RESUMEN
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting immunotherapies (e.g., chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs)) have achieved remarkable clinical responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Their use is accompanied by exaggerated immune responses related to T-cell activation and cytokine elevations leading to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in some patients, which can be potentially life-threatening. However, systematic evaluation of the risk of CRS with BCMA-targeting BsAb and CAR-T therapies, and comparisons across different routes of BsAb administration (intravenous (i.v.) vs. subcutaneous (s.c.)) have not previously been conducted. This study utilized a meta-analysis approach to compare the CRS profile in BCMA-targeting CAR-T vs. BsAb immunotherapies administered either i.v. or s.c. in patients with RRMM. A total of 36 studies including 1,560 patients with RRMM treated with BCMA-targeting CAR-T and BsAb therapies were included in the analysis. The current analysis suggests that compared with BsAbs, CAR-T therapies were associated with higher CRS incidences (88% vs. 59%), higher rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS (7% vs. 2%), longer CRS duration (5 vs. 2 days), and more prevalent tocilizumab use (44% vs. 25%). The proportion of CRS grade ≥ 3 may also be lower (0% vs. 4%) for BsAb therapies administered via the s.c. (3 studies, n = 311) vs. i.v. (5 studies, n = 338) route. This meta-analysis suggests that different types of BCMA-targeting immunotherapies and administration routes could result in a range of CRS incidence and severity that should be considered while evaluating the benefit-risk profiles of these therapies.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/inmunología , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/efectos adversos , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Administración IntravenosaRESUMEN
Elranatamab is a humanized B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody. In the ongoing phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma received subcutaneous elranatamab once weekly after two step-up priming doses. After six cycles, persistent responders switched to biweekly dosing. Results from cohort A, which enrolled patients without prior BCMA-directed therapy (n = 123) are reported. The primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review was met with an ORR of 61.0% (75/123); 35.0% ≥complete response. Fifty responders switched to biweekly dosing, and 40 (80.0%) improved or maintained their response for ≥6 months. With a median follow-up of 14.7 months, median duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival (secondary endpoints) have not been reached. Fifteen-month rates were 71.5%, 50.9% and 56.7%, respectively. Common adverse events (any grade; grade 3-4) included infections (69.9%, 39.8%), cytokine release syndrome (57.7%, 0%), anemia (48.8%, 37.4%), and neutropenia (48.8%, 48.8%). With biweekly dosing, grade 3-4 adverse events decreased from 58.6% to 46.6%. Elranatamab induced deep and durable responses with a manageable safety profile. Switching to biweekly dosing may improve long-term safety without compromising efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04649359 .
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Inducción de RemisiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The undetermined efficacy of the current standard-of-care neoadjuvant treatment, anthracycline/platinum-based chemotherapy, in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and germline BRCA mutations emphasizes the need for biomarker-targeted treatment, such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, in this setting. This phase II, single-arm, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant talazoparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated early-stage TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated early-stage TNBC received talazoparib 1 mg once daily for 24 weeks (0.75 mg for moderate renal impairment) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) by independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB) by ICR. Safety and tolerability of talazoparib and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 61 patients, 48 received ≥80% talazoparib doses, underwent surgery, and were assessed for pCR or progressed before pCR assessment and considered nonresponders. pCR rate was 45.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.0%-60.6%) and 49.2% (95% CI, 36.7%-61.6%) in the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) population, respectively. RCB 0/I rate was 45.8% (95% CI, 29.4%-63.2%) and 50.8% (95% CI, 35.5%-66.0%) in the evaluable and ITT population, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 58 (95.1%) patients. Most common grade 3 and 4 TRAEs were anemia (39.3%) and neutropenia (9.8%). There was no clinically meaningful detriment in quality of life. No deaths occurred during the reporting period; 2 deaths due to progressive disease occurred during long-term follow-up (>400 days after first dose). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant talazoparib monotherapy was active despite pCR rates not meeting the prespecified threshold; these rates were comparable to those observed with combination anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03499353.
Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1 , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Humanos , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Calidad de Vida , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Antraciclinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary describes the design of an ongoing research study (also known as a clinical trial) called TALAPRO-2. The TALAPRO-2 trial is testing the combination of two medicines called talazoparib and enzalutamide as a first treatment in adult men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The study began in December 2017 and has enrolled 1037 adult men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from 26 countries. WHAT IS METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER?: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is a type of cancer that has advanced beyond the prostate and continues to grow even when testosterone levels in the blood are suppressed. WHICH MEDICINES ARE BEING TESTED?: The combination of talazoparib plus enzalutamide will be compared with enzalutamide plus placebo. Enzalutamide is approved to treat men with prostate cancer. Talazoparib is not approved to treat men with prostate cancer. A placebo does not contain any active ingredients and is also known as a sugar pill. WHAT ARE THE AIMS OF THE TALAPRO-2 TRIAL?: The TALAPRO-2 trial will find out if combining talazoparib with enzalutamide increases the length of time the men in the study live without their cancer getting worse compared with enzalutamide plus placebo. The study will also measure how long men in the study live and any side effects the men have while they are taking the study medicines. Researchers are also testing the DNA from the tumor cells of all men in the study to find out if they have faulty DNA repair genes. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT0339519 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína , Ftalazinas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Azúcares/uso terapéutico , TestosteronaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have demonstrated efficacy in tumors with germline breast cancer susceptibility genes (gBRCA) 1 and 2 mutations, but further factors influencing response to PARPi are poorly understood. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Breast cancer tumor tissue from patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations from the phase III EMBRACA trial of the PARPi talazoparib versus chemotherapy was sequenced using FoundationOne CDx. RESULTS: In the evaluable intent-to-treat population, 96.1% (296/308) had ≥1 tumor BRCA (tBRCA) mutation and there was strong concordance (95.3%) between tBRCA and gBRCA mutational status. Genetic/genomic characteristics including BRCA loss of heterozygosity (LOH; identified in 82.6% of evaluable patients), DNA damage response (DDR) gene mutational burden, and tumor homologous recombination deficiency [assessed by genomic LOH (gLOH)] demonstrated no association with talazoparib efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, BRCA LOH status, DDR gene mutational burden, and gLOH were not associated with talazoparib efficacy; however, these conclusions are qualified by population heterogeneity and low patient numbers in some subgroups. Further investigation in larger patient populations is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Células Germinativas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Humanos , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PARP inhibitors in combination with androgen receptor-targeted therapy have demonstrated potential in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Here, we describe the design and rationale of the multinational, phase III, two-part TALAPRO-2 study comparing talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide as a first-line treatment for patients with mCRPC with or without DNA damage response (DDR) alterations. This study has two co-primary end points: radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) by blinded independent clinical review in all-comers (cohort 1) and in patients with DDR alterations (cohort 2). TALAPRO-2 will demonstrate whether talazoparib plus enzalutamide can significantly improve the efficacy of enzalutamide in terms of rPFS in both molecularly unselected and DDR-deficient patients with mCRPC (NCT03395197). Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03395197 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/uso terapéutico , Daño del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Daño del ADN/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have antitumour activity against metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers with DNA damage response (DDR) alterations in genes involved directly or indirectly in homologous recombination repair (HRR). In this study, we assessed the PARP inhibitor talazoparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers with DDR-HRR alterations. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 2 trial (TALAPRO-1), participants were recruited from 43 hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, South Korea, the UK, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they were men aged 18 years or older with progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancers of adenocarcinoma histology, measurable soft-tissue disease (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1]), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, DDR-HRR gene alterations reported to sensitise to PARP inhibitors (ie, ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), had received one or two taxane-based chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease, and progressed on enzalutamide or abiraterone, or both, for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers. Eligible patients were given oral talazoparib (1 mg per day; or 0·75 mg per day in patients with moderate renal impairment) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate, defined as best overall soft-tissue response of complete or partial response per RECIST 1.1, by blinded independent central review. The primary endpoint was assessed in patients who received study drug, had measurable soft-tissue disease, and had a gene alteration in one of the predefined DDR-HRR genes. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03148795, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Oct 18, 2017, and March 20, 2020, 128 patients were enrolled, of whom 127 received at least one dose of talazoparib (safety population) and 104 had measurable soft-tissue disease (antitumour activity population). Data cutoff for this analysis was Sept 4, 2020. After a median follow-up of 16·4 months (IQR 11·1-22·1), the objective response rate was 29·8% (31 of 104 patients; 95% CI 21·2-39·6). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (39 [31%] of 127 patients), thrombocytopenia (11 [9%]), and neutropenia (ten [8%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 43 (34%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Talazoparib showed durable antitumour activity in men with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers with DDR-HRR gene alterations who had been heavily pretreated. The favourable benefit-risk profile supports the study of talazoparib in larger, randomised clinical trials, including in patients with non-BRCA alterations. FUNDING: Pfizer/Medivation.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Reparación del ADN/genética , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/genética , Anciano , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
In the phase 3 EMBRACA trial, treatment with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, talazoparib, led to significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.71; P < .0001). We conducted an exposure-efficacy analysis using EMBRACA data from 285 patients who were treated with talazoparib and had available pharmacokinetic parameters to evaluate the effect of talazoparib exposure (time-varying average talazoparib concentration [Cavg,t ]) and other baseline variables on PFS. Graphical examination of the relationship between Cavg,t and PFS and a Cox proportional model were used. Exposure-response analyses showed that higher talazoparib exposure, absence of visceral disease, lower baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels, and disease-free interval >12 months were independent covariates associated with longer PFS. The association of talazoparib exposure with PFS (higher exposure, longer PFS) suggests the recommended starting dose of 1 mg once daily (the maximum tolerated dose) is appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Ftalazinas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Humanos , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ftalazinas/sangre , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/sangre , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, such as talazoparib, may affect hematopoiesis. This analysis characterized the relationship between talazoparib exposure and the most common grade ≥ 3 hematopoietic adverse events (AEs) leading to dose modification in the phase 2 (ABRAZO) and phase 3 (EMBRACA) trials. The relationship between time-varying average talazoparib concentration (Cavg,t ), along with other baseline variables, and grade ≥ 3 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were evaluated both by graphical examination and using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The results indicated that higher Cavg,t was associated with a higher risk of anemia and thrombocytopenia. A trend toward an association between higher Cavg,t and neutropenia was observed, although not statistically significant. Higher risk of all tested safety end points was associated with lower baseline hemoglobin. Higher risk of neutropenia was associated with lower baseline absolute neutrophil count and lower body weight. These findings support the proposed management of AEs through talazoparib dosing modification.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/sangre , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/sangre , Ftalazinas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/sangre , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the EMBRACA phase III study (NCT01945775), talazoparib was associated with a significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCT) in germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Herein, the safety profile of talazoparib is explored in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 412 patients received ≥1 dose of talazoparib (n = 286) or PCT (n = 126). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated, including timing, duration, and potential overlap of selected AEs. The relationship between talazoparib plasma exposure and grade ≥3 anemia was analyzed. Time-varying Cox proportional hazard models assessed the impact of dose reductions on PFS. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with common AEs and health resource utilization (HRU) were assessed in both treatment arms. RESULTS: The most common AEs with talazoparib were hematologic (195 [68.2%] patients) and typically occurred within the first 3-4 months of receiving talazoparib. Grade 3-4 anemia lasted approximately 7 days for both arms. Overlapping grade 3-4 hematologic AEs were infrequent with talazoparib. Higher talazoparib exposure was associated with grade ≥3 anemia. Permanent discontinuation of talazoparib due to hematologic AEs was low (<2%). A total of 150 (52.4%) patients receiving talazoparib had AEs associated with dose reduction. Hematologic toxicities were managed by supportive care medication (including transfusion) and dose modifications. Among patients with anemia or nausea and/or vomiting AEs, PROs favored talazoparib. After accounting for the treatment-emergent period, talazoparib was generally associated with a lower rate of hospitalization and supportive care medication use compared with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Talazoparib was associated with superior efficacy, favorable PROs, and lower HRU rate versus chemotherapy in gBRCA-mutated ABC. Toxicities were manageable with talazoparib dose modification and supportive care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Talazoparib was generally well tolerated in patients with germline BRCA-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in the EMBRACA trial. Common toxicities with talazoparib were primarily hematologic and infrequently resulted in permanent drug discontinuation (<2% of patients discontinued talazoparib due to hematologic toxicity). Hematologic toxicities typically occurred during the first 3-4 months of treatment and were managed by dose modifications and supportive care measures. A significant efficacy benefit, improved patient-reported outcomes, lower rate of health resource utilization and a tolerable safety profile support incorporating talazoparib into routine management of germline BRCA-mutated locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Femenino , Células Germinativas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Humanos , Ftalazinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Purpose: Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R) is critically involved in pancreatic cancer pathophysiology, promoting cancer cell survival and therapeutic resistance. Assessment of IGF-1R inhibitors in combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy, however, failed to demonstrate significant clinical benefit. The aim of this work is to unravel mechanisms of resistance to IGF-1R inhibition in pancreatic cancer and develop novel strategies to improve the activity of standard-of-care therapies.Experimental Design: Growth factor screening in pancreatic cancer cell lines was performed to identify activators of prosurvival PI3K/AKT signaling. The prevalence of activating growth factors and their receptors was assessed in pancreatic cancer patient samples. Effects of a bispecific IGF-1R and ErbB3 targeting antibody on receptor expression, signaling, cancer cell viability and apoptosis, spheroid growth, and in vivo chemotherapy activity in pancreatic cancer xenograft models were determined.Results: Growth factor screening in pancreatic cancer cells revealed insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and heregulin (HRG) as the most potent AKT activators. Both growth factors reduced pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to gemcitabine or paclitaxel in spheroid growth assays. Istiratumab (MM-141), a novel bispecific antibody that blocks IGF-1R and ErbB3, restored the activity of paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the presence of IGF-1 and HRG in vitro Dual IGF-1R/ErbB3 blocking enhanced chemosensitivity through inhibition of AKT phosphorylation and promotion of IGF-1R and ErbB3 degradation. Addition of istiratumab to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel improved chemotherapy activity in vivoConclusions: Our findings suggest a critical role for the HRG/ErbB3 axis and support the clinical exploration of dual IGF-1R/ErbB3 blocking in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2873-85. ©2018 AACR.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas/farmacología , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-3/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Somatomedina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Caspasas/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Desoxicitidina/farmacología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Humanos , Ratones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Receptor ErbB-3/metabolismo , Receptor IGF Tipo 1 , Receptores de Somatomedina/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
The ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases comprises four members: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1), human EGFR 2 (HER2/ErbB2), ErbB3/HER3, and ErbB4/HER4. The first two members of this family, EGFR and HER2, have been implicated in tumorigenesis and cancer progression for several decades, and numerous drugs have now been approved that target these two proteins. Less attention, however, has been paid to the role of this family in mediating cancer cell survival and drug tolerance. To better understand the complex signal transduction network triggered by the ErbB receptor family, we built a computational model that quantitatively captures the dynamics of ErbB signaling. Sensitivity analysis identified ErbB3 as the most critical activator of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Akt signaling, a key pro-survival pathway in cancer cells. Based on this insight, we designed a fully human monoclonal antibody, seribantumab (MM-121), that binds to ErbB3 and blocks signaling induced by the extracellular growth factors heregulin (HRG) and betacellulin (BTC). In this article, we present some of the key preclinical simulations and experimental data that formed the scientific foundation for three Phase 2 clinical trials in metastatic cancer. These trials were designed to determine if patients with advanced malignancies would derive benefit from the addition of seribantumab to standard-of-care drugs in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer, hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, and EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From preclinical studies we learned that basal levels of ErbB3 phosphorylation correlate with response to seribantumab monotherapy in mouse xenograft models. As ErbB3 is rapidly dephosphorylated and hence difficult to measure clinically, we used the computational model to identify a set of five surrogate biomarkers that most directly affect the levels of p-ErbB3: HRG, BTC, EGFR, HER2, and ErbB3. Preclinically, the combined information from these five markers was sufficient to accurately predict which xenograft models would respond to seribantumab, and the single-most accurate predictor was HRG. When tested clinically in ovarian, breast and lung cancer, HRG mRNA expression was found to be both potentially prognostic of insensitivity to standard therapy and potentially predictive of benefit from the addition of seribantumab to standard of care therapy in all three indications. In addition, it was found that seribantumab was most active in cancers with low levels of HER2, consistent with preclinical predictions. Overall, our clinical studies and studies of others suggest that HRG expression defines a drug-tolerant cancer cell phenotype that persists in most solid tumor indications and may contribute to rapid clinical progression. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a drug designed and clinically tested using the principles of Systems Biology.
RESUMEN
Background HER3/EGFR heterodimers have been implicated as a mode of resistance to EGFR-directed therapies. Methods This Phase 1 trial assessed the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the HER-3 antibody seribantumab in combination with cetuximab (Part I) or cetuximab and irinotecan (Part II) in patients with EGFR-dependent cancers. In Part I, escalating doses of seribantumab and cetuximab were administered. In Part II of the trial, escalating doses of seribantumab/cetuximab were combined with irinotecan 180 mg/m2 administered every two weeks. Results 34 patients were enrolled in Part I (seribantumab/cetuximab) and 14 patients were enrolled in Part II (seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan). Common toxicities of seribantumab/cetuximab included acneiform rash, diarrhea, stomatitis, and paronychia. The MTD of Part I was seribantumab 40 mg/kg bolus, then 20 mg/kg weekly combined with cetuximab 400 mg/m2 bolus, then 250 mg/m2 IV weekly. Common toxicities reported in the seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan combination were similar to the Part I portion. However, toxicities were more frequent and severe with the triplet combination. There was one treatment-related death in Part II secondary to Grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. Other dose-limiting toxicities in Part II were Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 diarrhea. A cholangiocarcinoma patient, previously untreated with EGFR-directed therapy, had a confirmed partial response (PR). One colorectal cancer patient, previously treated with EGFR-directed therapy, had an unconfirmed PR. Conclusions Seribantumab/cetuximab was well tolerated and patients experienced toxicities typical to EGFR inhibition. Unlike the seribantumab/cetuximab doublet, seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan was difficult to tolerate in this heavily pretreated population. There was limited efficacy of the combination therapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Antineoplásicos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Cetuximab , Receptor ErbB-3/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/farmacología , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Cetuximab/farmacología , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Irinotecán , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Purpose Seribantumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody that binds to human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 3 (ErbB3), blocking heregulin (HRG) -mediated ErbB3 signaling and inducing ErbB3 receptor downregulation. This open-label randomized phase II study evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) with seribantumab in combination with once-per-week paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory ovarian cancer. A key secondary objective was to determine if any of five prespecified biomarkers predicted benefit from seribantumab. Patients and Methods Patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer were randomly assigned at a ratio of two to one to receive seribantumab plus paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone. Patients underwent pretreatment core needle biopsy; archival tumor samples were also obtained to support biomarker analyses. Results A total of 223 patients were randomly assigned (seribantumab plus paclitaxel, n = 140; paclitaxel alone, n = 83). Median PFS in the unselected intent-to-treat population was 3.75 months with seribantumab plus paclitaxel compared with 3.68 months with paclitaxel alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.027; 95% CI, 0.741 to 1.425; P = .864). Among patients whose tumors had detectable HRG mRNA and low HER2 (n = 57 [38%] of 151 with available biomarker data), increased treatment benefit was observed in those receiving seribantumab plus paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone (PFS HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.76; P = .007). The HR in patients not meeting these criteria was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.08 to 2.98; P = .023). Conclusion The addition of seribantumab to paclitaxel did not result in improved PFS in unselected patients. Exploratory analyses suggest that detectable HRG and low HER2, biomarkers that link directly to the mechanism of action of seribantumab, identified patients who might benefit from this combination. Future clinical trials are needed to validate this finding and should preselect for HRG expression and focus on cancers with low HER2 levels.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Bcl-2/IgH rearrangements can be quantified in follicular lymphoma (FL) from peripheral blood (PB) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The prognostic value of Bcl-2/IgH levels in FL remains controversial. We therefore prospectively studied PB Bcl-2/IgH levels from 173 first-line FL patients who were consecutively enrolled, randomized, and treated within the multicenter phase 3 clinical trial NHL1-2003 comparing bendamustine-rituximab (B-R) with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone. From April 2005 to August 2008, 783 pre- and posttreatment PB samples were quantified by quantitative PCR. At inclusion, 114 patients (66%) tested positive and 59 (34%) were negative for Bcl-2/IgH. High pretreatment Bcl-2/IgH levels had an adverse effect on progression-free survival (PFS) compared with intermediate or low levels (high vs intermediate: hazard [HR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-10.77; P = .002; high vs low: HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.55-5.86; P = .001). No PFS difference between treatment arms was observed in Bcl-2/IgH-positive patients. A positive posttreatment Bcl-2/IgH status was associated with shorter PFS (8.7 months vs not reached; HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.51-6.58; P = .002). By multivariate analysis, the pretreatment Bcl-2/IgH level was the strongest predictor for PFS. Our data suggest that pre- and posttreatment Bcl-2/IgH levels from PB have significant prognostic value for PFS in FL patients receiving first-line immunochemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00991211 and at the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices as #BfArM-4021335.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfoma Folicular/sangre , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/sangre , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Linfoma Folicular/diagnóstico , Linfoma Folicular/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Quimiocina CXCL12/sangre , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/sangre , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/diagnóstico , Albúmina Sérica/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/mortalidad , Biblioteca de Péptidos , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Albúmina Sérica/química , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Leukemic cells disrupt normal patterns of blood cell formation, but little is understood about the mechanism. We investigated whether leukemic cells alter functions of normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Exposure to chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) caused normal mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells to divide more readily, altered their differentiation, and reduced their reconstitution and self-renewal potential. Interestingly, the normal bystander cells acquired gene expression patterns resembling their malignant counterparts. Therefore, much of the leukemia signature is mediated by extrinsic factors. Indeed, IL-6 was responsible for most of these changes. Compatible results were obtained when human CML were cultured with normal human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Furthermore, neutralization of IL-6 prevented these changes and treated the disease.
Asunto(s)
Citocinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/citología , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/terapia , Animales , Técnicas de Cocultivo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Interleucina-6/farmacología , Interleucina-6/uso terapéutico , Ratones , Células Tumorales CultivadasRESUMEN
To expand the current knowledge about azacitidine (Aza) and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) as salvage therapy for relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and to identify predictors for response and survival, we retrospectively analyzed data of 154 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 124), myelodysplastic (MDS, n = 28), or myeloproliferative syndrome (n = 2). All patients received a median number of 4 courses of Aza (range, 4 to 14) and DLI were administered to 105 patients (68%; median number of DLI, 2; range, 1 to 7). Complete and partial remission rates were 27% and 6%, respectively, resulting in an overall response rate of 33%. Multivariate analysis identified molecular-only relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 43.5; P = .004) and diagnosis of MDS (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 12.2; P = .011) as predictors for complete remission. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 29% ± 4%. Molecular-only relapse (HR, .14; 95% CI, .03 to .59; P = .007), diagnosis of MDS (HR, .33; 95% CI, .16 to .67; P = .002), and bone marrow blasts <13% (HR, .54; 95% CI, .32 to .91; P = .021) were associated with better OS. Accordingly, 2-year OS rate was higher in MDS patients (66% ± 10%, P = .001) and correlated with disease burden in patients with AML. In summary, Aza and DLI is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with relapse after allo-HSCT, in particular those with MDS or AML and low disease burden. The latter finding emphasizes the importance of stringent disease monitoring and early intervention.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Azacitidina/administración & dosificación , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Transfusión de Linfocitos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidad , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/mortalidad , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Homing and engraftment of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) during bone marrow transplantation are critically dependent on integrins such as ß1-integrin. In the present study, we show that ß1-integrin and the tetraspanin CD63 form a cell surface receptor complex for the soluble serum protein tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) on human CD34⺠HSPCs. Through binding to this receptor complex, TIMP-1 activates ß1-integrin, increases adhesion and migration of human CD34⺠cells, and protects these cells from induced apoptosis. TIMP-1 stimulation in murine bone marrow mononuclear cells also promotes migration and adhesion; this is associated with augmented homing of murine mononuclear cells and of murine LSK⺠cells during bone marrow transplantation. These results not only indicate that TIMP-1 is conducive to HSPC homing; they also identify CD63 and ß1-integrin as a TIMP-1 receptor complex on HSPCs.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Movimiento Celular , Supervivencia de Injerto , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/metabolismo , Inhibidor Tisular de Metaloproteinasa-1/metabolismo , Animales , Adhesión Celular , Femenino , Humanos , Integrina beta1/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Tetraspanina 30/metabolismo , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
Dendritic cells (DCs) are master regulators of the immune system, but molecular regulation of early DC differentiation has been poorly understood. Here, we report that the transcription factor C/EBPα coordinates the development of progenitor cells required for production of multiple categories of DCs. C/EBPα was needed for differentiation from stem/progenitor cells to common DC progenitors (CDPs), but not for transition of CDP to mature DCs. C/EBPα deletion in mature DCs did not affect their numbers or function, suggesting that this transcription factor is not needed for maintenance of DCs in lymphoid tissues. ChIP-seq and microarrays were used to identify candidate genes regulated by C/EBPα and required for DC formation. Genes previously shown to be critical for DC formation were bound by C/EBPα, and their expression was decreased in the earliest hematopoietic compartments in the absence of C/EBPα. These data indicate that C/EBPα is important for the earliest stages of steady-state DC differentiation.