Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Outcomes of Short Course Consolidation Immunotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The current standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by one year of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. However, the optimal duration of consolidation CPI remains unknown. Here, we characterized the relationship between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) minimal residual disease (MRD) and clinical outcomes of unresectable locally advanced NSCLC patients treated on a phase 2 trial of short course consolidation immunotherapy after CRT, with the goal of testing if ctDNA may be able to identify patients who do not require a full year of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma samples for ctDNA analysis were collected from patients on the BTCRC LUN 16-081 trial after completion of CRT, prior to C2D1 of CPI (i.e. 1 month after treatment start), and at the end of up to 6 months of treatment. Tumor-informed ctDNA MRD analysis was performed using CAPP-Seq. Levels of ctDNA at each time point were correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Detection of ctDNA predicted significantly inferior progression-free survival (PFS) after completion of CRT (24-month 29% vs 65%, P = 0.0048), prior to C2D1 of CPI (24-month 0% vs 72%, P < 0.0001) and at the end of CPI (24-month 15% vs 67%, P = 0.0011). Additionally, patients with decreasing or undetectable ctDNA levels after one cycle of CPI had improved outcomes compared to patients with increasing ctDNA levels (24-month PFS 72% vs 0%, P < 0.0001). Progression of disease occurred within <12 months of starting CPI in all patients with increasing ctDNA levels at C2D1. CONCLUSION: Detection of ctDNA before, during, or after 6 months of consolidation CPI is strongly associated with inferior outcomes. Our findings suggest that analysis of ctDNA MRD may enable personalizing the duration of consolidation immunotherapy treatment.

Comparison of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 PharmDx Combined Positive Score (CPS) in Primary Versus Metastatic Nodal Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: Is There a Significant Difference?

PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx is an FDA-approved companion test to select patients for anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma PD-L1 expression is determined using a Combined Positive Score (CPS), which evaluates expression in tumor cells and tumor-associated leukocytes. We hypothesized that in nodal metastasis, the CPS should be higher given their inherent higher proportion of leukocytes. A significant difference in CPS between sites would mean that the tissue chosen for PD-L1 testing would impact patient eligibility for therapy. Currently, guidelines about which tissue should be tested do not exist. PD-L1 22C3 IHC was performed in the primary and nodal metastases of 35 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and a CPS was generated by 3 pathologists. Mean CPS was higher at the primary than the nodal metastasis: 47.2 versus 42.2; however, the difference was not statistically significant: P=0.259 . By therapeutic groups: negative (CPS <1), low (CPS 1-19) and high (CPS≥20), low-expression was more common in the primary: 40 vs. 26%, and high-expression in the nodal metastasis: 74 vs. 60% but this difference was not statistically significant: P=0.180. Stratified by positive versus negative (CPS <1 vs. ≥1), there were no differences between sites. Interobserver agreement for CPS among the 3 raters was slight for both sites: ƙ = 0.117 and 0.025, fair if stratified by therapeutic group: ƙ = 0.371 and 0.318, and near perfect if stratified as negative versus positive: ƙ = 0.652 and 1. There were no statistically significant differences in CPS between primary and nodal metastases independent of how the CPS was stratified.

A phase 2 trial of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-LUN15-029.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy using a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) alone or in combination with chemotherapy is the standard of care for treatment-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations for which targeted therapies have been approved. It is unknown whether continuing CPI treatment beyond disease progression results in improved outcomes. METHODS: Patients who experienced progressive disease (PD) after a clinical benefit from chemotherapy plus a CPI were enrolled. Patients received pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus next-line chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Key secondary end points included the overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate, and toxicity. The authors' hypothesis was that continuing pembrolizumab beyond progression would improve the median PFS to 6 months in comparison with a historical control of 3 months with single-agent chemotherapy alone. RESULTS: Between May 2017 and February 2020, 35 patients were enrolled. The patient and disease characteristics were as follows: 51.4% were male; 82.9% were current or former smokers; and 74.3%, 20%, and 5.7% had adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and NSCLC not otherwise specified, respectively. The null hypothesis that the median PFS would be 3 months was rejected (p < .05). The median PFS was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-8.0 months). The median OS was 24.5 months (95% CI, 15.6-30.9 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (60%), anemia (54.3%), and nausea (42.9%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab plus next-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who experienced PD after a clinical benefit from a CPI was associated with statistically significant higher PFS in comparison with historical controls of single-agent chemotherapy alone.

Physician Awareness of Immune-Related Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proven to be very effective in the treatment of multiple cancers. They have a unique side-effect profile distinct from conventional chemotherapy that can manifest as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). With expanding ICI use, clinicians will increasingly encounter irAEs, and thus adequate physician knowledge on their recognition and management is crucial. METHODS: To assess physician knowledge of irAEs due to ICIs, an online survey was administered to resident physicians in internal medicine (IM), emergency medicine, and family medicine (FM), as well as to faculty physicians in IM and FM. RESULTS: We sent the survey to 413 physicians and received responses from 155 (38%), of which 110 were residents and 45 were faculty. Pembrolizumab was identified as an ICI by 79% of physicians, nivolumab by 64%, and ipilimumab by 55%. Twenty-five percent incorrectly thought infliximab and adalimumab were ICIs. Most physicians (93%) were able to identify the gastrointestinal tract as an irAE site, whereas only 57% and 67% were able to identify cardiovascular and renal systems as irAE sites, respectively. A total of 59% believed steroids negatively affect efficacy of ICIs and should be used with caution to treat irAEs, 65% incorrectly thought endocrinopathies due to irAEs are usually reversible, and 45% of FM residents considered antibiotics as the mainstay of treatment in ICI-mediated colitis. On a self-rated scale from 0 to 100, the median comfort level for all physicians in recognizing irAEs was 15 and for treatment of irAEs was 10. CONCLUSIONS: Significant knowledge gaps exist among residents and faculty physicians across multiple specialties regarding the recognition and treatment of irAEs due to ICIs. Given that these physicians are usually the first point of contact with patients, physician education on identification and treatment of irAEs is needed. Early detection of these toxicities is critical for their resolution.

CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody ® PD-L1 inhibitor, in advanced or recurrent solid tumors (PROCLAIM-CX-072): an open-label dose-finding and first-in-human study.

BACKGROUND: Probody® therapeutics are antibody prodrugs that are activated in the tumor microenvironment by tumor-associated proteases, thereby restricting the activity to the tumor microenvironment and minimizing 'off-tumor' toxicity. We report dose-escalation and single-agent expansion phase data from the first-in-human study of CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody checkpoint inhibitor directed against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). METHODS: In the dose-escalation phase of this multicenter, open-label study (NCT03013491), adults with advanced solid tumors (naive to programmed-death-1/PD-L1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors) were enrolled into one of seven dose-escalation cohorts, with pacmilimab administered intravenously every 14 days. The primary endpoints were safety and determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In the expansion phase, patients with one of six prespecified malignancies (triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]; anal squamous cell carcinoma [aSCC]; cutaneous SCC [cSCC]; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [UPS]; small bowel adenocarcinoma [SBA]; and thymic epithelial tumor [TET]); or high tumor mutational burden (hTMB) tumors were enrolled. The primary endpoint was objective response (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v.1.1). RESULTS: An MTD was not reached with doses up to 30 mg/kg. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 10 mg/kg was chosen based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings in the expansion phase. Ninety-eight patients enrolled in the expansion phase: TNBC (n=14), aSCC (n=14), cSCC (n=14), UPS (n=20), SBA (n=14), TET (n=8), and hTMB tumors (n=14). Of 114 patients receiving pacmilimab at the RP2D, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 10 patients (9%), serious TRAEs in six patients (5%), and treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs in two patients (2%). Grade ≥3 immune-related AEs occurred in two patients (rash, myocarditis). High PD-L1 expression (ie, >50% Tumor Proportion Score) was observed in 22/144 (19%) patients. Confirmed objective responses were observed in patients with cSCC (n=5, including one complete response), hTMB (n=4, including one complete response), aSCC (n=2), TNBC (n=1), UPS (n=1), and anaplastic thyroid cancer (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Pacmilimab can be administered safely at the RP2D of 10 mg/kg every 14 days. At this dose, pacmilimab had a low rate of immune-mediated toxicity and showed signs of antitumor activity in patients not selected for high PD-L1 expression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03013491.

Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Efficacy Outcomes With Consolidation Pembrolizumab After Chemoradiation in Patients With Inoperable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients with metastatic NSCLC who receive checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and experience irAEs generally receive fewer cycles of CPI without decreased efficacy. However, the association between irAEs and efficacy outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with curative intent with CPI after chemoradiation has never been reported. Here we report a retrospective analysis of the association between irAEs and efficacy outcomes from the Hoosier Cancer Research Network (HCRN) LUN 14-179 single-arm phase 2 trial of consolidation pembrolizumab after chemoradiation in patients with stage III NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 92 eligible patients were enrolled from March 2015 to November 2016. Demographics, disease characteristics, and number of pembrolizumab cycles received were reported in patients with and without irAEs. Chi-square test was used for comparisons for categorical variables and Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze time to metastatic disease or death (TMDD), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A log-rank test was used to compare groups. RESULTS: Any grade irAEs occurred in 55.4% of patients. There was no significant difference in number of pembrolizumab cycles received, TMDD, OS, or PFS in patients with and without irAEs. Patients who discontinued pembrolizumab early because of irAEs received significantly fewer cycles of pembrolizumab (5 vs 15, P = .0016) without a significant difference in TMDD, PFS, or OS. Similarly, patients who received immunosuppressive therapy received fewer numbers of cycles of pembrolizumab (4 vs 16, P < .001) without significantly reduced TMDD, PFS, or OS. CONCLUSION: irAEs due to pembrolizumab, regardless of grade or number of irAEs, were not associated with decreased efficacy outcomes. Furthermore, early discontinuation of pembrolizumab because of irAEs and/or treatment of irAEs with immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with a decrease in treatment efficacy.

A phase 2 trial of consolidation pembrolizumab following concurrent chemoradiation for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Hoosier Cancer Research Network LUN 14-179.

BACKGROUND: Five-year overall survival (OS) for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poor. Until recently, a standard of care was concurrent chemoradiation alone. Patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with anti-programmed death 1 antibodies have demonstrated improved OS. This trial evaluated pembrolizumab as consolidation therapy after concurrent chemoradiation in patients with unresectable stage III disease. METHODS: Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC received concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin and etoposide, cisplatin and pemetrexed, or carboplatin and paclitaxel and 59.4 to 66.6 Gy of radiation. Patients with nonprogression of disease were enrolled and received pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 12 months). The primary endpoint was the time to metastatic disease or death (TMDD). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. RESULTS: The median follow-up for 93 patients (92 for efficacy) was 32.2 months (range, 1.2-46.6 months). The median TMDD was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.7 months to not reached), which was significantly longer than the historical control of 12 months (P < .0001). The median PFS was 18.7 months (95% CI, 12.4-33.8 months), and the median OS was 35.8 months (95% CI, 24.2 months to not reached). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS estimates were 81.2%, 62.0%, and 48.5%, respectively. Forty patients (43.5%) completed 12 months of treatment (median number of cycles, 13.5). Symptomatic pneumonitis (grade 2 or higher) was noted in 16 patients (17.2%); these cases included 4 grade 3 events (4.3%), 1 grade 4 event (1.1%), and 1 grade 5 event (1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation pembrolizumab after concurrent chemoradiation improves TMDD, PFS, and OS in comparison with historical controls of chemoradiation alone. Rates of grade 3 to 5 pneumonitis were similar to those reported with chemoradiation alone.

Prognostic Variables Associated With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Stage III NSCLC Treated With Chemoradiation Followed by Consolidation Pembrolizumab: A Subset Analysis of a Phase II Study From the Hoosier Cancer Research Network LUN 14-179.

INTRODUCTION: The Hoosier Cancer Research Network (HCRN) LUN 14-179 is a phase II trial of consolidation pembrolizumab after concurrent chemoradiation for the treatment of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Time to metastatic disease or death (TMDD), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) appear to be superior to that in historical controls of chemoradiation alone. Unfortunately, not all patients benefit from consolidation immunotherapy. We performed a univariate analysis to evaluate variables associated with PFS, metastatic disease, and OS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in HCRN LUN 14-179. Data collected included age, sex, stage, smoking status, programmed death ligand 1 status, Grade (G) ≥ 2 versus G ≤ 1 adverse event, G ≤ 2 versus G ≥ 3 pneumonitis, duration of pembrolizumab (< 4 vs. ≥ 4 cycles), chemotherapy regimen, performance status 0 versus 1, time to start pembrolizumab (4-6 vs. 6-8 weeks from radiation), volume of lung receiving at least 20 Gy of radiation (V20; < 20% vs. ≥ 20%). Univariable Cox regression was performed to determine the variables associated with 3 end points: TMDD, PFS, and OS. RESULTS: From April 2015 to December 2016, 93 patients were enrolled and 92 were included in the efficacy analysis (1 patient was ineligible). For TMDD, improved outcomes might be associated (P < .1) with stage IIIA and ≥ 4 cycles of pembrolizumab. For PFS, improved outcomes (P < .1) might be seen for ≥ 4 cycles of pembrolizumab, stage IIIA and V20 < 20%. For OS, improved outcomes (P < .1) might be seen for stage IIIA and ≥ 4 cycles of pembrolizumab. CONCLUSION: Stage IIIA and longer duration of pembrolizumab treatment might be associated with prolonged TMDD, PFS, and OS for patients with stage III NSCLC treated with chemoradiation followed by pembrolizumab.

A multi-center phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of palbociclib in combination with carboplatin for the treatment of unresectable recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Background Palbociclib is a selective inhibitor of CDK4/6 approved in metastatic breast cancer as well as evidence of activity in malignancies with CDK4-amplifications. Extensive preclinical evidence has demonstrated synergy of CDK4/6 inhibitors with platinum chemotherapy suggesting a potential role for clinical synthetic lethality. Given the sensitivity to platinum therapy as well as the landscape of genomic alterations, concurrent treatment with platinum chemotherapy and palbociclib is of significant interest as a novel treatment approach. Patients and Methods Patients with unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNC) were enrolled. Eligible patients were required to have no previous treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting. This was a multicenter phase II trial in which patients were administered carboplatin in addition to concurrent palbociclib. The primary endpoint of this trial was 12-week disease control rate (DCR). Results Twenty-one patients were enrolled and 18 were evaluable for response. Grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities were seen in 79% of patients of which the most common were related to myelosuppression. 12-week DCR was 33% (5 patients with stable disease, 1 with a partial response). Median progression free survival was 2.9 months (range: 1.2-13.3) and overall survival was 4.6 months (range: 1.4-14.8). Conclusion The combination of carboplatin and palbociclib is associated with significant treatment related toxicity and insufficient anti-tumor activity.

Second-Line Chemotherapy and Beyond for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The landscape for the second- and third-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically over the last two decades. Immunotherapeutic agents have become a preferred choice following progression on platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. However, there remains a role for cytotoxic chemotherapy and pemetrexed and docetaxel (with or without ramucirumab) are approved for single-agent use in the second-line setting. With the discovery of new genetic alterations and the development of novel targeted drugs, the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer following progression on first-line therapy continues to become more complicated as new treatment algorithms evolve.

Targeting multiple angiogenic pathways simultaneously: experience with nintedanib in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Angiogenesis plays a major role in the growth and progression of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and there is increasing interest in the development of therapies that block this particular aspect of tumorigenesis. Bevacizumab was the first US FDA-approved inhibitor of angiogenesis after demonstrating improved progression-free survival and overall survival in combination with chemotherapy in treating NSCLC. However, the benefit of bevacizumab is only modest and transient as the tumors inevitably develop resistance to this particular treatment. Therefore, new therapies are being developed that attempt to inhibit angiogenesis through several different pathways. One promising new drug, nintedanib, is an oral triple angiokinase inhibitor that acts by blocking not only VEGFR, but also FGFR and PDGFR, which are involved in the development of resistance to bevacizumab. This article discusses the rationale for this approach and summarizes the clinical trial data on nintedanib, including the two most recent Phase III trials.