Perceived comfort with weight, body shape and eating pattern of young adults with type 1 diabetes and associations with clinical and psychological parameters in a clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Higher prevalence of disordered eating in young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) culminates in higher levels of morbidity and mortality. In addition to validated questionnaires for diabetes distress, depression/anxiety symptoms and emotional well-being, the Diabetes Psychosocial Assessment Tool (DPAT) includes three questions about comfort with weight, body shape and eating pattern (WSE), which were derived from literature and multidisciplinary team consensus. Recognising individuals with low comfort with WSE, is the first step towards identifying those who may be at risk of developing eating disorders. AIMS: Observe comfort with WSE, in young adults with T1D, and its associations with demographic/clinical characteristics and psychological parameters. METHODS: 276 young adults, aged 15-26, who attended routine clinical care at a Young Adult Diabetes Clinic, completed the DPAT. The WSE questions were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 indicating lowest comfort). Linear regression analysed differences in comfort with weight and eating pattern by demographic and psychological parameters. RESULTS: 1 in 3 young adults (29%) reported low comfort with WSE (scores 1 or 2). In females, 40%, 41% and 35% had low comfort with weight, shape and eating patterns respectively, in comparison to males in whom it was 18.5%, 16% and 21.5%. Females reported lower comfort with weight and eating pattern (mean 2.9 and 3.0 respectively) than Males (mean 3.7 and 3.6 respectively), each p < 0.001. Lower comfort with weight (p < 0.001) and eating pattern (p = 0.001) was associated with higher body mass index (BMI). Young adults with low comfort with weight and eating pattern experienced elevated diabetes distress and depressive/anxiety symptoms (each p < 0.001), also when adjusted for sex and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The study has shown that low comfort with WSE is common among young adults with T1D. Adding these questions into routine care, can allow for easy and early identification of low comfort, initiation of a therapeutic dialogue and implementation of focused management strategies.

There is a higher rate of disordered eating (DE) in young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared to their peers without diabetes. DE occurs on a spectrum from mildly distorted thoughts and behaviours regarding weight, shape and eating to thoughts and behaviours with medical and mental health consequences that do not meet formal diagnostic criteria for an eating disorder. Early screening for DE in T1D is not routinely performed and therefore often remains undetected. Due to the seriousness of the conditions, identification is key. The Diabetes Psychosocial Assessment Tool was developed to annually assess psychosocial well-being of young adults (≥ 16 years) with T1D and includes three questions about comfort with weight, shape and eating pattern (WSE). 1 in 3 young adults with T1D reported low comfort with WSE. Lower comfort with weight and eating pattern was associated with females and with higher body mass index. There was a strong relationship between low comfort with weight and eating pattern and diabetes distress and depressive/anxiety symptoms, after adjusting for sex and body mass index. Hence, inclusion of the WSE questions is valuable for early identification of young adults with T1D who may be at risk for an eating disorder.

Emotional well-being and HbA1c following the implementation of the Diabetes Psychosocial Assessment Tool (DPAT) in young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM): An observational study.

AIMS: This observational study evaluated the implementation of the Diabetes Psychosocial Assessment Tool (DPAT), assessing emotional well-being of young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and the clinical congruency between DPAT-recommended and specialist-led referrals. METHODS: Young adults with T1DM attending the clinic completed the DPAT on two occasions. The DPAT includes the PAID (diabetes distress), PHQ-4 (depression/anxiety) and WHO-5 (general well-being), a diabetes health audit and a referral pathway to (allied) health professionals. Demographic and clinical information was retrieved from medical records. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: 115 people with T1DM, aged 16-25 years, were included in the analysis. Symptoms of moderate-severe diabetes distress were present in 29 (25%) participants, symptoms of depression/anxiety and impaired well-being in 21 (19%) and 26 (23%) participants, respectively. The odds of depression/anxiety symptoms was lower at the second timepoint compared to the first timepoint (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.96, p = 0.03). The odds of moderate-severe diabetes distress tended to be lower. No change was observed in general well-being or HbA1c. There was moderate concordance between DPAT and clinician referrals to psychologists (81%) and dieticians (70%). CONCLUSIONS: Using the DPAT facilitates the conversation about emotional well-being during routine consultation and follow-up.

Agenda-setting by young adults with type 1 diabetes and associations with emotional well-being/social support: results from an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Psychosocial Assessment Tool (DPAT) was developed to assess the psychosocial well-being of young adults with type 1 diabetes in clinical practice. The DPAT includes three validated questionnaires (assessing diabetes distress, anxiety/depressive symptoms and emotional well-being) and an agenda-setting tool. It is currently used by the Queensland Statewide Diabetes Clinical Network (available at Clinical Excellence Queensland). AIMS: To describe agenda items set by young adults with type 1 diabetes and investigate their association with emotional well-being/social support. METHODS: The DPAT was completed by young adults attending routine diabetes outpatient appointments at the Mater Hospital (Brisbane) between November 2016 and January 2020. For the current analysis, data included responses on agenda-setting and outcomes from three validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Responses of 277 young adults (15-26 years) were analysed. Ninety-four (34%) reported one to three agenda item(s). Common agenda items were diabetes technology and medications, but other topics raised included pregnancy, body image and eating concerns. Participants with moderate diabetes distress or anxiety symptoms were more likely to list at least one agenda item (P = 0.006; P = 0.002), as were females and older participants. CONCLUSION: Several agenda items for young adults with type 1 diabetes were identified and were more likely to be raised by those with elevated diabetes distress and anxiety symptoms. The DPAT is a valuable and convenient tool that can be easily applied in routine clinical practice to enable clinicians to understand the concerns of the young adult population and deliver personalised medicine to optimise long-term outcomes.

T-Cell Expression and Release of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 in Response to Glucose Variations Initiates Kidney Injury in Early Diabetes.

Half of the mortality in diabetes is seen in individuals <50 years of age and commonly predicted by the early onset of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). In type 1 diabetes, increased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) during adolescence defines this risk, but the pathological factors responsible remain unknown. We postulated that early in diabetes, glucose variations contribute to kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) release from circulating T cells, elevating uACR and DKD risk. DKD risk was assigned in youth with type 1 diabetes (n = 100; 20.0 ± 2.8 years; males/females, 54:46; HbA1c 66.1 [12.3] mmol/mol; diabetes duration 10.7 ± 5.2 years; and BMI 24.5 [5.3] kg/m2) and 10-year historical uACR, HbA1c, and random blood glucose concentrations collected retrospectively. Glucose fluctuations in the absence of diabetes were also compared with streptozotocin diabetes in apolipoprotein E -/- mice. Kidney biopsies were used to examine infiltration of KIM-1-expressing T cells in DKD and compared with other chronic kidney disease. Individuals at high risk for DKD had persistent elevations in uACR defined by area under the curve (AUC; uACRAUC0-10yrs, 29.7 ± 8.8 vs. 4.5 ± 0.5; P < 0.01 vs. low risk) and early kidney dysfunction, including ∼8.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 higher estimated glomerular filtration rates (modified Schwartz equation; Padj < 0.031 vs. low risk) and plasma KIM-1 concentrations (∼15% higher vs. low risk; P < 0.034). High-risk individuals had greater glycemic variability and increased peripheral blood T-cell KIM-1 expression, particularly on CD8+ T cells. These findings were confirmed in a murine model of glycemic variability both in the presence and absence of diabetes. KIM-1+ T cells were also infiltrating kidney biopsies from individuals with DKD. Healthy primary human proximal tubule epithelial cells exposed to plasma from high-risk youth with diabetes showed elevated collagen IV and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 expression, alleviated with KIM-1 blockade. Taken together, these studies suggest that glycemic variations confer risk for DKD in diabetes via increased CD8+ T-cell production of KIM-1.

Advanced glycation end products as predictors of renal function in youth with type 1 diabetes.

To examine if skin autofluorescence (sAF) differed in early adulthood between individuals with type 1 diabetes and age-matched controls and to ascertain if sAF aligned with risk for kidney disease. Young adults with type 1 diabetes (N = 100; 20.0 ± 2.8 years; M:F 54:46; FBG-11.6 ± 4.9 mmol/mol; diabetes duration 10.7 ± 5.2 years; BMI 24.5(5.3) kg/m2) and healthy controls (N = 299; 20.3 ± 1.8 years; M:F-83:116; FBG 5.2 ± 0.8 mmol/L; BMI 22.5(3.3) kg/m2) were recruited. Skin autofluorescence (sAF) and circulating AGEs were measured. In a subset of both groups, kidney function was estimated by GFRCKD-EPI CysC and uACR, and DKD risk defined by uACR tertiles. Youth with type 1 diabetes had higher sAF and BMI, and were taller than controls. For sAF, 13.6% of variance was explained by diabetes duration, height and BMI (Pmodel = 1.5 × 10-12). In the sub-set examining kidney function, eGFR and sAF were higher in type 1 diabetes versus controls. eGFR and sAF predicted 24.5% of variance in DKD risk (Pmodel = 2.2 × 10-9), which increased with diabetes duration (51%; Pmodel < 2.2 × 10-16) and random blood glucose concentrations (56%; Pmodel < 2.2 × 10-16). HbA1C and circulating fructosamine albumin were higher in individuals with type 1 diabetes at high versus low DKD risk. eGFR was independently associated with DKD risk in all models. Higher eGFR and longer diabetes duration are associated with DKD risk in youth with type 1 diabetes. sAF, circulating AGEs, and urinary AGEs were not independent predictors of DKD risk. Changes in eGFR should be monitored early, in addition to uACR, for determining DKD risk in type 1 diabetes.

Diabetes care: addressing psychosocial well-being in young adults with a newly developed assessment tool.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial assessment should be part of clinic visits for people with diabetes mellitus (DM). AIMS: To assess the usage and acceptance of a diabetes psychosocial assessment tool (DPAT) and to profile the clinical and psychosocial characteristics of young people with diabetes. METHODS: Over a 12-month period, young adults (18-25 years) attending diabetes clinic were offered DPAT. The tool embeds validated screening tools including the Problem Areas in Diabetes 20 (PAID-20) questionnaire, the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) and the World Health Organization Well-Being Index-5 (WHO-5). Baseline clinical data were collected and questions regarding social support, body image, eating concerns, hypoglycaemia and finances were included. RESULTS: Over the 12 month, the form was offered to 155 participants (64.6% of eligible attendees). The majority (96.1%) had type 1 DM with a mean duration of 10.5 (±5.3 SD) years. Average glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 8.7% (±1.5 SD) (or 71.2 mmol/mol ±16.5 SD). Severe diabetes-related distress (PAID-20 ≥ 40) was found in 19.4%. Low WHO-5 scores (28-50 points) were seen in 14.8%. PHQ-4 identified 25.8% with anxiety and 16.1% with depression. Significant weight, shape and eating concerns were identified in 27.1, 26.6 and 28.4%, respectively. Serious hypoglycaemia concerns were raised by 4.5%. CONCLUSION: DPAT revealed a high prevalence of psychosocial stress among young adults with DM. The tool was easy to use and accepted by patients and may aid streamlining referrals to relevant members of a multidisciplinary team.

Psychosocial screening and management of young people aged 18-25 years with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Routine psychosocial screening and management of people with diabetes is recommended. AIMS: To profile demographic, medical and psychosocial characteristics of young people with diabetes, and to develop a screening tool and care pathway for routine use. METHODS: Indices of diabetes control and recorded diabetes complications were complimented by psychosocial screening tools assessing psychological, diabetes specific and perceived stress (Kessler 10, Problem Area in Diabetes, Perceived Stress Scale), well-being (World Health Organization Well Being Index-5), disordered eating (Eating Disorder Risk Inventory-3 Risk Composite), compensatory behaviour questionnaire, social support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support), resilience (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale - 2 item) and financial concerns. Service provision and demographic data were also collected. Diabetes and mental health clinicians then identified a subset of measures to use for routine screening along with care pathways. RESULTS: Psychosocial screening was well accepted. Participants (151) had suboptimal glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin 8.0 interquartile range 1.8%/64 interquartile range 22 mmol/mol). Severe diabetes-related distress (Problem Area in Diabetes ≥40) was found in 19.4% and 26.0% reported difficulties managing healthcare costs. A mental health disorder was likely in 9.7%, whilst 23.4% had high Kessler 10 scores. Low World Health Organization Well Being Index-5 scores (≤13) were seen in 29.0%. Risk for an eating disorder (Eating Disorder Risk Inventory-3 Risk Composite) was 12.7%, whereas approximately 36.0% had disturbed eating behaviours. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial screening of young adults with diabetes identified complex needs. A brief psychosocial screening tool and associated care pathways were developed for routine use in a young adult tertiary referral diabetes clinic. The tool assesses constructs, such as diabetes distress, depression, anxiety, well-being, hypoglycaemia-unawareness, fear of hypoglycaemia, social support, weight, shape and eating concerns and financial concerns. This will provide a longitudinal data source for further research to inform clinical practice.