased.. · There is a higher risk of adverse outcomes with DKA outside of pregnancy..

Indicated vs universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies: a pre-post-intervention study.

BACKGROUND: In low-risk pregnancies, a third-trimester ultrasound examination is indicated if fundal height measurement and gestational age discrepancy are observed. Despite potential improvement in the detection of ultrasound abnormality, prior trials to date on universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies, compared with indicated ultrasound examination, have not demonstrated improvement in neonatal or maternal adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine if universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies could attenuate composite neonatal adverse outcomes. The secondary objectives were to compare changes in composite maternal adverse outcomes and detection of abnormalities of fetal growth (fetal growth restriction or large for gestational age) or amniotic fluid (oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios). STUDY DESIGN: Our pre-post intervention study at 9 locations included low-risk pregnancies, those without indication for ultrasound examination in the third trimester. Compared with indicated ultrasound in the preimplementation period, in the postimplementation period, all patients were scheduled for ultrasound examination at 36.0-37.6 weeks. In both periods, clinicians intervened on the basis of abnormalities identified. Composite neonatal adverse outcomes included any of: Apgar score ≤5 at 5 minutes, cord pH <7.00, birth trauma (bone fracture or brachial plexus palsy), intubation for >24 hours, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, seizure, sepsis (bacteremia proven with blood culture), meconium aspiration syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or IV, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, stillbirth after 36 weeks, or neonatal death within 28 days of birth. Composite maternal adverse outcomes included any of the following: chorioamnionitis, wound infection, estimated blood loss >1000 mL, blood transfusion, deep venous thrombus or pulmonary embolism, admission to intensive care unit, or death. Using Bayesian statistics, we calculated a sample size of 600 individuals in each arm to detect >75% probability of any reduction in primary outcome (80% power; 50% hypothesized risk reduction). RESULTS: During the preintervention phase, 747 individuals were identified during the initial ultrasound examination, and among them, 568 (76.0%) met the inclusion criteria at 36.0-37.6 weeks; during the postintervention period, the corresponding numbers were 770 and 661 (85.8%). The rate of identified abnormalities of fetal growth or amniotic fluid increased from between the pre-post intervention period (7.1% vs 22.2%; P<.0001; number needed to diagnose, 7; 95% confidence interval, 5-9). The primary outcome occurred in 15 of 568 (2.6%) individuals in the preintervention and 12 of 661 (1.8%) in the postintervention group (83% probability of risk reduction; posterior relative risk, 0.69 [95% credible interval, 0.34-1.42]). The composite maternal adverse outcomes occurred in 8.6% in the preintervention and 6.5% in the postintervention group (90% probability of risk; posterior relative risk, 0.74 [95% credible interval, 0.49-1.15]). The number needed to treat to reduce composite neonatal adverse outcomes was 121 (95% confidence interval, 40-200). In addition, the number to reduce composite maternal adverse outcomes was 46 (95% confidence interval, 19-74), whereas the number to prevent cesarean delivery was 18 (95% confidence interval, 9-31). CONCLUSION: Among low-risk pregnancies, compared with routine care with indicated ultrasound examination, implementation of a universal third-trimester ultrasound examination at 36.0-37.6 weeks attenuated composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes.

Large for Gestational Age and Adverse Outcomes: Stratified By Diabetes Status.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of adverse outcomes among parturients with large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight ≥ 90th) newborns, stratified by diabetes status. Additionally, we described the temporal trends of adverse outcomes among LGA neonates. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used the U.S. Vital Statistics dataset between 2014 and 2020. The inclusion criteria were singleton, nonanomalous LGA live births who labored and delivered at 24 to 41 weeks with known diabetes status. The coprimary outcomes were composite neonatal adverse outcomes of the following: Apgar score < 5 at 5 minutes, assisted ventilation > 6 hours, seizure, or neonatal or infant mortality, and maternal adverse outcomes of the following: maternal transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit, or unplanned procedure. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Average annual percent change (AAPC) was calculated to assess changes in rates of LGA and morbidity over time. RESULTS: Of 27 million births in 7 years, 1,843,467 (6.8%) met the inclusion criteria. While 1,656,888 (89.9%) did not have diabetes, 186,579 (10.1%) were with diabetes. Composite neonatal adverse outcomes (aRR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.43, 1.52) and composite maternal adverse outcomes (aRR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.36, 1.38) were significantly higher among individuals with diabetes, compared with those without diabetes. From 2014 to 2020, the LGA rate was stable among people without diabetes. However, there was a downward trend of LGA in people with diabetes (AAPC = - 2.4, 95% CI = - 3.5, -1.4). CONCLUSION: In pregnancies with LGA newborns, composite neonatal and maternal morbidities were higher in those with diabetes, compared with those without diabetes. KEY POINTS: · Large for gestational age stratified by diabetes status.. · Composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes are worse among individuals with diabetes as compared to those without.. · During 2014 to 2020, the trend of LGA in individuals without diabetes increased..

Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Stratified by Severity.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcome (CMHO) among individuals with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), stratified by disease severity. Additionally, we investigated the composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO) among individuals with HDP who had postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) versus did not have PPH. STUDY DESIGN: Our retrospective cohort study included all singletons who delivered at a Level IV center over two consecutive years. The primary outcome was the rate of CMHO, defined as blood loss ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics, mechanical tamponade, surgical techniques for atony, transfusion, venous thromboembolism, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, or maternal death. A subgroup analysis was performed to investigate the primary outcome stratified by (1) chronic hypertension, (2) gestational hypertension and preeclampsia without severe features, and (3) preeclampsia with severe features. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of HDP with and without PPH on a CNAO which included APGAR <7 at 5 minutes, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, seizures, neonatal sepsis, meconium aspiration syndrome, ventilation >6 hours, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or neonatal death. RESULTS: Of 8,357 singletons, 2,827 (34%) had HDP. Preterm delivery <37 weeks, induction of labor, prolonged oxytocin use, and magnesium sulfate usage were more common in those with versus without HDP (p < 0.001). CMHO was higher among individuals with HDP than those without HDP (26 vs. 19%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22). In the subgroup analysis, only individuals with preeclampsia with severe features were associated with higher CMHO (n = 802; aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32-1.75). There was a higher likelihood of CNAO in individuals with both HDP and PPH compared to those with HDP without PPH (aRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-2.09). CONCLUSION: CMHO was higher among those with HDP. After stratification, only those with preeclampsia with severe features had an increased risk of CMHO. Among individuals with HDP, those who also had a PPH had worse neonatal outcomes than those without hemorrhage. KEY POINTS: · Individuals with HDP had an 11% higher likelihood of CMHO.. · After stratification, increased CMHO was limited to those with preeclampsia with severe features.. · There was a higher likelihood of CNAO in those with both HDP and PPH compared to HDP without PPH..

Equivalence of single and standard doses of antenatal corticosteroids for late preterm neonatal outcomes: insights from a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: The recent paradigm shift of treating individuals at risk of late preterm birth with antenatal corticosteroids warrants an assessment of the effect of single dosage. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of neonates born in the late preterm period (34.0-36.6 weeks) after a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids vs placebo. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial. All individuals enrolled in the parent trial who received only a single dose of either antenatal corticosteroids or placebo and delivered within 24 hours were included. Primary outcome was a composite of respiratory support at 72 hours, including continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula ≥2 hours, oxygen with an inspired fraction of ≥30% for ≥4 hours, or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Of the 2831 individuals in the parent trial, 1083 (38.3%) met inclusion criteria; of them, 539 (49.8%) received a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids and 544 (50.2%) a single placebo dose. The placebo and antenatal corticosteroids groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference in the rate of the primary respiratory outcome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.47) or in the rate of respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.26) between those who received a single antenatal corticosteroids dose and placebo. An exploratory stratification by randomization-to-delivery intervals of 12-hour increments also showed no association with lower primary respiratory outcome rates. CONCLUSION: In individuals with late preterm birth pregnancies who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered before a second dose, there were no differences in neonatal respiratory morbidities compared with placebo. However, this study is not powered to detect treatment efficacy.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and late preterm birth: outcomes with and without antenatal corticosteroid exposure.

BACKGROUND: Unlike pregestational diabetes mellitus, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends antenatal corticosteroids in those with gestational diabetes mellitus at risk for preterm birth. However, this recommendation is based on limited data, only 10.6% of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study sample had gestational diabetes mellitus. There is a paucity of data on the risk of neonatal respiratory and other morbidity in this population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine respiratory outcomes in parturients with gestational diabetes mellitus who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered during the late preterm period vs those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based cohort study used the US Vital Statistics dataset between 2016 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were singleton, nonanomalous individuals who delivered between 34.0 to 36.6 weeks with gestational diabetes mellitus and known status of antepartum corticosteroid exposure. The primary outcome, a composite neonatal adverse outcome, included Apgar score <5 at 5 minutes, immediate assisted ventilation, assisted ventilation >6 hours, surfactant use, seizure, or neonatal mortality. The secondary outcome was a composite maternal adverse outcome, including maternal blood transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, and admission to the intensive care unit. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. Average annual percent change was calculated to assess changes in rates of corticosteroid exposure over the study period. RESULTS: Of 19 million births during the study period, 110,197 (0.6%) met the inclusion criteria, and among them, 23,028 (20.9%) individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus received antenatal corticosteroids. The rate of antenatal steroid exposure remained stable over the 5 years (APC=10.7; 95% confidence interval, -5.4 to 29.4). The composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly higher among those who received corticosteroids than among those who did not (137.1 vs 216.5 per 1000 live births; adjusted relative risk 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.28). Three components of the composite neonatal adverse outcome-immediate assisted ventilation, intubation >6 hours, and surfactant use-were significantly higher with exposure than without. In addition, the composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly higher among those who received corticosteroids (adjusted relative risk, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.52). Three components of the composite maternal adverse outcome-admission to intensive care unit, blood transfusion, and unplanned hysterectomy-were significantly higher among the exposed group. Subgroup analysis, among large for gestational age, by gestational age, and race and ethnicity, confirm the trend of increased likelihood of adverse outcomes with exposure to corticosteroid. CONCLUSION: Individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus and antenatal corticosteroid exposure, who delivered in the late preterm, were at higher risk of neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes than those unexposed to corticosteroid.

The association between maternal insurance status on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

The objective of this study was to examine the association between maternal insurance status and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in women who had hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. A population-based retrospective cohort study was undertaken using the US Vital Statistics dataset on Period Linked Birth-Infant Data from 2016-2020. The study population was restricted to non-anomalous births from women whose pregnancies were complicated by hypertensive disorders. Insurance status was categorized as private, Medicaid, self-pay and other. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal adverse outcomes, which included admission to the intensive care unit, unplanned hysterectomy, maternal blood transfusion or uterine rupture. We examined the role of prenatal care in these relationships using a mediation analysis with Kotelchuck's Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between maternal insurance status and adverse outcomes (using adjusted odds ratios [aOR] and 99% confidence interval [CI]). Of the 18,999,865 live births in the five-year study, 1,642,654 (8.6%) met the inclusion criteria. The frequency of the composite maternal adverse outcome was 1.3%. The maternal composite occurred more frequently in women with Medicaid (aOR = 1.11, 99% CI: 1.06, 1.16) or self-pay (aOR = 1.40, 99% CI: 1.25, 1.55) when compared to private insurance. Adjusting for prenatal care slightly attenuated this association, but remained significant. Among women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, women with Medicaid insurance or self-pay were more likely to experience maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes than women with private insurance.

Desirability of outcome ranking for obstetrical trials: illustration and application to the ARRIVE trial.

BACKGROUND: In randomized trials, 1 primary outcome is typically chosen to evaluate the consequences of an intervention, whereas other important outcomes are relegated to secondary outcomes. This issue is amplified for many obstetrical trials in which an intervention may have consequences for both the pregnant person and the child. In contrast, desirability of outcome ranking, a paradigm shift for the design and analysis of clinical trials based on patient-centric evaluation, allows multiple outcomes-including from >1 individual-to be considered concurrently. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe desirability of outcome ranking methodology tailored to obstetrical trials and to apply the methodology to maternal-perinatal paired (dyadic) outcomes in which both individuals may be affected by an intervention but may experience discordant outcomes (eg, an obstetrical intervention may improve perinatal but worsen maternal outcomes). STUDY DESIGN: This secondary analysis applies the desirability of outcome ranking methodology to data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network ARRIVE trial. The original analysis found no substantial difference in the primary (perinatal composite) outcome, but a decreased risk of the secondary outcome of cesarean delivery with elective induction at 39 weeks. In the present desirability-of-outcome-ranking analysis, dyadic outcomes ranging from spontaneous vaginal delivery without severe neonatal complication (most desirable) to cesarean delivery with perinatal death (least desirable) were classified into 8 categories ranked by overall desirability by experienced investigators. Distributions of the desirability of outcome ranking were compared by estimating the probability of having a more desirable dyadic outcome with elective induction at 39 weeks of gestation than with expectant management. To account for various perspectives on these outcomes, a complementary analysis, called the partial credit strategy, was used to grade outcomes on a 100-point scale and estimate the difference in overall treatment scores between groups using a t test. RESULTS: All 6096 participants from the trial were included. The probability of a better dyadic outcome for a randomly selected patient who was randomized to elective induction was 53% (95% confidence interval, 51-54), implying that elective induction led to a better overall outcome for the dyad when taking multiple outcomes into account concurrently. Furthermore, the desirability-of-outcome-ranking probability of averting cesarean delivery with elective induction was 52% (95% confidence interval, 51-53), which was not at the expense of an operative vaginal delivery or a poorer outcome for the perinate (ie, survival with a severe neonatal complication or perinatal death). Randomization to elective induction was also advantageous in most of the partial credit score scenarios. CONCLUSION: Desirability-of-outcome-ranking methodology is a useful tool for obstetrical trials because it provides a concurrent view of the effect of an intervention on multiple dyadic outcomes, potentially allowing for better translation of data for decision-making and person-centered care.

Ambulation for latency during expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial (AMBLE).

BACKGROUND: Individuals hospitalized with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes are often advised to limit their activity or adhere to bed rest. Some evidence suggests that greater activity is associated with longer latency and improved outcomes, but no high-quality evidence from a randomized controlled trial exists. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether encouragement to ambulate at least 2000 steps daily affects latency among individuals with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes compared with usual care. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multisite unblinded, 2-arm randomized trial of individuals at 23 0/7 to 35 0/7 weeks of gestation undergoing inpatient expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes with planned delivery at least 7 days away. Each participant wore a Fitbit Inspire that tracked steps. The intervention arm was encouraged (verbal and Fitbit-based reminders) to reach a goal of 2000 steps per day. The usual-care arm was allowed ad libitum activity with no step goal or reminders. The primary outcome was latency (days) from randomization to delivery. Secondary analyses included composite neonatal and maternal clinical outcomes and maternal mental health survey results. Statistical analyses were conducted with an intent-to-treat approach under a Bayesian framework using neutral priors (a priori assumed 50:50 likelihood of longer latency in either arm). A total of 100 participants were required to have 80% power to demonstrate a 4-day difference in latency with 75% certainty (Bayesian probability). RESULTS: Among 163 eligible individuals, 100 (61%) were randomized, and after loss to follow-up, 95 were analyzed. Gestational age at randomization was 29 3/7 weeks (interquartile range, 26 2/7 to 31 5/7) in the intervention arm and 27 4/7 weeks (interquartile range, 25 4/7 to 29 6/7) in the usual-care arm. Median step counts were 1690 per day in the intervention arm (interquartile range, 1031-2641) and 1338 per day in the usual-care arm (interquartile range, 784-1913). Median days of latency were 9 days in the intervention arm (interquartile range, 4-17) and 6 days in the usual-care arm (interquartile range, 2-14). The primary analysis indicated a 65% posterior probability that the intervention increased latency relative to usual care (posterior relative risk, 1.09; 95% credible interval, 0.70-1.71). The relative risk was 0.55 (95% credible interval, 0.32-0.82) for the composite neonatal adverse outcome, with 99% posterior probability of intervention benefit, and was 0.94 (95% credible interval, 0.72-1.20) for the composite maternal adverse outcome, with 70% posterior probability of intervention benefit. There was a 94% posterior probability of the intervention arm having a greater decrease in maternal stress score from baseline to before delivery compared with the usual-care arm (mean arm difference, 3.24 points [95% credible interval, -7.23 to 0.79]). Adjustment for gestational age at randomization had minimal impact on secondary outcome results. CONCLUSION: Individuals with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes randomized to encouragement to ambulate had a longer latency to delivery and improved neonatal and mental health outcomes, with similar maternal clinical outcomes compared with usual care.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Gunshot Wounds in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

A systematic review was performed to compare adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant patients with gunshot wounds (GSW) to the abdominopelvic vs other region(s) at > 20 weeks gestation. A search of Medline Ovid, Elsevier Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, and Cochrane Library in July 2022 and reference searches resulted in 1742 studies, which were screened. The 41 included studies reported outcomes for 59 pregnant patients with GSW, of which 31 (52.5%) had an isolated abdominopelvic GSW and 28 (47.5%) had an extremity, thorax, head/neck, back/spine, poly-site, or other/unknown GSW. Stillbirth occurred in 26.7% of abdominopelvic GSW and 26% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Maternal death occurred in 3.7% of abdominopelvic GSW and 10.7% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Neonatal death occurred in 9.1% of abdominopelvic GSW and 5.3% of non-abdominopelvic GSW. Further research is needed to standardize the approach for the evaluation and management of patients with GSW in pregnancy.

Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission.

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered: a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared. RESULTS: Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI: 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82), respectively (p = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S. COHORT: Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed. KEY POINTS: · A total of 3.9% of individuals received a blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission.. · Three models used in clinical practice are externally valid for blood transfusion prediction.. · Institutional model selection should be based on ease of application until further research identifies the optimal approach..