RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item tool developed to screen for depression in the general population. To psychometrically evaluate and validate the CES-D scale for use in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. METHODS: The CES-D was applied to 130 subjects at onset of radiation treatment and 3-months following treatment. Analysis was conducted via face and content validity using two expert raters, internal consistency was applied using Cronbach's alpha, test retest reliability comparing baseline to 3-month application, concurrent validity was performed against the FACT-H&N and Pain Disability Index, construct validity was conducted via exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The sample was predominantly male receiving chemo radiation. Face validity was strong (αâ¯=â¯0.85). Significant difference was found in the mean score between depressed (CES-D cut pointâ¯≥â¯16) vs. non-depressed (tâ¯=â¯-15.84, pâ¯=â¯.00) (95% CIâ¯=â¯-17.18, -13.33). Internal consistency of the scale was high (αâ¯=â¯0.84). Test retest reliability (pâ¯<â¯.001) showed moderate-strong correlations (0.51), however was not sensitive to change in this sample across the study time period. Concurrent validity was strong (râ¯=â¯-0.77, 0.51). Factor analysis at baseline explained 54.92% of variance, with 3 distinct factors; depressed affect, somatic/retarded activity, and positive affect. In contrast to general populations, the factor 'disturbed interpersonal skill' was not retained. CONCLUSION: Results confirm the reliability and validity of the CES-D as a measure of depression in HNC populations. Proposed cut off scores remain stable but scale responsiveness suggests caution when evaluating change over time in this population.