RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the structural properties of the cadaver bone-screw interface for cementless intramedullary screw fixation in the context of total elbow arthroplasty. METHODS: The intramedullary canals of seven humerus and seven ulna specimens from fresh-frozen cadavers were drilled using custom drill bits until the inner cortex was reached and then hand tapped for the corresponding thread size. Titanium screws were advanced into the tapped holes until securely seated. The bones were potted and then mounted on a uniaxial material testing machine. A tensile load was applied, and end-of-test elongation, failure load, energy absorbed, and stiffness were determined. End-of-test load and elongation were defined as the elongation and load experienced by the structure at 3,000 N or failure. Each specimen was inspected for evidence of pullout, loosening, or visible fractures. RESULTS: The end-of-test load and elongation for the humerus specimens were 2721 ± 738 N and 3.0 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. The ulna specimens reached 92% of the humerus specimens' end-of-test load at 2,514 ± 678 N and 120% of their end-of-test elongation (3.6 ± 0.6 mm). The stiffness of the humerus specimens was 1,077 ± 336 N/mm, which was 1.3 times greater than the stiffness of the ulna specimens (790 ± 211 N/mm). Lastly, the energy absorbed by the humerus samples was 3.6 ± 1.6 J, which was 92% of the energy absorbed by the ulna samples at 3.9 ± 1.1 J. One humerus and three ulnas failed before the end-of-test load of 3,000 N. Two failures were caused by screw pullout and two by bone fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that intramedullary screw fixation is successful in withstanding forces that are greater than required for osseointegration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Uncemented fixation may be beneficial in elbow arthroplasty.
RESUMEN
Purpose: The treatment of bidirectional ligament instability is proposed using a method that simultaneously tensions medial and lateral ligaments. Graft tension is maintained via plates that apply compression between the graft and bone. Methods: We tested static varus and valgus elbow stability in six cadaver elbows with intact ligaments and capsules at five positions, and then created gross instability by dividing all soft tissue attachments. A ligament reconstruction was subsequently performed with and without nonabsorbable ligament augmentation. Elbow stability was measured and compared with the native state. Results: The augmented and the nonaugmented ligament reconstructions provided stability to the lateral side with only 1.0 mm of increased deflection recorded for the augmented ligaments and 0.6 mm for the nonaugmented when compared with the native state. On the medial side, the deflection was greater after reconstruction compared with the native state with the augmented ligaments ranging between 1.0 and 1.8 mm and the nonaugmented ligament reconstruction ranging between 2.4 and 3.3 mm. Conclusions: This novel ligament reconstruction maintained secure fixation between ligament and bone and allowed for maintenance of static stability at different degrees of elbow flexion. Clinical Relevance: Restoring elbow stability using a method that minimizes ligament graft and which may not need to be removed could benefit management of bidirectionally unstable elbows, such as following interposition arthroplasty or substantial trauma.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: Malposition of pedicle screws during instrumentation in the lumbar spine is associated with complications secondary to spinal cord or nerve root injury. Intraoperative triggered electromyographic monitoring (t-EMG) may be used during instrumentation for early detection of malposition. The association between lumbar pedicle screws stimulated at low EMG thresholds and postoperative neurological deficits, however, remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess whether a low threshold t-EMG response to lumbar pedicle screw stimulation can serve as a predictive tool for postoperative neurological deficit. METHODS: The present study is a meta-analysis of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase identifying prospective/retrospective studies with outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with t-EMG testing. RESULTS: The total study cohort consisted of 2,236 patients and the total postoperative neurological deficit rate was 3.04%. 10.78% of the patients incurred at least 1 pedicle screw that was stimulated below the respective EMG alarm threshold intraoperatively. The incidence of postoperative neurological deficits in patients with a lumbar pedicle screw stimulated below EMG alarm threshold during placement was 13.28%, while only 1.80% in the patients without. The pooled DOR was 10.14. Sensitivity was 49% while specificity was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Electrically activated lumbar pedicle screws resulting in low t-EMG alarm thresholds are highly specific but weakly sensitive for new postoperative neurological deficits. Patients with new postoperative neurological deficits after lumbar spine surgery were 10 times more likely to have had a lumbar pedicle screw stimulated at a low EMG threshold.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: This study is a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies identified in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase with outcomes of patients who received intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during lumbar spine surgery. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative lower extremity SSEP changes for predicting postoperative neurological deficit. As a secondary analysis, we evaluated three subtypes of intraoperative SSEP changes: reversible, irreversible, and total signal loss. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar decompression and fusion surgery can treat lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis but carry a risk for nerve root injury. Published neurophysiological monitoring guidelines provide no conclusive evidence for the clinical utility of intraoperative SSEP monitoring during lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies with outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar spine surgeries with intraoperative SSEP monitoring. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated and presented with forest plots and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 5607 patients. All significant intraoperative SSEP changes had a sensitivity of 44% and specificity of 97% with a DOR of 22.13 (95% CI, 11.30-43.34). Reversible and irreversible SSEP changes had sensitivities of 28% and 33% and specificities of 97% and 97%, respectively. The DORs for reversible and irreversible SSEP changes were 13.93 (95% CI, 4.60-40.44) and 57.84 (95% CI, 15.95-209.84), respectively. Total loss of SSEPs had a sensitivity of 9% and specificity of 99% with a DOR of 23.91 (95% CI, 7.18-79.65). CONCLUSION: SSEP changes during lumbar spine surgery are highly specific but moderately sensitive for new postoperative neurological deficits. Patients who had postoperative neurological deficit were 22 times more likely to have exhibited intraoperative SSEP changes.Level of Evidence: 2.