Sinus node sparing novel hybrid approach for treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia/postural sinus tachycardia: multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) still needs to be defined. Medical treatments yield suboptimal results. Endocardial catheter ablation of the sinus node (SN) may risk phrenic nerve damage and open-heart surgery may be accompanied by unjustified invasive risks. METHODS: We describe our first multicenter experience of 255 consecutive patients (235 females, 25.94 ± 3.84 years) having undergone a novel SN sparing hybrid thoracoscopic ablation for drug-resistant IST (n = 204, 80%) or POTS (n = 51, 20%). As previously described, the SN was identified with 3D mapping. Surgery was performed through three 5-mm ports from the right side. A minimally invasive approach with a bipolar radiofrequency clamp was used to ablate targeted areas while sparing the SN region. The targeted areas included isolation of the superior and the inferior caval veins, and a crista terminalis line was made. All lines were interconnected. RESULTS: Normal sinus rhythm (SR) was restored in all patients at the end of the procedure. All patients discontinued medication during the follow-up. After a blanking period of 6 months, all patients presented stable SR. At a mean of 4.07 ± 1.8 years, normal SN reduction and chronotropic response to exercise were present. In the 51 patients initially diagnosed with POTS, no syncope occurred. During follow-up, pericarditis was the most common complication (121 patients: 47%), with complete resolution in all cases. Pneumothorax was observed in 5 patients (1.9%), only 3 (1.1%) required surgical drainage. Five patients (1.9%) required a dual-chamber pacemaker due to sinus arrest > 5 s. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results of this multicenter experience with a novel SN sparing hybrid ablation of IST/POTS, using surgical thoracoscopic video-assisted epicardial ablation combined with simultaneous endocardial 3D mapping may prove to be an efficient and safe therapeutic option in patients with symptomatic drug-resistant IST and POTS. Importantly, in our study, all patients had a complete resolution of the symptoms and restored normal SN activity.

Variability in postpacing intervals predicts global ventricular activation pattern during tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of ventricular activation pattern is critical to the successful ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). We have previously shown that the global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia can be rapidly and accurately assessed by calculating the postpacing interval variability (PPIV); PPIV was minimal in circuitous tachycardias and highly variable in centrifugal tachycardias. In the present study, we use the PPIV to determine the ventricular global activation pattern during VT. METHODS: Patients with mappable VT were included. We defined global ventricular activation as either centrifugal (arising from a focus with radial expansion) or circuitous (gross macro-reentrant circuit), based on the findings of electroanatomic mapping. PPIV was calculated as the difference in postpacing interval with right ventricular apical overdrive pacing during tachycardia at cycle lengths (CL) 10 ms and 30-ms shorter than tachycardia, regardless of the origin of the tachycardia. We studied 20 patients with 23 VTs (11 centrifugal, mean CL 390 +/- 36.1 ms; 12 circuitous, mean CL 418 +/- 75.7 ms). RESULTS: The mean PPIV was 45 +/- 16 ms for patients with centrifugal VT and 6.7 +/- 4.1 ms for patients with circuitous VT. Rank sum analysis of PPIV showed a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the global ventricular activation pattern during VT can be rapidly and accurately defined by assessing the PPIV. This technique allows for a rapid confirmation of the tachycardia activation and significantly facilitates mapping and ablation.

Variability in post-pacing intervals predicts global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the global atrial activation pattern is critical to ablation of an atrial arrhythmia. We hypothesized that the variability in post-pacing intervals (PPIs) with pacing at different cycle lengths (CLs) from the same pacing site, regardless of distance to the circuit, can be used to identify atrial activation patterns during tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients referred for ablation of organized atrial arrhythmias were included (n = 28, 31 total tachycardias). The variability in PPIs (PPIV) was calculated by comparing the difference in PPIs after overdrive pacing with 5-second trains 10, 20, and 30 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The global activation pattern was defined as circuitous (macroreentrant atrial circuit) or centrifugal (focal origin with centrifugal radiation) by electroanatomic mapping. Except for one case, all pacing was performed from the proximal coronary sinus bipole. Circuitous tachycardias (n = 17, all macro-reentrant) exhibited minimal variability with pacing at 10 ms and 30 ms shorter than TCL (6.0 +/- 2.5 ms), whereas centrifugal tachycardias (n = 14, 8 microreentrant) displayed a high degree of variability (56.5 +/- 20.6 ms). Rank sum analysis of PPIV suggests that the two groups are indeed distinct (P < 0.001). Using PPIV cutoffs of or=30 ms, circuitous and centrifugal activation patterns could be distinguished with a high degree of sensitivity (94% circuitous, 92.8% centrifugal) and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of PPIV to rapidly and accurately predict the global activation pattern during atrial arrhythmia.

Interatrial conduction measured during biventricular pacemaker implantation accurately predicts optimal paced atrioventricular intervals.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay during biventricular (BiV) pacemaker implantation can require substantial resources. Hence, a simpler method is desirable. We hypothesized that interatrial conduction time (IACT), measured at the time of BiV device implant, could be a surrogate value for the optimal AV delay. OBJECTIVE: This study determined the relationship between paced IACT and the optimal paced AV delay (PAV), as determined by echocardiography. METHODS: Consecutive subjects (N = 25; age = 66 +/- 10 years; M/F: 17/8) undergoing BiV pacemaker implantation and in sinus rhythm were included. Cannulation of the coronary sinus (CS) was at the operator's discretion. A quadripolar electrophysiology catheter was inserted via the guiding sheath into the inferiolateral CS to measure left atrial depolarization. The IACT was calculated as the interval between right atrial stimulation artifact and earliest deflection on the coronary sinus catheter electrogram. Subsequently, during atrial pacing the PAV was determined using transmitral pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography (iterative method). The relationship between paced IACT and PAV was then determined. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD paced IACT and PAV were 126 +/- 25 msec and 157 +/- 23 msec, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between the paced IACT and PAV (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). The equation describing the relationship was PAV = 0.68 * (IACT + 104) msec. CONCLUSIONS: The paced IACT has a strong correlation with the echo derived optimal PAV. This method may be used to program PAV intervals without need for echocardiography in patients undergoing BiV pacemaker implantation.