Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Am Heart J ; 2024 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39303835

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persistence and adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) is crucial for its effectiveness in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess the impact of different ascertainment methods on estimated persistence rates. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the Medicare claims data (01/01/2013-12/31/2019). We built an incident user cohort of OAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin) prescription filling. We measured OAC medication persistence and adherence using the following approaches: 1) treatment-anniversary based persistence: if there is an active prescription overlapping the 180th and 365th day with vs. without a 15-day buffer period (i.e., overlapping with 165th-195th and 350th-380th day); 2) dispensing-gap-based persistence: if there is OAC discontinuation defined as having gap between prescriptions more than a threshold (e.g., 5 to 60 days) and secondarily, 3) proportion of days covered (PDC) adherence: proportion of days in which patient had filled medication available over the 365-day interval. RESULTS: We identified 1,398,692 patients who initiated OACs during the study interval. With the treatment-anniversary based approach, only 51.2 to 65.4% of the patients persisted with the medication for either warfarin or DOACs at 180 days, and the number dropped to 43.4 to 60.7% at one year. Adding a 15-day buffer period increased the treatment-anniversary based persistence rates by 6.5 to 10.5%. When the allowable gap increased from 5 to 60 days, the persistence rates increased by 36.3 to 42.4% for all OACs. Apixaban users had the highest PDC (74 to 75%) over the 365 days, compared to other OACs (60 to 69%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the estimated persistence rates are sensitive to the choice of ascertainment methods. When reporting and comparing persistence findings using the claims database, definitions of OAC discontinuation must be clearly delineated.

2.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(8): e5872, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39135513

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to validate and, if performance was unsatisfactory, update the previously published prognostic model to predict clinical deterioration in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, using data following vaccine availability. METHODS: Using electronic health records of patients ≥18 years, with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, from a large care-delivery network in Massachusetts, USA, from March 2020 to November 2021, we tested the performance of the previously developed prediction model and updated the prediction model by incorporating data after availability of COVID-19 vaccines. We randomly divided data into development (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. We built a model predicting worsening in a published severity scale in 24 h by LASSO regression and evaluated performance by c-statistic and Brier score. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 8185 patients (Development: 5730 patients [mean age: 62; 44% female] and Validation: 2455 patients [mean age: 62; 45% female]). The previously published model had suboptimal performance using data after November 2020 (N = 4973, c-statistic = 0.60. Brier score = 0.11). After retraining with the new data, the updated model included 38 predictors including 18 changing biomarkers. Patients hospitalized after Jun 1st, 2021 (when COVID-19 vaccines became widely available in Massachusetts) were younger and had fewer comorbidities than those hospitalized before. The c-statistic and Brier score were 0.77 and 0.13 in the development cohort, and 0.73 and 0.14 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 differed substantially over time. We developed a new dynamic model for rapid progression with satisfactory performance in the validation set.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Anciano , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Deterioro Clínico , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Modelos Estadísticos , Adulto , Medición de Riesgo
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(8): 1028-1038, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin have shown benefit for preventing major ischemic events, albeit with increased bleeding risk, among patients in the general population with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data are scarce in patients with cirrhosis and AF. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus rivaroxaban and versus warfarin in patients with cirrhosis and AF. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Two U.S. claims data sets (Medicare and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database [2013 to 2022]). PARTICIPANTS: 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched patients with cirrhosis and nonvalvular AF initiating use of apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes included ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage or major gastrointestinal bleeding). Database-specific and pooled PS-matched rate differences (RDs) per 1000 person-years (PY) and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated, controlling for 104 preexposure covariates. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban initiators had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhagic events than apixaban initiators (RD, 33.1 per 1000 PY [95% CI, 12.9 to 53.2 per 1000 PY]; HR, 1.47 [CI, 1.11 to 1.94]) but no significant differences in rates of ischemic events or death. Consistently higher rates of major hemorrhage were found with rivaroxaban across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Warfarin initiators also had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhage than apixaban initiators (RD, 26.1 per 1000 PY [CI, 6.8 to 45.3 per 1000 PY]; HR, 1.38 [CI, 1.03 to 1.84]), particularly hemorrhagic stroke (RD, 9.7 per 1000 PY [CI, 2.2 to 17.2 per 1000 PY]; HR, 2.85 [CI, 1.24 to 6.59]). LIMITATION: Nonrandomized treatment selection. CONCLUSION: Among patients with cirrhosis and nonvalvular AF, initiators of rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhage and similar rates of ischemic events and death. Initiation of warfarin versus apixaban also contributed to significantly higher rates of major hemorrhagic events, including hemorrhagic stroke. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Hemorragia , Cirrosis Hepática , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Rivaroxabán , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Embolia/prevención & control , Embolia/etiología , Embolia/epidemiología
4.
N Engl J Med ; 390(12): 1069-1079, 2024 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507750

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maternal use of valproate during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Although most studies of other antiseizure medications have not shown increased risks of these disorders, there are limited and conflicting data regarding the risk of autism spectrum disorder associated with maternal topiramate use. METHODS: We identified a population-based cohort of pregnant women and their children within two health care utilization databases in the United States, with data from 2000 through 2020. Exposure to specific antiseizure medications was defined on the basis of prescription fills from gestational week 19 until delivery. Children who had been exposed to topiramate during the second half of pregnancy were compared with those unexposed to any antiseizure medication during pregnancy with respect to the risk of autism spectrum disorder. Valproate was used as a positive control, and lamotrigine was used as a negative control. RESULTS: The estimated cumulative incidence of autism spectrum disorder at 8 years of age was 1.9% for the full population of children who had not been exposed to antiseizure medication (4,199,796 children). With restriction to children born to mothers with epilepsy, the incidence was 4.2% with no exposure to antiseizure medication (8815 children), 6.2% with exposure to topiramate (1030 children), 10.5% with exposure to valproate (800 children), and 4.1% with exposure to lamotrigine (4205 children). Propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios in a comparison with no exposure to antiseizure medication were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.65) for exposure to topiramate, 2.67 (95% CI, 1.69 to 4.20) for exposure to valproate, and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46) for exposure to lamotrigine. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of autism spectrum disorder was higher among children prenatally exposed to the studied antiseizure medications than in the general population. However, after adjustment for indication and other confounders, the association was substantially attenuated for topiramate and lamotrigine, whereas an increased risk remained for valproate. (Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health.).


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Lamotrigina , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Topiramato , Ácido Valproico , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/inducido químicamente , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/etiología , Trastorno Autístico/inducido químicamente , Trastorno Autístico/epidemiología , Trastorno Autístico/etiología , Lamotrigina/efectos adversos , Lamotrigina/uso terapéutico , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Topiramato/efectos adversos , Topiramato/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(11): e2342264, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943558

RESUMEN

Importance: There are no data on patient-centered outcomes and health care costs by frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking oral anticoagulants (OACs). Objective: To compare home time, clinical events, and health care costs associated with OACs by frailty levels in older adults with AF. Design, Setting, and Participants: This community-based cohort study assessed Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older with AF from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed from January to December 2022. Exposures: Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin use were measured from prescription claims. Frailty was measured using a validated claims-based frailty index. Main outcomes and measures: Outcome measures were (1) home time (days alive out of the hospital and skilled nursing facility) loss greater than 14 days; (2) a composite end point of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death; and (3) total cost per member per year after propensity score overlap weighting. Results: The weighted population comprised 136 551 beneficiaries, including 45 950 taking apixaban (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 51.3% female), 45 320 taking rivaroxaban (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 51.9% female), and 45 281 taking warfarin (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 52.0% female). Compared with apixaban, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of home time lost greater than 14 days (risk difference per 100 persons, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.1]), composite end point (rate difference per 1000 person-years, 21.3 [95% CI, 16.4-26.2]), and total cost (mean difference, $890 [95% CI, $652-$1127]), with greater differences among the beneficiaries with frailty. Use of warfarin relative to apixaban was associated with increased home time lost (risk difference per 100 persons, 3.2 [95% CI, 2.9-3.5]) and composite end point (rate difference per 1000 person-years, 29.4 [95% CI, 24.5-34.3]), with greater differences among the beneficiaries with frailty. Compared with apixaban, warfarin was associated with lower total cost (mean difference, -$1166 [95% CI, -$1396 to -$937]) but higher cost when excluding OAC cost (mean difference, $1409 [95% CI, $1177 to $1642]) regardless of frailty levels. Conclusions and Relevance: In older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with increased home time and lower rates of clinical events than rivaroxaban and warfarin, especially for those with frailty. Apixaban was associated with lower total cost compared with rivaroxaban but higher cost compared with warfarin due to higher OAC cost. These findings suggest that apixaban may be preferred for older adults with AF, particularly those with frailty.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Fragilidad , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Medicare , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA