RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are the most common cause of hospital admission to orthopaedic departments in Europe and they generate a major health problem. Therefore, it is of great interest to identify additional risk factors that will help us to better understand the pathophysiology of these fractures and improve our preventive capacity. There is sufficient data to support the theory of modulation of bone mass by gut microbiota (osteomicrobiology); however, there is a lack of human clinical studies directly linking microbiota to hip fracture risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, analytical, case-control study. The sample consisted of 50 patients and it was distributed as follows: 25 elderly patients with fragility hip fracture and 25 subjects without fracture. The intestinal microbiota was determined by DNA extraction from stool samples and 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing after generation of gene libraries. RESULTS: Alpha diversity revealed an elevation of the estimators for the taxonomic class level in the hip fracture group. The orders Bacteroidales, Oscillospirales, Lachnospirales, Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales and Enterobacterales were the dominant orders in both groups. In patients with fracture, a significant percentage increase in the orders Bacteroidales (p<.001) and Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales (p<.005) was observed, as well as a decrease in the orders Lachnospirales (p<.001) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study has found an association between a specific microbiota in elderly patients with fragility hip fracture. These findings open the door to new strategies to prevent hip fractures. Modification of the microbiota through probiotics may prove to be an effective method to reduce the risk of hip fracture.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are the most common cause of hospital admission to orthopaedic departments in Europe and they generate a major health problem. Therefore, it is of great interest to identify additional risk factors that will help us to better understand the pathophysiology of these fractures and improve our preventive capacity. There is sufficient data to support the theory of modulation of bone mass by gut microbiota (osteomicrobiology); however, there is a lack of human clinical studies directly linking microbiota to hip fracture risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, analytical, case-control study. The sample consisted of 50 patients and it was distributed as follows: 25 elderly patients with fragility hip fracture and 25 subjects without fracture. The intestinal microbiota was determined by DNA extraction from stool samples and 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing after generation of gene libraries. RESULTS: Alpha diversity revealed an elevation of the estimators for the taxonomic class level in the hip fracture group. The orders Bacteroidales, Oscillospirales, Lachnospirales, Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales and Enterobacterales were the dominant orders in both groups. In patients with fracture, a significant percentage increase in the orders Bacteroidales (p<.001) and Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales (p<.005) was observed, as well as a decrease in the orders Lachnospirales (p<.001) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study has found an association between a specific microbiota in elderly patients with fragility hip fracture. These findings open the door to new strategies to prevent hip fractures. Modification of the microbiota through probiotics may prove to be an effective method to reduce the risk of hip fracture.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Flexion-relaxation response of the lumbar erector spinae has been previously studied after different interventions such as exercise programs or spinal manipulation, in subjects with chronic low back pain. The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of an isolated myofascial release protocol on erector spinae myoelectric activity and lumbar spine kinematics in chronic low back pain. METHODS: Thirty-six participants, with nonspecific chronic low back pain, were randomized to myofascial release group (nâ¯=â¯18) receiving four sessions of myofascial treatment, each lasting 40â¯min, and to control group (nâ¯=â¯18) receiving a sham myofascial release. Electromyographic and kinematic variables as well as pain and disability questionnaires were analyzed. FINDINGS: There was a bilateral reduction of the flexion relaxation ratio in individuals receiving myofascial release and who did not show myoelectric silence at baseline (right difference Mâ¯=â¯0.34, 95% CI [0.16, 0.33], pâ¯≤â¯.05 and left difference Mâ¯=â¯0.45, 95% CI [0.16, 0.73], pâ¯≤â¯.05). There was also a significant reduction in pain in the myofascial release group (difference Mâ¯=â¯-9.1, 95% CI [-16.3, -1.8], pâ¯≤â¯.05) and disability (difference Mâ¯=â¯-5.6, 95% CI [-9.1, -2.1], pâ¯≤â¯.05), compared with control group. No significant differences between groups were found for the kinematic variables. INTERPRETATION: The myofascial release protocol contributed to the normalization of the flexion- relaxation response in individuals who did not show myoelectric silence before the intervention, and also showed a significant reduction in pain and disability compared with the sham group.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/fisiología , Región Lumbosacra/fisiología , Manipulación Espinal , Masaje , Músculos Paraespinales/fisiología , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Método Doble Ciego , Electromiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rango del Movimiento ArticularRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Unstable shoes were developed as a walking device to strengthen the lower extremity muscles and reduce joint loading. Many studies have reported increased muscle activity throughout the gait cycle in most of the lower limb muscles in healthy adults using these shoes. However, no previous studies have explored the effects of wearing unstable shoes on trunk muscle activity in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the activity of selected trunk muscles in patients with CLBP during a gait test while walking wearing unstable shoes or conventional flat shoes (control). METHODS: Thirty-five CLBP patients (51.1⯱â¯12.4 y; 26⯱â¯3.8â¯kg/m2; 9.3⯱â¯5.2 Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score) were recruited from the Orthopedic Surgery Service at the Hospital to participate in this cross-sectional study. All the participants underwent gait analysis by simultaneously collecting surface electromyography (EMG) data from erector spinae (ES), rectus abdominis (RA), obliquus internus (OI), and obliquus externus (OE) muscles, while walking on a treadmill with flat control shoes or experimental unstable shoes. RESULTS: The results showed significantly higher %EMG activity in the ES (mean difference: 1.8%; 95% CI: 1.3-2.2), RA (mean difference: 1.5%; 95% CI: 0.3-2.7), and OI (mean difference: 1.5%; 95% CI: 0.2-2.8) in the unstable versus the flat-shoe condition, with a large effect size for the ES (Cohen's dâ¯=â¯1.27). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, the use of unstable shoes may be implicated in promoting spine stability, particularly in improving neuromuscular control of the trunk muscles in CLBP treatment.