Assessment of deep brain stimulation candidacy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned and future directions for neuropsychologists.

ObjectiveNeuropsychological assessment is integral to the pre-surgical deep brain stimulation (DBS) workup for patients with movement disorders. The COVID-19 pandemic quickly affected care access and shifted healthcare delivery, and neuropsychology has adapted successfully to provide tele-neuropsychological (teleNP) DBS evaluations during this time, thus permanently changing the landscape of neuropsychological practice. Method: In this paper, we discuss the lessons learned from the pandemic and we offer care management guidelines for teleNP and in-person evaluations of pre-DBS populations, with exploration of the feasibility of the different approaches for uninterrupted care access. Results: We summarize the strengths and weaknesses of these care models and we provide future directions for the state of clinical neuropsychological practice for DBS programs, with implications for broader patient populations. Conclusions: A better understanding of these dynamics will inform and educate the DBS team and community regarding the complexities of performing DBS neuropsychological evaluations during COVID-19 and beyond.

The global pandemic has permanently changed the state of practice for pre-DBS neuropsychological evaluations.

The evaluation and management of patients with movement disorders has evolved considerably due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the assessment of candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy. Members of the Neuropsychology Focus Group from the Parkinson Study Group Functional Neurosurgical Working Group met virtually to discuss current practices and solutions, build consensus, and to inform the DBS team and community regarding the complexities of performing DBS neuropsychological evaluations during COVID-19. It is our viewpoint that the practice of neuropsychology has adapted successfully to provide tele-neuropsychological pre-DBS evaluations during the global pandemic, thus permanently changing the landscape of neuropsychological services.

Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: As the population continues to age, the number of elderly patients with symptomatic pituitary tumours will continue to increase. Little information exists as to the safety of pituitary surgery in this patient population. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the presentation and perioperative risk associated with transsphenoidal surgery in patients over the age of 70. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was undertaken for patients over the age of 70 undergoing transsphenoidal surgery at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center between 1995 and 2005. FINDINGS: Sixty-four patients over the age of 70 were identified with an average age of 73.4 years (range 70-84). The average follow-up period was 44 months (range 14-104). Symptoms of mass effect were the presenting complaint in 72% of patients while 9% had documentation of growth on imaging studies. Twelve percent presented with a history consistent with apoplexy. Three patients (5%) presented with acromegaly. Post-operative hospital stay averaged 2.6 days (range 2-7). Eight patients had new hormonal deficits post-operatively (1 ACTH, 3 TSH, 2 ACTH/TSH, 2 vasopressin). There were no cardiopulmonary complications and no deaths within 90 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Transsphenoidal surgery can be performed in patients over the age of 70 without undo significant risks. Surgical removal of pituitary adenomas should be considered the mainstay of treatment in elderly patients in whom treatment is necessary. Patients who are medically suitable candidates should be offered surgical resection as would their younger counterparts.

The quick confusion scale in the ED: comparison with the mini-mental state examination.

The Quick Confusion Scale (QCS) is a 6-item battery of questions focusing on orientation, memory, and concentration weighted to yield a top score of 15. Analysis of the QCS compared with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is needed to determine if the QCS is a valid marker of cognitive mental status. The MMSE and the QCS were administered to a convenience sample of 205 patients presenting to the emergency department. Exclusions included head trauma, multisystem trauma, Glasgow Coma Scale less than 15, non-English speaking, education level less than 8 years, contact or droplet isolation, acute illness, or incomplete data for reasons such as restricted patient access. Mean scores were 24.8(SD = 4.7; range 2-30) on the MMSE and 11.89 (SD = 3.5; range 0-15) on the QCS. QCS scores were significantly correlated (r = .783) with MMSE scores. The QCS appears comparable with the MMSE and is quicker to administer.

Pilot study of electrical stimulation on median nerve in comatose severe brain injured patients: 3-month outcome.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine if electrical stimulation (ES) benefits (waking time, 3-month outcomes) treated coma patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: Double blind randomized-controlled study. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Ten coma patients; six treatment and four controls, using the 'Respond Select' by EMPI. EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTIONS: Treatment group received radial nerve ES applied in 300 ms intermittent pulses at 40 Hz, 15-20m A 8 hours a day up to 14 days of coma; control group received sham stimulation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: ES group emerged from coma mean 2 days earlier than controls, although this result was not statistically significant. At 3 months post-injury, there was no group difference in Glasgow Outcome Scale, although the ES group had improved function over controls as measured by the FIM/FAM (mean of 114 and 64.5, respectively, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: These data show an interesting trend, although statistical power was limited in this small pilot study, suggesting the need for a larger trial.

Correlation of aphasia and/or neglect with cortical infarction in a subpopulation of RANTTAS.

Classically in neurology, aphasia and neglect were accepted as reliable markers of cortical lesions. The actual prognostic values of aphasia and neglect have yet to be formally tested. This analysis sought to determine the predictive accuracy of aphasia and/or neglect in acute stroke for cortical infarction. Data from the RANTTAS investigation of tirilazad mesylate in stroke patients were reanalyzed, comparing acute National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) measures of aphasia and neglect to lesion location on day 7-10 CT scans. Correlations between the presence of aphasia and/or neglect and the presence of a cortical lesion were only in the moderate range, and positive predictive values were far from perfect, as would be expected. 'Subcortical' aphasia or neglect was more likely in large, subcortical lesions. Aphasia and neglect, as determined in the acute setting by the NIHSS, are only moderately associated with cortical infarct identified on follow-up CT scans. If selective neuroprotection is envisioned for acute stroke patients, more accurate markers of cortical infarction may be needed.

Do women fare worse: a metaanalysis of gender differences in traumatic brain injury outcome.

OBJECT: The purpose of this metaanalysis was to investigate possible gender differences in traumatic brain injury (TBI) sequelae. The case fatality rates in patients after TBI have previously been shown to be significantly higher in women as compared with men. METHODS: A quantitative review of published studies of TBI outcome revealed eight studies (20 outcome variables) of TBI, in which outcome was reported separately for men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome was worse in women than in men for 85% of the measured variables, with an average effect size of -0.15. Although clinical opinion is often that women tend to experience better outcomes than men after TBI, the opposite pattern was suggested in the results of this metaanalysis. However, this conclusion is limited by the fact that, in only a small percentage of the total published reports on TBI outcome, was outcome described separately for each sex. A careful, prospective study of sex differences in TBI outcome is clearly needed.

Do women fare worse? A metaanalysis of gender differences in outcome after traumatic brain injury.

The purpose of this metaanalysis was to investigate possible gender differences in TBI sequelae. The case fatality rates in patients after TBI have previously been shown to be significantly higher in women as compared with men. A quantitative review of published studies of TBI outcome revealed eight studies (20 outcome variables) of TBI in which outcome was reported separately for men and women. Outcome was worse in women than in men for 85% of the measured variables, with an average effect size of -0.15. Although clinical opinion is often that women tend to experience better outcomes than do men after TBI, the opposite pattern was suggested in the results of this metaanalysis. However, this conclusion is limited by the fact that in only a small percentage of the total published reports on TBI outcome was outcome described separately for each sex. A careful, prospective study of sex differences in TBI outcome is clearly needed.