Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the JointMan database.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a progressive fibrotic disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); real-world data for evaluating RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) are limited. We evaluated prevalence, time to onset, clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with RA (n = 8963) in the Discus Analytics JointMan database (2009-2019) with and without ILD. ILD prevalence was 4.1% (95% confidence interval 3.7-4.5); > 90% had an ILD diagnosis after RA diagnosis (mean time to onset 3.3 years). At baseline, a higher proportion of patients with RA-ILD were older (> 65 years), male, with history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with patients in the RA cohort. Patients in the RA-ILD cohort were likely to have more severe RA characteristics and joint evaluation compared with patients without ILD, at baseline and before/after ILD diagnosis. In this large, real-world database patients with (vs without) ILD had a higher burden of RA characteristics. Previously established risk factors for RA-ILD were confirmed (age, baseline COPD, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity, C-reactive protein, Clinical Disease Activity Index score); thus, recognition of these factors and tracking routine disease activity metrics may help identify patients at higher risk of RA complications and lead to improved diagnosis and earlier treatment.

Treatment Persistence and Clinical Outcomes of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Cycling or Switching to a New Mechanism of Action Therapy: Real-world Observational Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in the United States with Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: To examine treatment persistence and clinical outcomes associated with switching from a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to a medication with a new mechanism of action (MOA) (abatacept, anakinra, rituximab, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib) versus cycling to another TNFi (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal study included patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the JointMan® US clinical database who received a TNFi in April 2010 or later and either cycled to a TNFi or switched to a new MOA therapy by March 2015. Cox proportional hazards models were used for time to non-persistence (switching or discontinuing). An ordinary least squares regression model compared 1-year reduction from baseline for the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). RESULTS: There were 332 (54.2%) TNFi cyclers and 281 (45.8%) new MOA switchers. During a median follow-up of 29.9 months, treatment persistence was 36.7% overall. Compared with new MOA switchers, TNFi cyclers were 51% more likely to be non-persistent (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.511; 95% CI 1.196, 1.908), driven by a higher likelihood of switching again (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.016; 95% CI 1.428, 2.847). Clinical outcomes were evaluable for 239 (53.3%) TNFi cyclers and 209 (46.7%) new MOA switchers. One-year mean reduction in CDAI from baseline to end of follow-up was significantly higher for new MOA switchers than TNFi cyclers (-7.54 vs. -4.81; P = 0.037), but the difference was not statistically significant after adjustment for baseline CDAI (-6.39 vs. -5.83; P = 0.607). CONCLUSION: In this study, TNFi cycling was common in clinical practice, but switching to a new MOA DMARD was associated with significantly better treatment persistence and a trend toward greater CDAI reduction that was not significant after adjustment for baseline disease activity. FUNDING: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.