Functional outcomes and quality of life after AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens implantation in a real-world study.

The extended depth-of-focus AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens technology offers promising features for presbyopia management, evaluated in this research in a 6 months real-world setting. Prospective interventional mono-centric study including 40 patients who underwent elective bilateral phacoemulsification. We performed one pre-operative visit (V0) and one evaluation six months post-operatively (V1), evaluating uncorrected and corrected visual acuity for near (UNVA/CNVA), intermediate (UIVA/CIVA) and far (UDVA/UCVA), slit-lamp evaluation, tomography with static pupillometry, endothelial cell count and contrast sensitivity chart. In order to assess post-operative Quality of Life, we administered the patients McAlinden's Quality of Vision test and Morlock's Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire. We divided eyes in with Toric-IOL and with non-Toric IOL. A total of 36 eyes received non-tonic IOL implantation, whereas 44 eyes received toric IOL implantation. There were no statistically significant disparities observed in visual outcome measures and contrast sensitivity between the toric group and the non-toric group. Furthermore, we assessed the predictive preoperative refractive astigmatism (PPRA) and residual refractive astigmatism (RRA) in both cohorts, and no statistical significance was found between the two cohorts (p = 0.08). Twenty-one (53%) patients reported total independence from their glasses at all distances. The mean difference between the predicted and measured refractive error, as calculated by spherical equivalent, was 0.09 D. AcrySof IQ Vivity is a well-tolerated and effective IOL with optimal refractive target for both distant and intermediate vision, needing slight spherical addition for the best near vision. Great questionnaire-based satisfaction was reported by the patients.

High-Fluence Epithelium-off Accelerated Pulsed Corneal Cross-linking (15 mW/cm2; 7.2 J/cm2) for Pediatric Keratoconus: A 3-Year Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment and secondarily determine the topographic changes, visual outcomes, and demarcation line depth after high-fluence pulsed light accelerated cross-linking (ACXL) in pediatric patients (younger than 18 years) with progressive keratoconus. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 32 eyes (25 children, aged 11 to 18 years), with progressive keratoconus treated with high-energy epithelium-off pulsed light ACXL (7.2 J/cm2, 15 mW/cm2, 12 minutes, 2 seconds on/1 second off). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), Scheimpflug tomography, and anterior optical coherence tomography measurements were recorded preoperatively and 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 32 eyes were included. Significant CDVA improvement, pachymetry, and maximum keratometry reduction were found at all follow-up visits. Mean keratometric values remained stable, and astigmatism showed a mild worsening (< 0.25 D) with statistical significance at 1 and 3 years. Total aberration showed discordant results and coma aberration had a slight improvement without statistical significance. The demarcation line depth was 265 ± 26 µm. Three patients developed mild haze without visual acuity loss. None of the patients underwent a second CXL procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, high-fluence epithelium-off pulsed light ACXL appears to be a safe and effective procedure to halt the progression of keratoconus, slightly improving the CDVA and keratometric values. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(3):e148-e155.].

Intracoronary bolus of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor as bridging or adjunctive strategy to oral P2Y12 inhibitor load in the modern setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: In the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) bolus not followed by intravenous infusion is potentially advantageous given their fast onset and offset of action, but clinical evidence in a contemporary setting is limited. METHODS: We collected data from consecutive STEMI patients admitted to the cardiac catheterization laboratory of the IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation from October 2017 to September 2019. RESULTS: Out of 423 consecutive STEMI patients, 297 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Of them, 107/297 (36%) received an intracoronary GPI bolus-only during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) not followed by intravenous infusion and 190/297 (64%) received standard antithrombotic therapy. Of the 107 GPI-treated, 22/107 (21%) had P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment (adjunctive strategy) and 85/107 (79%) did not (bridging strategy). During hospital staying, there was no difference in the primary safety endpoint of TIMI major+minor bleeding (P=0.283), TIMI major (P=0.267) or TIMI minor (P=0.685) bleeding between groups. No stroke event occurred in the GPI group. Despite patients receiving GPI having a significantly higher intraprocedural ischemic burden, no significant differences were found in the efficacy outcomes between groups. Consistent findings were observed for patients receiving GPIs bolus before (bridging strategy) or after (adjunctive strategy) P2Y12 inhibitors, compared to those receiving standard therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses did not find any independent predictors significantly associated to the primary and secondary composite endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary real-world population of STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, the use of intracoronary GPIs bolus-only in selected patients at high ischemic risk is safe and could represent a useful antithrombotic strategy both in those pretreated and in those naïve to P2Y12 inhibitors.

ORal anticoagulants In fraGile patients with percutAneous endoscopic gastrostoMy and atrIal fibrillation: the (ORIGAMI) study.

AIMS: The ORal anticoagulants In fraGile patients with percutAneous endoscopic gastrostoMy and atrIal fibrillation (ORIGAMI) study investigates the safety and efficacy of Edoxaban administered via PEG in patients with atrial fibrillation and a clinical indication for a long-term anticoagulation. DESIGN: In this prospective, single-centre observational study, 12 PEG-treated patients with indication to anticoagulation will receive edoxaban via PEG and will be followed up to 6 months. Plasma antifactor Xa activity and edoxaban concentrations will be assessed. Thromboembolic (ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism) and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) will be recorded at 1 and 6 months. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of five atrial fibrillation cases undergoing PEG implantation at our Institution who received edoxaban via PEG showed plasma anti-FXa levels at a steady state of 146 ±â€Š15 ng/ml, without major adverse event at a mean follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSION: ORIGAMI prospectively investigates PEG-administration of edoxaban in PEG-treated patients requiring long-term anticoagulation. Our preliminary retrospective data support this route of DOAC administration. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04271293.