Pituitary metastases: a case series and scoping review.

PURPOSE: To understand the natural history and optimal treatment strategy for pituitary gland metastasis. METHODS: We performed both a retrospective chart review of patients treated at our institution and a scoping review of the topic. RESULTS: The retrospective review identified seven patients with an average age of 59.6 years. Primary histologies included breast cancer (4), melanoma (1), renal cell carcinoma (1), and sarcoma (1). Two patients had anterior pituitary endocrine dysfunction, one of whom was the only patient with visual symptoms. All patients were treated with radiosurgery and two also underwent surgical resection. Overall survival ranged from 6.5 to 117 months. Literature review identified 166 patients from 71 studies. The most common primary cancer was lung (27.7%), followed by breast (18.7%) and renal (14.5%) cancer. 107 presented with endocrine dysfunction, including 41 cases of diabetes insipidus and 55 cases of hypopituitarism. 110 presented with visual compromise. 107 patients received radiotherapy, 96 underwent surgical resection and 44 received systemic chemotherapy/immunotherapy. Surgery was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of vision improvement and a decreased likelihood of endocrine normalization. Radiographic regression predicted visual improvement. Median overall survival was 9.9 months (range: 0.2-96). CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review showed that both radiosurgery and surgical resection have been frequently used to treat pituitary metastases with good response. Vision improvement is more likely to happen following surgical resection, likely at the expense of endocrine dysfunction. Despite treatment and radiographic response, patient survival remains less than a year.

Postoperative CT scans after resection of brain metastases: neurosurgical routine or added value?

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is the most common brain tumor in adults. It is the standard of care at most North American centers to obtain an early postoperative imaging after their resection. However, the necessity of this practice in the absence of a new postoperative deficit remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our surgical cohort of patients who underwent resection of brain metastases from July 2018 to June 2019. We collected demographic data and reviewed results of routine postoperative CT scans and neurological morbidities to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of an early postoperative scan. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the topic. RESULTS: Our review included 130 patients, all of whom underwent gross total resection of one or more brain metastases. On postoperative CT, none had unexpected findings such as cavity hematoma or new ischemia; no changes in management resulted from postoperative imaging. One patient required a higher dose of dexamethasone on postoperative day 4 for delayed hemiparesis and aphasia due to cerebral edema. Three additional patients underwent a wound washout for delayed infection during a subsequent admission. Our systematic review identified three additional studies; in a combined cohort of 450 patients (including our own), no patients had clinically actionable findings on routine postoperative CT. CONCLUSIONS: Following resection of brain metastases, a routine postoperative CT scan has low diagnostic yield and did not change patient management in any cases examined in this work.