Performance of handheld ultrasound devices in diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension and right heart dysfunction in ICU patients.

AIM: The use of handheld ultrasonography devices (HHUD) has increased recently but there are limited data about their performance in the evaluation of right heart dysfunction (RHD) and pulmonary hypertension (PHT). The aim of the study is to compare the performance of a HHUD with a conventional ultrasound device (CUD) in assessing PHT and RHD. METHODS: This single-center prospective study was performed in a seven-bed teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU). PHT and RHD criteria were compared by HHUD and CUD. Additional PHT criteria and right ventricle (RV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction criteria were also measured. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the imaging rates and mean values of the parameters measured by both devices. When the positivity rates for additional PHT parameters and RHD criteria were compared, there were no significant differences between the devices. In Bland-Altman's analysis, there was good agreement and there was no bias between the measurements of the two devices but left ventricular end-systolic eccentricity index (LVSEI), right atrium area (RAA), and pulmonary artery diameter (PAD). Ninety percent of the patients had PHT probability, of whom 43% had a low, 37% had intermediate and 10% had a high probability of PHT. Ninety-two percent of the patients had RHD and there was no significant difference between the devices in the diagnosis of RHD (p = .212). When RV systolic and diastolic dysfunction evaluations of the devices were compared according to the British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) criteria there was no significant difference between the devices' measurements in the evaluation of systolic and diastolic function. CONCLUSION: The imaging and measurement capabilities of the HHUDs for PHT and RHD parameters were similar to CUDs, and considering the inconsistent parameters, the HHUD can be useful in diagnosing these problems.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block-2 and quadratus lumborum block-3 for postoperative pain in cesarean section: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block-2 (QLB-2) and quadratus lumborum block-3 (QLB-3) after cesarean section (C/S) under general anesthesia. METHOD: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. A total of 143 term pregnant women with American Society of Anesthesiologists II status, who were scheduled for elective C/S under general anesthesia were randomly separated into QLB-2 and QLB-3 groups. After surgery under standardized general anesthesia, QLBs were performed with 0.3 mL.Kg-1 0.25% bupivacaine in both groups. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) devices were used for additional analgesia. The primary outcomes were pain scores evaluated at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours. In addition, PCA demands, actual delivered tramadol doses, rescue analgesic requirements, anesthesia time, and patient satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were analyzed statistically. Pain scores were statistically lower in the QLB-3 group at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (P = .001). Anesthesia time was longer in the QLB-3 group. Patients who received QLB-3 block demonstrated significantly fewer PCA demands and lower consumption of tramadol (P = .003). Moreover, the first analgesic requirement time was longer along with higher patient satisfaction. In addition, all procedures were performed without any complications and side effects due to PCA were negligible. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, although both QLBs were safe and reliable, QLB-3 provides more effective analgesia and patient satisfaction than QLB-2 in C/S.

Knowledge of the Research Assistants Regarding Local Anaesthetics and Toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular system depression, respiratory arrest, coma, convulsions, loss of consciousness, muscle twitching, blurred vision, vertigo, dizziness and numbness of the tongue can be seen in local anaesthetic toxicity. Treatment includes 20% lipid solutions, airway control, symptomatic treatment for arrhythmia and convulsions. The aim of this study is to present the knowledge of research assistants, who used local anaesthetics in daily practice, regarding these medications and toxicity treatment and to raise awareness. METHODS: The questionnaire comprising 20 questions was administered to 115 research assistants who worked at different specialities in our hospital. RESULTS: One hundred and two (88.6%) research assistants answered the questionnaire. Participants' mean age was 28.93 years. Most of them were from the Emergency Department (15.7%). A total of 40.6% of participants worked for 2-5 years at their departments. Local anaesthetics were used in daily practice for 44.4% of them, but 70.3% of them had not been educated about local anaesthetics. Research assistants from anaesthesiology and reanimation participated at a significantly higher rate than other departments (76.9%), in terms of training programs regarding local anaesthetics. While the most popular answers about early toxicity symptoms were anaphylaxis (12.7%) and arrthymia (12.7%), late toxicity was hepatotoxicity (10.8%). However, 87.9% of participants had never encountered local anaesthetic toxicity. The great majority of participants had never heard of lipid therapy (67.4%), and those who were aware had heard it from their trainers (52.2%). Although lipid solution was available in our hospital, only 8.4% of participants knew this. CONCLUSION: We believe that additional training programs regarding local anaesthetics and toxicity are needed.

Use of remifentanil in a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome requiring urgent cesarean section.

We describe a case of 41-yr.-old multigravida at 35 weeks gestation, with a diagnosis of Eisenmenger syndrome, requiring urgent Cesarean section. The parturient had signs and symptoms of respiratory distress due to high pulmonary artery pressure, and the pregnancy was complicated by preeclampsia. A general anesthetic consisting of ketamine and etomidate and an intravenous infusion of remifentanil were used to provide stable anesthesia and analgesia for a successful delivery. The baby was delivered with high Apgar scores. The potential benefits and safety of the use of remifentanil in parturients with high pulmonary artery pressures are discussed.