Leptomeningeal metastases in prostate cancer: A review of the current literature.

Leptomeningeal metastasis/leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC; terms used interchangeably) is an inflammatory complication of primary tumors that involves the spread of the disease to the meninges (specifically the arachnoid and pia maters) and spinal cord. In the United States, approximately 110,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, and the prognosis is usually poor. Complications of LMC include cognitive impairment, cranial nerve dysfunction, ischemic stroke, and mortality. The survival times of untreated and treated LMC are approximately 4-6 weeks and 2-4 months, respectively. Leptomeningeal carcinomatoses are usually metastatic cancers that spread to the central nervous system. Although lung and breast cancers have a clearly defined relationship with LMC, it remains unclear whether prostate cancer (PC) is also directly associated with LMC. To determine whether such association exists, we conducted a PubMed review of the literature on patients with PC with coexisting LMCs. Our search yielded 23 case reports of patients with preexisting PC who developed LMC. In addition, 2 retrospective cohort studies were examined. Various findings were identified in the revised cases and studies. The first 3 findings were related to the progression of the disease: patients presenting with neurological disease symptoms were in remission from PC for 7 years on average, LMCs tended to occur after other cancer diagnoses, and the disease had already rapidly progressed by the time the symptoms were present. Regarding diagnosis, the major finding was that most LMCs were detected by magnetic resonance imaging (which does not detect early dissemination), and it was suggested that single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography imaging could be used for earlier detection. Finally, in terms of treatment, the main finding was that treatment was palliative rather than curative and that prognosis remained poor despite treatment. On the basis of these results, we recommend for individuals with risk factors, such as high-grade PC and hormonal PC, to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for increased surveillance of LMC development.

How Agent Orange impacts prostate cancer risk, pathology, and treatment outcomes.

Between 2.6 and 3.8 million veterans served in Vietnam while the US military dispersed Agent Orange (AO), although the exact number of exposed individuals is unknown. Agent Orange, an herbicide, is a known risk factor for various cancers, including sarcoma and leukemia, but less is known about its link with prostate cancer (PC). Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death in men worldwide. In 2023, approximately 288,300 patients will be given a diagnosis of PC, and an estimated 34,700 fatalities will occur in the United States. However, whether the pathologic characteristics of PC among those exposed to AO differ from those in the general population remains unclear. Our review synthesizes the literature regarding the impact of AO exposure on PC incidence and disease course. A comprehensive PubMed literature search of articles published beginning in 1950 was performed using the primary search terms "Agent Orange," "TCDD," and "tetrachlorodibenzodioxin" and the secondary search terms "prostate cancer" or "prostate neoplasm." The search was limited to studies that focused on human participants and were published in English. Four authors thoroughly reviewed the retrieved articles for relevancy to the study aims: discussion of PC diagnosis, prognosis, or management among patients exposed to AO. Of 108 studies identified in our search, 13 were included in this systematic review. Findings within studies concerning AO exposure with relation to PC incidence, age at diagnosis or treatment initiation, and PC severity seemed to be mixed and generally conflicting. However, the literature seems to indicate that there are no significant differences in survivorship between exposed and unexposed veterans who are given a diagnosis of PC. Given these heterogeneous outcomes, the evidence does not encourage a significantly different approach to the diagnosis and management of PC for veterans exposed to AO. Clinicians should make case-by-case decisions regarding PC screening and potential treatment options for this patient group, weighing clinical suspicion against the harms of diagnostic workup and treatment.

Comparing Frailty Indices for Risk Stratification in Urologic Oncology: Which Index to Choose?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive ability of the modified Frailty Index (mFI) and the revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-Rev) for perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic oncologic surgery, aiming to identify the optimal frailty screening tool for surgical risk stratification. METHODS: NSQIP was queried to identify patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, partial or radical nephrectomy, or radical cystectomy between 2013-2017. We investigated the association of mFI and RAI-Rev with the following 30-day perioperative outcomes using multivariable logistic regression: major complications, Clavien grade ≥4 complications, non-home discharge, 30-day readmission, and all-cause mortality. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis compared the predictive performances of the two frailty instruments, with differences between the C-statistics assessed using DeLong's test. RESULTS: Among 101,739 patients, 30-day major complication rates varied from 2.40% in prostatectomy to 26.86% in cystectomy, non-home discharge rates ranged from 1.92% to 13.54%, and mortality rates were between 0.16% and 1.43%. RAI-Rev showed higher discriminatory ability for mortality (C-statistic: 0.688-0.798) and non-home discharge (C-statistic: 0.638-0.734) compared to mFI (C-statistic: 0.594-0.677 and 0.593-0.639, respectively). Both frailty indices had similar discriminatory ability for major perioperative complications (C-statistic: 0.531-0.607). DeLong's test confirmed statistically significant differences in C-statistics between RAI-Rev and mFI for mortality (p<0.001) and non-home discharge (p<0.001) across all surgical cohorts. CONCLUSION: RAI-Rev may have greater utility as a frailty prognostic tool than mFI among patients undergoing major urologic surgery. Prospective studies and clinical trials exploring frailty should consider these results during trial design.

Artificial intelligence model for automated surgical instrument detection and counting: an experimental proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Retained surgical items (RSI) are preventable events that pose a significant risk to patient safety. Current strategies for preventing RSIs rely heavily on manual instrument counting methods, which are prone to human error. This study evaluates the feasibility and performance of a deep learning-based computer vision model for automated surgical tool detection and counting. METHODS: A novel dataset of 1,004 images containing 13,213 surgical tools across 11 categories was developed. The dataset was split into training, validation, and test sets at a 60:20:20 ratio. An artificial intelligence (AI) model was trained on the dataset, and the model's performance was evaluated using standard object detection metrics, including precision and recall. To simulate a real-world surgical setting, model performance was also evaluated in a dynamic surgical video of instruments being moved in real-time. RESULTS: The model demonstrated high precision (98.5%) and recall (99.9%) in distinguishing surgical tools from the background. It also exhibited excellent performance in differentiating between various surgical tools, with precision ranging from 94.0 to 100% and recall ranging from 97.1 to 100% across 11 tool categories. The model maintained strong performance on a subset of test images containing overlapping tools (precision range: 89.6-100%, and recall range 97.2-98.2%). In a real-time surgical video analysis, the model maintained a correct surgical tool count in all non-transition frames, with a median inference speed of 40.4 frames per second (interquartile range: 4.9). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that using a deep learning-based computer vision model for automated surgical tool detection and counting is feasible. The model's high precision and real-time inference capabilities highlight its potential to serve as an AI safeguard to potentially improve patient safety and reduce manual burden on surgical staff. Further validation in clinical settings is warranted.

Testicular Cancer and Paraneoplastic Encephalitis: A Review of the Current Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Paraneoplastic encephalitis (PE) represents a rare but significant complication in patients with testicular cancer (TC). Given the paucity of comprehensive literature on this topic, our review seeks to consolidate current knowledge and provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of PE in the context of TC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In adherence to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted from 1950 to April 2024 using PubMed. The search focused on articles where TC was identified as the primary etiology of PE. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's levels of evidence tool were employed for assessing study quality, and a thematic analysis was conducted to identify trends and patterns. RESULTS: Out of 91 articles identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 5 retrospective chart reviews, 3 case series, and 22 case reports. Findings indicate that PE symptoms can manifest at any stage of TC-before tumor detection, during treatment, or even years posttreatment. A notable observation was the frequent oversight of microscopic testicular tumors in ultrasound imaging, leading to diagnostic delays. The outcomes of PE in the context of TC were diverse, reflecting the heterogeneity of the studies included. CONCLUSION: PE, although rare, is a critical consideration in patients with TC presenting with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Early recognition and appropriate diagnostic workup, including consideration for microscopic neoplasms, are essential for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.

Automated surgical step recognition in transurethral bladder tumor resection using artificial intelligence: transfer learning across surgical modalities.

Objective: Automated surgical step recognition (SSR) using AI has been a catalyst in the "digitization" of surgery. However, progress has been limited to laparoscopy, with relatively few SSR tools in endoscopic surgery. This study aimed to create a SSR model for transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), leveraging a novel application of transfer learning to reduce video dataset requirements. Materials and methods: Retrospective surgical videos of TURBT were manually annotated with the following steps of surgery: primary endoscopic evaluation, resection of bladder tumor, and surface coagulation. Manually annotated videos were then utilized to train a novel AI computer vision algorithm to perform automated video annotation of TURBT surgical video, utilizing a transfer-learning technique to pre-train on laparoscopic procedures. Accuracy of AI SSR was determined by comparison to human annotations as the reference standard. Results: A total of 300 full-length TURBT videos (median 23.96 min; IQR 14.13-41.31 min) were manually annotated with sequential steps of surgery. One hundred and seventy-nine videos served as a training dataset for algorithm development, 44 for internal validation, and 77 as a separate test cohort for evaluating algorithm accuracy. Overall accuracy of AI video analysis was 89.6%. Model accuracy was highest for the primary endoscopic evaluation step (98.2%) and lowest for the surface coagulation step (82.7%). Conclusion: We developed a fully automated computer vision algorithm for high-accuracy annotation of TURBT surgical videos. This represents the first application of transfer-learning from laparoscopy-based computer vision models into surgical endoscopy, demonstrating the promise of this approach in adapting to new procedure types.

Exploring the link between ACEs and opioid use: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature surrounding the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and opioid use disorder (OUD) to guide clinical identification of high-risk individuals and assess treatment implications. DESIGN: A PubMed search was conducted from the year 2000 to 2022 using a series of primary and secondary search terms. A total of 21,524 unique results were screened for relevancy to ACEs and OUDs. After excluding unrelated articles, a total of 48 articles were included in this systematic review. RESULTS: Increased frequency of ACEs was directly related to increased risk of OUD and lower onset age. ACEs were also associated with OUD severity. ACEs linked to OUD included childhood neglect, emotional abuse, physical abuse, and sexual abuse. Additionally, dysfunctional childhood home environment, female gender, and psychiatric/behavioral comorbidities increased the risk of OUD, while resilience was found to be a protective factor. Multiple biochemical markers were associated with both ACEs and OUD. CONCLUSIONS: Children experiencing multiple ACEs should be the target of preventative intervention by medical professionals. Clinicians should include ACEs in their opioid misuse risk assessment. High incidence of co-occurring psychiatric/behavioral disorders provides multiple treatment avenues for patients with OUD. Resilience, along with being therapy target, should be fostered early in the life course. Incorporation of family members may improve opioid abuse treatment outcomes. Future research should focus on interventions interrupting the progression of ACEs to OUD along with proposed biochemical pathways.

Frailty and survival among veterans treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Due to a lack of head-to-head trials, they are prescribed interchangeably. However, the drugs have different pharmacokinetics and thus may have differing efficacy and adverse effects influenced by patient functional status and comorbid diseases. Additionally, mCRPC mainly affects older adults and since the prevalence of frailty increases with age, frailty is an important patient factor to consider in personalizing drug selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of US veterans treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide for mCRPC from September 2014 to June 2017. Frailty was assessed using the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index (VA-FI), which utilizes administrative codes to assign a standardized frailty score. Patients were categorized as frail if VA-FI scores were > 0.2. The primary outcome was difference in overall survival (OS) between the two treatment groups. Cox regression modeling and propensity score matching was used to compare between abiraterone and enzalutamide treatments. RESULTS: We identified 5,822 veterans, 57% of whom were initially treated with abiraterone and 43% with enzalutamide. Frail patients (n = 2,314; 39.7%) were older, with a mean age of 76.1 versus 74.9 years in the non-frail group (n = 3,508; 60.3%, p < 0.001) and had shorter OS compared to non-frail patients regardless of treatment group (18.5 vs. 26.6 months, p < 0.001). Among non-frail patients there was no significant difference in OS between abiraterone and enzalutamide treatment (27.7 vs 26.1 months, p = 0.07). However, frail patients treated with enzalutamide versus abiraterone had improved OS (20.7 vs 17.2 months, p < 0.001). In a propensity score matched analysis of frail patients (n = 2,070), enzalutamide was associated with greater median OS (24.1 vs 20.9 months, p < 0.001). In patients with dementia, enzalutamide was associated with longer OS (19.4 vs. 16.6 months, p = 0.003). DISCUSSION: In this study of 5822 US veterans with mCRPC, treatment with enzalutamide was associated with improved OS compared to abiraterone among frail veterans and veterans with dementia, but not among non-frail veterans. Future studies should evaluate interactions between frailty and cancer treatments to optimize selection of therapy among frail adults.

Association of Male Hypogonadism With Risk of Hospitalization for COVID-19.

Importance: Male sex is associated with severe COVID-19. It is not known whether the risk of hospitalization differs between men with hypogonadism, men with eugonadism, and those receiving testosterone therapy (TTh). Objective: To compare COVID-19 hospitalization rates for men with hypogonadism who were not receiving TTh, men with eugonadism, and men receiving TTh. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted in 2 large academic health systems in St Louis, Missouri, among 723 men with a history of COVID-19 who had testosterone concentrations measured between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Exposures: The primary exposure was gonadal status (hypogonadism, eugonadism, and TTh). Hypogonadism was defined as a total testosterone concentration below the limit of normal provided by the laboratory (which varied from 175 to 300 ng/dL [to convert to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 0.0347]). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was rate of hospitalization for COVID-19. Statistical adjustments were made for group differences in age, body mass index, race and ethnicity, immunosuppression, and comorbid conditions. Results: Of the 723 study participants (mean [SD] age, 55 [14] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 33.5 [7.3]), 116 men had hypogonadism, 427 had eugonadism, and 180 were receiving TTh. Men with hypogonadism were more likely than men with eugonadism to be hospitalized with COVID-19 (52 of 116 [45%] vs 53 of 427 [12%]; P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, men with hypogonadism had higher odds than men with eugonadism of being hospitalized (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.4; P < .003). Men receiving TTh had a similar risk of hospitalization as men with eugonadism (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.3; P = .35). Men receiving inadequate TTh (defined as subnormal testosterone concentrations while receiving TTh) had higher odds of hospitalization compared with men who had normal testosterone concentrations while receiving TTh (multivariable adjusted odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.6; P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that men with hypogonadism were more likely to be hospitalized after COVID-19 infection compared with those with eugonadism, independent of other known risk factors. This increased risk was not observed among men receiving adequate TTh. Screening and appropriate therapy for hypogonadism need to be evaluated as a strategy to prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes among men.