Identifying High-Quality Non-Instrumental Dysphagia Screening Tools for Detection of Adult Dysphagia Case in Acute-Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: As patients nowadays tend to have multiple diseases and complex medical histories, our aim was to identify high-quality, non-instrumental dysphagia screening tools used for the detection of adult dysphagia cases in all disease categories in acute-care settings. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in five databases from each database's earliest inception to 31 July 2021 and guided by five keywords: 'dysphagia', 'deglutition', 'screening', 'test' and 'measure'. Without limiting the search in any specific disease category, reviewers assessed original studies and identified tools if they had been validated against instrumental evaluations and if they had been designed as a pass-fail procedure to screen whether dysphagia is absent or present. We further excluded any tool if it was (1) for pediatric focus, or (2) a patient self-report questionnaire. All final tool candidates underwent a methodological quality appraisal using the Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). RESULT: Out of 195 studies with 165 tools identified, 20 tool candidates underwent QUADAS-2 review. We found six high-quality, non-instrumental screening tools for detecting adult dysphagia cases in acute-care settings, including the Yale Swallow Protocol, Gugging Swallowing Screen, Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (both English and Portuguese versions), Sapienza Global Bedside Evaluation of Swallowing and Two-Step Thickened Water Test. These high-quality tools were developed primarily for patients with stroke. Only Yale Swallow Protocol was originally tested for heterogeneous populations with stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, oesophageal surgery, neurosurgery and head-and-neck cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the gap in the unavailability of high-quality dysphagia screening tool in several emerged high-risk populations including elderly inpatients, or patients following endotracheal extubation. Further research is needed to determine whether these six tools can be effectively applied across different high-risk populations in acute-care settings to screen for cases finding.

Surgical Resection and Reconstruction of Ameloblastoma: A 13-Year Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Ameloblastoma is a locally aggressive, benign tumor presenting in the maxilla and mandible prone to recurrence. Resection greatly limits recurrence; however, reconstruction becomes critical to preserve patients' functionality and esthetics. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe surgical resection and reconstructive approaches in the treatment of ameloblastoma and compare clinical outcomes to conservative methods of treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A retrospective case series was completed through analysis of patient records. The study population was composed of patients treated for ameloblastoma at the Royal Brisbane Hospital (Queensland, Australia) in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2020. Patients without histological confirmation of intraosseous ameloblastoma were excluded from the study sample. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The primary outcome variable was time to recurrence. Secondary outcome variables included any surgical complications incurred. COVARIATES: The covariate variables collected included age at diagnosis/treatment, gender, ethnicity, location of lesion and site(s) of involvement, tumor extent, alveolar expansion, histopathological growth pattern, and soft tissue involvement. ANALYSES: Descriptive statistics were computed for each study variable. RESULTS: A total of 48 cases of histologically confirmed ameloblastoma were identified (41 mandibular, 7 maxillary) involving 50 excisional operations (44 resections, 6 enucleations). Of these cases, 44 were followed up > 12 months, with a mean length of follow-up time of 65.6 months. No recurrence was detected for resected lesions. One enucleated lesion recurred at 25 months. Thirty-seven reconstructive procedures were undertaken, including 32 immediate free flaps. All reconstructive flaps and grafts survived, and no major complications were recorded. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Resection of ameloblastoma limits recurrence and should be considered curative. Immediate microvascular free flap reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular defects from resection of ameloblastoma is safe and predictable.

Nurses' knowledge of and attitude toward postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and the associated factors.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain control is pivotal for surgical care; it facilitates patient recovery. Although patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been available for decades, inadequate pain control remains. Nurses' knowledge of and attitude toward PCA may influence the efficacy on clinic application. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate nurses' knowledge of and attitude toward postoperative PCA and investigate the associated factors. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. We enrolled registered nurses from a 2200-bed medical center in northern Taiwan within one year. The participants completed an anonymous self-reported PCA knowledge inventory and PCA attitude inventory. Data were analyzed descriptively and associated were tested using logistic regression. RESULTS: With 303 participants enrolled, we discovered that nurses had limited knowledge of and a negative attitude toward PCA. Under half of the participants know how to set up a bolus dose and lockout intervals. The majority held misconceptions regarding side effect management for opioids. The minority agree to increase the dose when a patient experienced persistent pain or suggested the use of PCA. Surprisingly, participants with a bachelor's or master's degree had lower knowledge scores than those with a junior college degree. Those with 6-10 years of work experience also are lower than those with under 5 years of experience. However, the participants with experience of using PCA for patient care had higher knowledge scores and a more positive attitude. CONCLUSIONS: Although postoperative PCA has been available for decades and education programs are routinely provided, nurses had limited knowledge of and a negative attitude toward PCA. A higher education level and longer work experience were not associated with more knowledge. The current education programs on PCA should be revised to enhance their efficacy in delivering up-to-date knowledge and situation training which may convey supportive attitude toward clinical application of PCA.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ambulatory urologic oncology surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) are two common surgeries for prostate and bladder cancer. We aim to assess the trends in the site of care for RALP and TURBT before and after the COVID outbreak. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified adults who underwent RALP and TURBT within the California Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and the State Ambulatory Surgery Database between 2018 and 2020. Multivariable analysis and spline analysis with a knot at COVID outbreak were performed to investigate the time trend and factors associated with ambulatory RALP and TURBT. RESULTS: Among 17,386 RALPs, 6,774 (39.0%) were ambulatory. Among 25,070 TURBTs, 21,573 (86.0%) were ambulatory. Pre-COVID, 33.5% of RALP and 85.3% and TURBT were ambulatory, which increased to 53.8% and 88.0% post-COVID (both p < 0.001). In multivariable model, RALP and TURBT performed after outbreak in March 2020 were more likely ambulatory (OR 2.31, p < 0.0001; OR 1.25, p < 0.0001). There was an overall increasing trend in use of ambulatory RALP both pre- and post-COVID, with no significant change of trend at the time of outbreak (p = 0.642). TURBT exhibited an increased shift towards ambulatory sites post-COVID (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a shift towards ambulatory RALP and TURBT following COVID outbreak. There was a large increase in ambulatory RALP post-COVID, but the trend of change was not significantly different pre- and post-COVID - possibly due to a pre-existing trend towards ambulatory RALP which predated the pandemic.

Effects of a swallowing and oral-care program on resuming oral feeding and reducing pneumonia in patients following endotracheal extubation: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The resumption of oral feeding and free from pneumonia are important therapeutic goals for critically ill patients who have been successfully extubated after prolonged (≥ 48 h) endotracheal intubation. We aimed to examine whether a swallowing and oral-care (SOC) program provided to critically ill patients extubated from prolonged mechanical ventilation improves their oral-feeding resumption and reduces 30-day pneumonia incidence. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, controlled trial, participants were consecutively enrolled and randomized to receive the SOC program or usual care. The interventions comprised three protocols: oral-motor exercise, sensory stimulation and lubrication, and safe-swallowing education. Beginning on the day following patient extubation, an SOC nurse provided the three-protocol care for seven consecutive days or until death or hospital discharge. With independent outcome assessors, oral-feeding resumption (yes, no) corresponded to level 6 or level 7 on the Functional Oral Intake Scale (censored seven days postextubation) along with radiographically documented pneumonia (yes, no; censored 30 days postextubation), abstracted from participants' electronic medical records were coded. RESULTS: We analyzed 145 randomized participants (SOC group = 72, control group = 73). The SOC group received, on average, 6.2 days of intervention (14.8 min daily) with no reported adverse events. By day 7, 37/72 (51.4%) of the SOC participants had resumed oral feeding vs. 24/73 (32.9%) of the control participants. Pneumonia occurred in 11/72 (15.3%) of the SOC participants and in 26/73 (35.6%) of the control participants. Independent of age and intubation longer than 6 days, SOC participants were likelier than their control counterparts to resume oral feeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI 1.38-4.01) and had lower odds of developing pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI 0.12-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The SOC program effectively improved patients' odds that oral feeding would resume and the 30-day pneumonia incidence would decline. The program might advance dysphagia care provided to critically ill patients extubated from prolonged mechanical ventilation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03284892, registered on September 15, 2017.

Predicting hospital mortality and length of stay: A prospective cohort study comparing the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist versus Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare two tools, the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (ICU) (CAM-ICU), for their predictive validity for outcomes related to delirium, hospital mortality, and length of stay (LOS). METHODS: The prospective study conducted in six medical ICUs at a tertiary care hospital in Taiwan enrolled consecutive patients (≥20 years) without delirium at ICU admission. Delirium was screened daily using the ICDSC and CAM-ICU in random order. Arousal was assessed by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Participants with any one positive result were classified as ICDSC- or CAM-ICU-delirium groups. RESULTS: Delirium incidence evaluated by the ICDSC and CAM-ICU were 69.1% (67/97) and 50.5% (49/97), respectively. Although the ICDSC identified 18 more cases as delirious, substantial concordance (κ = 0.63; p < 0.001) was found between tools. Independent of age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, both ICDSC- and CAM-ICU-rated delirium significantly predicted hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 4.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.56 to 15.63 vs. 2.79; 95% CI: 1.12 to 6.97, respectively), and only the ICDSC significantly predicted hospital LOS with a mean of 17.59 additional days compared with the no-delirium group. Irrespective of delirium status, a sensitivity analysis of normal-to-increased arousal (RASS≥0) test results did not alter the predictive ability of ICDSC- or CAM-ICU-delirium for hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.06 to 8.37 vs. 3.82; 95% CI: 1.35 to 10.82, respectively). With reduced arousal (RASS<0), neither tool significantly predicted mortality or LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The ICDSC identified more delirium cases and may have higher predictive validity for mortality and LOS than the CAM-ICU. However, arousal substantially affected performance. Future studies may want to consider patients' arousal when deciding which tool to use to maximise the effects of delirium identification on patient mortality.

Association of Incident Delirium With Short-term Mortality in Adults With Critical Illness Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

Importance: Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired delirium and/or coma have consequences for patient outcomes. However, contradictory findings exist, especially when considering short-term (ie, in-hospital) mortality and length of stay (LOS). Objective: To assess whether incident delirium, days of delirium, days of coma, and delirium- and coma-free days (DCFDs) are associated with 14-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, and hospital LOS among patients with critical illness receiving mechanical ventilation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center prospective cohort study was conducted in 6 ICUs of a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Taiwan. A total of 267 delirium-free patients (aged ≥20 years) with critical illness receiving mechanical ventilation were consecutively enrolled from August 14, 2018, to October 1, 2020. Exposures: Participants were assessed daily for the development of delirium and coma status over 14 days (or until death or ICU discharge) using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality rates (14-day and in-hospital) and hospital LOS using electronic health records. Results: Of 267 participants (median [IQR] age, 65.9 [57.4-75.1] years; 171 men [64.0%]; all of Taiwanese ethnicity), 149 patients (55.8%) developed delirium for a median (IQR) of 3.0 (1.0-5.0) days at some point during their first 14 days of ICU stay, and 105 patients (39.3%) had coma episodes also lasting for a median (IQR) of 3.0 (1.0-5.0) days. The 14-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 18.0% (48 patients) and 42.1% (112 of 266 patients [1 patient withdrew from the study]), respectively. The incidence and days of delirium were not associated with either 14-day mortality (incident delirium: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.37; 95% CI, 0.69-2.72; delirium by day: aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.10) or in-hospital mortality (incident delirium: aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.55; delirium by day: aHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97-1.07), whereas days spent in coma were associated with an increased hazard of dying during a given 14-day period (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22) and during hospitalization (aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14). The number of DCFDs was a protective factor; for each additional DCFD, the risk of dying during the 14-day period was reduced by 11% (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94), and the risk of dying during hospitalization was reduced by 7% (aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97). Incident delirium was associated with longer hospital stays (adjusted ß = 10.80; 95% CI, 0.53-21.08) when compared with no incident delirium. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, despite prolonged LOS, ICU delirium was not associated with short-term mortality. However, DCFDs were associated with a lower risk of dying, suggesting that future research and intervention implementation should refocus on maximizing DCFDs to potentially improve the survival of patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Predicting feeding-tube dependence in patients following endotracheal extubation: a two-item swallowing screen.

BACKGROUND: To meet the surging demands for intubation and invasive ventilation as more COVID-19 patients begin their recovery, clinicians are challenged to find an ultra-brief and minimally invasive screen for postextubation dysphagia predicting feeding-tube dependence persisting for 72 h after extubation. METHODS: This study examined the predictive validity of a two-item swallowing screen on feeding-tube dependence over 72 h in patients following endotracheal extubation. Intensive-care-unit (ICU) patients (≥ 20 years) successfully extubated after ≥ 48 h endotracheal intubation were screened by trained nurses using the swallowing screen (comprising oral stereognosis and cough-reflex tests) 24 h postextubation. Feeding-tube dependence persisting for 72 h postextubation was abstracted from the medical record by an independent rater. To verify the results and cross-check whether the screen predicted penetration and/or aspiration during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), participants agreeing to receive FEES were analyzed within 30 min of screening. RESULTS: The results showed that 95/123 participants (77.2%) failed the screen, which predicted ICU patients' prolonged (> 72 h) feeding-tube dependence, yielding sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.35, and accuracy of 0.68. Failed-screen participants had 2.96-fold higher odds of feeding-tube dependence (95% CI, 1.13-7.76). For the 38 participants receiving FEES, the swallowing screen had 0.89 sensitivity to detect feeding-tube dependence and 0.86 sensitivity to predict penetration/aspiration, although specificity had room for improvement (0.36 and 0.21, respectively). CONCLUSION: This ultra-brief swallowing screen is sufficiently sensitive to identify high-risk patients for feeding-tube dependence persisting over 72 h after extubation. Once identified, a further assessment and care are indicated to ensure the prompt return of patients' oral feeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03284892, registered on September 15, 2017.

Effects of Slowness, Frailty, Insufficient Intake, and Delirium in Patients Following Cardiac Surgery: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Slow gait, frailty, insufficient postoperative caloric intake, and delirium, although seemingly distinct, can appear simultaneously in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate how these 4 factors overlap and how they individually and cumulatively affect cardiac surgery outcomes. METHODS: The effects of slowness (gait speed <0.83 m/s), frailty (≥3/5 Fried criteria), insufficient postoperative intake (<800 kcal/d), and delirium (defined by the Confusion Assessment Method) on hospital length of stay (LOS) and 3-month mortality were analyzed in 308 adult patients. RESULTS: Slowness, frailty, insufficient intake, and delirium affected 27.5%, 29.5%, 31.5%, and 13.3% of participants, respectively; only 42.2% (130/308) were free from these risks. Risk overlap was prevalent, as 26.3% (n = 81) had 2 or more risk factors. The most obvious overlap was in delirium (80% of delirious participants had other risks), suggesting that delirium cannot be managed in isolation. Individually, whereas slowness was associated only with longer LOS, frailty, insufficient intake, and delirium all led to longer LOS and higher mortality. When equally weighting each risk factor to analyze their cumulative effects, LOS increased by 4.4 days (95% confidence interval, 3.0-5.7) and 3-month mortality increased by 2.6-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.6), with each risk factor added, independent of participants' educational level, body mass index, and risk for cardiac surgery (EuroSCORE II ≥6). CONCLUSIONS: Because a clinical overlap of slowness, frailty, insufficient postoperative intake, and delirium was evident in patients who underwent cardiac surgery, and risk of death and longer hospital stay increased with each factor added, care should be revised to consider these overlapping factors to maximize patient outcomes.

Surviving and Thriving 1 Year After Cardiac Surgery: Frailty and Delirium Matter.

BACKGROUND: We compared 1-year functional outcomes for 4 cardiac surgery patient groups: comparison (without preoperative frailty or postoperative delirium [POD]), frailty only (with preoperative frailty only), POD only (with POD only), and frailty-POD (combined frailty and POD). METHODS: Consecutive cardiac surgery patients (n = 298) at a university hospital were assessed for preoperative frailty using Fried's phenotype, and POD was assessed daily for 10 days after surgery using the Confusion Assessment Method. Functional outcomes (Barthel Index for activities of daily living [ADL]) and all-cause mortality were evaluated 1-year after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative frailty presented in 85 of participants (28.5%) and POD in 38 (12.8%). Frail participants were at increased risk for POD (odds ratio = 4.9; P < .001). Overall, 1-year mortality was 4.0% (n = 12) and functional change was 0.4 ± 11.0 Barthel points. Controlling for age, cardiac risk, and baseline ADL, frailty-only and comparison participants had comparable 1-year functional outcomes. The POD-only group had greater mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 23.9; P = .01), whereas the combined frailty-POD group had the greatest ADL decline (ß = -23.7; P = .01) and the highest mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 30.2; P = .006) compared with the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative frailty alone did not negatively affect cardiac surgery patients' functional outcomes up to 1 year, but coexisting frailty and POD led to substantial loss of independence on 3 to 4 ADLs and a 30.2-fold higher likelihood of dying 1 year after surgery. Because frailty led to a 4.9-fold increase in POD risk, frailty may serve as a presurgical screen to identify patients who would likely benefit from delirium prevention and functional recovery programs to maximize 1-year postsurgical outcomes.

Discrepancy in Therapeutic and Prophylactic Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dentists and Maxillofacial Specialists in Australia.

There are concerns that general dentists (GDs) and dental specialists may be prescribing antibiotics inappropriately. This study explored the prescribing habits and decision-making processes of GDs versus oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFSs). A case-based online questionnaire was used to examine the prescribing of therapeutic and prophylactic antibiotics in two clinical scenarios. Stratified and systematic sampling strategies were implemented to provide a representative sample. The final valid sample was 60 GDs and 18 OMFSs. The majority of OMFSs (61.1%) routinely prescribed antibiotics for the surgical removal of third molars, which was significantly greater than for GDs (23.5%). For implant placement procedures, 72.2% of OMFSs and 62.1% of GDs prescribed antibiotics. Amoxicillin was the most selected agent for both scenarios. All OMFSs would prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus in both cases, but only 56.0-63.0% of GDs would do this. GDs based prescribing decisions primarily on information from prescribing guides, while OMFSs relied more on information gained from specialist training. Surgical prophylaxis protocols differed considerably between groups. Both groups used surgical prophylaxis for some situations that are outside current recommendations. Education with regards to discrepancies between clinical practice and current guidelines for antimicrobial therapy is needed to progress antimicrobial stewardship.

Effects of Apparent Temperature on the Incidence of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: Differential Association Between Patients With and Without Electrical Storm.

Background: Electrical storm (ES) has profound psychological effects and is associated with a higher mortality in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Assessing the incidence and features of ES, is vital. Previous studies have shown winter peaks for ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) in ICD patients. However, the effects of heat with a high relative humidity remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to assess the nonlinear and lagged effects of apparent temperature [or heat index (HI)] on VTA among patients with and without ES after ICD implantation. Methods: Of 626 consecutive patients who had ICDs implanted from January 2004 to June 2017 at our hospital, 172 who experienced sustained VTAs in ICD recording were analyzed, and their clinical records were abstracted to assess the association between VTA incidence and HI by time-stratified case-crossover analysis. Cubic splines were used for the nonlinear effect of HI, with adjustment for air pollutant concentrations. Results: A significant seasonal effect for ES patients was noted. Apparent temperature, but not ambient temperature, was associated with VTA occurrences. The low and high HI thresholds for VTA incidence were <15° and >30°C, respectively, with a percentage change in odds ratios of 1.06 and 0.37, respectively, per 1°C. Lagged effects could only be demonstrated in ES patients, which lasted longer for low HI (in the next 4 days) than high HI (in the next 1 day). Conclusion: VTA occurrence in ICD patients was strongly associated with low HI and moderately associated with high HI. Lagged effects of HI on VTA were noted in patients with ES. Furthermore, patients with ES were more vulnerable to heat stress than those without ES. Patients with ICD implantation, particularly in those with ES, should avoid exposure to low and high HI to reduce the risk of VTAs, improve quality of life and possibly reduce mortality.

Effects of a swallowing and oral care intervention for patients following endotracheal extubation: a pre- and post-intervention study.

BACKGROUND: For patients who survive a critical illness and have their oral endotracheal tube removed, dysphagia is highly prevalent, and without intervention, it may persist far beyond hospital discharge. This pre- and post-intervention study with historical controls tested the effects of a swallowing and oral care (SOC) intervention on patients' time to resume oral intake and salivary flow following endotracheal extubation. METHODS: The sample comprised intensive care unit patients (≥ 50 years) successfully extubated after ≥ 48 h endotracheal intubation. Participants who received usual care (controls, n = 117) were recruited before 2015, and those who received usual care plus the intervention (n = 54) were enrolled after 2015. After extubation, all participants were assessed by a blinded nurse for daily intake status (21 days) and whole-mouth unstimulated salivary flow (2, 7, 14 days). The intervention group received the nurse-administered SOC intervention, comprising toothbrushing/salivary gland massage, oral motor exercise, and safe-swallowing education daily for 14 days or until hospital discharge. RESULTS: The intervention group received 8.3 ± 4.2 days of SOC intervention, taking 15.4 min daily with no reported adverse event (coughing, wet voice, or decreased oxygen saturation) during and immediately after intervention. Participants who received the intervention were significantly more likely than controls to resume total oral intake after extubation (aHR 1.77, 95% CI 1.08-2.91). Stratified by age group, older participants (≥ 65 years) in the SOC group were 2.47-fold more likely than their younger counterparts to resume total oral intake (aHR 2.47, 95% CI 1.31-4.67). The SOC group also had significantly higher salivary flows 14 days following extubation (ß = 0.67, 95% CI 0.29-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: The nurse-administered SOC is safe and effective, with greater odds of patients' resuming total oral intake and increased salivary flows 14 days following endotracheal extubation. Age matters with SOC; it more effectively helped participants ≥ 65 years old resume total oral intake postextubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02334774, registered on January 08, 2015.

Understanding self-determination as a crucial component in promoting the distinct value of occupational therapy in post-secondary transition planning.

School-based occupational therapists are well-equipped to prepare adolescents to transition from the education system to work and live in their communities, but they report challenges in securing their place on post-secondary transition planning teams. We argue that occupational therapists' efforts to advocate for their role in post-secondary transition could be strengthened by a deeper engagement with what is considered 'best practice' in transition planning: improving students' ability and opportunity to exercise self-determination. In this commentary, we review the self-determination evidence-base; identify congruence between the underlying philosophies of self-determination and occupational therapy; and highlight gaps in existing self-determination models that occupational therapists are uniquely posed to fill by focusing on self-determination as they support transition age students.

Effects of sarcopenia on functional improvement over the first year after cardiac surgery: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is linked with poor postoperative outcomes. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of sarcopenia on first-year functional changes after cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, functional changes (physical activity levels in metabolic equivalent hours/week, 6-minute walking distance in metres, and grip strength in kg) from preoperative baseline to 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively were compared in adult patients with and without sarcopenia undergoing cardiac surgery at a tertiary medical centre. Presurgical sarcopenia was defined as low muscle mass plus either low strength or poor physical performance (i.e. reduced gait speed). Secondary outcomes (length of hospital stay and 1-year mortality) were compared between sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. RESULTS: Sarcopenia presented in 27.7% ( n=67) of 242 participants. Participants with sarcopenia were significantly older, predominantly women, and had lower body mass index and higher cardiac surgery risk (measured by the EuroSCORE II) than those without sarcopenia. For both groups, physical activity levels, walking distance and grip strength steadily improved over the year following cardiac surgery. Independent of EuroSCORE II, changes in physical activity levels, walking distance and grip strength did not differ significantly between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Nevertheless, the sarcopenia group had a significantly longer length of hospital stay than the non-sarcopenia group (19.4 vs. 15.3 days; ß=2.9, P=0.02) but 1-year mortality (3.4 vs. 3.9% for non-sarcopenia group) was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a longer length of hospital stay for the sarcopenia group, sarcopenia was not a restriction for cardiac surgery given their comparable functional improvement and mortality 1 year following surgery.

Three Nurse-administered Protocols Reduce Nutritional Decline and Frailty in Older Gastrointestinal Surgery Patients: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the modified Hospital Elder Life Program (mHELP) comprising 3 nurse-administered protocols in older patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. DESIGN: Cluster randomized trial. SETTING: Two 36-bed GI wards at a university-affiliated medical center in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Older patients (≥65 years, N = 377) were recruited if they were scheduled for elective GI surgery with an expected length of hospital stay >6 days. After transferring to the GI ward after surgery, participants were randomly assigned to the mHELP or control group (1:1) by room rather than individually because most patient units are double- or triple-occupancy rooms. INTERVENTION: The mHELP protocols (early mobilization, oral and nutritional assistance, and orienting communication) were administered daily with usual care by a trained nurse until hospital discharge. The control group received usual care only. MEASURES: Outcomes were in-hospital nutritional decline, measured by body weight and Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, and Fried's frailty phenotype. Return of GI motility was examined as a potential mechanism contributing to observed outcomes. RESULTS: Participants (mean age = 74.5 years; 56.8% male) primarily underwent colorectal (56.5%), gastric (21.2%), and pancreatobiliary (13.8%) surgery. Participants who received the mHELP [for a median of 7 days (interquartile range = 6-10 days)] had significantly lower in-hospital weight loss and decline in MNA scores (weight -2.1 vs -4.0 lb, P = .002; score -3.2 vs -4.0, P = .03) than the control group. The mHELP group also had significantly lower rates of incident frailty during hospitalization (12.0% vs 21.7%, P = .022), and persistent frailty (50.0% vs 92.9%, P = .03). Participants in the mHELP group had trends toward an accelerated return of GI motility. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The mHELP effectively reduced nutritional decline, prevented new frailty, and promoted recovery of frailty present before admission. These nurse-administered protocols might be useful in other settings, including conditions managed at home or in nursing facilities.

Bedside screen for oral cavity structure, salivary flow, and vocal production over the 14days following endotracheal extubation.

PURPOSE: To describe the sequelae of oral endotracheal intubation by evaluating prevalence rates of structural injury, hyposalivation, and impaired vocal production over 14days following extubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive adults (≥20years, N=114) with prolonged (≥48h) endotracheal intubation were enrolled from medical intensive care units at a university hospital. Participants were assessed by trained nurses at 2, 7, and 14days after extubation, using a standardized bedside screening protocol. RESULTS: Within 48-hour postextubation, structural injuries were common, with 51% having restricted mouth opening. Unstimulated salivary flow was reduced in 43%. For vocal production, 51% had inadequate breathing support for phonation, dysphonia was common (94% had hoarseness and 36% showed reduced efficiency of vocal fold closure), and >40% had impaired articulatory precision. By 14days postextubation, recovery was noted in most conditions, but reduced efficiency of vocal fold closure persisted. Restricted mouth opening (39%) and reduced salivary flow (34%) remained highly prevalent. CONCLUSIONS: After extubation, restricted mouth opening, reduced salivary flow, and dysphonia were common and prolonged in recovery. Reduced efficiency of vocal cord closure persisted at 14days postextubation. The extent and duration of these sequelae remind clinicians to screen for them up to 2weeks after extubation.