Cherenkov imaging combined with scintillation dosimetry provides real-time positional and dose monitoring for radiotherapy patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices.

Background and purpose: Cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) require dose monitoring during each fraction of radiotherapy, which can be time consuming and may have delayed read-out times. This study explores the potential of Cherenkov imaging combined with scintillation dosimetry as an alternative verification system. Methods and materials: Time-gated, complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (iCMOS) cameras were used to collect video images of anthropomorphic phantoms and patients undergoing radiation treatment near chest wall cardiac devices. Scintillator discs and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used for dose measurement. Accuracy of spatial delivery was assessed by overlaying predicted surface dose outlines derived from the treatment planning system (TPS) with the Cherenkov images. Dose measurements from OSLDs and scintillators were compared. Results: In phantom studies, Cherenkov images visibly indicated when dose was delivered to the CIED as compared to non-overlapping dose deliveries. Comparison with dose overlays revealed congruence at the planned position and non-congruence when the phantom was shifted from the initial position. Absolute doses derived from scintillator discs aligned well with the OSLD measurements and TPS predictions for three different positions, measuring within 10 % for in-field positions and within 5 % for out-of-field positions. For two patients with CIEDs imaged over 18 fractions, Cherenkov imaging confirmed positional accuracy for all fractions, and dose measured by scintillator discs deviated by <0.015 Gy from the OSLD measurements. Conclusions: Cherenkov imaging combined with scintillation dosimetry presents an alternative methodology for CIED monitoring with the added benefit of instantly detecting deviations, enabling timely corrective actions or proper patient triage.

Visual Dose Monitoring for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy Treatments via Combined Cherenkov Imaging and Scintillation Dosimetry.

PURPOSE: This study investigates scintillation dosimetry coupled with Cherenkov imaging for in vivo dose monitoring during whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT). Given recent observations of excess dose to the contralateral breast (CB), in vivo dosimetry (IVD) could help ensure accurate dose delivery and decrease risks of secondary cancer. This work presents a rapid, streamlined alternative to traditional IVD, providing direct visualization of measurement location relative to the treatment field on the patient. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten WBRT patients consented under an institutional review board-approved protocol were monitored with scintillation dosimetry and always-on Cherenkov imaging, on both their treated and CB for 1 to 3 fractions. Scintillator dosimeters, small plastic discs 1 mm thick and 15 mm in diameter, were calibrated against optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) to generate an integral output-to-dose conversion, where integral output is measured in postprocessing through a custom fitting algorithm. The discs have been extensively characterized in a previous study for various treatment conditions including beam energy and treatment geometry. RESULTS: A total of 44 dosimetry measurements were evaluated, including 22 treated breast and 22 CB measurements. After integral output-to-dose calibration, in vivo scintillator dosimeters exhibited high linearity (R2 = 0.99) with paired OSLD readings across all patients. The difference between scintillation and OSLD dose measurements averaged 2.8% of the prescribed dose, or an absolute dose difference of approximately 7 cGy. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of scintillation dosimetry with Cherenkov imaging offers an accurate, rapid alternative for in vivo dose verification in WBRT, circumventing the limitations of conventional point dosimeters. The additional benefit of visualizing measurement locations relative to the treatment field provides users an enhanced understanding of results and allows for detection of high dose gradients. Future work will explore the applicability of this technique across a broader range of radiation therapy treatments, aiming to streamline IVD practices.

Technical note: Visual, rapid, scintillation point dosimetry for in vivo MV photon beam radiotherapy treatments.

BACKGROUND: While careful planning and pre-treatment checks are performed to ensure patient safety during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), inevitable daily variations mean that in vivo dosimetry (IVD) is the only way to attain the true delivered dose. Several countries outside the US require daily IVD for quality assurance. However, elsewhere, the manual labor and time considerations of traditional in vivo dosimeters may be preventing frequent use of IVD in the clinic. PURPOSE: This study expands upon previous research using plastic scintillator discs for optical dosimetry for electron therapy treatments. We present the characterization of scintillator discs for in vivo x-ray dosimetry and describe additional considerations due to geometric complexities. METHODS: Plastic scintillator discs were coated with reflective white paint on all sides but the front surface. An anti-reflective, matte coating was applied to the transparent face to minimize specular reflection. A time-gated iCMOS camera imaged the discs under various irradiation conditions. In post-processing, background-subtracted images of the scintillators were fit with Gaussian-convolved ellipses to extract several parameters, including integral output, and observation angle. RESULTS: Dose linearity and x-ray energy independence were observed, consistent with ideal characteristics for a dosimeter. Dose measurements exhibited less than 5% variation for incident beam angles between 0° and 75° at the anterior surface and 0-60 ∘ $^\circ $ at the posterior surface for exit beam dosimetry. Varying the angle between the disc surface and the camera lens did not impact the integral output for the same dose up to 55°. Past this point, up to 75°, there is a sharp falloff in response; however, a correction can be used based on the detected width of the disc. The reproducibility of the integral output for a single disc is 2%, and combined with variations from the gantry angle, we report the accuracy of the proposed scintillator disc dosimeters as ±5.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic scintillator discs have characteristics that are well-suited for in vivo optical dosimetry for x-ray radiotherapy treatments. Unlike typical point dosimeters, there is no inherent readout time delay, and an optical recording of the measurement is saved after treatment for future reference. While several factors influence the integral output for the same dose, they have been quantified here and may be corrected in post-processing.

Unraveling the Intertwined Effect of pH on Helicobacter pylori Motility and the Microrheology of the Mucin-Based Medium It Swims in.

The gastric pathogen, Helicobacter pylori bacteria have to swim across a pH gradient from 2 to 7 in the mucus layer to colonize the gastric epithelium. Previous studies from our group have shown that porcine gastric mucin (PGM) gels at an acidic pH < 4, and H. pylori bacteria are unable to swim in the gel, although their flagella rotate. Changing pH impacts both the rheological properties of gastric mucin and also influences the proton (H+)-pumped flagellar motors of H. pylori as well as their anti-pH sensing receptors. To unravel these intertwined effects of acidic pH on both the viscoelastic properties of the mucin-based mucus as well as the flagellar motors and chemo-receptors of the bacterium, we compared the motility of H. pylori in PGM with that in Brucella broth (BB10) at different pH values using phase contrast microscopy to track the motion of the bacteria. The results show that the distribution of swimming speeds and other characteristics of the bacteria trajectories exhibit pH-dependent differences in both media. The swimming speed exhibits a peak at pH 4 in BB10, and a less pronounced peak at a higher pH of 5 in PGM. At all pH values, the bacteria swam faster and had a longer net displacement in BB10 compared to PGM. While the bacteria were stuck in PGM gels at pH < 4, they swam at these acidic pH values in BB10, although with reduced speed. Decreasing pH leads to a decreased fraction of motile bacteria, with a decreased contribution of the faster swimmers to the distributions of speeds and net displacement of trajectories. The body rotation rate is weakly dependent on pH in BB10, whereas in PGM bacteria that are immobilized in the low pH gel are capable of mechano-sensing and rotate faster. Bacteria can be stuck in the gel in various ways, including the flagella getting entangled in the fibers of the gel or the cell body being stuck to the gel. Our results show that in BB10, swimming is optimized at pH4, reflecting the combined effects of pH sensing by anti-pH tactic receptors and impact on H+ pumping of flagellar motors, while the increase in viscosity of PGM with decreasing pH and gelation below pH 4 lead to further reduction in swimming speed, with optimal swimming at pH 5 and immobilization of bacteria below pH 4.

Color-resolved Cherenkov imaging allows for differential signal detection in blood and melanin content.

Significance: High-energy x-ray delivery from a linear accelerator results in the production of spectrally continuous broadband Cherenkov light inside tissue. In the absence of attenuation, there is a linear relationship between Cherenkov emission and deposited dose; however, scattering and absorption result in the distortion of this linear relationship. As Cherenkov emission exits the absorption by tissue dominates the observed Cherenkov emission spectrum. Spectroscopic interpretation of this effects may help to better relate Cherenkov emission to ionizing radiation dose delivered during radiotherapy. Aim: In this study, we examined how color Cherenkov imaging intensity variations are caused by absorption from both melanin and hemoglobin level variations, so that future Cherenkov emission imaging might be corrected for linearity to delivered dose. Approach: A custom, time-gated, three-channel intensified camera was used to image the red, green, and blue wavelengths of Cherenkov emission from tissue phantoms with synthetic melanin layers and varying blood concentrations. Our hypothesis was that spectroscopic separation of Cherenkov emission would allow for the identification of attenuated signals that varied in response to changes in blood content versus melanin content, because of their different characteristic absorption spectra. Results: Cherenkov emission scaled with dose linearly in all channels. Absorption in the blue and green channels increased with increasing oxy-hemoglobin in the blood to a greater extent than in the red channel. Melanin was found to absorb with only slight differences between all channels. These spectral differences can be used to derive dose from measured Cherenkov emission. Conclusions: Color Cherenkov emission imaging may be used to improve the optical measurement and determination of dose delivered in tissues. Calibration for these factors to minimize the influence of the tissue types and skin tones may be possible using color camera system information based upon the linearity of the observed signals.

One Year of Clinic-Wide Cherenkov Imaging for Discovery of Quality Improvement Opportunities in Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Cherenkov imaging is clinically available as a radiation therapy treatment verification tool. The aim of this work was to discover the benefits of always-on Cherenkov imaging as a novel incident detection and quality improvement system through review of all imaging at our center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Multicamera Cherenkov imaging systems were permanently installed in 3 treatment bunkers, imaging continuously over a year. Images were acquired as part of normal treatment procedures and reviewed for potential treatment delivery anomalies. RESULTS: In total, 622 unique patients were evaluated for this study. We identified 9 patients with treatment anomalies occurring over their course of treatment, which were only detected with Cherenkov imaging. Categorizing each event indicated issues arising in simulation, planning, pretreatment review, and treatment delivery, and none of the incidents were detected before this review by conventional measures. The incidents identified in this study included dose to unintended areas in planning, dose to unintended areas due to positioning at treatment, and nonideal bolus placement during setup. CONCLUSIONS: Cherenkov imaging was shown to provide a unique method of detecting radiation therapy incidents that would have otherwise gone undetected. Although none of the events detected in this study reached the threshold of reporting, they identified opportunities for practice improvement and demonstrated added value of Cherenkov imaging in quality assurance programs.

Clinical implementation of the first Cherenkov imaging system in a community-based hospital.

Purpose: To document experiences with one year of clinical implementation of the first Cherenkov imaging system and share the methods that we developed to utilize Cherenkov imaging to improve treatment delivery accuracy in real-time. Methods: A Cherenkov imaging system was installed commissioned and calibrated for clinical use. The optimal room lighting conditions and imaging setup protocols were developed to optimize both image quality and patient experience. The Cherenkov images were analyzed for treatment setup and beam delivery verification. Results: We have successfully implemented a clinical Cherenkov imaging system in a community-based hospital. Several radiation therapy patient setup anomalies were found in 1) exit dose to the contralateral breast, 2) dose to the chin due to head rotation for a supraclavicular field, 3) intrafractional patient motion during beam delivery, and 4) large variability (0.5 cm to 5 cm) in arm position between fractions. The system was used to deliver deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) treatment delivery of an electron treatment beam. Clinical process and procedures were improved to mitigate the identified issues to ensure treatment delivery safety and to improve treatment accuracy. Conclusion: The Cherenkov imaging system has proven to be a valuable clinical tool for the improvement of treatment delivery safety and accuracy at our hospital. With only minimal training the therapists were able to adjust or correct treatment positions during treatment delivery as needed. With future Cherenkov software developments Cherenkov imaging systems could provide daily surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and real time treatment delivery quality control for all 3D and clinical setup patients without adding additional radiation image dose as in standard kV, MV and CBCT image verifications. Cherenkov imaging can greatly improve clinical efficiency and accuracy, making real time dose delivery consistency verification and SGRT a reality.

Performance comparison of quantitative metrics for analysis of in vivo Cherenkov imaging incident detection during radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Examine the responses of multiple image similarity metrics to detect patient positioning errors in radiotherapy observed through Cherenkov imaging, which may be used to optimize automated incident detection. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom mimicking patient vasculature, a biological marker seen in Cherenkov images, was simulated for a breast radiotherapy treatment. The phantom was systematically shifted in each translational direction, and Cherenkov images were captured during treatment delivery at each step. The responses of mutual information (MI) and the γ passing rate (%GP) were compared to that of existing field-shape matching image metrics, the Dice coefficient, and mean distance to conformity (MDC). Patient images containing other incidents were analyzed to verify the best detection algorithm for different incident types. RESULTS: Positional shifts in all directions were registered by both MI and %GP, degrading monotonically as the shifts increased. Shifts in intensity, which may result from erythema or bolus-tissue air gaps, were detected most by %GP. However, neither metric detected beam-shape misalignment, such as that caused by dose to unintended areas, as well as currently employed metrics (Dice and MDC). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that different radiotherapy incidents may be detected by comparing both inter- and intrafractional Cherenkov images with a corresponding image similarity metric, varying with the type of incident. Future work will involve determining appropriate thresholds per metric for automatic flagging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Classifying different algorithms for the detection of various radiotherapy incidents allows for the development of an automatic flagging system, eliminating the burden of manual review of Cherenkov images.