Renal Transplant in Elderly End-Stage Renal Disease Patients: Impact of Comorbidities and Posttransplant Adverse Events on Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Elderly renal transplant continues to be debated because of age-related factors affecting transplant success and long-term prognosis. We investigated the effects ofrecipient age and predictors of renal transplant outcomes in elderly renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 506 patients who had a first renal transplant between January 2010 and December 2020; there were 165 recipients aged ≥60 years (elderly) and 341 recipients aged <60 years (young).We collected recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics and assessed 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall patient and death-censored graft survival and risk factors influencing outcomes ofrenal transplant in elderly recipients. RESULTS: Elderly recipients showed significantly lower 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates (96.3%, 89.8%, 80.9%) than young recipients (98.8%, 98.5%, 97.8%; P < .001). However, death-censored graft survival rates were not significantly different (P = .459) between elderly (96.3%, 94.3%, 93.2%) and young recipients (97.7%, 97.0%, 93.9%). Advanced recipient age was identified as an independent risk factor for patient survival, irrespective of donor age. In elderly recipients, male gender (hazard ratio 2.013; 95% CI, 1.110-3.649), pretransplant cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio 1.774; 95% CI, 1.030-3.553), and posttransplant chestinfection (hazard ratio 2.421; 95% CI, 1.439-4.076) were significant predictors of inferior patient survival. Proteinuria at 1 month (hazard ratio 1.006; 95% CI, 1.000-1.011) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months (hazard ratio 0.943; 95% CI, 0.899-0.988) posttransplant were early predictors of worse death-censored graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly renaltransplantrecipients showed promising 5-year patient and death-censored graft survival, exceeding 80%, despite higher mortality risk compared with young recipients. Optimizing outcomes of elderly renal transplant necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing meticulous pretransplant cardiovascular disease assessment, rigorous posttransplant chest infection prevention and management, and proactive monitoring for early posttransplant kidney dysfunction, to permit timely intervention.

Relation of middle molecules levels and oxidative stress to erythropoietin requirements in high-flux versus low-flux hemodialysis.

The objective of this study is to investigate the serum beta-2-microglobulin (B2MG) and advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) as middle molecule uremic toxins and protein carbonyl (PCO) as oxidative stress marker in uremic patients undergoing high-flux versus low-flux hemodialysis (HD) and to correlate their levels to the erythropoietin requirements for those patients. Twenty patients on chronic low-flux HD were recruited in the study. At the start of the study, all patients underwent high-flux HD for eight weeks, followed by low-flux HD for two weeks as a washout period. The patients were then subjected to another eight weeks of low-flux HD. Blood samples were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the high-flux period and the low-flux period. The mean erythropoietin dose for patients using high-flux HD was significantly lower than that for low-flux HD (P = 0.0062). Post-high flux, the B2MG and PCO levels were significantly lower than the pre-high-flux levels (P = 0.026 and 0.0005, respectively), but no significant change was observed in AOPP (P = 0.68). Post-low flux, the B2MG, AOPP and PCO were significantly higher than the pre-low-flux levels (P = 0.0002, 0.021 and <0.0001, respectively). Post-low flux, the B2MG and PCO were significantly higher than the post-high-flux levels (P <0.0001), but no significant difference was observed in AOPP (P = 0.11). High-flux HD results in reduction of some of the middle molecule toxins and PCO levels better than low-flux HD, and is associated with a better response to erythropoietin.

Enhanced efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2a over pegylated interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4A randomized trial and quality of life analysis.

AIM: The therapy of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 (HCV-4) has not been optimized yet. This randomized, prospective, parallel-group clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a) plus ribavirin and PEG-IFN α-2b plus ribavirin and assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with chronic HCV-4. METHODS: Eligible patients with proven chronic HCV-4 were randomized to receive either a weekly dose of PEG-IFN α-2a (180 µg) or PEG-IFN α-2b (1.5 µg/kg) and a daily dose of ribavirin (1000-1200 mg) for 48 weeks with 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) defined by undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment. The Short form-36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) and the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaires (CLDQ) were assessed before, during and after therapy. RESULTS: The overall SVR rate of the entire cohort was 59.9%. The SVR rates were significantly higher in patients treated with PEG-IFN α-2a and ribavirin (Group A; n=109) compared with those treated with PEG-IFN α-2b and ribavirin (Group B; n=108, 70.6 vs. 54.6%, respectively; P=0.017). The relapse rates were 5.1% for PEG-IFN α-2a and 15.7% for PEG-IFN α-2b (P=0.0019). The SF-36v2 and CLDQ were low during therapy and improved significantly after therapy successful therapy. CONCLUSION: Pegylated interferon α-2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than PEG-IFN α-2b and ribavirin therapy in the treatment of chronic HCV-4 patients. The tolerability and adverse events were comparable between the two regimens. The HRQOL improved significantly after successful PEG-IFN α-2a plus ribavirin therapy.