The carrier clinic: an evaluation of a novel clinic dedicated to the follow-up of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers--implications for oncogenetics practice.

BACKGROUND: A novel oncogenetic clinic was established in 2002 at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust offering advice and specialist follow-up for families with a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. The remit of this multidisciplinary clinic, staffed by individuals in both oncology and genetics, is to provide individualised screening recommendations, support in decision making, risk reducing strategies, cascade testing, and an extensive research portfolio. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate uptake of genetic testing, risk reducing surgery and cancer prevalence in 346 BRCA1/BRCA2 families seen between January 1996 and December 2006. RESULTS: 661 individuals attended the clinic and 406 mutation carriers were identified; 85.8% mutation carriers have chosen to attend for annual follow-up. 70% of mutation carriers elected for risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO). 32% of unaffected women chose risk reducing bilateral mastectomy. 32% of women with breast cancer chose contralateral risk reducing mastectomy at time of diagnosis. Some women took over 8 years to decide to have surgery. 91% of individuals approached agreed to participate in research programmes. INTERPRETATION: A novel specialist clinic for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers has been successfully established. The number of mutation positive families is increasing. This, and the high demand for RRBSO in women over 40, is inevitably going to place an increasing demand on existing health resources. Our clinic model has subsequently been adopted in other centres and this will greatly facilitate translational studies and provide a healthcare structure for management and follow-up of such people who are at a high cancer risk.

Development of an outpatient finger-prick glomerular filtration rate procedure suitable for epidemiological studies.

Development of an outpatient finger-prick glomerular filtration rate (GFR) procedure suitable for epidemiological studies. In clinical practice, reference GFR procedures are rarely used; in large-scale research studies, a great deal of effort and experience is required to obtain them, which is a considerable disincentive to using GFR as an end point. The major problem for both clinical staff and the subject is the length of time that the procedure takes, requiring continuous attendance in the outpatient clinic or its vicinity. Using iohexol as a marker, we therefore propose an alternative approach, which addresses this fundamental deterrent to a more widespread use of GFR measurement. Eighty-two GFR measurements were performed in a mixture of healthy subjects and patients with differing degrees of renal impairment with a wide range of GFRs. Serum was obtained from blood samples to enable a reference GFR to be calculated. Blood spots were collected on filter paper at the same intervals (120, 180, and 240 min), allowed to dry, and then sent through the post. Serum and blood spots were analyzed simultaneously for each individual by automated reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. Standard linear regression analyses confirmed a good agreement (r2 = 0.953) between the iohexol serum GFR and iohexol blood spots GFR. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed that there was no concentration bias. Paired comparisons (Wilcoxon's paired signed rank test) showed no significant difference between the two measurements. Capillary sampling is simple, effective, and significantly reduces the time and costs of performing plasma clearance GFR measurements. This approach will make the GFR measurement more accessible for clinical practice and large-scale epidemiological studies may become feasible.

Incidence of HBsAg in blood samples submitted to the metropolitan police forensic science laboratory.

In survey carried out at the Metropolitan Police Forensic Science Laboratory, the frequency of HBsAg positive blood samples, being submitted for grouping purposes, was estimated to be 1.6%. This figure is significantly higher than that quoted for the general population.