Burden of illness in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease: a real-world analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) is associated with high rates of respiratory failure and death. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost data are needed to characterize PH-ILD disease burden. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of the Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and Medicare Supplemental Database between June 2015 to June 2019 was conducted. Patients with ILD were identified and indexed based on their first claim with a PH diagnosis. Patients were required to be 18 years of age on the index date and continuously enrolled for 12-months pre- and post-index. Patients were excluded for having a PH diagnosis prior to ILD diagnosis or the presence of other non-ILD, PH-associated conditions. Treatment patterns, HCRU, and healthcare costs were compared between the 12 months pre- versus 12 months post-index date. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients with PH-ILD were included (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [16.6] years; female, 64.8%). The same medication classes were most frequently used both pre- and post-index (corticosteroids: pre-index 43.4%, post-index 53.5%; calcium channel blockers: 25.4%, 36.9%; oxygen: 12.3%, 25.4%). All-cause hospitalizations increased 2-fold, with 29.5% of patients hospitalized pre-index vs. 59.0% post-index (P < 0.0001). Intensive care unit (ICU) utilization increased from 6.6 to 17.2% (P = 0.0433). Mean inpatient visits increased from 0.5 (SD, 0.9) to 1.1 (1.3) (P < 0.0001); length of stay (days) increased from 5.4 (5.9) to 7.5 (11.6) (P < 0.0001); bed days from 2.5 (6.6) to 8.0 (16.3) (P < 0.0001); ICU days from 3.8 (2.3) to 7.0 (13.2) (P = 0.0362); and outpatient visits from 24.5 (16.8) to 32.9 (21.8) (P < 0.0001). Mean (SD) total all-cause healthcare costs increased from $43,201 ($98,604) pre-index to $108,387 ($190,673) post-index (P < 0.0001); this was largely driven by hospitalizations (which increased from a mean [SD] of $13,133 [$28,752] to $63,218 [$75,639] [P < 0.0001]) and outpatient costs ($16,150 [$75,639] to $25,604 [$93,964] [P < 0.0001]). CONCLUSION: PH-ILD contributes to a high HCRU and cost burden. Timely identification, management, and treatment are needed to mitigate the clinical and economic consequences of PH-ILD development and progression.

Exploring kidney dialysis costs in the United States: a scoping review.

AIMS: The increasing prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States (US) represents a considerable economic burden due to the high cost of dialysis treatment. This review examines data from real-world studies to identify cost drivers and explore areas where dialysis costs could be reduced. METHODS: We identified and synthesized evidence published from 2016-2023 reporting direct dialysis costs in adult US patients from a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and grey literature sources (e.g. US Renal Data System reports). RESULTS: Most identified data related to Medicare expenditures. Overall Medicare spending in 2020 was $29B for hemodialysis and $2.8B for peritoneal dialysis (PD). Dialysis costs accounted for almost 80% of total Medicare expenditures on ESRD beneficiaries. Private insurance payers consistently pay more for dialysis; for example, per person per month spending by private insurers on outpatient dialysis was estimated at $10,149 compared with Medicare spending of $3,364. Dialysis costs were higher in specific high-risk patient groups (e.g. type 2 diabetes, hepatitis C). Spending on hemodialysis was higher than on PD, but the gap in spending between PD and hemodialysis is closing. Vascular access costs accounted for a substantial proportion of dialysis costs. LIMITATIONS: Insufficient detail in the identified studies, especially related to outpatient costs, limits opportunities to identify key drivers. Differences between the studies in methods of measuring dialysis costs make generalization of these results difficult. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that prevention of or delay in progression to ESRD could have considerable cost savings for Medicare and private payers, particularly in patients with high-risk conditions such as type 2 diabetes. More efficient use of resources is needed, including low-cost medication, to improve clinical outcomes and lower overall costs, especially in high-risk groups. Widening access to PD where it is safe and appropriate may help to reduce dialysis costs.

Previous papers have studied the cost of treating patients who need dialysis for kidney failure. We reviewed these costs and looked for patterns. Dialysis was the most expensive part of treatment for people with kidney disease who have Medicare. Dialysis with private insurance was much more expensive than with Medicare. People with diabetes experienced higher costs of dialysis than those without diabetes. Dialysis in a hospital costs more than dialysis at home. There are opportunities to reduce the cost of dialysis that should be explored further, such as more use of low-cost medication that can prevent the worsening of kidney disease and reduce the need for dialysis.

Nursing action towards the sustainable development goals: Barriers and opportunities.

BACKGROUND: Climate change, poverty, hunger and complex diseases are just some of the many wicked problems impacting human health. The Sustainable Development Goals aim to alleviate these and many other global issues. Although the nursing profession is paramount to successfully achieving the goals, nurses require increased education to maximise their contributions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of education on graduate nurses' action towards the Sustainable Development Goals. DESIGN: This study applied a qualitative case study methodology. SETTING: The study took place within an Australian Higher Education institution. Graduate nurses working in clinical settings were invited to reflect on the Sustainable Development Goals. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included thirteen graduate nurses (n = 13) working in a variety of clinical settings that had completed the final year capstone subject. METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were undertaken with graduate nurses who undertook education on the Sustainable Development Goals in an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing capstone subject. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed. FINDINGS: Data was analysed through two lens focusing on the barriers and opportunities for action towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Three core barriers were identified as 'Drowning'; 'Powerless'; and 'Invisible'. Three key opportunities were designated as 'War on Waste'; 'Front and Centre'; and 'Revolutionary Leadership'. CONCLUSIONS: Educating undergraduate nurses on the Sustainable Development Goals had limited impact on specific graduate nurses' action towards the goals due to significant barriers within the healthcare system. However, graduate nurses recognised the importance of contributing to the goals and identified opportunities for future action. Education providers and the healthcare industry should work in partnership to create a more sustainable future for healthcare.