RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Myocardial work is an innovative echocardiographic tool to assess left ventricular performance. Emerging data have shown the added value of this method for evaluating cardiac function compared to traditional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal strain. However, few studies are present in the literature about the role of myocardial work during cardiac rehabilitation. Our aim was to assess the impact of a rehabilitation program on myocardial work indices in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and after coronary artery bypass grafting. In addition, we assessed the correlation between baseline myocardial work indices and their change after cardiac rehabilitation, establishing an optimal cut-off value to predict the improvement. METHODS: An observational, single-center, and prospective study was conducted. We enrolled patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass grafting and with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Before and after the cardiac rehabilitation program, a comprehensive patient assessment was performed, including traditional transthoracic echocardiography, myocardial work analysis, and a six-minute walk test. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled; the mean age was 67.96 (±7.42) years and 78.6% were male. The left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in all patients, and the global longitudinal strain was -16.18 ± 2.55%, the global work index was 1588.56 ± 345 mmHg%, the global constructive work was 1771.27 ± 366.36 mmHg%, the global wasted work was 105.8 ± 72.02 mmHg%, and the global work efficiency was 92.63 ± 3.9% at baseline. After the cardiac rehabilitation program, the global work index, the global constructive work, and the six-minute walk test improved significantly (1588.56 ± 345 vs. 1960.2 ± 377.03 mmHg%, p-value < 0.001; 1771.27 ± 366.36 vs. 2172.01 ± 418.73 mmHg%, p-value < 0.001; 70.71 ± 40.2 vs. 437.5 ± 108.70 m, p-value < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial work indices, specifically global work index and global constructive work, improve after cardiac rehabilitation program in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
RESUMEN
Two methods are currently available for left atrial (LA) strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography, with two different reference timings for starting the analysis: QRS (QRS-LASr) and P wave (P-LASr). The aim of MASCOT HIT study was to define which of the two was more reproducible, more feasible, and less time consuming. In 26 expert centers, LA strain was analyzed by two different echocardiographers (young vs senior) in a blinded fashion. The study population included: healthy subjects, patients with arterial hypertension or aortic stenosis (LA pressure overload, group 2) and patients with mitral regurgitation or heart failure (LA volume-pressure overload, group 3). Difference between the inter-correlation coefficient (ICC) by the two echocardiographers using the two techniques, feasibility and analysis time of both methods were analyzed. A total of 938 subjects were included: 309 controls, 333 patients in group 2, and 296 patients in group 3. The ICC was comparable between QRS-LASr (0.93) and P-LASr (0.90). The young echocardiographers calculated QRS-LASr in 90% of cases, the expert ones in 95%. The feasibility of P-LASr was 85% by young echocardiographers and 88% by senior ones. QRS-LASr young median time was 110 s (interquartile range, IR, 78-149) vs senior 110 s (IR 78-155); for P-LASr, 120 s (IR 80-165) and 120 s (IR 90-161), respectively. LA strain was feasible in the majority of patients with similar reproducibility for both methods. QRS complex guaranteed a slightly higher feasibility and a lower time wasting compared to the use of P wave as the reference.
RESUMEN
Although often referred to as "the forgotten chamber", compared with left ventricle (LV), especially in the past years, the left atrium (LA) plays a critical role in the clinical expression and prognosis of patients with heart and cerebrovascular disease, as demonstrated by several studies. Echocardiographers initially focused on early detection of atrial geometrical abnormalities through monodimensional atrial diameter quantification and then bidimensional (2D) areas and volume estimation. Now, together with conventional echocardiographic parameters, new echocardiographic techniques, such as strain Doppler, 2D speckle tracking and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, allow assessing early LA dysfunction and they all play a fundamental role to detect early functional remodelling before anatomical alterations occur. LA dysfunction and its important prognostic implications may be detected sooner by LA strain than by volumetric measurements.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/tendencias , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Atrios Cardíacos/patología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/patología , Humanos , Atención al Paciente/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess systolic left atrial (LA) reservoir function in patients with mitral stenosis (MS) using two-dimensional (2D) strain (ε) and strain rate imaging and its prognostic value in predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) at 4-year follow-up. METHODS: One hundred one asymptomatic patients with pure rheumatic MS and 70 healthy controls were evaluated using standard Doppler echocardiography (mitral valve area, mean gradient, systolic pulmonary pressure, LA width, LA volumes, and LA ejection fraction) and 2D speckle-tracking. RESULTS: LA width, volumes, and systolic pulmonary pressure were significantly increased (P < .0001), and LA 2D ε and strain rate were significantly impaired in patients with MS (P < .0001). At 4-year follow-up, 20 patients (20%) showed AF on standard electrocardiography or 24-hour Holter electrocardiography. Patients with MS who had AF were older than those who did not, without significant differences in LA dimensions, volumes, ejection fraction, and compliance index. Instead, atrial myocardial systolic 2D ε was significantly impaired in patients with events. On multivariate analysis (age, LA volume, planimetric mitral area, average annular Ea, and LA strain) the best predictor of AF was average LA peak systolic ε (coefficient, 0.43; SE, 0.098; P < .01), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.761 (SE, 0.085; 95% confidence interval, 0.587-0.888, P = .002) for a cutoff value of 17.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of 2D ε imaging are abnormal in patients with asymptomatic MS and predict AF at 4-year follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatía Reumática/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Función del Atrio Izquierdo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Curva ROC , Cardiopatía Reumática/complicaciones , Cardiopatía Reumática/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , SístoleRESUMEN
We report a case of an asymptomatic patient in whom a right atrial mass was fortuitously documented by echocardiography few months after a transcatheter radiofrequency catheter ablation for recurrent AF. No masses were seen in the cardiac chambers before the ablative procedure, raising important diagnostic and decision-making issues. The patient was referred to the surgeon and a diagnosis of right atrial myxoma was made.