Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pneumonol Alergol Pol ; 82(6): 518-33, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25339562

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The first-line therapy in chronic sarcoidosis, according to WASOG/ATS/ERS recommendations, is GCS. This therapy is associated with significant adverse effects and finally does not alter the natural history of the disease. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with MTX, as an alternative to GCS, in progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An open prospective real-life, single-centre trial was performed on 50 patients with biopsy proven sarcoidosis, 28M and 22F, mean age 45.55 ± 8.9 years. The average duration of disease before MTX therapy was 12.34 ± 20.49 years, GCS therapy in the past was applied in 41 patients. All patients received MTX (10 mg or 15 mg weekly) between 2004 and 2013 because of chronic progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis. Therapy was planned for 24 months. Patients underwent regular clinical evaluation, pulmonary function assessment, exercise ability testing (6MWT), and chest radiography for therapy effectiveness every six months and side effects monitoring every 4-6 weeks. Forty-nine patients were included for statistical analysis of treatment efficacy. They were retrospectively allocated to "MTX responder" group if an improvement of 10% of FEV1, FVC, TLC, or 15% of DLCO from the initial value was documented for at least one parameter or "non-responders" if the patient did not meet the above-mentioned criteria. RESULTS: Duration of treatment ranged from 6 to 24 months, mean time 60.75 ± 34.1 weeks. For the whole cohort significant improvement after MTX therapy was observed for minimal SaO2 (%) (p = 0.043) and for decrease of DSaO2 (%) (p = 0.048) in six-minute walk test. The results were significantly better for patients treated with 15 mg than for those treated with 10 mg weekly and for those who obtained a greater total amount of MTX during therapy. Significant difference of DLCO%pred was observed after six months of MTX therapy between groups treated 15 mg vs 10 mg weekly (73.27 ± 12.7% vs. 63.15 ± 16.4%, p = 0.03). Twenty-five patients (55%) met the criteria of "MTX responders" group. Patients who responded well to treatment had significantly lower TLC and FVC initial values comparing to "MTX non-responders". After treatment the only significant difference in PFT between groups was noted for DLCO%pred. Eleven patients (22%) stopped the treatment due to adverse events of MTX, mild hepatic abnormalities were observed in ten patients (20%), and concomitant infection was found in four patients. There were no patients with a fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: MTX as a single agent in the treatment of sarcoidosis has proved to be a safe and effective steroid alternative. Selected patients with chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis experience definite PFT improvements after MTX treatment. There is need to search for predictors of MTX treatment effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Sarcoidosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Pneumonol Alergol Pol ; 77(6): 560-4, 2009.
Artículo en Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20013708

RESUMEN

Pregnancy is a risk factor for both pulmonary embolism (PE), and an incorrect diagnostic assessment in cases of suspected PE with potentially dangerous consequences for the mother and foetus. The major concern is ionising radiation utilized by diagnostic tests and its potential negative effect on foetal safety. This paper presents diagnostic difficulties encountered in a 31-year-old patient at 20 weeks of gestation who was admitted to hospital with non-specific chest pain and suspected PE as a complication of right lower limb venous thrombosis. The case study reminds of chest ultrasound as a useful tool in the diagnosis of PE. The official clinical practice guidelines do not recommend the use of chest ultrasound for diagnosing of PE due to lack of a sufficient number of published studies. This case report may encourage further, prospective studies in the hope to define whether and when chest ultrasound might find its place in the diagnostic strategy of PE, especially in pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA