Can STEreotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Improve the Prognosis of Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer? Long-Term Clinical Outcomes, Toxicity and Prognostic Factors on 142 Patients (STEP Study).

AIM: The gold standard of care for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the integrated treatment of surgery and chemotherapy (ChT), but about 50% of patients present with unresectable disease. Our study evaluated the efficacy in terms of local control, survival and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: A retrospective study (STEP study) analyzed patients with LAPC treated with a dose of 45 Gy in 6 fractions. Local control (LC), distant progression free survival (DPFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were evaluated. Seventy-six patients (53.5%) received induction ChT before SBRT. The median follow-up was 11 months. One-, 2- and 3-year LC rate was 81.9%, 69.1% and 58.5%. Median DPFS was 6.03 months; 1- and 2-year DPFS rate was 19.9% and 4.5%. Median OS was 11.6 months and 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 45.4%, 16.1%, and 9.8%. At univariate analysis, performed by the log-rank test, age < 70 years (p = 0.037), pre-SBRT ChT (p = 0.004) and post-SBRT ChT (p = 0.019) were associated with better OS. No patients experienced G3 toxicity. CONCLUSION: SBRT represents an effective and safe therapeutic option in the multimodal treatment of patients with LAPC in terms of increased LC. When SBRT was sequentially integrated with ChT, the treatment proved to be promising in terms of OS as well.

Total tumor volume as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple oligometastases treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

BACKGROUND: Delivering stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with multiple oligometastases represents a challenge for clinical and technical reasons. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients affected by multiple oligometastases treated with SABR and the impact of tumor volume on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all the patients treated with single course SABR for 3 to 5 extracranial oligometastases. All patients were treated with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique with ablative intent. End-points of the analysis were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and toxicity. RESULTS: 136 patients were treated from 2012 to 2020 on 451 oligometastases. Most common primary tumor was colorectal cancer (44.1%) followed by lung cancer (11.8%). A total of 3, 4 and 5 lesions were simultaneously treated in 102 (75.0%), 26 (19.1%), and 8 (5.9%) patients, respectively. Median total tumor volume (TTV) was 19.1 cc (range 0.6-245.1). With a median follow-up of 25.0 months, OS at 1 and 3 years was 88.4% and 50.2%, respectively. Increasing TTV was independent predictive factor of worse OS (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.18-4.78, p = 0.014) and PFS (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05-2.54; p = 0.028). Median OS was 80.6 months if tumor volume was ≤ 10 cc (1 and 3 years OS rate 93.6% and 77.5%, respectively), and 31.1 months if TTV was higher than 10 cc (1 and 3 years OS rate 86.7% and 42.3%, respectively). Rates of LC at 1 and 3 years were 89.3% and 76.5%. In terms of toxicity, no grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported both in the acute and late settings. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the impact of tumor volume on survival and disease control of patients affected by multiple oligometastases treated with single course SABR.

Adaptive Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Evaluation of Benefit on Target Coverage and Sparing of Organs at Risk.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is essential in the management of head-neck cancer. During the course of radiotherapy, patients may develop significant anatomical changes. Re-planning with adaptive radiotherapy may ensure adequate dose coverage and sparing of organs at risk. We investigated the consequences of adaptive radiotherapy on head-neck cancer patients treated with volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy compared to simulated non-adaptive plans: Materials and methods: We included in this retrospective dosimetric analysis 56 patients treated with adaptive radiotherapy. The primary aim of the study was to analyze the dosimetric differences with and without an adaptive approach for targets and organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord, parotid glands, oral cavity and larynx. The original plan (OPLAN) was compared to the adaptive plan (APLAN) and to a simulated non-adaptive dosimetric plan (DPLAN). RESULTS: The non-adaptive DPLAN, when compared to OPLAN, showed an increased dose to all organs at risk. Spinal cord D2 increased from 27.91 (21.06-31.76) Gy to 31.39 (27.66-38.79) Gy (p = 0.00). V15, V30 and V45 of the DPLAN vs. the OPLAN increased by 20.6% (p = 0.00), 14.78% (p = 0.00) and 15.55% (p = 0.00) for right parotid; and 16.25% (p = 0.00), 18.7% (p = 0.00) and 20.19% (p = 0.00) for left parotid. A difference of 36.95% was observed in the oral cavity V40 (p = 0.00). Dose coverage was significantly reduced for both CTV (97.90% vs. 99.96%; p = 0.00) and PTV (94.70% vs. 98.72%; p = 0.00). The APLAN compared to the OPLAN had similar values for all organs at risk. CONCLUSIONS: The adaptive strategy with re-planning is able to avoid an increase in dose to organs at risk and better target coverage in head-neck cancer patients, with potential benefits in terms of side effects and disease control.

Stereotactic radiation therapy for oligometastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: outcome and prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results and prognostic factors in a cohort of patient with oligometastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients affected by 1-3 metastases treated with SRT from 2013 to 2021. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to polymetastatic dissemination (TTPD) and time to systemic therapy change/initiation (TTS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2021, 55 patients were treated with SRT on 80 oligometastatic sites. Median follow-up was 20 months. Nine patients had local progression. 1 and 3 years LC was respectively 92 and 78%. 41 patients experienced further distant disease progression, median PFS was 9.6 months, 1 and 3 years PFS was respectively 40 and 15%. 34 patients died, median OS was 26.6 months, 1 and 3 years OS was respectively 78 and 40%. During follow-up, 24 patients changed or initiated a new systemic therapy; median TTS time was 9 months. 27 patients experienced poliprogression, 44% after 1 year and 52% after 3 years. Median TTPD was 8 months. The best local response (LR), tyming of metastases and PS were related with prolonged PFS on multivariate analysis. LR was correlated with OS at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: SRT represents a valid treatment for oligometastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. CR correlated with PFS and OS, while metachronous metastasis and a good PS correlated with a better PFS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In selected gastroesopagheal oligometastatic patients, SRT can prolong OS Local response to SRT, metachronous timing of metastases and better PS improve PFS.Local response correlates with OS.

The impact of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy on oligoprogressive metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 80-90% of all kidney tumors and about 15-25% of patients will develop distant metastases. Systemic therapy represents the standard of care for metastatic patients, but stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) may play a relevant role in the oligoprogressive setting, defined as the progression of few metastases during an ongoing systemic therapy on a background of otherwise stable disease. Aim of the present study was to analyze the outcome of RCC patients treated with SABR on oligoprogressive metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this monocenter study, we analyzed patients affected by RCC treated with SABR on a maximum of 5 cranial or extracranial oligoprogressive sites of disease. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: We included 74 oligoprogressions (26 intracranial and 48 extracranial) and 57 SABR treatments in 44 patients. Most common concomitant treatments were sunitinib (28, 49.1%), pazopanib (12, 21.0%) and nivolumab (11, 19.3%). Median follow-up was 19.0 months, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 79.2% and 57.3%, respectively. Repeated SABR was a positive predictive factor for OS (p = 0.034). Median PFS was 9.8 months, with 1- and 2-year rates of 43.2% and 25.8%. At multivariable analysis, disease-free interval (p = 0.022) and number of treated metastases (p = 0.007) were significant for PFS. About 80% of patients continued the ongoing systemic therapy 1- and 2-years after SABR with no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: we confirmed the efficacy and safety of SABR for oligoprogression from RCC, with the potential to ablate resistant metastases and to prolong the ongoing systemic therapy.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy after Incomplete Transarterial (Chemo-) Embolization (TAE\TACE) versus Exclusive TAE or TACE for Treatment of Inoperable HCC: A Phase III Trial (NCT02323360).

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent liver malignancy and a leading cause of cancer death in the world. In unresectable HCC patients, transcatheter arterial (chemo-) embolization (TAE/TACE) has shown a disease response in 15-55% of cases. Though multiple TAE/TACE courses can be administered in principle, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as an alternative option in the case of local relapse following multiple TAE/TACE courses. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group superiority trial of SBRT versus standard TAE/TACE for the curative treatment of the intermediate stage of HCC after an incomplete response following TAE/TACE (NCT02323360). The primary endpoint is 1-year local control (LC): 18 events were needed to assess a 45% difference (HR: 0.18) in favor of SBRT. The secondary endpoints are 1-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS), Overall Survival (OS) and the incidence of acute and late complications. Results: At the time of the final analysis, 40 patients were enrolled, 19 (49%) in the TAE/TACE arm and 21 (51%) in the SBRT arm. The trial was prematurely closed due to slow accrual. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 57% and 36%. The use of SBRT resulted in superior LC as compared to TAE/TACE rechallenge (median not reached versus 8 months, p = 0.0002). PFS was 29% and 16% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. OS was 86% and 62% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. In the TAE arm, PFS was 13% and 6% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. In the SBRT arm, at 1 and 2 years, PFS was 37% and 21%, respectively. OS at 1 and 2 years was 75% and 64% in the SBRT arm and 95% and 57% in the TACE arm, respectively. No grade >3 toxicity was recorded. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective treatment option in patients affected by inoperable HCC experiencing an incomplete response following ≥1 cycle of TAE/TAC.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung and Liver Oligometastases from Breast Cancer: Toxicity Data of a Prospective Non-Randomized Phase II Trial.

AIMS: We report the mature toxicity data of a phase II non-randomized trial on the use of SBRT for lung and liver oligometastases. METHODS: Oligometastatic patients from breast cancer were treated with SBRT for up to five lung and/or liver lesions. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years, ECOG 0-2, diagnosis of breast cancer, less than five lung/liver lesions (with a maximum diameter <5 cm), metastatic disease confined to the lungs and liver or extrapulmonary or extrahepatic disease stable or responding to systemic therapy. Various dose-fractionation schedules were used. Then, a 4D-CT scan and FDG-CTPET were acquired for simulation and fused for target definition. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2021, 64 patients and a total of 90 lesions were irradiated. Treatment was well tolerated, with no G 3-4 toxicities. No grade ≥3 toxicities were registered and the coprimary endpoint of the study was met. Median follow-up was 19.4 months (range 2.6-73.1). CONCLUSIONS: The co-primary endpoint of this phase II trial was met, showing excellent tolerability of SBRT for lung and liver oligometastatic in breast cancer patients. Until efficacy data will mature with longer follow-up, SBRT should be regarded as an opportunity for oligometastatic breast cancer patients.

Training and validation of a knowledge-based dose-volume histogram predictive model in the optimisation of intensity-modulated proton and volumetric modulated arc photon plans for pleural mesothelioma patients.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the performance of a narrow-scope knowledge-based RapidPlan (RP) model for optimisation of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans applied to patients with pleural mesothelioma. Second, estimate the potential benefit of IMPT versus VMAT for this class of patients. METHODS: A cohort of 82 patients was retrospectively selected; 60 were used to "train" a dose-volume histogram predictive model; the remaining 22 provided independent validation. The performance of the RP models was benchmarked, comparing predicted versus achieved mean and near-to-maximum dose for all organs at risk (OARs) in the training set and by quantitative assessment of some dose-volume metrics in the comparison of the validation RP-based data versus the manually optimised training datasets. Treatment plans were designed for a prescription dose of 44 Gy in 22 fractions (proton doses account for a fixed relative biological effectiveness RBE = 1.1). RESULTS: Training and validation RP-based plans resulted dosimetrically similar for both VMAT and IMPT groups, and the clinical planning aims were met for all structures. The IMPT plans outperformed the VMAT ones for all OARs for the contra-lateral and the mean and low dose regions for the ipsilateral OARs. Concerning the prediction performance of the RP models, the linear regression for the near-to-maximum dose resulted in Dachieved = 1.03Dpredicted + 0.58 and Dachieved = 1.02Dpredicted + 1.46 for VMAT and IMPT, respectively. For the mean dose it resulted: Dachieved = 0.99Dpredicted + 0.34 and Dachieved = 1.05Dpredicted + 0.27 respectively. In both cases, the linear correlation between prediction and achievement is granted with an angular coefficient deviating from unity for less than 5%. Concerning the dosimetric comparison between manual plans in the training cohort and RP-based plans in the validation cohort, no clinical differences were observed for the target volumes in both the VMAT and IMPT groups. Similar consistency was observed for the dose-volume metrics analysed for the OAR. This proves the possibility of achieving the same quality of plans with manual procedures (the training set) or with automated RP-based methods (the validation set). CONCLUSION: Two models were trained and validated for VMAT and IMPT plans for pleural mesothelioma. The RP model performance resulted satisfactory as measured by the agreement between predicted and achieved (after full optimisation) dose-volume metrics. The IMPT plans outperformed the VMAT plans for all the OARs (with different intensities for contra- or ipsilateral structures). RP-based planning enabled the automation of part of the optimisation and the harmonisation of the dose-volume results between training and validation. The IMPT data showed a systematic significant dosimetric advantage over VMAT. In general, using an RP-based approach can simplify the optimisation workflow in these complex treatment indications without impacting the quality of plans.

Multidisciplinary Tumor Board in the Management of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Single-Center Review of 847 Patients.

There is still debate over how reviewing oncological histories and addressing appropriate therapies in multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions may affect patients' overall survival (OS). The aim of this study was to describe MDT outcomes for a single cancer center's patients affected by colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). From 2010 to 2020, a total of 847 patients with CRLMs were discussed at our weekly MDT meeting. Patients' characteristics and MDT decisions were analyzed in two groups: patients receiving systemic therapy (ST) versus patients receiving locoregional treatment (LRT). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was run to reduce the risk of selection bias. The median time from MDT indication to treatment was 27 (IQR 13−51) days. The median OS was 30 (95%CI = 27−34) months. After PSM, OS for patients undergoing LRT was 51 (95%CI = 36−64) months compared with 15 (95%CI = 13−20) months for ST patients (p < 0.0001). In this large retrospective study, the MDT discussions were useful in providing the patients with all available locoregional options.

Oligoscore: a clinical score to predict overall survival in patients with oligometastatic disease treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: to find clinical features that can predict prognosis in patients with oligometastatic disease treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with less than 5 metastases in less than 3 different body sites were included in the analysis. Various clinical and treatment parameters were analyzed to create a Cox proportional hazard model for Overall Survival (OS). Subsequently, significant variables were used to create a score. RESULTS: 997 patients were analyzed. Median OS was 2.61 years, 1 and 3 years OS was respectively 85% and 43%. Location of the primary tumor, performance status, site of irradiated metastases, presence of extratarget non irradiated lesions and RT dose were significant prognostic factors for OS. These parameters were used to create a score and to distinguish three different classes, with median OS of 5.67 years in low risk, 2.47 years in intermediate risk and 1.82 years in high risk group. CONCLUSION: moving from easily accessible clinical parameters, a score was created to help the physician's decision about the better treatment or combination of treatments for the individual patient.

Radiomics-based prognosis classification for high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate if CT-based radiomics features could correlate to the risk of metastatic progression in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical RT and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 157 patients were investigated and radiomics features extracted from the contrast-free treatment planning CT series. Three volumes were segmented: the prostate gland only (CTV_p), the prostate gland with seminal vesicles (CTV_psv), and the seminal vesicles only (CTV_sv). The patients were split into two subgroups of 100 and 57 patients for training and validation. Five clinical and 62 radiomics features were included in the analysis. Considering metastases-free survival (MFS) as an endpoint, the predictive model was used to identify the subgroups with favorable or unfavorable prognoses (separated by a threshold selected according to the Youden method). Pure clinical, pure radiomic, and combined predictive models were investigated. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 30.7 months, the MFS at 1 and 3 years was 97.2% ± 1.5 and 92.1% ± 2.0, respectively. Univariate analysis identified seven potential predictors for MFS in the CTV_p group, 11 in the CTV_psv group, and 9 in the CTV_sv group. After elastic net reduction, these were 4 predictors for MFS in the CTV_p group (positive lymph nodes, Gleason score, H_Skewness, and NGLDM_Contrast), 5 in the CTV_psv group (positive lymph nodes, Gleason score, H_Skewnesss, Shape_Surface, and NGLDM_Contrast), and 6 in the CTV_sv group (positive lymph nodes, Gleason score, H_Kurtosis, GLCM_Correlation, GLRLM_LRHGE, and GLZLM_SZLGE). The patients' group of the training and validation cohorts were stratified into favorable and unfavorable prognosis subgroups. For the combined model, for CTV_p, the mean MFS was 134 ± 14.5 vs. 96.9 ± 22.2 months for the favorable and unfavorable subgroups, respectively, and 136.5 ± 14.6 vs. 70.5 ± 4.3 months for CTV_psv and 150.0 ± 4.2 vs. 91.1 ± 8.6 months for CTV_sv, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiomic features were able to predict the risk of metastatic progression in high-risk prostate cancer. Combining the radiomic features and clinical characteristics can classify high-risk patients into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups.

A Pattern of Care Report on the Management of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus-A Study by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Tumors Study Group.

Background and objectives: The diagnosis and therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus may vary significantly in daily clinical practice, even if international guidelines are available. Materials and Methods: We conducted a pattern of care survey to assess the management of patients with anal cancer in Italy (38 questions). We analyzed 58 questionnaires. Results: Most of the respondents work in public and/or university hospitals (75.8%) in northern Italy (65.5%). The majority (88.0%) treat less than 20 patients/year. Common examinations for diagnosis and staging are anorectal endoscopy (84.5%), computed tomography scan (86.2%) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (96.5%). The most frequently prescribed dose to primary tumor is 50-54 Gy (46.5-58.6%) for early stage disease and 54-59.4 Gy (62.1-32.8%) for locally advanced cases. Elective volumes are prescribed around 45 Gy (94.8%). Most participants use volumetric intensity modulated radiotherapy (89.7%) and a simultaneous integrated boost (84.5%). Concurrent radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin is considered the standard of care (70.6%). Capecitabine is less frequently used (34.4%). Induction chemotherapy is an option for extensive localized disease (65.5%). Consolidation chemotherapy is rarely used (18.9%). A response evaluation is conducted at 26-30 weeks (63.9%) with a pelvic MRI (91.4%). Follow-up is generally run by the multidisciplinary tumor board (62.1%). Conclusions: Differences were observed for radiotherapy dose prescription, calling for a consensus to harmonize treatment strategies.

Phase II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy on adrenal gland metastases: evaluation of efficacy and impact on hormonal production.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess prospectively the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for adrenal gland metastasis, with a focus on the assessment of the irradiated subjects' endocrinological function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled from 2017 to 2020 in this prospective phase II trial. Patients were treated with Linac-based SBRT, with a dose of 45 Gy in 3 consecutive fractions. Primary end-point was local control (LC) of the treated lesions and secondary end-points included evaluation of acute and late toxicity, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the impact on the hormonal production of adrenal glands. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, LC rates at 1 and 2 years were 94.7% and 88.4%, respectively. Rates of PFS at 1 and 2 years were 50.5% and 29.8%, with a median PFS of 14.7 months. Rates of OS at 1 and 2 years were 62.9% and 44.1%. At univariate analysis, oligorecurrence was associated with better OS compared to oligoprogressive or synchronous metastatic disease. No grade 3 or greater toxicities were registered and only a minority of patients (22.2%) reported mild treatment-related side effects. Hormonal and electrolytes production was assessed before and after treatment, showing only a slight and transient variation within the reference ranges. CONCLUSION: SBRT on adrenal metastases has been confirmed to be a feasible and effective treatment. With an excellent disease control and the preservation of the endocrine function, SBRT with ablative dose can be considered a viable alternative to more invasive approaches.

Dosimetric impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity and outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 68 patients treated between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Since 2009 patients received 3DCRT with 50/70 Gy to the elective/boost volumes in 35 fractions; from then, VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with 54.45/69.96 Gy in 33, or 54/66 Gy in 30 fractions. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 74% of the patients, concomitant cisplatinum in 87%. Acute and late toxicity data, progression-free survival PSF and overall survival OS, and toxicity correlations with dose metrics were reported. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 64 months, complete remission at the last evaluation was in 68% of the patients, while 28% and 9% had locoregional relapse and distant disease, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 62.7 ± 6.5% and 53.2 ± 8.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 78.9 ± 5.5% and 61.4 ± 9.2%, respectively. At the multivariate Cox analysis TNM stage (p = 0.02) and concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.01) resulted significant for PFS, concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.04) for OS.Improvements in acute toxicity were presented for VMAT patients due to its ability to spare OARs. Odds ratio (OR) for acute salivary toxicity, between VMAT and 3DCRT, was 4.67 (p = 0.02). Dosimetrically, salivary toxicity correlated with mean parotid dose (p = 0.05), dysphagia with laryngeal (p = 0.04) and mean oral cavity (p = 0.06) doses, when dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are corrected for fractionation. CONCLUSION: This study is a proof of a significant benefit of the VMAT technique compared with 3DCRT in terms of side effects in nasopharynx patients, and adds dosimetric correlations.

EUS-guided placement of fiducial markers for image-guided radiotherapy in gastrointestinal tumors: A critical appraisal.

We present here a new chapter of the series of papers on how to perform specific EUS techniques. In this manuscript, we discuss on how to perform EUS-guided placement of fiducial markers in gastrointestinal tumors. The aim is to present the scientific evidence of fiducials placement before radiation therapy, including an accurate revision of the literature, to give some advices on the technical approach, and to discuss Pros and Cons from the point of view of gastroenterologists and radiation oncologist.

Charlson comorbidity index and G8 in older old adult(≥80 years) hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is characterized, in Western countries, by higher incidence and mortality rates in the older adult population. In frail patients, limited therapeutic resources are available due to limited expected benefit concerning the risk of treatment-related toxicity. The aim of our study is to evaluate the role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in the clinical management of older old adults (age ≥ 80 years) HCC patients and to identify predictors of efficacy and toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical and treatment-related data of older old adults HCC patients treated with SBRT at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was carried out to identify variables correlated with impaired outcome and toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included, accounting for 63 treated tumors. Median age was 85 (range 80-91) years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and G8 scores were 10 (range 7-16) and 11 (range 8-14), respectively. SBRT was administered to a median BED10 of 103 Gy10. Median follow-up interval was 11 (range 3-40) months. Two years Local Control (LC), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS) were 93%, 31%, and 43%, respectively. Acute toxicity occurred in 28% (n = 13) of treatments. A G8 score > 10 was associated with improved survival (p = 0.045), while a CCI ≥10 was correlated with increased acute toxicity (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is a safe and effective option in older old adults HCC patients. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is advised before treatment decisions to select optimal candidates for SBRT.

Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy for post-operative treatment of prostate cancer: long-term outcome and pattern of toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is an established treatment for prostate cancer (PC). Though hypofractionation is commonly used for radical treatments, open issues still remain in the postoperative setting due to the lack of long-term data. Aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of postoperative moderately hypofractionated RT (MHRT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis including PC patients treated with prostatectomy and postoperative MHRT delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Endpoints of the analysis included biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), distant metastases free-survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and pattern of acute and late toxicity. RESULTS: 181 patients were included. Pathological stage was classified as pT3a in 33.6% and pT3b in 30%. Median PSA value before RT was 0.23 ng/ml and median RT total dose was 70 Gy (65-74.2 Gy) in 25/28 fractions. With a median follow-up of 54.5 months, rates of BRFS at 3 and 5 years were 80.7 and 72.3%. ISUP grade group (HR 1.44, p = 0.015), pathological T stage (HR 2.03; p = 0.009), and pre-RT PSA >0.2 ng/ml (HR 2.64; p = 0.015) were correlated with BRFS. Three and 5­year DMFS were 87.4 and 80.8%. ISUP grade group (HR 1.50; p = 0.011) and pre-RT PSA (HR 5.34; p = 0.001) were correlated with DMFS. Five (2.7%) and 3 (1.6%) patients reported late grade 3 GU and GI toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of postoperative MHRT for PC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present paper demonstrates the long-term safety and efficacy of MHRT for postoperative prostate cancer. Reduction of treatment time in long-course radiotherapy has advantages in terms of both patients' quality of life and departmental organization.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection and predictors of outcome and toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) emerged as a valuable option in early to advanced-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) as defined by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. The aim of our study is to evaluate SBRT in HCC patients and to identify predictors of outcome and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of HCC patients treated at our Institution between November 2011 and December 2018 was carried out. SBRT was delivered in 3-10 fractions to a median Biologically Effective Dose (BED10) of 103 Gy10. RESULTS: SBRT was performed in 128 patients to 217 HCC localizations, accounting for 142 treatment courses. BCLC stage was A, B, C in, respectively, 40 (31%), 72 (56%) and 16 (13%) patients. Local Control (LC), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at 2 years were, respectively: 78%, 15% and 58%. LC was influenced by BED10 > 120 Gy10 (Hazard Ratio, HR: 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.59; p = 0.013) and size ≥ 3 cm (HR: 2.71, 95% CI 1.10-6.66; p = 0.03). BCLC stage was correlated to PFS (median 14 vs 12 vs 5 months, p = 0.012). In BCLC stage A-B disease (n = 112), LC was associated with improved survival (median 30 months vs not reached, p = 0.036). Acute and late toxicity rate was 26% (n = 37) and 8% (n = 11). Patients with BCLC B-C stage disease showed increased acute toxicity (HR: 2.9, 95% CI 1.10-7.65; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Delivery of ablative doses > 120 Gy10 and tumor size are determinants of LC. Prolonged PFS and improved OS can be obtained in BCLC A-B patients. Grade 3 liver dysfunction is infrequent.

Dose coverage impacts local control in ultra-central lung oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The use of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is controversial in Ultra-Central lung tumors, a subset of central lung tumors characterized by proximity to critical mediastinal structures. This is of interest in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) patients, who can yield survival benefit from local treatments. The aim of our study is to assess the determinants of efficacy and toxicity in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and dosimetric parameters were reviewed in a cohort of oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT for ultra-central tumors. Local control rate (LC) and toxicity were assessed. Statistical Analysis was carried out to assess the impact of those predictors on local recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: One-hundred-nine consecutive patients were included. A median Biologic Effective Dose (BED) of 105 (75-132) Gy10 was prescribed. At a median follow-up of 17 (range 3-78) months, 2-year LC was 87%. Improved LC was correlated to Planning Treatment Volume (PTV) covered by 95% of the prescription dose (V95% PTV) > 85% (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.05-0.49, p = 0.0017) and to Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) < 90 cm3 (HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.07-0.56, p = 0.0021). Overall and grade ≥ 3 toxicity incidence was 20% and 5%, respectively. Patients experiencing acute and late toxicities received significantly higher dose to 1 cm3 (D1cm3) of esophagus and lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy (V5Gy) (p = 0.016 and p = 0.013), and higher dose to 0.1 cm3 (D0.1cm3) of heart (p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION: V95% PTV > 85% and GTV < 90 cm3 are independent predictors of LC. Dose to esophagus, lung and heart should be carefully assessed to minimize treatment-related toxicities.