Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 10(2): e00006, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829920

RESUMEN

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by high prevalence of multifocality. Multifocal HCC can arise synchronously or metachronously either from intrahepatic metastasis (IM) or multicentric occurrence (MO). To date, there have been no established criteria to accurately distinguish whether multifocal HCC originates from IM or MO. Histopathological features remain the most convenient strategy but with subjectivity and limited accuracy. Various molecular biological techniques involving assessment of TP53 mutation status, hepatitis B virus integration sites, and chromosomal alterations have been applied to determine the clonal origin. The introduction of next-generation sequencing facilitates a more comprehensive annotation of intertumor heterogeneity, resulting in more sensitive and accurate clonal discrimination. Generally, MO-HCC has better overall survival than IM-HCC after curative resection. Adjuvant antiviral treatment has been proved to decrease post-treatment recurrence probably by reducing MO-HCC recurrence, whereas adjuvant sorafenib treatment targeting prior micrometastasis failed to reduce IM-HCC recurrence. Recent studies recommended transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and traditional Chinese medicine Huaier granule as effective adjuvant treatments probably by preventing IM and both types of recurrences respectively. Immunotherapy that inhibits immune checkpoint interaction may be an optimal choice for both MO- and IM-HCC. In the future, effective personalized therapy against multifocal HCC may be achieved.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Hígado/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Células Clonales/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Hepatectomía , Virus de la Hepatitis B/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Hígado/citología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Mutación , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/mortalidad , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/terapia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/mortalidad , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética
2.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 8(10): e118, 2017 Oct 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28981082

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed at investigating the preoperatively available prognostic factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients and proposing a new preoperative prognostic scoring system for ICC. METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive ICC patients who underwent curative hepatectomy were enrolled retrospectively and were randomly divided into training (n=164) and validation cohorts (n=82) at a ratio of 2:1. The prognostic factors were investigated in both cohorts using multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses identified that two preoperative factors (serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels >4.1 mg/l (hazard ratio (HR): 2.75, 95% CI: 1.65-4.73, P<0.001) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels >300 mg/ml (HR: 3.76, 95% CI: 2.18-6.49)) were independent prognostic factors for postoperative survival in the training cohort. The results were further confirmed in the validation cohort. On the basis of these data, a preoperative prognostic score (PPS) was established by allocating 0 or 1 point to the two factors, respectively. Then, both in the training and validation cohorts, the PPS showed the power to stratify patients into three distinct groups (groups with scores 2, 1, and 0) with significant difference in the risk of postoperative death. CONCLUSIONS: A new preoperative scoring system consisting of preoperative CRP and CA19-9 levels could effectively predict postoperative survival of ICC patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA