Genome-wide study identifies novel genes associated with bone toxicities in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Bone toxicities are common among paediatric patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with potentially major negative impact on patients' quality of life. To identify the underlying genetic contributors, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) in 260 patients of European-descent from the DFCI 05-001 ALL trial, with validation in 101 patients of European-descent from the DFCI 11-001 ALL trial. We identified a significant association between rs844882 on chromosome 20 and bone toxicities in the DFCI 05-001 trial (p = 1.7 × 10-8). In DFCI 11-001 trial, we observed a consistent trend of this variant with fracture. The variant was an eQTL for two nearby genes, CD93 and THBD. In TWAS, genetically predicted ACAD9 expression was associated with an increased risk of bone toxicities, which was confirmed by meta-analysis of the two cohorts (meta-p = 2.4 × 10-6). In addition, a polygenic risk score of heel quantitative ultrasound speed of sound was associated with fracture risk in both cohorts (meta-p = 2.3 × 10-3). Our findings highlight the genetic influence on treatment-related bone toxicities in this patient population. The genes we identified in our study provide new biological insights into the development of bone adverse events related to ALL treatment.

Treatment completion, asparaginase completion, and oncologic outcomes among children, adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with DFCI Consortium Protocols.

Adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) face worse outcomes than children. While pediatric-inspired protocols have improved outcomes, the ability of patients to complete these intensive regimens and the reasons for discontinuation are unknown. We analyzed a cohort of 332 AYA patients (aged 15-49 years) and 1159 children (aged 1-14 years) with Ph-negative ALL treated on DFCI consortium protocols. We found that AYA patients completed treatment at lower rates than children (60.8% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.001), primarily due to higher rates of early treatment failure (14.5% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001). Withdrawal from treatment for toxicity, social/personal, or unknown reasons was uncommon, but higher among AYA patients (9.3% vs 4.7%, p = 0.001). Patients who remained on assigned therapy for one year had favorable overall survival (AYA 5-year OS 88.9%; children 5-year OS 96.4%; p < 0.001). Among patients who continued treatment for 1 year, AYA patients completed asparaginase (defined as receiving 26+ weeks) at lower rates than children (79.1% vs. 89.6%, p < 0.001). Patients who received more weeks of consolidation asparaginase had higher overall and event-free survival. Efforts should focus on identifying patients at risk for early treatment failure and optimizing asparaginase delivery.

A new prognostic model in chemotherapy-treated patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: An analysis of ECOG-ACRIN E1305.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) periodic reassessment of prognostic factors provides valuable information that can aid in patient stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis included all patients with R/M HNSCC enrolled in the ECOG-ACRIN E1305 phase III clinical trial who received first-line treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy doublet with or without bevacizumab. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors for OS were identified using univariate and multivariable analyses. A new prognostic model for OS was built retaining the prognostic factors which were significant in the final multivariable analysis (P < 0.05). RESULTS: All 403 study participants were included in the analysis. The median OS in the whole study cohort was 11.8 months (90% confidence intervals [CI], 10.6-13.2). The new prognostic model for OS comprised four risk factors (ECOG performance status [1 versus 0], primary tumor location [other versus oropharynx], presence of bone or liver metastasis, and prior radiation to the head and neck); patients with ≤ 2 (n = 249) and > 2 risk factors (n = 154) had a median OS of 15.2 and 7.6 months, respectively (Hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.73-2.66; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new proposed model includes 4 clinical prognostic factors that can be readily assessed at baseline. Similar models have the potential to improve trial design and optimize stratification of patients with R/M HNSCC.