[A 30-Month Survival Case of Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Duodenum Treated by Pancreaticoduodenectomy].

The patient was an elderly man in his early 80s who was admitted to our hospital due to anemia and tarry stools. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a type 2 tumor in the second portion of the duodenum. An endoscopic biopsy revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. We performed a pancreaticoduodenectomy because neither lymphadenopathy nor distant metastases were found. Macroscopic findings revealed that the lesion was mainly in the second portion of the duodenum, and there was no evidence of invasion of the main pancreatic duct, the bile duct, or the ampulla of Vater. Histologically, the tumor was composed of atypical cells with polymorphic or spindle-shaped nuclei proliferating in a scattered fashion, and immunohistological examinations showed weakly positive results for cytokeratin(CK)AE1/AE3 and CK20 and positive results for vimentin but negative results for CK7. The tumor was diagnosed as undifferentiated carcinoma of the duodenum(pT4N0M0, pStage ⅡB). The patient recovered enough to be discharged and was followed up without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. He maintained recurrence-free survival for 27 months, after which lymph node and lung metastases reoccurred. This is a rare case of undifferentiated carcinoma of the duodenum treated by curative resection with a relatively favorable prognosis.

Pathological Evaluation of Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases: mFOLFOX6 Plus Bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 Plus Cetuximab in the Phase II ATOM Trial.

We compared the preplanned histopathological responses of resected liver metastases from patients who received modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab or modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab for liver-limited colorectal metastases in the ATOM trial. Fibrosis and viable tumor cells in tumor regression grade (TRG), infarct-like necrosis in modified TRG (mTRG), and dangerous halo (DH) were assessed. Fifty-five patients (28 and 27 patients in the bevacizumab and cetuximab arms, respectively) were divided into the low (viable tumor cells ≤ 50%) and high (>50%) TRG or mTRG groups. DH was characterized as absent/rare or focal/diffuse. Compared to the bevacizumab arm, the cetuximab arm was more effective, with respect to low TRG (13 vs. 23 patients) and absent/rare DH (14 vs. 19 patients), respectively. Low mTRG was similarly observed in both arms. Low TRG/mTRG and absent/rare DH showed better relapse-free survival (RFS) than high TRG/mTRG and focal/diffuse DH. In the bevacizumab arm, a significant difference in RFS existed between the low and high TRG groups, while in the cetuximab arm, for TRG, mTRG, and DH, the low and absent/rare groups demonstrated significantly longer RFS than the high and focal/diffuse groups, respectively. TRG could estimate RFS in patients who underwent liver metastasectomy after bevacizumab or cetuximab chemotherapy.

A case of successful conversion surgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer with synchronous triple cancer of the lung and esophagus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The number of reports of multiple primary cancer (MPC) is increasing because of the advancement in diagnostic imaging technology. However, the treatment strategy for MPCs involving pancreatic cancer is controversial because of the extremely poor prognosis. We herein report a patient with synchronous triple cancer involving the pancreas, esophagus, and lung who underwent conversion surgery after intensive chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with epigastric pain, anorexia, and weight loss. Computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed that the patient had synchronous triple cancer of the pancreas, esophagus, and lung. While the esophageal and lung cancer were relatively non-progressive, the pancreatic tail cancer had invaded the aorta, celiac axis, and left kidney, and the patient was diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced disease. Because the described lesion could have been the prognostic determinant for this patient, we initiated intensive chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) for pancreatic cancer. After six courses of chemotherapy, the tumor size shrank remarkably and no invasion to the aorta or celiac axis was observed. No significant changes were observed in the esophageal and lung cancers; endoscopic submucosal dissection could be still a curative treatment for the esophageal cancer. Therefore, we performed curative resection for pancreatic cancer (distal pancreatomy, splenectomy, and left nephrectomy; ypT3N0cM0, ypStage IIA, UICC 8th). Pathologically, complete resection was achieved. The patient then underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer (pT1a[M]-LPM) and video-assisted thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy in combination with right lower partial resection for early lung cancer (pT2aN0M0, pStage IB, UICC 8th). Eight months after pancreatic cancer surgery, the patient is alive and has no sign of recurrence; as a result of the successful treatment, the patient has a good quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of MPC is challenging, especially for cases with unresectable tumors. Although synchronous triple cancer can involve unresectable pancreatic cancer, radical resection may be possible after careful assessment of the appropriate treatment strategy and downstaging of unresectable tumors.

RAD51 Expression as a Biomarker to Predict Efficacy of Preoperative Therapy and Survival for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Large-cohort Observational Study (KSCC1307).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify biomarkers that predict efficacy of preoperative therapy and survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). BACKGROUND: It is essential to improve the accuracy of preoperative molecular diagnostics to identify specific patients who will benefit from the treatment; thus, this issue should be resolved with a large-cohort, retrospective observational study. METHODS: A total of 656 patients with ESCC who received surgery after preoperative CDDP + 5-FU therapy, docetaxel + CDDP + 5-FU therapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were enrolled. Immunohistochemical analysis of TP53, CDKN1A, RAD51, MutT-homolog 1, and programmed death-ligand 1 was performed with biopsy samples obtained before preoperative therapy, and expression was measured by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In all therapy groups, overall survival was statistically separated by pathological effect (grade 3 > grade 2 > grade 0, 1, P < 0.0001). There was no correlation between TP53, CDKN1A, MutT-homolog 1, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and pathological effect, whereas the proportion of positive RAD51 expression (≥50%) in cases with grade 3 was lower than that with grade 0, 1, and 2 (P = 0.022). In the CRT group, the survival of patients with RAD51-positive tumor was significantly worse than RAD51-negative expressors (P = 0.0119). Subgroup analysis of overall survival with respect to positive RAD51 expression indicated preoperative chemotherapy (CDDP + 5-FU or docetaxel + CDDP + 5-FU) was superior to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: In ESCC, positive RAD51 expression was identified as a useful biomarker to predict resistance to preoperative therapy and poor prognosis in patients who received preoperative CRT. Administration of preoperative chemotherapy may be warranted for patients with positive RAD51 expression.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk resectable colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The role of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains undetermined. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of NAC in patients with resectable CRLM, especially in high-risk subgroups for recurrence, with special reference to synchronicity and the CRLM grade in the Japanese classification system. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional cohort who was diagnosed with resectable CRLM was performed. CRLM was classified into three grades (A, B, and C) according to the combination of H stage (H1: ≤ 4 lesions and ≤ 5 cm, H2: ≥ 5 lesions or > 5 cm, H3: ≥ 5 lesions and > 5 cm), nodal status of the primary tumor (pN0/1: ≤ 3 metastases, pN2: ≥ 4 metastases), and the presence of resectable extrahepatic metastases. RESULTS: Among 222 patients with resectable CRLM, 97 (43.7%) had synchronous CRLM. The surgical failure-free survival (SF-FS) of patients with synchronous CRLM (without NAC) was significantly worse than that of patients with metachronous CRLM (P = 0.0264). The SF-FS of patients with Grade B/C was also significantly worse than that of Grade A (P = 0.0058). Among the 53 patients with synchronous and Grade B/C CRLM, 31 were assigned to NAC, and all of them underwent liver surgery. In this high-risk subgroup, the SF-FS and OS in the NAC group were significantly better than those in the upfront surgery group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with synchronous and Grade B/C CRLM could be good candidates for indication of NAC.

Safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 combination therapy in patients with previously untreated HER2-negative unresectable, advanced, or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: a phase II trial (KSCC1501A).

BACKGROUND: In a randomized pivotal global phase III study, S-1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 (SOX100) combination chemotherapy was as effective as S-1 and cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and showed a favorable safety profile. In this phase II study, we analyzed survival outcomes to assess the efficacy and safety of the SOX regimen with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (SOX130) in AGC. METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative AGC received 80 mg/m2/day S-1 orally on days 1-14 and 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until the criteria for treatment withdrawal were fulfilled. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and the null hypothesis of RR in the current trial was 45%. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to CTCAE version 4.0. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled from June 2015 to November 2016, but eight were excluded for ineligibility. Therefore, all final analyses were conducted with 63 patients. The confirmed RR was 46.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 36.1-56.3), and the disease control rate was 77.8% (90% CI: 68.1-85.1). The median PFS and OS were 4.9 (95% CI: 4.2-7.1) and 14.8 (95% CI: 11.1-18.9) months, respectively. Incidences of grade 3-4 AEs > 10% were anorexia (19.0%), peripheral neuropathy (12.7%), nausea (11.1%), and thrombocytopenia (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first evaluation of SOX130 in patients with HER2-negative AGC. SOX130 showed an acceptable safety profile, but the prespecified statistical efficacy targets were not achieved.

Efficacy and feasibility of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (C-SOX) for treating patients with stage III colon cancer (KSCC1303): final analysis of 3-year disease-free survival.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted treatment to improve survival rates in patients with stage III colon cancer, and regimens including oxaliplatin have been shown to be superior to those containing 5-FU alone. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and feasibility of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (C-SOX) as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer following curative resection. METHODS: Patients with colon cancer who underwent curative resection were enrolled and received oral S-1 40-60 mg twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks plus intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 for eight courses. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints were the rate of treatment completion, adverse events, relative dose intensity, and overall survival. RESULTS: Between February 2014 and December 2014, 89 patients were enrolled. One patient was excluded from the analysis because of ineligibility, and the remaining 88 patients were included. The rate of protocol treatment completion was 72.3%. The relative dose intensity of S-1 and oxaliplatin was 72% and 76.3%, respectively. Hematological severe adverse events (Grade 3/4) were neutropenia (21.3%) and thrombocytopenia (15.7%). The most frequent symptom was diarrhea (Grade 3/4: 5.6%). The incidence of grade 2 neuropathy has decreased from 8.1 to 2.7% after 3 years of the therapy. Three-year disease-free survival rate was 73.9% (95% CI 63.8-81.9), and 3-year overall survival rate was 94.3% (95% CI 86.8-97.6) CONCLUSIONS: C-SOX is a safe and feasible adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in patients with stage III colon cancer undergoing curative resection.

Multicenter phase II study of SOX plus trastuzumab for patients with HER2+ metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer: KSCC/HGCSG/CCOG/PerSeUS 1501B.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab (T-mab) combined with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidines is a standard first-line treatment for HER2+ advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We conducted the first phase II trial among four Japanese study groups to assess the efficacy and safety of T-mab + S-1 and oxaliplatin (T-SOX130) for HER2+ AGC or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/FISH+ tumors received 80 mg/m2 (80-120 mg/day) oral S-1 on days 1-14, 130 mg/m2 intravenous oxaliplatin on day 1, and intravenous T-mab (8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg thereafter) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed response rate (RR). Adverse events were based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Ver.4.0. RESULTS: We enrolled 42 patients from June 2015 to May 2016. Efficacy and safety analyses were conducted for 39 patients. The data cutoff was May 31, 2018. The confirmed RR was 82.1% (32/39; 90% CI 70.0-90.0); the disease control rate was 87.2% (34/39; 95% CI 73.3-94.4). Nine patients underwent curative surgery after T-SOX130. Median Time to treatment failure (TTF), Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) was 5.7 (95% CI 4.6-7.0), 7.0 (95% CI 5.5-14.1), and 27.6 (95% CI 15.6-Not reached) months, respectively. Incidences of grade 3-4 adverse events > 10% were thrombocytopenia (17.9%), anorexia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), neutropenia (10.3%), and hyponatremia (10.3%). CONCLUSIONS: T-SOX130 showed promising response and survival with a favorable safety profile and should be considered for patients with HER2+ AGC.

[Retrospective Examination of Usefulness and Adverse Effects of Tapentadol in Patients with Cancer Pain during Anticancer Treatment].

We retrospectively examined 106 cases of tapentadol use in Japan in August 2014 for cancer pain at our hospital.The advantage of the opioid medication tapentadol is that its introduction is suitable in patients undergoing anti-cancer treatment because of the low incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms, with glucuronidation involved in the metabolism, and lack of interactions with other drugs.However, depending on the dosage form and presence of swallowing disorders, the administration should be considered carefully.

Randomised phase II trial of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus cetuximab as first-line treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (ATOM trial).

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with biologics followed by liver surgery improves the resection rate and survival of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, no prospective study has compared the outcomes of chemotherapy with bevacizumab (BEV) versus cetuximab (CET). METHODS: The ATOM study is the first randomised trial comparing BEV and CET for initially unresectable CRLM. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive mFOLFOX6 plus either BEV or CET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between May 2013 and April 2016, 122 patients were enrolled. Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.2-13.3 months) in the BEV group and 14.8 months (95% CI 9.7-17.3 months) in the CET group (hazard ratio 0.803; P = 0.33). Patients with a smaller-number but larger-sized metastases did better in the CET group. In the BEV and CET groups, the response rates were 68.4% and 84.7% and the resection rates were 56.1% and 49.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although CET achieved a better response rate than BEV for patients with a small number of large liver metastases, both biologics had similar efficacy regarding liver resection and acceptable safety profiles. To achieve optimal PFS, biologics should be selected in accordance with patient conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01836653), and UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000010209).

Survival Outcomes of Two Phase 2 Studies of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin for Patients with Gastric Cancer After D2 Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Two phase 2 trials of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy for patients with gastric cancer (GC) after D2 gastrectomy were conducted in Japan. The SOXaGC trial evaluated the tolerability and safety of adjuvant therapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX), whereas the J-CLASSIC trial evaluated the feasibility of adjuvant therapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX). Because both were studies that did not evaluate survival results as study end points, the authors evaluated the survival outcomes for the patients in the two trials. METHODS: All 62 and 100 patients in the full analysis set of the SOXaGC and J-CLASSIC trials, respectively, were included in the current study. Their information about survival outcome was collected. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: For the pathologic stage (pStage 2) patients treated with CAPOX, the 3-year RFS rate was 87.8% and the 3-year OS rate was 92.7%. For the pStage 3 patients treated with SOX and CAPOX, the 3-year RFS rates were respectively 70.9% and 67.8% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.72), whereas the 3-year OS rates were respectively 75.7% and 79.3% (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.54-2.26). Subgroup analysis showed significant interactions between the treatment (SOX vs. CAPOX) and both sex (male vs. female; P = 0.024) and histologic type (diffuse vs. other, P = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis demonstrated that SOX and CAPOX are suggested to have similar efficacy for pStage 3 GC patients after D2 gastrectomy. Differences in the treatment effect according to sex and histologic type warrant further evaluation.

A phase II randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus S-1 plus cisplatin for completely resected pathological stage II/IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is the standard postoperative adjuvant treatment for pathological stage II/III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oral S-1 therapy has good efficacy and relatively low toxicity for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. We investigated whether long-term S-1 monotherapy is also useful as an adjuvant therapy after surgery in patients with NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II randomized open-label multi-institutional study in patients with pathological stage II/IIIA NSCLC (7th TNM classification) who underwent complete resection from 2009 to 2013. The primary endpoint, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, was evaluated using the Bayesian method. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two arms: oral S-1 monotherapy (S-1 arm) and S-1 plus cisplatin combination therapy followed by S-1 (S-1 plus cisplatin arm) both for a total of 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 70 and 71 patients were enrolled in S-1 arm and S-1 plus cisplatin arm, respectively. The 2-year DFS rates were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.63) and 61% (95% CI, 0.48-0.70) for S-1 arm and S-1 plus cisplatin arm, respectively. Both arms met the primary endpoint. Neither DFS nor OS was significantly different between the arms (log-rank test: P = 0.1695 and P = 0.8684, respectively). The main G3/4 adverse events were loss of appetite and anemia (S-1 vs. S-1 plus cisplatin: 4.3% vs. 11.6% and 0% vs. 5.8%, respectively). The treatment completion rate did not differ between the two arms (S-1 vs. S-1 plus cisplatin: 45.7%, 95% CI, 41.9-66.3% vs. 43.5% 95% CI, 44.0-68.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 was a feasible and promising treatment for patients with completely resected NSCLC, regardless of cisplatin addition. S-1 monotherapy should be investigated further, based on its low toxicity and practical convenience.

[A New Twist on the Administration of Naldemedine for Opioid-Induced Constipation in an Outpatient].

Opioid-induced constipation(OIC)occurs with high frequency in patients with cancer undergoing pain treatment using opioids. Osmotic or irritant laxatives are usually used to prevent OIC. Recently, naldemedine has become operational for OIC. Although naldemedine achieved the desired effect, diarrhea is a little feared from the results of clinical phase III study(V9236 clinical trial). We herein report the use of naldemedine to alleviate diarrhea and expect the improvement of the quality of the bowel habits in outpatients with cancer undergoing pain treatment using opioids.

Recent advances in treatment for colorectal liver metastasis.

A major challenge for the management of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is the multidisciplinary approach including surgery. Resection is the most important treatment strategy to prolong the survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Even when resection is not possible as a primary treatment, it may still be carried out for curative intent after effective chemotherapy. Therefore, resection should always be considered when conducting chemotherapy for CRLM. Neoadjuvant anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody has shown a high response rate for RAS wild CRC. However, whether anti-EGFR antibody is superior to antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody for all types of CRLM is yet to be determined. Recently, several randomized control trials of first-line therapy for advanced CRC have been conducted, and some of them are ongoing. The optimal chemotherapy regimen and tumor biology indicated for neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as conversion surgery are expected to be determined in the near future.

[Combinatorial Use of Rapid-Onset Opioid and Short-Acting Opioid Is Effective against Breakthrough Cancer Pain].

Breakthrough cancer pain is divided into "predictable breakthrough pain" and "unpredictable breakthrough pain". Uncontrolled breakthrough pain in cancer negatively affects the quality of life of the patients. The short-acting opioid(SAO) requires considerable time to produce analgesia, and is not adequate as a rescue drug. The rapid-onset opioid(ROO)immediately produces analgesia, but its appropriate usage is difficult. For instance, the frequency and interval of ROO usage is limited, making the optimization of dosage cumbersome. Therefore, ROO has not yet gained popularity. Here, we report that a combinatorial use of ROO and SAO is effective against breakthrough cancer pain, with SAO and ROO being suitable for "predictable breakthrough pain", and "unpredictable breakthrough pain", respectively. The effectiveness and safety of this combination were assessed for many patients with breakthrough cancer pain.

A Multicenter Clinical Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: QUATTRO Study.

BACKGROUND: FOLFOXIRI (Fluorouracil, folinate, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), compared with FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, folinate, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab, but significantly increased the incidences of adverse events. The efficacy and safety profiles of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in ethnic Asian patients have not been established yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was an open-label, single-arm, multi-centered phase II prospective clinical trial in patients with mCRC who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the PFS rate at 10 months. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, response rate, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as induction therapy and were assessed for efficacy and safety. The PFS rate at 10 months was 75.2% and the median PFS was 13.3 months. Complete response and partial response were achieved in 2 (2.9%) and 47 patients (69.1%), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events with incidence rates exceeding 20% were neutropenia (72.5%), hypertension (34.8%), leucopenia (33.3%), and febrile neutropenia (21.7%). Significantly more patients with grade 4 neutropenia had single-heterozygous UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 (46.2%) than UGT1A1 wild-type genotype (*1/*1) (13.3%) (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is considered an effective first-line regimen that improves the outcome of patients with mCRC regardless of ethnicity. In Asian patients, utmost attention should be paid to the possible onset of severe neutropenia or febrile neutropenia attributed to different types of UGT1A1*6 and *28 polymorphism, when FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is administered.

Prophylactic Effect of Dexamethasone on Regorafenib-Related Fatigue and/or Malaise: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (KSCC1402/HGCSG1402).

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with a proven survival benefit for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The KSCC1402/HGCSG1402 study investigated the prophylactic effect of oral dexamethasone (DEX) on regorafenib-related fatigue and/or malaise. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who progressed after standard chemotherapy were randomized 1: 1 to a DEX group (2 mg/day; days 1-28) with regorafenib or a placebo group with regorafenib. The primary endpoint was the incidence of fatigue and/or malaise, based on version 4.0 of the National Cancer Institute's CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). One of the secondary endpoints was the in-cidence of fatigue and/or malaise based on the CTCAE assessed by patient-reported outcome (PRO). RESULTS: The incidence of any grade of fatigue and/or malaise assessed by the investigators was 58.8% in the DEX group and 61.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.8101), and that assessed by PRO was 47.2 and 58.3%, respectively (p = 0.3450). The incidence of grade ≥2 fatigue and/or malaise, as assessed by the investigators, was 19.4% for the DEX group and 38.9% for the placebo group (p = 0.0695), and that assessed by PRO was 27.8 and 52.8%, respectively (p = 0.0306). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that prophylactic oral DEX is clinically effective in improving regorafenib-related fatigue and/or malaise.

Study protocol of a phase II clinical trial (KSCC1501A) examining oxaliplatin + S-1 for treatment of HER2-negative advanced/recurrent gastric cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin + S-1 is a recognized treatment regimen in Japan, but there are no Japanese clinical data on an oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg/m2. The current research involves a single-arm, prospective, phase II clinical trial to examine the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin + S-1 with an oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg/m2 to treat HER2-negative advanced/recurrent gastric cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy in Japan. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary endpoint of this trial will be the response rate, and the secondary endpoints will be the safety profile of oxaliplatin + S-1, progression-free survival, the response rate in subjects under the age of 75, overall survival, time to treatment failure, duration of treatment, time to failure of strategy, and dose intensity. The threshold response rate is 45% and the expected response rate is 60%. Assuming that a one-tailed score test will be performed with an α of 0.05, 68 patients are needed to ensure a statistical power of 80%. Planned enrollment is 70 subjects and the total duration of this trial is expected to be 3 years. DISCUSSION: Since replacing cisplatin with oxaliplatin should provide the same level of therapeutic efficacy while limiting adverse events and simplifying treatment, oxaliplatin + S-1 may be increasingly used to treat gastric cancer in Japan. Verifying the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin + S-1 with an oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg is an important task that the current trial has set out to achieve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at the website of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID UMIN000017550) on May 29, 2015. The details are available at the following web address: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ .

Low Visceral Fat Content Is a Negative Predictive Marker for Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

AIM: This study aimed to clarify the predictive impact of visceral fat on response to bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pretreatment computed tomography was used to measure visceral fat area (VFA) and patients with mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab were divided by median VFA value into two groups: high VFA and low VFA. RESULTS: In the bevacizumab-treated group, patients with low VFA had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than patients with high VFA in univariate (median=21.1 vs. 38.9 months; hazard ratio=1.70, 95% confidence interval=1.06-2.70, p=0.03) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio=1.85, 95% confidence interval=1.15-3.03, p=0.01). No significant differences were seen in OS between groups treated with chemotherapy alone. The VFA had a marginally significant modifying effect on the relationship between bevacizumab and OS (p for interaction=0.07). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide the first evidence that a low VFA might be a negative predictive marker for response to bevacizumab in patients with mCRC.

Correction to: S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy for patients with oxaliplatin-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study in Japan (KSCC1102).

In the original publication, in Abstract, the sentence that reads as, "Oral S-1 at a dose of 80 mg/m2 was…………. drug-free interval" should read as, "Oral S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m2 was administered twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week drug-free interval.