2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

Immune mechanisms in fibrotic interstitial lung disease.

Fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILDs) have poor survival rates and lack effective therapies. Despite evidence for immune mechanisms in lung fibrosis, immunotherapies have been unsuccessful for major types of fILD. Here, we review immunological mechanisms in lung fibrosis that have the potential to impact clinical practice. We first examine innate immunity, which is broadly involved across fILD subtypes. We illustrate how innate immunity in fILD involves a complex interplay of multiple cell subpopulations and molecular pathways. We then review the growing evidence for adaptive immunity in lung fibrosis to provoke a re-examination of its role in clinical fILD. We close with future directions to address key knowledge gaps in fILD pathobiology: (1) longitudinal studies emphasizing early-stage clinical disease, (2) immune mechanisms of acute exacerbations, and (3) next-generation immunophenotyping integrating spatial, genetic, and single-cell approaches. Advances in these areas are essential for the future of precision medicine and immunotherapy in fILD.

RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease in European ancestry.

Objective: Recently, a genome-wide association study identified an association between RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) and RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 in the Japanese population, especially for patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern. We aimed to replicate this association in a European population and test for interaction with MUC5B rs35705950. Methods: In this genetic case-control association study, patients with RA and ILD and controls with RA and no ILD were included from France, the USA and the Netherlands. Only cases and controls from European genetic ancestries determined by principal components analysis were included in the analyses. RA was defined by the 1987 ACR or 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and ILD by chest high-resolution CT scan, except in the control dataset from the Netherlands, where the absence of ILD was determined by chart review. Patients were genotyped for RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950. Associations were tested using logistic regression adjusted for sex, age at RA onset, age at ILD onset or at certified absence of ILD, tobacco smoking status and country of origin. Results: Among the 883 patients included, 322 were RA-ILD cases (36.5%). MUC5B rs35705950 was strongly associated with RA-ILD in all datasets {combined adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% CI 2.1, 3.9], P = 1.1 × 10-11. No association between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and RA-ILD was observed [combined OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.8, 1.6), P = 0.31. No interaction was found between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950 (P = 0.70). Conclusion: Our findings did not support a contribution of RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 to the overall RA-ILD susceptibility in the European population.

Rheumatoid arthritis and changes on spirometry by smoking status in two prospective longitudinal cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: To compare longitudinal changes in spirometric measures between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and non-RA comparators. METHODS: We analysed longitudinal data from two prospective cohorts: the UK Biobank and COPDGene. Spirometry was conducted at baseline and a second visit after 5-7 years. RA was identified based on self-report and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use; non-RA comparators reported neither. The primary outcomes were annual changes in the per cent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) and per cent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%). Statistical comparisons were performed using multivariable linear regression. The analysis was stratified based on baseline smoking status and the presence of obstructive pattern (FEV1/FVC <0.7). RESULTS: Among participants who underwent baseline and follow-up spirometry, we identified 233 patients with RA and 37 735 non-RA comparators. Among never-smoking participants without an obstructive pattern, RA was significantly associated with more FEV1% decline (ß=-0.49, p=0.04). However, in ever smokers with ≥10 pack-years, those with RA exhibited significantly less FEV1% decline than non-RA comparators (ß=0.50, p=0.02). This difference was more pronounced among those with an obstructive pattern at baseline (ß=1.12, p=0.01). Results were similar for FEV1/FVC decline. No difference was observed in the annual FVC% change in RA versus non-RA. CONCLUSIONS: Smokers with RA, especially those with baseline obstructive spirometric patterns, experienced lower FEV1% and FEV1/FVC decline than non-RA comparators. Conversely, never smokers with RA had more FEV1% decline than non-RA comparators. Future studies should investigate potential treatments and the pathogenesis of obstructive lung diseases in smokers with RA.

Forced vital capacity trajectories and risk of lung transplant and ILD-related mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

We aimed to determine the prevalence and outcomes for forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp) decline among patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). We identified patients with RA-ILD in the Mass General Brigham Healthcare system. RA-ILD diagnosis was determined by review of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging by up to three thoracic radiologists. We abstracted FVCpp measurements, covariates, lung transplant, and ILD-related death from the medical record. We employed a relative FVCpp decline cutoff of > 10% within 24 months. We also used a group-based trajectory model to obtain patterns of change from RA-ILD diagnosis. We then assessed for associations of each FVC decline definition with risk of lung transplant or ILD-related death using multivariable logistic regression. We analyzed 172 patients with RA-ILD with a median of 6 FVCpp measurements per patient over 6.5 years of follow-up (mean age 62.2 years, 36% male). There were seven (4%) lung transplants and 44 (26%) ILD-related deaths. Ninety-eight (57%) patients had relative decline of FVCpp by > 10% in 24 months. We identified three trajectory groups of FVCpp change: rapidly declining (n = 24/168 [14%]), slowly declining (n = 90/168 [54%]), and stable/improving (n = 54/168 [32%]). The rapidly declining group and FVCpp > 10% had adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for lung transplant/ILD-related death of 19.2 (95%CI 4.9 to 75.5) and 2.8 (95%CI 1.3 to 6.1) respectively. Over half of patients with RA-ILD had declining FVCpp. The different trajectory patterns demonstrate the importance of FVC monitoring for identifying patients at the highest risk of poor outcomes. Key Points • Over half of patients with RA-ILD had declining FVCpp over a median of 6.5 years of follow-up. • The rapidly declining FVCpp trajectory group had stronger associations with lung transplant and ILD-related death compared to those with FVCpp decline by > 10%. • Clinicians can employ FVC monitoring to proactively treat patients who are at risk of poor outcomes.

Agreement between local and central anti-synthetase antibodies detection: results from the Classification Criteria of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome project biobank.

OBJECTIVES: The CLASS (Classification Criteria of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome) project is a large international multicentre study that aims to create the first data-driven anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) classification criteria. Identifying anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies (anti-ARS) is crucial for diagnosis, and several commercial immunoassays are now available for this purpose. However, using these assays risks yielding false-positive or false-negative results, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. The established reference standard for detecting anti-ARS is immunoprecipitation (IP), typically employed in research rather than routine autoantibody testing. We gathered samples from participating centers and results from local anti-ARS testing. As an "ad-interim" study within the CLASS project, we aimed to assess how local immunoassays perform in real-world settings compared to our central definition of anti-ARS positivity. METHODS: We collected 787 serum samples from participating centres for the CLASS project and their local anti-ARS test results. These samples underwent initial central testing using RNA-IP. Following this, the specificity of ARS was reconfirmed centrally through ELISA, line-blot assay (LIA), and, in cases of conflicting results, protein-IP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. We also calculated the inter-rater agreement between central and local results using a weighted κ co-efficient. RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrates that local, real-world detection of anti-Jo1 is reliable with high sensitivity and specificity with a very good level of agreement with our central definition of anti-Jo1 antibody positivity. However, the agreement between local immunoassay and central determination of anti-non-Jo1 antibodies varied, especially among results obtained using local LIA, ELISA and "other" methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluates the performance of real-world identification of anti-synthetase antibodies in a large cohort of multi-national patients with ASSD and controls. Our analysis reinforces the reliability of real-world anti-Jo1 detection methods. In contrast, challenges persist for anti-non-Jo1 identification, particularly anti-PL7 and rarer antibodies such as anti-OJ/KS. Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting anti-synthetase antibodies, especially when commercial immunoassays test positive for non-anti-Jo1 antibodies.

Utility of peripheral protein biomarkers for the prediction of incident interstitial features: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION/RATIONALE: Protein biomarkers may help enable the prediction of incident interstitial features on chest CT. METHODS: We identified which protein biomarkers in a cohort of smokers (COPDGene) differed between those with and without objectively measured interstitial features at baseline using a univariate screen (t-test false discovery rate, FDR p<0.001), and which of those were associated with interstitial features longitudinally (multivariable mixed effects model FDR p<0.05). To predict incident interstitial features, we trained four random forest classifiers in a two-thirds random subset of COPDGene: (1) imaging and demographic information, (2) univariate screen biomarkers, (3) multivariable confirmation biomarkers and (4) multivariable confirmation biomarkers available in a separate testing cohort (Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS)). We evaluated classifier performance in the remaining one-third of COPDGene, and, for the final model, also in PLuSS. RESULTS: In COPDGene, 1305 biomarkers were available and 20 differed between those with and without interstitial features at baseline. Of these, 11 were associated with feature progression over a mean of 5.5 years of follow-up, and of these 4 were available in PLuSS, (angiopoietin-2, matrix metalloproteinase 7, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha) over a mean of 8.8 years of follow-up. The area under the curve (AUC) of classifiers using demographics and imaging features in COPDGene and PLuSS were 0.69 and 0.59, respectively. In COPDGene, the AUC of the univariate screen classifier was 0.78 and of the multivariable confirmation classifier was 0.76. The AUC of the final classifier in COPDGene was 0.75 and in PLuSS was 0.76. The outcome for all of the models was the development of incident interstitial features. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple novel and previously identified proteomic biomarkers are associated with interstitial features on chest CT and may enable the prediction of incident interstitial diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Short peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length in rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease.

Shortened telomere lengths (TLs) can be caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms and loss-of-function mutations in telomere-related genes (TRG), as well as ageing and lifestyle factors such as smoking. Our objective was to determine if shortened TL is associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is the largest study to demonstrate and replicate that shortened peripheral blood leukocytes-TL is associated with ILD in patients with RA compared with RA without ILD in a multinational cohort, and short PBL-TL was associated with baseline disease severity in RA-ILD as measured by forced vital capacity percent predicted.

Effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in a real-world cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung diseases (RA-ILD). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified RA-ILD patients initiating antifibrotics at Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, a large multi-hospital healthcare system in Boston, MA, USA. We used electronic query to identify all patients with at least 2 RA diagnosis codes and a prescription for either nintedanib or pirfenidone (2014-2023). All analyzed patients met 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for RA and had definite RA-ILD according to Bongartz criteria. Data regarding pulmonary function test (PFT) results, adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and clinical data were collected. A linear mixed model with random intercept was used to compare the within-patient trajectory of the percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp) within 18-months before to 18-months after antifibrotic initiation among those with these PFT data. Lung transplant-free survival and drug retention was estimated in a Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent baseline factors associated with lung transplant or mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 74 patients with RA-ILD that initiated antifibrotics (mean age 67.8 years, 53 % male); 40 patients initiated nintedanib and 34 initiated pirfenidone. Median follow-up was 89 weeks (min 4, max 387). There was a significant improvement in the estimated slope of FVCpp after antifibrotic initiation (-0.3 % per year after initiation compared to -6.2 % per year before antifibrotic initiation, p = 0.03). Nintedanib and pirfenidone had similar FVCpp trajectory. Twenty-six patients (35 %) died and 4 (5 %) had undergone lung transplantation during follow-up. Male sex and heavy smoking were each associated with the composite outcome of lung transplant or mortality. AEs were reported in 41 (55 %) patients, with gastrointestinal (GI) AEs being most common (n = 30). The initial antifibrotic was discontinued in 34 (46 %) patients mostly due to GI AEs (n = 19). The median drug retention time was 142 weeks (95 %CI 56, 262) with no difference between nintedanib and pirfenidone (p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: In this first real-world study of antifibrotic use dedicated to RA-ILD, antifibrotic initiation was associated with a modestly improved trajectory of FVCpp. AEs were frequently reported, particularly GI, and discontinuation was common. However, lung transplant and mortality rates were still high, emphasizing the need for further therapeutic strategies in patients with severe RA-ILD. These real-world data complement previous trial data that investigated efficacy and safety.

Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Update, From the AJR Special Series on Imaging of Fibrosis.

Pulmonary fibrosis is recognized as occurring in association with a wide and increasing array of conditions, and it presents with a spectrum of chest CT appearances. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which corresponds histologically with usual interstitial pneumonia and represents the most common idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, is a chronic progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) of unknown cause. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) describes the radiologic development of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with ILD of a known or unknown cause other than IPF. The recognition of PPF impacts management of patients with ILD-for example, in guiding initiation of antifibrotic therapy. Interstitial lung abnormalities are an incidental CT finding in patients without suspected ILD and may represent an early intervenable form of pulmonary fibrosis. Traction bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, when detected in the setting of chronic fibrosis, is generally considered evidence of irreversible disease, and progression predicts worsening mortality risk. Awareness of the association between pulmonary fibrosis and connective tissue diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis, is increasing. This review provides an update on the imaging of pulmonary fibrosis, with attention given to recent advances in disease understanding with relevance to radiologic practice. The essential role of a multidisciplinary approach to clinical and radiologic data is highlighted.

Rheumatoid arthritis, quantitative parenchymal lung features, and mortality among smokers.

OBJECTIVES: There have been limited investigations of the prevalence and mortality impact of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) parenchymal lung features in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the cross-sectional prevalence and mortality associations of QCT features, comparing RA and non-RA participants. METHODS: We identified participants with and without RA in COPDGene, a multicentre cohort study of current or former smokers. Using a k-nearest neighbor quantifier, high resolution CT chest scans were scored for percentage of normal lung, interstitial changes, and emphysema. We examined associations between QCT features and RA using multivariable linear regression. After dichotomizing participants at the 75th percentile for each QCT feature among non-RA participants, we investigated mortality associations by RA/non-RA status and quartile 4 vs quartiles 1-3 of QCT features using Cox regression. We assessed for statistical interactions between RA and QCT features. RESULTS: We identified 82 RA cases and 8820 non-RA comparators. In multivariable linear regression, RA was associated with higher percentage of interstitial changes (ß = 1.7 ± 0.5, p= 0.0008) but not emphysema (ß = 1.3 ± 1.7, p= 0.44). Participants with RA and >75th percentile of emphysema had significantly higher mortality than non-RA participants (HR 5.86, 95%CI 3.75-9.13) as well as RA participants (HR 5.56, 95%CI 2.71-11.38) with ≤75th percentile of emphysema. There were statistical interactions between RA and emphysema for mortality (multiplicative p= 0.014; attributable proportion 0.53, 95%CI 0.30-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Using machine learning-derived QCT data in a cohort of smokers, RA was associated with higher percentage of interstitial changes. The combination of RA and emphysema conferred >5-fold higher mortality.

Prevalence and mortality associations of interstitial lung abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis within a multicentre prospective cohort of smokers.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and mortality impact of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in RA and non-RA comparators. METHODS: We analysed associations between ILAs, RA, and mortality in COPDGene, a multicentre prospective cohort study of current and past smokers, excluding known interstitial lung disease (ILD) or bronchiectasis. All participants had research chest high-resolution CT (HRCT) reviewed by a sequential reading method to classify ILA as present, indeterminate or absent. RA cases were identified by self-report RA and DMARD use; non-RA comparators had neither an RA diagnosis nor used DMARDs. We examined the association and mortality risk of RA and ILA using multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 83 RA cases and 8725 non-RA comparators with HRCT performed for research purposes. ILA prevalence was 16.9% in RA cases and 5.0% in non-RA comparators. After adjusting for potential confounders, including genetics, current/past smoking and other lifestyle factors, ILAs were more common among those with RA compared with non-RA [odds ratio 4.76 (95% CI 2.54, 8.92)]. RA with ILAs or indeterminate for ILAs was associated with higher all-cause mortality compared with non-RA without ILAs [hazard ratio (HR) 3.16 (95% CI 2.11, 4.74)] and RA cases without ILA [HR 3.02 (95% CI 1.36, 6.75)]. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of smokers, RA was associated with ILAs and this persisted after adjustment for current/past smoking and genetic/lifestyle risk factors. RA with ILAs in smokers had a 3-fold increased all-cause mortality, emphasizing the importance of further screening and treatment strategies for preclinical ILD in RA.

Reliability and responsiveness of the D12 and validity of its scores as a measure of dyspnoea severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) affects a substantial minority of patients with RA, inducing life-altering symptoms, impairing quality of life (QOL) and forcing patients to confront the potential for shortened survival. Dyspnoea is the predominant respiratory symptom of RA-ILD and a strong driver of QOL impairment in patients with it. The D12 is a 12-item questionnaire that assesses the physical and affective components of dyspnoea. It was one of a battery of patient-reported outcomes used in the double-blind, placebo-controlled TRAIL 1 trial of pirfenidone for RA-ILD. There is little information on the reliability, validity or responsiveness of the D12 in RA-ILD. METHODS: In accordance with COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) methodology, we conducted analyses on data from the TRAIL 1 trial to assess the measurement properties of the D12. RESULTS: Internal consistency (α=0.95, 0.95, 0.95, 0.95 and 0.96 at baseline, 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks) and test-retest reliability 0.85 (0.71 to 0.92) exceeded acceptability criteria. Well over the 75% benchmark of hypotheses (43/46=93%) around D12 measurement properties were confirmed. Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences between subgroups of patients with differing levels of dyspnoea (eg, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Activity score ≥50 vs <50, 9.36 (1.27) points, p<0.0001, with a large effect size=1.7) and physiological impairment at baseline. Longitudinal validity was supported by significant associations between D12 and anchor scores over time (eg, at 52 weeks, correlation between D12 change and SGRQ Activity change was 0.54, p<0.0001; between D12 change and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) Functioning Component was 0.41, p<0.0001). A battery of analyses confirmed the responsiveness of D12 scores for capturing change in dyspnoea over time. We estimated the minimal within-patient change threshold for worsening as 3 points. CONCLUSIONS: D12 scores possess acceptable measurement properties in RA-ILD, such that it can be used with confidence in this population to assess dyspnoea severity defined by its physical and affective components. As validation is an ongoing process, and never accomplished in a single study, additional research on the psychometric properties of the D12 in RA-ILD is encouraged.

Autoantibodies against citrullinated and native proteins and prediction of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A nested case-control study.

Background: To identify fine specificity anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) associated with incident rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Methods: This nested case-control study within the Brigham RA Sequential Study matched incident RA-ILD cases to RA-noILD controls on time of blood collection, age, sex, RA duration, and rheumatoid factor status. A multiplex assay measured ACPA and anti-native protein antibodies from stored serum prior to RA-ILD onset. Logistic regression models calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for RA-ILD, adjusting for prospectively-collected covariates. We estimated optimism-corrected area under the curves (AUC) using internal validation. Model coefficients generated a risk score for RA-ILD. Findings: We analyzed 84 incident RA-ILD cases (mean age 67 years, 77% female, 90% White) and 233 RA-noILD controls (mean age 66 years, 80% female, 94% White). We identified six fine specificity antibodies that were associated with RA-ILD. The antibody isotypes and targeted proteins were: IgA2 to citrullinated histone 4 (OR 0.08 per log-transformed unit, 95% CI 0.03-0.22), IgA2 to citrullinated histone 2A (OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.03-8.00), IgG to cyclic citrullinated filaggrin (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.71-7.01), IgA2 to native cyclic histone 2A (OR 5.52, 95% CI 2.38-12.78), IgA2 to native histone 2A (OR 4.60, 95% CI 2.18-9.74), and IgG to native cyclic filaggrin (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.47-4.34). These six antibodies predicted RA-ILD risk better than all clinical factors combined (optimism-corrected AUC=0·84 versus 0·73). We developed a risk score for RA-ILD combining these antibodies with the clinical factors (smoking, disease activity, glucocorticoid use, obesity). At 50% predicted RA-ILD probability, the risk scores both without (score=2·6) and with (score=5·9) biomarkers achieved specificity ≥93% for RA-ILD. Interpretation: Specific ACPA and anti-native protein antibodies improve RA-ILD prediction. These findings implicate synovial protein antibodies in the pathogenesis of RA-ILD and suggest clinical utility in predicting RA-ILD once validated in external studies. Funding: National Institutes of Health.

Quantitative Interstitial Abnormality Progression and Outcomes in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD and Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The risk factors and clinical outcomes of quantitative interstitial abnormality progression over time have not been characterized. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: What are the associations of quantitative interstitial abnormality progression with lung function, exercise capacity, and mortality? What are the demographic and genetic risk factors for quantitative interstitial abnormality progression? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Quantitative interstitial abnormality progression between visits 1 and 2 was assessed from 4,635 participants in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) cohort and 1,307 participants in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS) cohort. We used multivariable linear regression to determine the risk factors for progression and the longitudinal associations between progression and FVC and 6-min walk distance, and Cox regression models for the association with mortality. RESULTS: Age at enrollment, female sex, current smoking status, and the MUC5B minor allele were associated with quantitative interstitial abnormality progression. Each percent annual increase in quantitative interstitial abnormalities was associated with annual declines in FVC (COPDGene: 8.5 mL/y; 95% CI, 4.7-12.4 mL/y; P < .001; PLuSS: 9.5 mL/y; 95% CI, 3.7-15.4 mL/y; P = .001) and 6-min walk distance, and increased mortality (COPDGene: hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.34-2.12; P < .001; PLuSS: hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.49; P = .001). INTERPRETATION: The objective, longitudinal measurement of quantitative interstitial abnormalities may help identify people at greatest risk for adverse events and most likely to benefit from early intervention.

Systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease: a conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive disease.

OBJECTIVES: To establish a framework by which experts define disease subsets in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: A conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive ILD was provided to 83 experts, asking them to use the framework and classify actual SSc-ILD patients. Each patient profile was designed to be classified by at least four experts in terms of severity and risk of progression at baseline; progression was based on 1-year follow-up data. A consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts agreed. Experts provided information on which items were important in determining classification. RESULTS: Forty-four experts (53%) completed the survey. Consensus was achieved on the dimensions of severity (75%, 60 of 80 profiles), risk of progression (71%, 57 of 80 profiles) and progressive ILD (60%, 24 of 40 profiles). For profiles achieving consensus, most were classified as clinical ILD (92%), low risk (54%) and stable (71%). Severity and disease progression overlapped in terms of framework items that were most influential in classifying patients (forced vital capacity, extent of lung involvement on high resolution chest CT [HRCT]); risk of progression was influenced primarily by disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: Using our proposed conceptual framework, international experts were able to achieve a consensus on classifying SSc-ILD patients along the dimensions of disease severity, risk of progression and progression over time. Experts rely on similar items when classifying disease severity and progression: a combination of spirometry and gas exchange and quantitative HRCT.