A decade of the Catalonian Arthroplasty Register (RACat): Variability, exhaustivity, and survival of prostheses between 2005 and 2014. / Una década del Registro de Artroplastias de Cataluña (RACat): exhaustividad, variabilidad y supervivencia de las prótesis entre 2005 y 2014.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The Catalonian Arthroplasty Register (RACat) is a public health-based population register used to analyse and evaluate hip and knee replacements in Catalonia. The aim of this study is to present the outcomes after 10 years in operation (January 2005-December 2014). METHODOLOGY: Using the information from the RACat and the minimum basic data set at hospital discharge, an analysis was made of the quality and exhaustivity of the data, as well as a descriptive analysis of the patients, prostheses, and care process. Survival was also analysed by calculating the accumulated incidence of revisions (according to the cause of intervention in hip replacements and conservation or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in knee replacement). The relationship between revision risk and the fixation technique of the prosthesis is also analysed, using competitive risk models adjusted for gender, age, and comorbidities. RESULTS: The main reason for the primary hip and knee replacement surgery was arthrosis. The accumulated incidence of revisions at 10 years was 3.9% in hip replacements caused by arthrosis, and 2.3% in those caused by fracture. Conservation of the posterior cruciate ligament was achieved in 4.4% of knee replacements, with sacrifice in 5.1%. DISCUSSION: The RACat is consolidated as a tool for the evaluation of joint replacements, with great potential in the analysis of medium and long-term efficacy, the study of the variability in clinical practice, and post-marketing surveillance.

Primary total hip arthroplasty in Catalonia: What is the clinical evidence that supports our prosthesis? / Artroplastias primarias de cadera implantadas en Cataluña: ¿qué evidencia clínica respalda a nuestras prótesis?

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of National Prostheses Registries allows us to obtain a large amount of data and make conclusions in order to improve the use of them. Sweden was the first country to implement a National Prostheses Registry in 1979. Catalonia has been doing this since 2005. The aim of our study is to analyse the evidence that supports primary total hip replacement in Catalonia in the last 9 years, based on the Arthroplasty Registry of Catalonia (RACat). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of the literature was carried out of the prosthesis (acetabular cups/stems) reported in the RACat between the period 2005 to 2013 in the following databases: ODEP (Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel), TRIP database, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Those prostheses implanted in less than 10 units (182 acetabular components corresponding to 49 models/228 stems corresponding to 63 models) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 18,634 (99%) implanted acetabular cups were analysed out of a total number of 18,816, corresponding to 74 different models. In 18 models (2527 acetabular cups) no clinical evidence to support its use was found. An analysis was performed on 19,367 (98.84%) out of a total number of 19,595 implanted stems, corresponding to 75 different models. In 16 models (1845 stems) no clinical evidence was found to support their use. Variable evidence was found in the 56 models of acetabular cups (16,107) and 59 models of stems (17,522), most of it corresponding to level iv clinical evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant number implanted prostheses evaluated (13.56% acetabular cups/9.5% stems) for which no clinical evidence was found. The elevated number of models is highlighted (49 types for acetabular cups/63 types for stems) with less than 10 units implanted, which corresponds to only 1% of the total implants. The use of arthroplasty registers is shown to be an extremely helpful tool that allows analyses and conclusions to be made for the follow-up and post-marketing surveillance period.

[Quality of life-associated factors at one year after total hip and knee replacement: a multicentre study in Catalonia]. / Factores relacionados con la calidad de vida al año de la artroplastia total de cadera y rodilla: estudio multicéntrico en Cataluña.

AIMS: To assess the health related quality of life (HRQOL) and associated factors of patients before, and one year after, total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty. METHODS: A quasi-experimental prospective study conducted in hospitals with different levels of complexity and volume in Catalonia, and on patients with an indication of a TKA or THA. Demographic and psychosocial variables were recorded, and the SF-36 and WOMAC, and a question on perception of change after surgery were administered to patients by telephone interview. The standardised differences (effect size) of perceived change using the SF-36 and WOMAC scores before and after surgery were calculated. The factors associated with HRQOL one year after surgery were analysed using adjusted general linear models. RESULTS: Although there was an overall improvement in most HRQOL domains of patients (n=672), 9% saw little improvement after surgery, with their scores at baseline and follow-up being very similar (small size effect: 0.0-0.4). Women, patients with low social support, with lower scores (worse) in perceived mental health and baseline HRQOL, and who declared that their condition was more severe, perceived a poorer HRQOL one year after surgery (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated to a worse prognosis one year after an arthroplasty have been identified and are consistent with other published studies. The assessment of HRQOL can be a key instrument for identifying possible patients without improvement, in order to assess alternatives to an intervention, or apply other interventions in order to improve the efficiency of the healthcare process.

[Arthroplasty registers as post-marketing surveillance systems: the Catalan Arthroplasty Register]. / Los registros de artroplastias como sistemas de vigilancia poscomercialización: el Registro de Artroplastias de Cataluña.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to present the functioning and results of the Catalan Arthroplasty Registry (RACat). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The RACat arose by the initiative of the Catalan Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, the Catalan Health Service (CHS) and the Catalan Agency for Health Information Assessment and Quality. Publicly funded hospitals sent information through the Internet (CHS Applications website) on knee and hip arthroplasties: patient identification, hospital, joint (hip/knee), type (primary/revision), side of operation, date of surgery and prosthesis (manufacturer's name and reference number). The quality of the data is analysed regularly. We estimate the risk of replacement by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 52 hospitals out of 62 send data to RACat, and information on 36,951 knee and 26,477 hip arthroplasties is available. Data quality improved between 2005 and 2010. In 2010 coverage exceeded 70%, with side of operation 97%, and prostheses identification of 80%. The risk of replacement at three years was 3.3% (95% CI:3.1-3.6) for knee, 2.9% (95% CI:2.5-3.3) for total hip, and 2.5% (95% CI:2.0-3.1) for partial hip. DISCUSSION: Risk of replacement is higher than that observed in other registers, although data quality and its improvement over time should be taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The information available in the RACat will help to establish a standard that will enable hospitals to compare results.

Brief report: The KIDSCREEN follow-up study on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Spanish children and adolescents. Pilot test and representativeness.

The Spanish KIDSCREEN follow-up study reassessed the Spanish baseline sample (n=840) of the European KIDSCREEN study 3 years later (2006). The aims of this paper were to describe the KIDSCREEN follow-up study and the pilot test, and to analyze participation rates and representativeness. Instruments included the KIDSCREEN-52 HRQoL measure and a set of scales including the possible explanatory variables. Focus groups and individual interviews were carried out in a pilot test. Participants were compared with non-participants at baseline, and also with Eurostat census data. Twenty-two out of 24 subjects were interviewed in the pilot test. Fifteen items needed to be modified after the pilot test. Participation rate reached 54% (n=454). Participants (mean age=12.71 years old) were on average 6 months younger than non-participants (p=0.03), and from more educated families. KIDSCREEN follow-up instrumentation seems adequate for collecting factors with potential influence on HRQoL. Follow-up respondents' representativeness seems to be acceptable.

Management and outcomes in digestive cancer surgery: design and initial results of a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: most studies that analyze the influence of structure factors on clinical outcomes are retrospective, based on clinical-administrative databases, and mainly focusing on surgical volume. OBJECTIVE: to study variations in the process and outcomes of oncologic surgery for esophagus, stomach, pancreas, liver metastases and rectum cancers in Catalonia, as well as the factors associated with these variations. PATIENTS AND METHOD: a retrospective (2002) and prospective (2003-05) multicenter cohort study. Data forms were designed to collect patient, process, and care outcome characteristics before surgery, at hospital discharge, and at 3 and 6 months after discharge. Main outcome measures were hospital and follow-up mortality, complications, re-interventions, and relapse rates. RESULTS: 49 hospitals (80%) participated in the retrospective phase, 44 of which (90%) also participated in the prospective phase: 3,038 patients (98%) were included. No differences were observed in the profile of operated patients according to hospital level of complexity, but clinical-pathological staging and other functional status variables could not be assessed because of over 20% of missing values. There was significant variability in the volume of interventions as well as in certain aspects of the healthcare process depending on type of cancer and center complexity. High rates of esophageal cancer mortality (18.2% at discharge, 27.3% at 6 months) and of complications and re-interventions for all cancers assessed, especially rectal cancer (18.4% re-interventions at 6 months), were identified. CONCLUSIONS: the study of the variability identified will require adequate risk-adjustment and should take into account different structure factors. It is necessary that information included in medical records be improved.

[Criteria for prioritising patients on surgical waiting lists in the National Health System]. / Criterios para priorizar a pacientes en lista de espera para procedimientos quirúrgicos en el Sistema Nacional de Salud.

OBJECTIVE: To survey the importance of previously proposed criteria for prioritising patients on surgical waiting lists and to analyse their use in daily practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study through a self-auto-administered postal questionnaire to hospital managers, medical directors, admissions managers, and department heads of general surgery, ophthalmology, orthopaedics and traumatology surgery and vascular surgery from 139 centres. The questionnaire comprised 3 sections: a) 3 to 5 of the most important criteria had to be selected and their use in daily practice had to be assessed; b) new criteria were proposed, c) socio-demographic data. The mean and its standard deviation of each criterion of importance were calculated. The proposed criteria were categorised and their frequency was calculated. RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by the 22% of those surveyed. Disease severity, speed of progression, waiting time and pain were the criteria considered as most important and were the most used. The current clinical situation and the professional environment were the two most common categories defined from the criteria proposed by those surveyed. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical priority should be determined by other criteria related to surgery necessity besides waiting time. Establishing prioritisation criteria could enable current implicit criteria to be used explicitly.

Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a population-based sample of children and adolescents after 3 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents over a 3-year period and to examine factors associated with change. METHODS: A representative sample of Spanish children and adolescents aged 8-18 years and their parents completed the KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire at baseline and again after 3 years. Data were also collected on gender, pubertal development (PD), and family socio-economic status (SES). Change in HRQOL over time was evaluated using effect sizes (ES). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze associations among changes in KIDSCREEN scores, socio-demographic factors, and pubertal development. RESULTS: Response rate at follow-up was 54% (n = 454). Overall, HRQoL worsened in eight out of the ten KIDSCREEN dimensions, with ES ranging from -0.10 (Moods and Emotions) to -0.34 (Psychological Well-being). The decrease was most marked in the intermediate age group (13-17 years of age at follow-up) and in girls. In the GEE models, pubertal development more strongly impacted changes in girls than in boys. CONCLUSIONS: In this representative, population-based sample of children and adolescents, moderate decrements in HRQoL were observed after 3 years. Changes were particularly important among girls and in relation to pubertal development. These results could provide useful reference data for other longitudinal studies in population sub-groups.

Wide social participation in prioritizing patients on waiting lists for joint replacement: a conjoint analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop a priority scoring system for patients on waiting lists for joint replacement based on a wide social participation, and to analyze the differences among participants. METHODS: Conjoint analysis. Focus groups in combination with a nominal technique were employed to identify the priority criteria (N=36). A rank-ordered logit model was then applied for scoring estimations. Participants (N=860) represented: consultants, allied-health professionals, patients and their relatives, and the general population of Catalonia. RESULTS: Clinical and social criteria were selected, and their relative importance (over 100 points) was: pain (33), difficulty in doing activities of daily living (21), disease severity (18), limitations on ability to work (10), having someone to look after the patient (9), being a caregiver (6), and recovery probability (4). Estimated criteria coefficients had the expected positive sign and all were statistically significant (P < 0.001). There were differences between groups; pain was rated higher by patients/relatives, and difficulty in doing activities was rated lower by patients/relatives and the general public. Most interaction terms for these criteria and groups were significant (P < 0.001). Consultants and allied-health professionals had the most similar prioritization pattern (r=0.97). CONCLUSION: Both clinical and social criteria are considered for prioritization of joint replacement surgery from a wide social perspective. The preference among professional and social groups varies and this might impact the result of patient prioritization. A wide social participation for obtaining adequate prioritizing systems for patients on waiting lists is desirable.

Measuring case-mix and outcome for older people in acute hospital care across Europe: the development and potential of the ACMEplus instrument.

AIM: To identify case-mix variables measured shortly after admission to be included in a patient classification system (ACMEplus) that best explains hospital outcome for older people in different health care systems. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study collecting patient factors (sociodemographics, functional, mental, clinical, administrative and perceived health) at different time assessments. METHODS: Multicentre study involving eight hospitals in six European countries (United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Finland, Greece and Poland). It included consecutive patients aged 65 years or older admitted to hospital for acute medical problems. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: discharge status, hospital readmission, mortality and length of stay. RESULTS: Of the 1667 included patients (mean age = 78.1 years; male gender = 43.5%) two-third had at least one 'Geriatric Giant' (immobility, confusion, incontinence or falls) on admission or shortly after. The most frequently affected system was cardiovascular (29.2%) and 31% of patients declared poor or very poor health. Mean length of stay was 17.9 days, 79% of patients were discharged to their usual residence; in-hospital and 1-month follow up mortality were 7.4% and 11.6%, respectively. Physical function explained the highest variation (between 8% and 21%), followed by cognitive status and number of Geriatric Giants, for almost all outcomes except readmission. CONCLUSION: Factors other than diagnosis (physical function, cognition and presenting problems) are important in predicting key outcomes of acute hospital care for older people and are consistent across countries. Their inclusion in a standardized system of measurement may be a way of improving quality and equity of medical care in older people.

The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to summarize the best evidence regarding the impact of providing patient-reported outcomes (PRO) information to health care professionals in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials (Medline, Cochrane Library; reference lists of previous systematic reviews; and requests to authors and experts in the field). RESULTS: Out of 1,861 identified references published between 1978 and 2007, 34 articles corresponding to 28 original studies proved eligible. Most trials (19) were conducted in primary care settings performed in the USA (21) and assessed adult patients (25). Information provided to professionals included generic health status (10), mental health (14), and other (6). Most studies suffered from methodologic limitations, including analysis that did not correspond with the unit of allocation. In most trials, the impact of PRO was limited. Fifteen of 23 studies (65%) measuring process of care observed at least one significant result favoring the intervention, as did eight of 17 (47%) that measured outcomes of care. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological concerns limit the strength of inference regarding the impact of providing PRO information to clinicians. Results suggest great heterogeneity of impact; contexts and interventions that will yield important benefits remain to be clearly defined.

Determinants of health related quality of life and health state utility in patients with age related macular degeneration: the association of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity.

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest in the use of measures of health related quality of life (HRQoL) and health state utility values in Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD). Visual acuity has been found to be an important determinant of such measures in previous studies. More recently, another measure of visual impairment, contrast sensitivity has received considerable attention. We designed a study to examine whether the contribution of contrast sensitivity in explaining HRQoL and health utilities over and above that of visual acuity. METHODS: 209 patients with unilateral or bilateral ARMD were recruited into a cross-sectional study of patients from a large teaching hospital. Patients underwent visual tests (near and distant visual acuity, contrast sensitivity) and completed a vision function questionnaire, the VF-14, HUI3, and time trade-off. RESULTS: Using multivariate regression analysis, the study revealed that contrast sensitivity remained a statistically significant predictor of all outcome measures even when visual acuity was included. This result was supported by the correlation coefficients between measures. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of contrast sensitivity appears to be better related to a person's HRQoL and health utility. Future studies should consider incorporating contrast sensitivity in addition to visual acuity. Studies, in particular economic evaluations, may underestimate the effect of treatment unless contrast sensitivity is considered.

Content-based interpretation aids for health-related quality of life measures in clinical practice. An example for the visual function index (VF-14).

BACKGROUND: In spite of a well-established development of instruments, difficulty in interpreting health related quality of life scores may limit its use in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To develop generalizable interpretation aids for a measure of perceived functional visual status, the VF-14 index. DESIGN: Item Response Theory (Rasch analysis) was used to analyze the performance of VF-14 items. The 'ruler' aid was derived from the most difficult activity (item) a patient is able to do without difficulty; the 'clinical scenarios' aid, first identified all significantly different clusters of items within the index and then estimated the mean expected difficulty (responses) to perform a benchmark item in each cluster. SETTING: The study was conducted in four hospitals and six ambulatory cataract surgery centers in Barcelona, Spain. PATIENTS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients scheduled for first eye cataracts surgery. MEASUREMENTS: The self-reported VF-14 index and clinical measures were used. RESULTS: All VF-14 items were found unidimensional with three items showing only partial misfit. For a patient with a VF-14 Rasch score of 71, the 'ruler' aid indicated that 'doing fine handwork' would be the most requiring activity he/she would perform without difficulty. The 'clinical scenarios' aid estimated that such a patient would be unable to 'drive at night', would have some difficulty 'reading small print' and no difficulty 'doing fine handwork', 'watching TV' or 'recognizing people'. Concordance between modeled and observed responses was fair to substantial. CONCLUSIONS: Simple content-based interpretation aids for the VF-14 scores were developed that should facilitate its use in clinical practice. These aids should be easily generalizable to other quality of life instruments.

[Citizens opinions, experiences and perceptions about waiting lists for elective cataract surgery and hip and knee replacement. ]. / Opiniones, vivencias y percepciones de los ciudadanos en torno a las listas de espera para cirugía electiva de catarata y artroplastia de cadera y rodilla.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe the views, perceptions and personal experience around elective cataract and hip and knee replacement waiting lists in Catalonia in order to improve their management. DESIGN: Qualitative methodology: four focus groups for each procedure. PLACE: Conducted between February-March 2000 at the Catalan Health Services headquarters. PARTICIPANTS: Each focus group included consultants (ophtalmologists, orthopedic surgeons, rheumatologists, rehabilitators, GPs), other related health professionals (nurses, social workers, physiotherapists, opticians/optometrist, GPs), patients and relatives and general population. Participants were selected through researchers and the clinical scientific committees. All of them followed a pre-established inclusion criteria. MAIN MEASURES: The analysis of the information was performed using the content analysis technique (contents of sessions were transcripted and information classified according to themes). RESULTS: Ten themes were identified. Waiting lists were argued to be a consequence of lack of resources, bad management and conflict of interest among consultants. Overall, the health care authority responsibility for the solution was acknowledged, although some participants claim more citizen participation. Among proposed solutions, prevention and education, more resources and improved management were found. Furthermore, a better physician-patient communication was considered essential. All the groups disagreed with the implicit current prioritisation system, however none wanted to assume the responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Citizen's perceptions and personal experiences point to a multifactorial approach to waiting lists management, which would ameliorate the problem and lead to a better social acceptance.

Identifying bone-mass-related risk factors for fracture to guide bone densitometry measurements: a systematic review of the literature.

Available evidence suggests that fracture prediction with bone densitometry may improve when used on people at high risk of osteoporotic fractures. The objectives of this literature review were: (1) to identify risk factors for fracture that are associated with the development of a low bone mass for both men and women; (2) to describe and assess the relationship between these factors and the risk of fracture; and (3) to classify them according to the strength of their association with fracture incidence. Studies were identified from MEDLINE (1982-1997), HealthSTAR (1975-1997) and The Cochrane Library (1997) databases. Pre-stated inclusion criteria (original analytic studies assessing risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in men and women) and methodologic quality were assessed by two independent investigators. Information on the study design and analysis, characteristics of participants, exposure (risk factor) and outcome measures (relative risk and odds ratios for fracture incidence), control for potential confounding factors and risk estimates was extracted using a standardized protocol. Qualitative and meta-analytic techniques were used for data synthesis. As a result, risk factors were classified into three groups according to their strength of association with fracture: high risk (RR > or = 2), moderate risk (1 < RR < 2) and no risk or protective (RR < or = 1). Of approximately 80 risk factors identified from 94 cohort and 72 case-control studies, 15% were classified in the high-risk group, including low body weight, loss of weight, physical inactivity, the consumption of corticosteroids or anticonvulsants, primary hyperparathyroidism, diabetes mellitus type 1, anorexia nervosa, gastrectomy, pernicious anemia, and aging (> 70-80 years). Eighteen percent and 8% of risk factors were classified in the moderate and no risk group respectively, whereas 60% showed either a lack of scientific evidence confirming their association with fracture or contradictory results. An efficient strategy for bone densitometry provision may thus be its selective use in those individuals who present with several strong or moderate risk factors for fracture related to bone mass loss.

Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on the process and the outcomes of care of feeding back information on perceived health status to health care professionals in clinical practice. DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled trials. DATA IDENTIFICATION: Search in electronic databases (MEDLINE 1966-1997), manual searches, and requests to experts in the field. DATA ANALYSIS: Differences between intervention and control group were considered in process of care (use of health services, diagnosis, and treatment), patient outcomes (health status), and patient satisfaction. In a subgroup of 13 interventions that dealt with the provision of feedback about the patient's mental health, the impact on the process of care was subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 21 studies that satisfied the selection criteria. Eleven of 20 (55%) found significant differences (P <0.05) in at least 1 of the process indicators in favor of the intervention group. Of 11 trials that assessed patient outcomes, only 4 (36%) detected significant improvements. A similar trend but lower percentages were observed among the 8 interventions that provided general health status information. Eleven interventions that evaluated feedback information about the patient's mental health status showed a higher rate of diagnosis in the intervention group (combined odds ratio [OR]=1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28 to 2.83). Seven of 9 studies evaluating treatment failed to show an effect on this indicator (combined OR=1.15; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.75). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of feedback on perceived health status to health professionals seems to have an effect on the process of care but not on patient functional or health status. This is especially true with regard to mental health status information. Nevertheless, there is still need for a more through evaluation of this type of intervention.

Intraoperative clinical practice and risk of early complications after cataract extraction in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To examine variation in intraoperative clinical practice and rates of adverse events after cataract surgery across four different healthcare systems. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were recruited from ophthalmic clinics in the United States (n = 75); in the Province of Manitoba, Canada (n = 12); in Denmark (n = 17); and the City of Barcelona, Spain (n = 10). In all, 1420 patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery were enrolled, with preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical data collected on 1344 patients (95%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of 23 specified intraoperative and early postoperative adverse events was measured. Four-month postoperative visual acuity outcome also was measured. RESULTS: Phacoemulsification was performed in two thirds of the extractions in the United States and Manitoba, in one third in Denmark, and in 3% in Barcelona (P < 0.001). More than 96% of extractions in North America and Denmark were performed with the patient under local anesthesia, whereas general anesthesia was used for 38% of extractions in Barcelona (P < 0.001). Rates of intraoperative adverse events were 11% to 12.8% in Manitoba, Denmark, and Barcelona and significantly lower in the United States (6%), mainly because of a lower rate of capsular rupture (P < 0.01). Significantly higher rates of early postoperative events were seen in the United States (18.8%) and Manitoba (20.4%) compared to Denmark (7.9%) and Barcelona (5%) (P < 0.001). The differences among sites in rates of events could not be explained by differences in recorded patient characteristics or surgical techniques. The occurrence of perioperative events was significantly associated with a worse 4-month visual outcome. CONCLUSION: The observed variation in clinical practice might represent a general trend of a slower diffusion of new medical technology in Europe compared with that of North America. Rates of intraoperative and early postoperative events varied significantly across sites.

Effectiveness of cataract surgery in Barcelona, Spain site results of an international study. Barcelona I-PORT investigators. International Patient Outcomes Research Team.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of cataract surgery on visual function and health status in terms of clinical indicators as well as perceived health and functional capacity, and to identify patient characteristics and differences in clinical management that might affect outcomes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Observational longitudinal study of a cohort of 218 patients aged 50 or older undergoing first eye cataract surgery. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively by clinical examinations (visual acuity [VA], ocular and medical comorbidity) and standardized telephone interviews. Main outcome measures included: the VF-14 Visual Function Index, the Cataract Symptom Score (CSS), the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and global measures of patients' trouble and satisfaction with vision. RESULTS: Significant improvement in all outcomes measures were observed at 4 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). However, the proportion of improved patients varied according to the outcome considered: VA (87%), CSS (72%), VF-14 (62%), and SIP (38%). Patient characteristics associated with higher a level of improvement were: worse preoperative visual function (VA, CSS, VF-14) (P < 0.001), less ocular comorbidity (P < 0.05), less postoperative complications (P < 0.05) and better preoperative general health status (SIP) (P < 0.01). The differences in clinical management were not associated with the outcomes (effectiveness) of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients benefit from cataract surgery, the greatest gain corresponding to visual function rather than to general health status. Since effectiveness of surgery is unrelated to operative procedures, less costly practices (i.e., day case surgery and loco-regional anesthesia) should be promoted.