Background rates of 41 adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccines in 10 European healthcare databases - an ACCESS cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In May 2020, the ACCESS (The vACCine covid-19 monitoring readinESS) project was launched to prepare real-world monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines. Within this project, this study aimed to generate background incidence rates of 41 adverse events of special interest (AESI) to contextualize potential safety signals detected following administration of COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: A dynamic cohort study was conducted using a distributed data network of 10 healthcare databases from 7 European countries (Italy, Spain, Denmark, The Netherlands, Germany, France and United Kingdom) over the period 2017 to 2020. A common protocol (EUPAS37273), common data model, and common analytics programs were applied for syntactic, semantic and analytical harmonization. Incidence rates (IR) for each AESI and each database were calculated by age and sex by dividing the number of incident cases by the total person-time at risk. Age-standardized rates were pooled using random effect models according to the provenance of the events. FINDINGS: A total number of 63,456,074 individuals were included in the study, contributing to 211.7 million person-years. A clear age pattern was observed for most AESIs, rates also varied by provenance of disease diagnosis (primary care, specialist care). Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia rates were extremely low ranging from 0.06 to 4.53/100,000 person-years for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) with thrombocytopenia (TP) and mixed venous and arterial thrombosis with TP, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Given the nature of the AESIs and the setting (general practitioners or hospital-based databases or both), background rates from databases that show the highest level of completeness (primary care and specialist care) should be preferred, others can be used for sensitivity. The study was designed to ensure representativeness to the European population and generalizability of the background incidence rates. FUNDING: The project has received support from the European Medicines Agency under the Framework service contract nr EMA/2018/28/PE.

Estimation of foot-and-mouth disease windborne transmission risk from USA beef feedlots.

Windborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) requires specific epidemiological and meteorological conditions, thus modeling the risk of windborne spread involves integrating epidemiological and meteorological models. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential risk of windborne spread of FMD from an infected US feedlot using an integrated modeling approach, and to identify factors that determine this risk. To address this objective, we integrated a within-herd epidemiological model and an advanced atmospheric dispersion model, and calculated infection risk dependent on exposed herd size. A previously developed epidemiological model was used to simulate the spread of FMD through a typical U.S. feedlot, while the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) HYSPLIT atmospheric dispersion model, which has been validated for FMD modeling, was used to model virus dispersion. Infection risk for exposed herds was calculated as a binomial probability accounting for dose and exposed herd size. We modeled risk of windborne spread from a typical 4000 head feedlot in the U.S. state of Iowa (IA), and a typical 48,000 head feedlot in the U.S. state of Kansas (KS) during winter and summer seasons. The risk of windborne spread of FMD varied based on weather/season conditions, estimated average viral shedding rate per head, size of infected herd, and size of exposed herd. In the baseline Kansas scenario (KS/103/W), the median of the maximum daily risk of infecting a 1000-head exposed herd ranged from 58.16 % at 1 km to 0.78 % at 10 km (Table 4). In the baseline Iowa scenario (IA/103/W), the median of the maximum daily risk of infecting a 1000-head exposed herd ranged from 21.78 % at 1 km to 0.05 % at 10 km (Table 4). The minimum control area recommended by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in an FMD outbreak is 10 km from the infected premise. Our results indicate that significant risk of windborne spread may extend beyond 10 km in certain situations. This is particularly a concern in areas where there are large feedlots in relatively close proximity, such as in southwestern Kansas. Our model may be useful as a research tool in the absence of an outbreak and may help direct surveillance and response efforts in the event of an outbreak.

Paediatric trauma: experience from the UK's busiest trauma centre.

Paediatric major trauma is relatively uncommon (6% of all traumas) and therefore unfamiliar to many radiologists. The indications for and interpretation of imaging are different to those commonly encountered in adults. In a centre that rarely encounters paediatric trauma, there can be trepidation over the best way to image children due to concerns regarding radiation and the injury patterns that occur at various ages. Within paediatric trauma, as per the Royal College of Radiologists "paediatric trauma protocols" guidelines and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance, the main reliance is on computed tomography (CT) and plain radiographs. This review of paediatric trauma from a busy UK major trauma centre demonstrates the most appropriate use of different imaging techniques, the extent of imaging, and the types of injuries that occur in a selection of paediatric trauma patients with a variety of trauma mechanisms. Cases include trauma related to road traffic accidents, bicycle handlebar injuries, falls, and even stabbings. Important learning points highlighted include the use of targeted body part imaging in children, the significance of handlebar injuries, and the importance of assessing for underlying injury in paediatric rib fractures and abdominal bruising and tenderness. We hope these examples will help to support and guide radiologists when encountering paediatric trauma within their own centres.

Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cementless fixation is an alternative to cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study was to determine if cementless UKR fixation is as good as cemented by comparing the five-year migration measured radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients were randomised to receive either a cemented or a cementless Oxford UKR and were studied at intervals up to five years to assess migration with RSA and radiolucencies with radiographs. RESULTS: During the first year there was a small and significant amount of migration, predominantly in an anterior direction, of both the cemented (0.24 mm, SD 0.32, p = 0.01) and cementless (0.26 mm, SD 0.31, p = 0.00) femoral components. Thereafter there was no significant migration in any direction. At no stage was there any significant difference between the migrations of the cemented or cementless femoral components. During the first year, particularly the first three months, the cementless tibial components subsided 0.28 mm (SD 0.19, p = 0.00). This was significantly (p = 0.00) greater than the subsidence of the cemented tibial component (0.09, SD 0.19, p = 0.28). Between the second and fifth years there was no significant migration of either cemented or cementless tibial components. At five years radiolucent lines occurred significantly less with cementless (one partial) compared to cemented (six partial and one complete) tibial components. CONCLUSIONS: As, between two and five years, there was no significant migration of cemented or cementless components, and no significant difference between them, we conclude that cementless fixation is as reliable as cemented. It may be better as there are fewer radiolucent lines.

The role of Veterinary Services in areas of conflict.

Armed conflict significantly impacts livestock production, animal health, public health, and the delivery of Veterinary Services by limiting resources, eroding border control, disrupting land use, impairing disease surveillance, and reducing food safety and quality. Those seeking to build capacity in animal health in areas of conflict should focus on strengthening resilience in animal production systems and animal health infrastructure to minimise the devastating effects of conflict. Methods for reconstructing Veterinary Service systems should be tailored to each country's specific needs. These can be determined through participatory assessment, with a focus on building sustainable relationships among all stakeholders. Although it is tempting for animal health professionals to focus primarily on improving animal health on individual farms or targeting specific diseases, attention should be centred on entire systems and on developing sustainable agricultural improvements that will enhance livelihoods on a national scale. Aiding economic growth can also help to lower the probability of future conflict.

Les conflits armés ont d'importantes répercussions sur l'élevage, la santé animale, la santé publique et les prestations des Services vétérinaires, car ils limitent les ressources, mettent à mal les contrôles aux frontières, perturbent l'utilisation des terres, nuisent à la surveillance des maladies et réduisent la sécurité sanitaire et la qualité des aliments. Les acteurs cherchant à renforcer les capacités en santé animale dans les zones de conflit devraient se centrer sur la consolidation de la résilience des systèmes de production animale et des infrastructures de santé animale afin de réduire au minimum les effets dévastateurs du conflit. Il convient d'adapter les méthodes de reconstruction des Services vétérinaires aux besoins spécifiques de chaque pays. Ceux-ci peuvent être estimés à partir d'évaluations participatives, qui mettent l'accent sur l'édification de relations durables entre tous les acteurs concernés. S'il peut être tentant pour les professionnels de la santé animale de s'attacher en premier lieu à l'amélioration de la santé animale dans des exploitations individuelles ou de cibler certaines maladies particulières, il faudrait plutôt centrer l'attention sur les systèmes dans leur ensemble et sur la mise sur pied d'améliorations agricoles durables qui finiront par renforcer les moyens de subsistance à l'échelle nationale. Les mesures favorisant la croissance économique peuvent également contribuer à réduire la probabilité d'un futur conflit.

Los conflictos armados inciden sustancialmente en la producción ganadera, la sanidad animal, la salud pública y la prestación de servicios veterinarios porque disminuyen los recursos disponibles, erosionan los controles de fronteras, desorganizan los usos del suelo, dificultan la vigilancia de enfermedades y merman los niveles de inocuidad y calidad de los alimentos. Quienes traten de potenciar los medios de acción zoosanitaria en zonas de conflicto deberían centrarse en conferir más resiliencia a los sistemas de producción animal y las infraestructuras zoosanitarias con el fin de reducir al mínimo los devastadores efectos de los conflictos. Los métodos para reconstruir los sistemas de prestación de servicios veterinarios deben estar adaptados a las necesidades específicas de cada país, necesidades que se pueden determinar con procesos de evaluación participativa, procurando especialmente forjar relaciones sostenibles entre todas las partes interesadas. Aunque para los profesionales de la sanidad animal resulte tentador centrarse primordialmente en la mejora de las condiciones zoosanitarias en las explotaciones o combatir selectivamente determinadas enfermedades, lo conveniente es prestar atención a los sistemas considerados en su conjunto e introducir en el mundo agropecuario mejoras sostenibles que potencien los medios de vida de la población de todo el país. El hecho de apuntalar el crecimiento económico también puede ser útil para reducir las probabilidades de conflicto en el futuro.

Age stratified, matched comparison of unicompartmental and total knee replacement.

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) tends to provide better function but has a higher revision rate than total knee replacement (TKR). The aim was to determine if this occurred in all age groups. METHODS: Two large, non-registry, prospective cohorts with median 10-year follow-up (2252 TKR, 1000 medial UKR) were identified. All UKR met recommended indications. TKR with an inappropriate disease pattern for medial UKR were excluded. Knees were propensity score-matched within age-strata (<60 years at operation, 60 to <75, 75+) and compared using Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Kaplan-Meier revision rates and a composite failure, defined as any of revision, reoperation or no improvement in OKS. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred and eighty-two TKR and UKR were matched. Results are reported TKR vs UKR for ages <60, 60 to <75 and 75+. Median 10-year OKS were 33 vs 45 (p < 0.001), 36 vs 42 (p < 0.001) and 36 vs 38 (p = 0.25). Ten-year revision rates were 11% vs 7%, 5% vs 5%, and 5% vs 10%, (none significant). The composite failures occurred 8%, 5% and 5% more frequently with TKR than UKR (none significant). CONCLUSIONS: In this matched study UKR provided better functional outcomes in all age groups, particularly the young, and provided substantially more excellent outcomes. Although in older groups TKR tended to have a lower revision rate, in the young UKR had a lower revision rate. This was surprising and was perhaps because in this study UKR was, as recommended, only used for bone-on-bone arthritis, whereas in young patients it is widely used for early arthritis, which is associated with a high failure rate. This study supports the use of UKR with recommended indications, in all age groups.

Mid- to long-term function and implant survival of ACL reconstruction and medial Oxford UKR.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe mid- to long-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with simultaneous or staged medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), and compare outcomes between (1) young patients aged younger than 55 at surgery and those older, (2) those with long-term follow-up greater than 10 years, (3) cemented and cementless UKR, and (4) compare outcomes to those with an intact ACL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified knees with staged or simultaneous ACL reconstruction and medial UKR from a prospectively followed designer UKR cohort, and describe mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS), mean Tegner activity score and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. We matched these knees to ACL-intact knees. RESULTS: Seventy-six consecutive UKR with staged or simultaneous ACL reconstruction were identified with mean six-year follow-up (range 1-15). There was significant improvement in OKS and Tegner score with surgery. At most recent follow-up, OKS was 41.0 (range 11 to 48), and Tegner score 3.6 (0 to 8). There were three revisions occurring at a mean of five years post-operatively. The five-, 10- and 15-year survival estimates were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93-100), 92% (83-100), and 92% (83-100). There was no difference in functional scores or implant survival in young patients, those with long-term follow-up (>10 years), those with cementless fixation, or when compared to ACL intact knees. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate excellent mid- to long-term function and survival of selected patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction and medial UKR. Their outcome was similar to those with intact ACLs.

Correlation of histological and microbiological findings in septic and aseptic knee implant failure.

INTRODUCTION: The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) has defined specific clinical and laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). In this study we assessed the diagnostic utility of MSIS microbiological and histological criteria for PJI in 138 cases of septic and aseptic knee implant failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intra-operative samples from 60 cases of knee septic implant failure (SIF) and 78 cases of aseptic implant failure (AIF), defined on the basis of clinical, laboratory and operative findings/surgical management, were analysed microbiologically and histologically. Findings were correlated with the final clinical diagnosis and the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of MSIS microbiological and histological criteria for knee PJI were assessed. RESULTS: 80% of SIF cases showed culture of the same organism from two or more samples (ie MSIS microbiological criteria for definite PJI); 8.3% grew an organism from one sample, and 11.7% showed no growth from any sample. 23.1% of AIF cases grew an organism from one sample and 76.9% showed no growth from any sample. MSIS histological criteria for PJI identified 96.7% of SIF cases. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive value of MSIS histological criteria for PJI were 96.7%, 100%, 98.6%, 100% and 97.5%, respectively. MSIS microbiological and histological criteria identified all AIF cases. CONCLUSIONS: Knee PJI is more often identified by current MSIS histological than microbiological criteria. A significant proportion of SIF cases show either no growth or growth of an organism from only one sample. AIF is identified by both MSIS microbiological and histological criteria. Correlation of clinical, radiological and laboratory findings is required for the diagnosis of knee PJI.

Functional Outcome and Revision Rate Are Independent of Limb Alignment Following Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about optimal limb alignment following knee replacement. An aim of using Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) implants is to accurately restore normal ligament tension in the knee, thereby restoring normal kinematics. This return to normal tension typically results in a return to prearthritic alignment, which is frequently varus. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between postoperative limb alignment and postoperative patient-reported outcome and implant revision rate. METHODS: We used a consecutive cohort of 891 knees with cemented Oxford medial UKR implants with a mean 10-year follow-up and recorded alignment. We grouped knees according to postoperative mechanical alignment as marked varus (estimated at 10°), mild varus (estimated at 5°), neutral, and valgus. The mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was calculated at 5 and 10 years postoperatively. Revision risk was assessed by survival analysis and component-time incidence rates. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 67 (8%) of the 891 knees were in marked varus; 308 (35%), in mild varus; 508 (57%), in neutral; and 8 (1%), in valgus. The valgus group (8 knees) was too small for further analysis. The mean OKS (and standard deviation [SD]) at 10 years postoperatively was 41.7 ± 7 for marked varus, 40.5 ± 8 for mild varus, and 39.4 ± 9 for neutral alignment (p = 0.28). At 10 years, 92%, 85%, and 76% achieved a good or excellent OKS outcome, respectively (p = 0.02). Twelve-year survival rates were 93.3% for marked varus, 93.2% for mild varus, and 93.6% for neutral alignment, respectively (p = 0.53). Revision incidence rates per 100 component-years were 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 1.5), 0.36 (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7), and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.4 to 0.8), respectively, and were not significantly different (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Marked postoperative varus mechanical alignment of an estimated 10° was present in 8%, and mild varus of about 5° was present in 35%. Increasing varus alignment was associated with an increasing percentage of good or excellent OKS outcomes, but otherwise there were no significant differences between alignment groups in patient-reported outcome or revision rate. These data support the standard operative technique for the Oxford UKR, which aims to restore ligament tension and therefore prearthritic alignment rather than neutral mechanical alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ten-year survival and seven-year functional results of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A prospective consecutive series of our first 1000 cases.

BACKGROUND: Cementless fixation is an alternative to cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), with several advantages over cementation. This study reports the ten-year survival and seven-year clinical outcome of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR). METHODS: This prospective study describes the clinical outcome and survival of the first 1000 consecutive cementless medial OUKRs implanted at two centres for recommended indications. RESULTS: The 10-year survival was 97% (CI 95%: 92-100%), with 25 knees being revised. The commonest reason for revision was progression of arthritis laterally, which occurred in nine knees, followed by primary dislocation of the bearing, which occurred in six knees. There were two dislocations secondary to trauma and a ruptured ACL, and two tibial plateau fractures. Although there were no definite cases of aseptic loosening, two early revisions were related to tibial fixation: one for pain and a radiolucent line and one for incomplete seating of the component with a radiolucent line. There were four revisions for pain, but the cause of the pain was uncertain: in one there was tibial overhang and in two there was patellofemoral degeneration, which possibly contributed to the pain. There were no deep infections. The mean OKS improved from 23 (SD 8) to 42 (SD 7) at a mean follow-up of 7.0 years (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival or clinical outcome between the designer and independent centre. CONCLUSIONS: The cementless OUKR is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent 10-year survival and clinical results in the hands of both designer and independent surgeons.

Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The primary stability of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) relies on interference fit (or press fit). Insufficient interference may cause implant loosening, whilst excessive interference could cause bone damage and fracture.The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interference fit by measuring the force required to seat the tibial component of the cementless OUKR (push-in force) and the force required to remove the component (pull-out force). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six cementless OUKR tibial components were implanted in 12 new slots prepared on blocks of solid polyurethane foam (20 pounds per cubic foot (PCF), Sawbones, Malmo, Sweden) with a range of interference of 0.1 mm to 1.9 mm using a Dartec materials testing machine HC10 (Zwick Ltd, Herefordshire, United Kingdom) . The experiment was repeated with cellular polyurethane foam (15 PCF), which is a more porous analogue for trabecular bone. RESULTS: The push-in force progressively increased with increasing interference. The pull-out force was related in a non-linear fashion to interference, decreasing with higher interference. Compared with the current nominal interference, a lower interference would reduce the push-in forces by up to 45% (p < 0.001 One way ANOVA) ensuring comparable (or improved) pull-out forces (p > 0.05 Bonferroni post hoc test). With the more porous bone analogue, although the forces were lower, the relationship between interference and push-in and pull-out force were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that decreasing the interference fit of the tibial component of the cementless OUKR reduces the push-in force and can increase the pull-out force. An optimal interference fit may both improve primary fixation and decrease the risk of fracture.Cite this article: S. Campi, S. J. Mellon, D. Ridley, B. Foulke, C. A. F. Dodd, H. G. Pandit, D. W. Murray. Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:226-231. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1.

Anterior knee pain and evidence of osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint should not be considered contraindications to mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up.

AIMS: It is not clear whether anterior knee pain and osteoarthritis (OA) of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) are contraindications to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Our aim was to investigate the long-term outcome of a consecutive series of patients, some of whom had anterior knee pain and PFJ OA managed with UKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the ten-year functional outcomes and 15-year implant survival of 805 knees (677 patients) following medial mobile-bearing UKA. The intra-operative status of the PFJ was documented and, with the exception of bone loss with grooving to the lateral side, neither the clinical or radiological state of the PFJ nor the presence of anterior knee pain were considered a contraindication. The impact of radiographic findings and anterior knee pain was studied in a subgroup of 100 knees (91 patients). RESULTS: There was no relationship between functional outcomes, at a mean of ten years, or 15-year implant survival, and pre-operative anterior knee pain, or the presence or degree of cartilage loss documented intra-operatively at the medial patella or trochlea, or radiographic evidence of OA in the medial side of the PFJ. In 6% of cases there was full thickness cartilage loss on the lateral side of the patella. In these cases, the overall ten-year function and 15-year survival was similar to those without cartilage loss; however they had slightly more difficulty with descending stairs. Radiographic signs of OA seen in the lateral part of the PFJ were not associated with a definite compromise in functional outcome or implant survival. CONCLUSION: Severe damage to the lateral side of the PFJ with bone loss and grooving remains a contraindication to mobile-bearing UKA. Less severe damage to the lateral side of the PFJ and damage to the medial side, however severe, does not compromise the overall function or survival, so should not be considered to be a contraindication. However, if a patient does have full thickness cartilage loss on the lateral side of the PFJ they may have a slight compromise in their ability to descend stairs. Pre-operative anterior knee pain also does not compromise the functional outcome or survival and should not be considered to be a contraindication. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:632-9.

Unsatisfactory outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with partial thickness cartilage loss: a medium-term follow-up.

AIMS: While medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is indicated for patients with full-thickness cartilage loss, it is occasionally used to treat those with partial-thickness loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the five-year outcomes in a consecutive series of UKAs used in patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the medial compartment of the knee. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2014, 94 consecutive UKAs were undertaken in 90 patients with partial thickness cartilage loss and followed up independently for a mean of six years (1 to 13). These patients had partial thickness cartilage loss either on both femur and tibia (13 knees), or on either the femur or the tibia, with full thickness loss on the other surface of the joint (18 and 63 knees respectively). Using propensity score analysis, these patients were matched 1:2 based on age, gender and pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) with knees with full thickness loss on both the femur and tibia. The functional outcomes, implant survival and incidence of re-operations were assessed at one, two and five years post-operatively. A subgroup of 36 knees in 36 patients with partial thickness cartilage loss, who had pre-operative MRI scans, was assessed to identify whether there were any factors identified on MRI that predicted the outcome. RESULTS: Knees with partial thickness cartilage loss had significantly worse functional outcomes at one, two and five years post-operatively compared with those with full thickness loss. A quarter of knees with partial thickness loss had a fair or poor result and a fifth failed to achieve a clinically significant improvement in OKS from a baseline of four points or more; double that seen in knees with full thickness loss. Whilst there was no difference in implant survival between the groups, the rate of re-operation in knees with partial thickness loss was three times higher. Most of the re-operations (three-quarters), were arthroscopies for persistent pain. Compared with those achieving good or excellent outcomes, patients with partial thickness cartilage loss who achieved fair or poor outcomes were younger and had worse pre-operative functional scores. However, there were no other differences in the baseline demographics. MRI findings of full thickness cartilage loss, subchondral oedema, synovitis or effusion did not provide additional prognostic information. CONCLUSION: Medial UKA should be reserved for patients with full thickness cartilage loss on both the femur and tibia. Whilst some patients with partial thickness loss achieve a good result we cannot currently identify which these will be and in this situation MRI is unhelpful and misleading. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:475-82.

Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement.

PURPOSE: Lateral progression of arthritis following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), although infrequent, is still the most common reason for revision surgery. Treatment options normally include conversion to total knee arthroplasty. An alternative strategy for some patients may be addition of a lateral UKA. We report the first results of staged bi-compartmental UKA (Bi-UKA) strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively selected from our UKA database patients who underwent a lateral UKA to treat a symptomatic lateral osteoarthritis progression after a medial UKA. The analysis included a clinical and radiological assessment of each patient. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients for a total of 27 knees of staged Bi-UKA were carried out in a single centre. The mean time interval between primary medial UKA and the subsequent lateral UKA was 8.1 years (SD ± 4.6 years). The mean age at the time of the Bi-UKA was 77.1 years (SD ± 6.5 years). The median hospital stay was 3 (range 2-9 days) days, and the mean follow-up after Bi-UKA was 4 years (SD ± 1.9 years). The functional scores showed a significant improvement as compared to the pre-operative status (paired t test, p = 0.003). There were no radiological evidences of failure. None of the patients needed blood transfusion, and there was no significant complications related to the surgical procedure without further surgeries or revisions at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that addition of a lateral UKA for arthritis progression following medial UKA is a good option in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Observational study without controls, Level IV.

Comparison of outcomes after UKA in patients with and without chondrocalcinosis: a matched cohort study.

PURPOSE: Chondrocalcinosis can be associated with an inflammatory arthritis and aggressive joint destruction. There is uncertainty as to whether chondrocalcinosis represents a contraindication to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study reports the outcome of a consecutive series of patients with chondrocalcinosis and medial compartment osteoarthritis treated with UKA matched to controls. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, 88 patients with radiological chondrocalcinosis (R-CCK) and 67 patients with histological chondrocalcinosis (H-CCK) were treated for end-stage medial compartment arthritis with Oxford UKA. One-to-two matching was performed to controls, treated with UKA, but without evidence of chondrocalcinosis. Functional outcome and implant survival were assessed in each group. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 10 years. The mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at final follow-up was 43, 41 and 41 in H-CCK, R-CCK and control groups (change from baseline OKS was 21, 18 and 15, respectively). The change was significantly higher in H-CCK than in control but was not significantly different in R-CCK. Ten-year survival was 96 % in R-CCK, 86 % in H-CCK and 98 % in controls. Although the survival in H-CCK was significantly worse than in control, only one failure was due to disease progression. CONCLUSION: The presence of R-CCK does not influence functional outcome or survival following UKA. Pre-operative radiological evidence of CCK should not be considered to be a contraindication to UKA. H-CCK is associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes but also a higher revision rate compared with controls. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case control study, Level III.

Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome, failures, implant survival, and complications encountered with cementless fixation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on cementless fixation in UKA was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The following database was comprehensively searched: PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Google Scholar. The keywords "unicompartmental", "unicondylar", "partial knee arthroplasty", and "UKA" were combined with each of the keyword "uncemented", "cementless" and "survival", "complications", and "outcome". The following data were extracted: demographics, clinical outcome, details of failures and revisions, cumulative survival, and complications encountered. The risk of bias of each study was estimated with the MINORS score and a further scoring system based on the presence of the primary outcomes. RESULTS: From a cohort of 63 studies identified using the above methodology, 10 papers (1199 knees) were included in the final review. The mean follow-up ranged from 2 to 11 years (median 5 years). The 5-year survival ranged from 90 to 99 % and the 10-year survival from 92 to 97 %. There were 48 revisions with an overall revision rate of 0.8 per 100 observed component-years. The most common cause of failure was progression of osteoarthritis in the retained compartment (0.9 %). The cumulative incidence of complications and revisions was comparable to that reported in similar studies on cemented UKAs. The advantages of cementless fixation include faster surgical time, avoidance of cementation errors, and lower incidence of radiolucent lines. CONCLUSIONS: Cementless fixation is a safe and effective alternative to cementation in medial UKA. Clinical outcome, failures, reoperation rate, and survival are similar to those reported for cemented implants with lower incidence of radiolucent lines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

PURPOSE: Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) was introduced to address some of the problems that can occur following cemented UKR. The aim of this study was to report the 5-year experience of the first 512 medial cementless Oxford UKR implanted by two surgeons for the recommended indications. METHODS: The first consecutive 512 cementless Phase 3 Oxford UKRs implanted by two surgeons for the recommended indications between June 2004 and October 2013 were prospectively identified and followed up independently. All the procedures were carried out through a minimally invasive approach without eversion or dislocation of the patella. Patients were assessed clinically pre-operatively and at 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery with functional outcome scores and radiographs. RESULTS: There were eight reoperations of which six were revisions giving a 5-year survival of 98 % (95 % CI 94-100 %). At a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (1.0-10.2), the mean OKS was 43 (SD 7), AKSS (objective) was 81 (SD 13), and AKSS (functional) was 86 (SD 17). The first 120 cases had a minimum follow-up of 5 years (mean 5.9; range 5-10.2). In these patients, the mean OKS was 41 (SD 8), AKSS (objective) was 81 (SD 14), and AKSS (functional) was 82 (SD 18). There were no femoral radiolucencies and no complete tibial radiolucencies. 11 % of tibial components had partial radiolucent lines; the remaining 89 % had no radiolucencies. CONCLUSION: The clinical results are as good as or better than those previously reported for cemented fixation. The radiographic results are better with secure bony attachment to the implants in every case. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Radiological Decision Aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and preliminary validation.

AIMS: An evidence-based radiographic Decision Aid for meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been developed and this study investigates its performance at an independent centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pre-operative radiographs, including stress views, from a consecutive cohort of 550 knees undergoing arthroplasty (UKA or total knee arthroplasty; TKA) by a single-surgeon were assessed. Suitability for UKA was determined using the Decision Aid, with the assessor blinded to treatment received, and compared with actual treatment received, which was determined by an experienced UKA surgeon based on history, examination, radiographic assessment including stress radiographs, and intra-operative assessment in line with the recommended indications as described in the literature. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the Decision Aid was 92% and 88%, respectively. Excluding knees where a clear pre-operative plan was made to perform TKA, i.e. patient request, the sensitivity was 93% and specificity 96%. The false-positive rate was low (2.4%) with all affected patients readily identifiable during joint inspection at surgery. In patients meeting Decision Aid criteria and receiving UKA, the five-year survival was 99% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 97 to 100). The false negatives (3.5%), who received UKA but did not meet the criteria, had significantly worse functional outcomes (flexion p < 0.001, American Knee Society Score - Functional p < 0.001, University of California Los Angeles score p = 0.04), and lower implant survival of 93.1% (95% CI 77.6 to 100). CONCLUSION: The radiographic Decision Aid safely and reliably identifies appropriate patients for meniscal-bearing UKA and achieves good results in this population. The widespread use of the Decision Aid should improve the results of UKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(10 Suppl B):3-10.

Unicompartmental knee replacement: Does the macroscopic status of the anterior cruciate ligament affect outcome?

PURPOSE: ACL damage is associated with progression of arthritis and whilst in the population undergoing joint replacement in the majority of cases the ACL is intact there is a wide spectrum of ACL disease. This study investigated whether the macroscopic status of the ACL affected functional outcome or survival following UKR. METHODS: The macroscopic status of the ACL was recorded in 820 cemented Oxford UKRs implanted by two surgeons for the recommended indications. The ACL was considered functionally normal in the setting of anteromedial tibial wear and macroscopically the ACL visually appeared normal or had synovial damage or longitudinal splits. The patients were followed up independently with a mean follow-up of 10.3years (range 5.3 to 16.6). RESULTS: More marked ACL macroscopic damage was significantly associated with increasing age, male gender and a more extensive anteromedial tibial defect. Patients with more ACL damage had a significantly lower pre-operative AKSS Objective Score, however no difference in AKSS-Functional or OKS was detected between groups. At 10years no difference in functional outcome or activity level was found between groups. Compared to those with a macroscopically normal ACL at 10years a significantly greater improvement from baseline OKS score was seen in patients with macroscopic ACL abnormalities. At 15years no difference in implant survival, or failure mechanism, was detected between groups. CONCLUSION: The macroscopic status of the ACL does not affect long term functional outcomes or implant survival and in the setting of an intact ACL macroscopic status is not a contraindication to mobile bearing UKR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs.

There have been concerns about the long-term survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This prospective study reports the 15-year survival and ten-year functional outcome of a consecutive series of 1000 minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford medial UKAs (818 patients, 393 men, 48%, 425 women, 52%, mean age 66 years; 32 to 88). These were implanted by two surgeons involved with the design of the prosthesis to treat anteromedial osteoarthritis and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee, which are recommended indications. Patients were prospectively identified and followed up independently for a mean of 10.3 years (5.3 to 16.6). At ten years, the mean Oxford Knee Score was 40 (standard deviation (sd) 9; 2 to 48): 79% of knees (349) had an excellent or good outcome. There were 52 implant-related re-operations at a mean of 5.5 years (0.2 to 14.7). The most common reasons for re-operation were arthritis in the lateral compartment (2.5%, 25 knees), bearing dislocation (0.7%, seven knees) and unexplained pain (0.7%, seven knees). When all implant-related re-operations were considered as failures, the ten-year rate of survival was 94% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92 to 96) and the 15-year survival rate 91% (CI 83 to 98). When failure of the implant was the endpoint the 15-year survival was 99% (CI 96 to 100). This is the only large series of minimally invasive UKAs with 15-year survival data. The results support the continued use of minimally invasive UKA for the recommended indications.