Association between Timing of labor Induction and Neonatal and Maternal outcomes: An Observational Study from China.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that elective induction of labor at 39 weeks may lead to more favorable perinatal outcomes compared with the expectant management, however, how to weigh the pros and cons of elective labor induction at 39 weeks, the expectation of spontaneous delivery at 40 or 41 weeks, or delayed labor induction at 40 or 41 weeks on neonatal and maternal outcomes remains a practical challenge in clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: We compared neonatal and maternal outcomes between elective induction of labor at 39 weeks and expectant management in a real word setting. We also divided the expectantly managed group and compared outcomes between the spontaneous delivery group at 40 or 41 weeks, and the induced group at 40 or 41 weeks versus the elective induced group at 39 weeks. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 21282 participants between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022. Participants were initially categorized into three groups at 39 weeks: elective induction of labor, spontaneous delivery, and expectant management, for the primary analysis comparing elective induction with expectant management. Subsequently, the expectant management group at 39 weeks was similarly divided into three groups at 40 weeks, and participants who underwent expectant management at 40 weeks were then divided into two groups at 41 weeks: elective induction and spontaneous delivery. In total, six groups were compared in the secondary analysis, with elective induction at 39 weeks serving as the reference group. RESULTS: At 39 weeks' gestational age, participants who received elective induction of labor had a significantly lower risk of primary composite outcomes compared to participants who received expectant management (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.95), and there was no significant difference in risk of cesarean delivery between the two groups. After further dividing the expectantly managed group, compared to participants with elective induction of labor at 39 weeks, those with spontaneous delivery at 40 weeks had significant lower risks of cesarean delivery (0.61, 0.52-0.71) and chorioamnionitis (0.78, 0.61-1.00), but a higher risk of fetal distress (1.39, 1.22-1.57); those with spontaneous delivery at 41 weeks had a significant higher risk of fetal distress (1.44, 1.16-1.79), postpartum hemorrhage (1.83, 1.26-2.66), and prolonged/arrested labor (1.61, 1.02-2.54). Moreover, compared to participants with elective induction of labor at 39 weeks, participants induced at later weeks had significantly higher risks of neonatal and maternal outcomes, especially at 40 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that elective induction of labor at 39 weeks was significantly associated with lower risks of short-term neonatal and maternal outcomes compared to expectant management. Moreover, our study highlights the nuanced trade-offs in risks and benefits between elective induction at 39 weeks versus waiting for spontaneous labor or delayed induction at 40/41 weeks, thus providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making in practice.

Psychological status of pregnant women during the omicron pandemic outbreak in China.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women faced great challenges and psychological and physiological changes of varying degrees during the omicron epidemic outbreak. It is important to recognize the potential impact of these challenges on the mental health of pregnant women and to provide appropriate resources and support to mitigate their effects. METHOD: By using the convenience sampling approach, a total of 401 pregnant women from two hospitals of different grades in two cities were included in the survey. The cross-sectional survey was conducted by basic characteristics, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and self-made questionnaire. RESULTS: Insomnia affected 207 participants (51.6%), depression affected 160 participants (39.9%) and anxiety affected 151 participants (37.7%). Moreover, pregnant women in provincial capital city were more likely to experience anxiety, depression and insomnia than those in county-level city (P < 0.01). Pregnant women's anxiety, depression and insomnia were positively correlated with the severity of COVID-19 infection (P < 0.05). However, COVID-19 infection had no appreciable impact on maternal demand for termination of pregnancy and cesarean section (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women frequently suffer from anxiety disorder, depression and insomnia as a result of the omicron pandemic in China. During this period, the community and medical professionals should provide more psychological counseling, conduct health education and offer virtual prenatal care to pregnant women (particularly in the provincial capital city).

Psychological Status of Medical Staff in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitals during the Omicron Pandemic Outbreak in China.

Background: Medical staff in China faced great challenges and psychological and physiological changes of varying degrees during the omicron epidemic outbreak. It is important to recognize the potential impact of these challenges on the mental health of medical staff and to provide appropriate resources and support to mitigate their effects. Methods: A total of 354 medical staff in two obstetrics and gynecology hospitals of different grades were included in this survey using convenience sampling. The cross-sectional self-report questionnaires survey was conducted using the Basic Characteristics Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Results: There were 169 (47.7%) participants suffering from anxiety disorder. Working with fever, working in obstetrics, and working with protective clothing were the risk factors for anxiety in medical staff (p < 0.05). One hundred and ninety-six (55.4%) participants were depressed. Working with fever and working in obstetrics were the risk factors for depression in medical staff (p < 0.05). There were 117 (33.1%) participants suffering from insomnia. Working with fever, high educational level, and severe COVID-19 infection status were the risk factors for insomnia in medical staff (p < 0.05). Moreover, medical staff in a provincial hospital were more anxious and depressed than those in a county hospital. At last, there were more participants working with fever in obstetrics (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Anxiety disorder, depression, and insomnia were common among obstetrics and gynecology medical staff during the outbreak of omicron pandemic. During this period, more resources for psychological counselling should be provided to the hospital as well as more reasonable staffing arrangements, and working while having a fever is prohibited, especially in provincial hospital.