RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a home-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity, phased (introduction, intermediate, maintenance), exercise prescription in breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen breast cancer patients were randomized to intervention or control for the duration of chemotherapy (16-24 weeks). The intervention was one aerobic exercise session at 80-90% VO2max for 25 min/week and 65%-75% VO2max for ≥ 50 min/week. Adherence to the tailored home-based program was assessed by heart rate monitors. Acceptability, tolerability, feasibility, efficacy, change in VO2max, and patient reported outcomes, safety, and clinical events were assessed. RESULTS: 25.7% of eligible women consented (acceptability). Adherence was 87.6%. Women were not able to maintain exercise intensity as chemotherapy progressed (23.7% of exercise minutes were completed at prescribed heart rate during maintenance). Efficacy of the intervention was demonstrated by maintenance of VO2max (-1.0 ± 13.2%) compared to (-27.5 ± 7.4%) the control group. Further, during and after therapy, patients in the intervention arm reported less fatigue (control-baseline: 14.4 ± 15.9; midpoint: 19.0 ± 11.4; follow-up: 29.4 ± 20.0; intervention-baseline: 29.2 ± 24.6; midpoint: 24.6 ± 14.4; follow-up: 23.6 ± 11.9), impairment in activities (control-baseline: 13.7 ± 16.0; midpoint: 32.8 ± 17.0; follow-up: 58.6 ± 27.9; intervention-baseline: 38.7 ± 31.8; midpoint: 47.1 ± 27.5; follow-up: 47.5 ± 31.0), and pain (control-baseline: 80.8 ± 17.1; midpoint: 73.9 ± 20.7; follow-up: 50.7 ± 25.7; intervention-baseline: 68.7 ± 28.4; midpoint: 61.4 ± 22.5; follow-up: 65.3 ± 22.4). There were no differences in adverse events, treatment delays, or pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant breast cancer patients maintained approximately one hour/week of moderate-intensity exercise over the course of their treatment. Further, this volume of exercise was sufficient to maintain fitness capacity and quality of life compared to the control group. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03280836, prospectively registered 9/13/2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280836 .
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Heterozygous Factor V R506Q [Factor V Leiden (FVL)] and prothrombin G20210A (PGM), the most common inherited thrombotic disorders in the Caucasian population, confer a low-moderate risk for first venous thromboembolic (VTE) event. We investigated the thrombotic complications of rare homozygous and compound heterozygous FVL and PGM. METHODS: A cohort of patients with homozygous and compound heterozygous FVL and PGM were evaluated at a major referral center in Central Pennsylvania, USA between June 2001 and March 2019. Data including incidence of first and recurrent thrombosis, associated risk factors, family history and demographics were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were eligible for analysis: 47 had homozygous FVL, three had homozygous PGM, 19 had compound heterozygous FVL and PGM, five had compound homozygous FVL and heterozygous PGM, and one had compound heterozygous FVL and homozygous PGM. Fifty-nine patients experienced 111 thromboembolic events. Forty-seven percent of first thrombotic events occurred in patients without clinical or surgical conditions predisposing to thrombosis. The rate of recurrent thromboembolism was 59%. The mean time to recurrence was 8.5â¯years. Ninety percent of recurrent events occurred during times when patients were not treated with anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Persons with homozygous and compound heterozygous FVL and PGM are at a significantly increased risk of first unprovoked and recurrent VTE. Patients with first thromboembolic events should be considered for long-term anticoagulation.