Temporal Trends in Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Nationwide Study.

With increased use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in treatment of aortic stenosis, it is important to evaluate real life data trends in outcomes. This nationwide register-based study aimed to present an outlook on temporal trends in characteristics and outcomes, including mortality. First-time consecutive Danish patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 to 2019 were included in this study. The chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to assess the differences in the characteristics over time and Cochrane-Armitage trend tests were used to examine changes in complications and mortality. Between 2010 and 2019, 4,847 patients (54.6% men, median age 82 [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 77 to 85] years) underwent first-time TAVI. A statistically significant decrease over time was observed for preprocedural hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure, whereas preexisting chronic obstructive lung disease and preprocedural pacemaker remained stable. We observed a significant decrease in 30- and 90-day postoperative preprocedural pacemaker implantation from 2011 to 2017, with 15.1% and 15.9% in 2011 and 8.6% and 8.9% in 2017, respectively. The incidence of for 30- and 90-day heart failure significantly decreased from 19.3% and 20.3% to 8.5% and 9.1%, respectively. We observed significant changes for 30-day atrial fibrillation, whereas the changes over time for 90-day atrial fibrillation and 30- and 90-day stroke/transient ischemic attack remained insignificant. The all-cause mortality within 30- and 90 days significantly decreased over time from 6.7% and 9.2% in 2011 to 1.5% and 2.7% in 2019 and 2016, respectively. In conclusion, this national study provides general insight on the trends of complications and mortality of TAVI, demonstrating significant reductions over time.

Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: medical therapy and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)-a real-world retrospective cohort analysis of outcomes and cost-effectiveness using national data.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the real-world difference between 2 groups of patients with severe aortic stenosis and similar baseline comorbidities: surgical turn down (STD) patients, who were managed medically prior to the availability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) following formal surgical outpatient assessment, and patients managed with a TAVI implant. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from real-world data. SETTING: Electronic patient letters were searched for patients with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis and a formal outpatient STD prior to the availability of TAVI (1999-2009). The second group comprised the first 90 cases of TAVI in South Wales (2009 onwards). 2 years prior to and 5 years following TAVI/STD were assessed. Patient data were pseudoanonymised, using the Secure Anonymized Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, and extracted from Office National Statistics (ONS), Patient-Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) and general practitioner databases. POPULATION: 90 patients who had undergone TAVI in South Wales, and 65 STD patients who were medically managed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival, hospital admission frequency and length of stay, primary care visits, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: TAVI patients were significantly older (81.8 vs 79.2), more likely to be male (59.1% vs 49.3%), baseline comorbidities were balanced. Mortality in TAVI versus STD was 28% vs 70% at 1000 days follow-up. There were significantly more hospital admissions per year in the TAVI group prior to TAVI/STD (1.5 (IQR 1.0-2.4) vs 1.0 IQR (0.5-1.5)). Post TAVI/STD, the TAVI group had significantly lower hospital admissions (0.3 (IQR 0.0-1.0) vs 1.2 (IQR 0.7-3.0)) and lengths of stay (0.4 (IQR 0.0-13.8) vs 11.0 (IQR 2.5-28.5), p<0.05). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for TAVI was £10 533 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI patients were more likely to survive and avoid hospital admissions compared with the medically managed STD group. The ICER for TAVI was £10 533 per QALY, making it a cost-effective procedure.

Changes in platelet function independent of pharmacotherapy following coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

BACKGROUND: High on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is common in patients receiving clopidogrel following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); it's also associated with increased morbidity and mortality. More potent and predictable antiplatelet drugs have addressed this issue at the expense of increased bleeding. Identification of HTPR and the targeted use of more potent antiplatelet drugs has, so far, broadly failed. We investigate this approach in terms of the timing of platelet function testing and how this can impact on the ability of these bedside tests to predict HTPR around the time of coronary intervention. METHODS: High risk ACS patients treated with 5 days of clopidogrel had platelet function assessed using the multiple electrode aggregometry system (MEA) pre, post and 24 h following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Simultaneous detailed analysis of platelet status was undertaken with quantification of platelet bound and soluble p-selectin and mass spectrometry quantification of the eicosanoid 12-HETE. RESULTS: As assessed by MEA 40.5% of patients had HTPR pre-PCI; mean aggregation units (AU) in response to ADP were 499.1 ± 46.3 pre-PCI, 407.6 ± 37.7 post-PCI and 269.1 ± 24.6 AU 24 h post-PCI (pre to post PCI p > 0.05, pre to 24 h post-PCI p = 0.0002). This highly significant drop in platelet reactivity was contrasted with on-going expression of platelet bound p-selectin, increased soluble p-selectin and rising 12-HETE concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines significant changes in ex-vivo platelet aggregation that occur within 24 h of PCI in high risk NSTEMI patients using bedside PFT. Whilst there were no changes in antiplatelet therapy during the study period its clear that timing is crucial when assessing high on treatment residual platelet activity.