Proximal fracture line extension in humeral shaft fractures.

Introduction: Humeral shaft fractures are common injuries treated by orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate displaced diaphyseal humerus fractures and describe the incidence and characteristics associated with non or minimally displaced fracture line extension into the proximal metadiaphyseal region of the humerus. Methods and materials: All adult patients with diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures located within the distal two-thirds of the humeral shaft, treated at a single level I trauma institution between 2007 and 2020, were retrospectively identified. 202 patients with 203 fractures of the humeral shaft were included. Fracture patterns were classified according to AO/OTA classification and fracture line extension into the proximal metadiaphyseal region was evaluated on radiographs. Patient demographics, management details, and radiographic outcomes were obtained from review of the electronic medical record. Results: Of 203 diaphyseal humerus fractures, 11.8 % (n = 24) had non or minimally displaced proximal extension of their main fracture line. This included 43.7 % (n = 7) of all proximal third junction diaphyseal fractures, 10.7 % (n = 16) of all middle third diaphyseal fractures, and 2.6 % (n = 1) of all distal third diaphyseal fractures. Patients with proximal fracture extension were, on average, older (61.7 versus 44.4 years, p < 0.001), and a higher percentage were female (75 % versus 45.5 %, p < 0.01) compared to patients without fracture proximal extension. Fractures with proximal extension were all closed fractures (n = 24), were more often sustained from low-energy fall (87.5 % versus 35.2 %, p < 0.001), and were more often spiral type fractures (62.5 % versus 17.2 %). Fractures with proximal extension were more often treated non-operatively (58.3 % versus 42.1 %, p < 0.01), but were found to have a higher rate of nonunion after non-operative treatment (17.6 % versus 8.1 %) compared to fractures without proximal extension. All operatively treated fractures that had proximal metaphyseal extension were secured with a fixation construct to achieve fixation proximal to the extent of the fracture line, most often into the humeral head and neck. Operative management with proximal fixation into the humeral head was also pursued for a patient with nonunion, including persistent lucency of the proximal extension line, after failed non-operative treatment. Mean follow-up was 35.5 weeks (range: 0-607 weeks). Conclusions: Proximal fracture line extension in the setting of diaphyseal humerus fractures is not uncommon. Detection and consideration of this sometimes subtle finding is important when planning to treat these injuries operatively.

Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs.

The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included. Main Outcome Measurements: Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as "high-risk" if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees. Results: Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (P = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], P < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [-18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as "low-risk" in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 - 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 - 3, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries. Level of Evidence: Level IV diagnostic study.

Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Nonunion in Open Tibial Shaft Fractures.

Open fracture is a risk factor for nonunion of diaphyseal tibia fractures. Compared with closed injuries, there is a relative lack of scientific knowledge regarding the healing of open tibia fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate which patient, injury, and surgeon-related factors predict nonunion in open tibial shaft fractures. A cohort of 98 patients with 104 extra-articular open tibial shaft fractures (OTA/AO 41A2-3, 42A-C, and 43A) were treated surgically between 2007 and 2018 at a single level 1 trauma center and were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent irrigation and debridement followed by definitive intramedullary nailing or plate fixation. Patient, injury, and perioperative prognostic factors were analyzed as predictors of nonunion based on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The nonunion rate was 27.9% (n=29). There were 12 occurrences of deep infection (11.5%). The median follow-up was 14 months. High-energy mechanism of injury (hazard ratio [HR], 5.76), Gustilo-Anderson class IIIA injury (HR, 3.66), postoperative cortical continuity of 0% to 25% (HR, 2.90), early postoperative complication (HR, 4.20), and deep infection (HR, 2.25) were significant predictors of nonunion on univariable analysis (P<.05). On multivariable assessment, only high-energy mechanism of injury, Gustilo-Anderson class IIIA injury, and early postoperative complication reached significance as predictors of nonunion. These data also indicate that lack of cortical continuity is a significant univariable radiographic predictor of nonunion. This is potentially modifiable, may guide surgeons in selecting patients for early bone grafting procedures, and should be assessed carefully in this high-risk population. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):142-147.].

Association of Injury Energy Level and Neurovascular Injury Following Knee Dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the associations between mechanism of injury energy level and neurovascular injury (NVI) following knee dislocation (KD) using a large representative sample of trauma patients and to examine risk factors within these groups. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with KD without lower extremity fracture. INTERVENTION: Patients were grouped as ultra-low, low, or high-energy based on injury mechanism. Univariate/multivariate analyses assessed associations of energy level with NVI and of patient characteristics with NVI within energy-level groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rate of nerve and blood vessel injury. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients with KD were identified; 181 sustained ultra-low-energy mechanisms, 275 low-energy, and 868 high-energy. Nerve injury occurred in 6% of ultra-low-energy injuries, 7% in low-energy, and 3% in high-energy (P = 0.03). Vessel injury occurred in 21% of ultra-low-energy injuries, 17% in low-energy, and 13% in high-energy (P = 0.01). On multivariate analyses, obesity was associated with nerve injury in the ultra-low-energy group (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.0-24.0) but not with other energy levels. Obesity was also associated with vessel injury in the ultra-low-energy group (OR 4.0; 95% CI 1.6-9.7). Smoking, hypertension, and diabetes were not associated with NVI. CONCLUSIONS: NVI following KD is more common after lower energy-level mechanisms. Obesity is associated with NVI in lower energy-level mechanisms. Physicians should be vigilant in screening for NVI in the setting of KD even with seemingly benign mechanisms of injury, especially in patients with obesity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.