Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
ESMO Open ; 7(2): 100424, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35248822

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with equivocal imaging findings after cranial radiotherapy were consecutively included into this monocentric prospective study. CCA was carried out by software-based automated subtraction of imaging features in late versus early T1-weighted sequences after contrast agent application. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated CCA with respect to PsP/RN and PD being blinded for histological findings. The radiological assessment was compared with the histopathological results, and its accuracy was calculated statistically. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included; 16 (48.5%) were treated because of a primary brain tumor (BT), and 17 (51.1%) because of a secondary BT. In one patient, CCA was technically infeasible. The accuracy of CCA in predicting the histological result was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95; one-sided P = 0.051; n = 32]. Sensitivity and specificity of CCA were 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-0.94), respectively. The accuracy in patients with secondary BTs was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) and nonsignificantly higher compared with patients with primary BT with an accuracy of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-0.92), P = 0.16. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CCA was a highly accurate, easy, and helpful method for distinguishing PsP or RN from PD after cranial radiotherapy, especially in patients with secondary tumors after radiosurgical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Traumatismos por Radiación , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Necrosis/etiología , Necrosis/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/patología
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 198(1): 1-11, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34786605

RESUMEN

The new Medical Licensing Regulations 2025 (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) will soon be passed by the Federal Council (Bundesrat) and will be implemented step by step by the individual faculties in the coming months. The further development of medical studies essentially involves an orientation from fact-based to competence-based learning and focuses on practical, longitudinal and interdisciplinary training. Radiation oncology and radiation therapy are important components of therapeutic oncology and are of great importance for public health, both clinically and epidemiologically, and therefore should be given appropriate attention in medical education. This report is based on a recent survey on the current state of radiation therapy teaching at university hospitals in Germany as well as the contents of the National Competence Based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Medicine 2.0 (Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin 2.0, NKLM) and the closely related Subject Catalogue (Gegenstandskatalog, GK) of the Institute for Medical and Pharmaceutical Examination Questions (Institut für Medizinische und Pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen, IMPP). The current recommendations of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) regarding topics, scope and rationale for the establishment of radiation oncology teaching at the respective faculties are also included.


Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos , Oncología por Radiación , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Alemania , Humanos , Oncología por Radiación/educación
4.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 197(5): 385-395, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33410959

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In radical radiochemotherapy (RCT) of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typical prognostic factors include T- and N-stage, while there are still conflicting data on the prognostic relevance of gross tumor volume (GTV) and particularly its changes during RCT. The NCT03055715 study of the Young DEGRO working group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) evaluated the prognostic impact of GTV and its changes during RCT. METHODS: A total of 21 university centers for radiation oncology from five different European countries (Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Belgium, and Austria) participated in the study which evaluated n = 347 patients with confirmed (biopsy) inoperable NSCLC in UICC stage III A/B who received radical curative-intent RCT between 2010 and 2013. Patient and disease data were collected anonymously via electronic case report forms and entered into the multi-institutional RadPlanBio platform for central data analysis. GTV before RCT (initial planning CT, GTV1) and at 40-50 Gy (re-planning CT for radiation boost, GTV2) was delineated. Absolute GTV before/during RCT and relative GTV changes were correlated with overall survival as the primary endpoint. Hazard ratios (HR) of survival analysis were estimated by means of adjusted Cox regression models. RESULTS: GTV1 was found to have a mean of 154.4 ml (95%CI: 1.5-877) and GTV2 of 106.2 ml (95% CI: 0.5-589.5), resulting in an estimated reduction of 48.2 ml (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 18.8 months with a median of 22.1, 20.9, and 12.6 months for patients with high, intermediate, and low GTV before RT. Considering all patients, in one survival model of overall mortality, GTV2 (2.75 (1.12-6.75, p = 0.03) was found to be a stronger survival predictor than GTV1 (1.34 (0.9-2, p > 0.05). In patients with available data on both GTV1 and GTV2, absolute GTV1 before RT was not significantly associated with survival (HR 0-69, 0.32-1.49, p > 0.05) but GTV2 significantly predicted OS in a model adjusted for age, T stage, and chemotherapy, with an HR of 3.7 (1.01-13.53, p = 0.04) per 300 ml. The absolute decrease from GTV1 to GTV2 was correlated to survival, where every decrease by 50 ml reduced the HR by 0.8 (CI 0.64-0.99, p = 0.04). There was no evidence for a survival effect of the relative change between GTV1 and GTV2. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that independently of T stage, the re-planning GTV during RCT is a significant and superior survival predictor compared to baseline GTV before RT. Patients with a high absolute (rather than relative) change in GTV during RT show a superior survival outcome after RCT.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Carga Tumoral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral/efectos de la radiación
5.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(8): 699-704, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32367455

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Medical students' knowledge of radiation oncology (RO) is of increasing importance with a rising prevalence of malignancies. However, RO teaching in medical schools is heterogeneous and has not been analyzed at a federal level yet. Therefore, the following survey aims to provide a national overview of RO teaching in Germany. METHODS: A questionnaire containing multiple-choice and free-text questions covering the extent and topics of RO teaching was sent to RO departments of all university hospitals in Germany and was answered by the heads of department/main lecturers. RESULTS: 24/35 (68.6%) RO departments returned completed forms. Most faculties employ lectures (91.7%), seminars (87.5%), and practical/bedside training (75.0%), whereas training in radiation biology and medical physics are rare (25% and 33.3%, respectively). Main topics covered are general RO (100%), radiation biology (91.7%), and side effects (87.5%). Regarding RO techniques and concepts, image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy are taught at all faculties, followed by palliative and stereotactic techniques (87.5% each). Notably, all departments offered at least a partial rotation in RO in conjunction with radiology and/or nuclear medicine departments in the last year of medical school, while only 70.8% provided a complete rotation in RO. In addition, 57.1% of the departments have taken measures concerning the upcoming National Competence-Based Learning Objectives Catalogue (NKLM) for medical education. CONCLUSION: RO plays an integral but underrepresented role in clinical medical education in Germany, but faces new challenges in the development of practical and competence-based education, which will require further innovative and interdisciplinary concepts.


Asunto(s)
Oncología por Radiación/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Curriculum , Docentes Médicos , Alemania , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Revisión por Expertos de la Atención de Salud , Sociedades Médicas , Enseñanza
6.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 47(6): 1368-1380, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31486876

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) is overexpressed in brain tumours and represents an interesting target for glioma imaging. 18F-GE-180, a novel TSPO ligand, has shown improved binding affinity and a high target-to-background contrast in patients with glioblastoma. However, the association of uptake characteristics on TSPO PET using 18F-GE-180 with the histological WHO grade and molecular genetic features so far remains unknown and was evaluated in the current study. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with histologically validated glioma at initial diagnosis or recurrence were included. All patients underwent 18F-GE-180 PET, and the maximal and mean tumour-to-background ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) as well as the PET volume were assessed. On MRI, presence/absence of contrast enhancement was evaluated. Imaging characteristics were correlated with neuropathological parameters (i.e. WHO grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation). RESULTS: Six of 58 patients presented with WHO grade II, 16/58 grade III and 36/58 grade IV gliomas. An (IDH) mutation was found in 19/58 cases, and 39/58 were classified as IDH-wild type. High 18F-GE-180-uptake was observed in all but 4 cases (being WHO grade II glioma, IDH-mutant). A high association of 18F-GE-180-uptake and WHO grades was seen: WHO grade IV gliomas showed the highest uptake intensity compared with grades III and II gliomas (median TBRmax 5.15 (2.59-8.95) vs. 3.63 (1.85-7.64) vs. 1.63 (1.50-3.43), p < 0.001); this association with WHO grades persisted within the IDH-wild-type and IDH-mutant subgroup analyses (p < 0.05). Uptake intensity was also associated with the IDH mutational status with a trend towards higher 18F-GE-180-uptake in IDH-wild-type gliomas in the overall group (median TBRmax 4.67 (1.56-8.95) vs. 3.60 (1.50-7.64), p = 0.083); however, within each WHO grade, no differences were found (e.g. median TBRmax in WHO grade III glioma 4.05 (1.85-5.39) vs. 3.36 (2.32-7.64), p = 1.000). No association was found between uptake intensity and MGMT or TERT (p > 0.05 each). CONCLUSION: Uptake characteristics on 18F-GE-180 PET are highly associated with the histological WHO grades, with the highest 18F-GE-180 uptake in WHO grade IV glioblastomas and a PET-positive rate of 100% among the investigated high-grade gliomas. Conversely, all TSPO-negative cases were WHO grade II gliomas. The observed association of 18F-GE-180 uptake and the IDH mutational status seems to be related to the high inter-correlation of the IDH mutational status and the WHO grades.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Carbazoles , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/genética , Humanos , Biología Molecular , Mutación , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Receptores de GABA
7.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(1): 70-76, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31586230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation necrosis is a possible adverse event after cranial radiation therapy and can cause severe symptoms, such as an increased intracranial pressure or neurological deterioration. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab (BEV) has been shown to be a feasible therapeutic option for symptomatic radiation necrosis, either when traditional antiedematous steroid treatment fails, or as an alternative to steroid treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one randomized study with a rather small cohort exists to prove a beneficial effect in this setting. Therefore, further real-life data are needed. This retrospective monocentric case study evaluates patients who received BEV due to radiation necrosis, with a specific focus on the respective clinical course. METHODS: Using the internal database for pharmaceutical products, all patients who received BEV in our department were identified. Only patients who received BEV as symptomatic treatment for radiation necrosis were included. Patient characteristics, symptoms before, during, and after treatment, and the use of dexamethasone were evaluated using medical reports and systematic internal documentation. The symptoms were graded using CTCAE version 5.0 for general neurological symptoms. Symptoms were graded directly before each cycle and after the treatment (approximately 6 weeks). Additionally, the daily steroid dose was collected at these timepoints. Patients who either improved in symptoms, received less dexamethasone after treatment, or both were considered to have a benefit from the treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients who received BEV due to radiation necrosis were identified. For 10 patients (47.6%) symptoms improved and 11 patients (52.4%) remained clinically stable during the treatment. In 14 patients (66.7%) the dexamethasone dose could be reduced during therapy, 5 patients (23.8%) received the same dose of dexamethasone before and after the treatment, and 2 patients (9.5%) received a higher dose at the end of the treatment. According to this analysis, overall, 19 patients (90.5%) benefited from the treatment with BEV. No severe adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: BEV might be an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with radiation necrosis as a complication after cranial radiation therapy. Patients seem to benefit from this treatment by improving symptomatically or through reduction of dexamethasone.


Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Encéfalo/efectos de la radiación , Irradiación Craneana/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 46(3): 580-590, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30244386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: PET represents a valuable tool for glioma imaging. In addition to amino acid tracers such as 18F-FET, PET targeting the 18-kDa mitochondrial translocator-protein (TSPO) is of high interest for high-grade glioma (HGG) imaging due to its upregulation in HGG cells. 18F-GE-180, a novel TSPO ligand, has shown a high target-to-background contrast in HGG. Therefore, we intra-individually compared its uptake characteristics to dynamic 18F-FET PET and contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with HGG. METHODS: Twenty HGG patients (nine IDH-wildtype, 11 IDH-mutant) at initial diagnosis (n = 8) or recurrence (n = 12) were consecutively included and underwent 18F-GE-180 PET, dynamic 18F-FET PET, and MRI. The maximal tumour-to-background ratios (TBRmax) and biological tumour volumes (BTV) were evaluated in 18F-GE-180 and 18F-FET PET. Dynamic 18F-FET PET analysis included the evaluation of minimal time-to-peak (TTPmin). In MRI, the volume of contrast-enhancement was delineated (VOLCE). Volumes were spatially correlated using the Sørensen-Dice coefficient. RESULTS: The median TBRmax tended to be higher in 18F-GE-180 PET compared to 18F-FET PET [4.58 (2.33-8.95) vs 3.89 (1.56-7.15); p = 0.062] in the overall group. In subgroup analyses, IDH-wildtype gliomas showed a significantly higher median TBRmax in 18F-GE-180 PET compared to 18F-FET PET [5.45 (2.56-8.95) vs 4.06 (1.56-4.48); p = 0.008]; by contrast, no significant difference was observed in IDH-mutant gliomas [3.97 (2.33-6.81) vs 3.79 (2.01-7.15) p = 1.000]. Only 5/20 cases showed higher TBRmax in 18F-FET PET compared to 18F-GE-180 PET, all of them being IDH-mutant gliomas. No parameter in 18F-GE-180 PET correlated with TTPmin (p > 0.05 each). There was a tendency towards higher median BTVGE-180 [32.1 (0.4-236.0) ml] compared to BTVFET [19.3 (0.7-150.2) ml; p = 0.062] with a moderate spatial overlap [median Sørensen-Dice coefficient 0.55 (0.07-0.85)]. In MRI, median VOLCE [9.7 (0.1-72.5) ml] was significantly smaller than both BTVFET and BTVGE180 (p < 0.001 each), leading to a poor spatial correlation with BTVGE-180 [0.29 (0.01-0.48)] and BTVFET [0.38 (0.01-0.68)]. CONCLUSION: PET with 18F-GE-180 and 18F-FET provides differing imaging information in HGG dependent on the IDH-mutational status, with diverging spatial overlap and vast exceedance of contrast-enhancement in MRI. Combined PET imaging might reveal new insights regarding non-invasive characterization of tumour heterogeneity and might influence patients' management.


Asunto(s)
Carbazoles , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/patología , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Transporte Biológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Carbazoles/metabolismo , Femenino , Glioma/genética , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Proyectos Piloto , Polimorfismo Genético , Trazadores Radiactivos , Receptores de GABA/genética , Carga Tumoral , Tirosina/metabolismo
9.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 44(13): 2230-2238, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28821920

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The 18-kDa mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO) was reported to be upregulated in gliomas. 18F-GE-180 is a novel 3rd generation TSPO receptor ligand with improved target-to-background contrast compared to previous tracers. In this pilot study, we compared PET imaging with 18F-GE-180 and MRI of patients with untreated and recurrent pretreated glioblastoma. METHODS: Eleven patients with histologically confirmed IDH wildtype gliomas (10 glioblastomas, 1 anaplastic astrocytoma) underwent 18F-GE-180 PET at initial diagnosis or recurrence. The PET parameters mean background uptake (SUVBG), maximal tumour-to-background ratio (TBRmax) and PET volume using different thresholds (SUVBG × 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0) were evaluated in the 60-80 min p.i. summation images. The different PET volumes were compared to the contrast-enhancing tumour volume on MRI. RESULTS: All gliomas were positive on 18F-GE-180 PET and were depicted with extraordinarily high tumour-to-background contrast (median SUVBG 0.47 (0.37-0.93), TBRmax 6.61 (3.88-9.07)). 18F-GE-180 uptake could be found even in areas without contrast enhancement on MRI, leading to significantly larger PET volumes than MRI-based volumes (median 90.5, 74.5, and 63.8 mL vs. 31.0 mL; p = 0.003, 0.004, 0.013). In percentage difference, the PET volumes were on average 179%, 135%, and 90% larger than the respective MRI volumes. The median spatial volumetric correlation (Sørensen-Dice coefficient) of PET volumes and MRI volumes prior to radiotherapy was 0.48, 0.54, and 0.58. CONCLUSION: 18F-GE-180 PET provides a remarkably high tumour-to-background contrast in untreated and pretreated glioblastoma and shows tracer uptake even beyond contrast enhancement on MRI. To what extent 18F-GE-180 uptake reflects the tumour extent of human gliomas and inflammatory cells remains to be evaluated in future prospective studies with guided stereotactic biopsies and correlation of histopathological results.


Asunto(s)
Carbazoles , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/metabolismo , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Receptores de GABA/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Ligandos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Recurrencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA