2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

Adenosine Increases Hepatic Artery Flow in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of low-dose adenosine on hepatic artery flow (HAF) when administered intraoperatively by continuous infusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2009 and August 2009, 74 patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Ten patients were enrolled for adenosine treatment, and 64 non-study patients served as controls. After arterial reperfusion, a 16-G central venous catheter was placed in the gastroduodenal artery, and adenosine was continuously infused at doses ranging from 0.7 to 2.8 µg/kg/min for 30 min. HAF and portal vein flow were measured using a transit time flow meter before adenosine infusion, during infusion, and 10 min after infusion. Liver function tests were monitored routinely, duplex ultrasonography was performed on postoperative day 1, and the hepatic artery resistive index measured. The patients were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Adenosine significantly increased HAF at doses from 0.7 to 2.8 µg/kg/min. The smallest increase in HAF was 24% above the baseline; in 80% of patients, the increase in HAF was >50% of the baseline values. In 2 patients, HAF was increased by >300%. The dosing started at 0.7 µg/kg/min, and 6 of 10 patients responded. Three patients required an increase to 1.4 µg/kg/min. Doses >2.8 µg/kg/min did not further increase HAF. One patient showed a minimal response regardless of the dose. There were no differences between the adenosine group and control group with respect to liver function (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and International Normalized Ratio), platelet count on POD2, hepatic artery resistive index, and post-transplant length of stay, intensive care days, or 1-year patient survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study established that adenosine administered directly into the hepatic artery produces a similar effect on HAF in cadaveric liver transplant recipients to that found in the laboratory without producing systemic side effects.

Should HLA mismatch acceptability for sensitized transplant candidates be determined at the high-resolution rather than the antigen level?

Defining HLA mismatch acceptability of organ transplant donors for sensitized recipients has traditionally been based on serologically defined HLA antigens. Now, however, it is well accepted that HLA antibodies specifically recognize a wide range of epitopes present on HLA antigens and that molecularly defined high resolution alleles corresponding to the same low resolution antigen can possess different epitope repertoires. Hence, determination of HLA compatibility at the allele level represents a more accurate approach to identify suitable donors for sensitized patients. This approach would offer opportunities for increased transplant rates and improved long term graft survivals.

Split liver transplantation using Hemiliver graft in the MELD era: a single center experience in the United States.

Under the "sickest first" Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) allocation, livers amenable to splitting are most often allocated to patients unsuitable for split liver transplantation (SLT). Our experience with SLT using hemilivers was reviewed. From April 2004 to June 2012, we used 25 lobar grafts (10 left lobes and 15 right lobes) for adult-sized recipients. Twelve recipients were transplanted with primary offers, and 13 were transplanted with leftover grafts. Six grafts were shared with other centers. The data were compared with matched whole liver grafts (n = 121). In 92% of donors, the livers were split in situ. Hemiliver recipients with severe portal hypertension had a greater graft-to-recipient weight ratio than those without severe portal hypertension (1.96% vs. 1.40%, p < 0.05). Hemiliver recipients experienced biliary complications more frequently (32.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.01); however, the 5-year graft survival for hemilivers was comparable to whole livers (80.0% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.43). The secondary recipients with leftover grafts did not have increased incidences of graft failure (p = 0.99) or surgical complications (p = 0.43) compared to the primary recipients. In conclusion, while routine application is still controversial due to various challenges, hemiliver SLT can achieve excellent outcomes under the MELD allocation.

De novo sirolimus and reduced-dose tacrolimus versus standard-dose tacrolimus after liver transplantation: the 2000-2003 phase II prospective randomized trial.

We studied whether the use of sirolimus with reduced-dose tacrolimus, as compared to standard-dose tacrolimus, after liver transplantation is safe, tolerated and efficacious. In an international multicenter, open-label, active-controlled randomized trial (2000-2003), adult primary liver transplant recipients (n=222) were randomly assigned immediately after transplantation to conventional-dose tacrolimus (trough: 7-15 ng/mL) or sirolimus (loading dose: 15 mg, initial dose: 5 mg titrated to a trough of 4-11 ng/mL) and reduced-dose tacrolimus (trough: 3-7 ng/mL). The study was terminated after 21 months due to imbalance in adverse events. The 24-month cumulative incidence of graft loss (26.4% vs. 12.5%, p=0.009) and patient death (20% vs. 8%, p=0.010) was higher in subjects receiving sirolimus. A numerically higher rate of hepatic artery thrombosis/portal vein thrombosis was observed in the sirolimus arm (8% vs. 3%, p=0.065). The incidence of sepsis was higher in the sirolimus arm (20.4% vs. 7.2%, p=0.006). Rates of acute cellular rejection were similar between the two groups. Early use of sirolimus using a loading dose followed by maintenance doses and reduced-dose tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients is associated with higher rates of graft loss, death and sepsis when compared to the use of conventional-dose tacrolimus alone.

The role of liver stromal cells in dendritic cells development in mice.

The inherent tolerogenicity of liver allografts may be due to tolerogenic dendritic cells (DC) therein. It is not clear whether the unique antigen-presenting function of liver DC is intrinsic or whether it is altered by microenvironmental factors in the liver. In the present study, we investigated the effect of hepatic stellate cells (HSC) on the development and function of DC propagated from bone marrow. DC exposed to HSC or HSC supernates expressed low CD11c, CD86, and major histocompatibility complex class II and elicited inferior allostimulatory function compared with conventional DC. These results suggested that soluble factor(s) secreted from HSC influence DC development.

Use of tissue plasminogen activator in liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors.

Ischemic-type biliary stricture (ITBS) occurs in up to 50% after liver transplantation (LT) from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. Thrombus formation in the peribiliary microcirculation is a postulated mechanism. The aim was to describe our experience of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) administration in DCD-LT. TPA was injected into the donor hepatic artery on the backtable (n = 22). Two recipients developed ITBS including one graft failure. Although excessive postreperfusion bleeding was seen in 14 recipients, the amount of TPA was comparable between those with and without excessive bleeding (6.4 ± 2.8 vs. 6.6 ± 2.8 mg, p = 0.78). However, donor age (41 ± 12 vs. 29 ± 9 years, p = 0.02), donor BMI (26.3 ± 5.5 vs. 21.7 ± 3.6 kg/m(2) , p = 0.03), previous laparotomy (50% vs. 0%, p = 0.02) and lactate after portal reperfusion (6.3 ± 4.6 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p = 0.005) were significantly greater in recipients with excessive bleeding. In conclusion, the use of TPA may lower the risk of ITBS-related graft failure in DCD-LT. Excessive bleeding may be related to poor graft quality and previous laparotomy rather than the amount of TPA. Further studies are needed in larger population.

Liver transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008.

Changes in organ allocation policy in 2002 reduced the number of adult patients on the liver transplant waiting list, changed the characteristics of transplant recipients and increased the number of patients receiving simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK). The number of liver transplants peaked in 2006 and declined marginally in 2007 and 2008. During this period, there was an increase in donor age, the Donor Risk Index, the number of candidates receiving MELD exception scores and the number of recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In contrast, there was a decrease in retransplantation rates, and the number of patients receiving grafts from either a living donor or from donation after cardiac death. The proportion of patients with severe obesity, diabetes and renal insufficiency increased during this period. Despite increases in donor and recipient risk factors, there was a trend towards better 1-year graft and patient survival between 1998 and 2007. Of major concern, however, were considerable regional variations in waiting time and posttransplant survival. The current status of liver transplantation in the United States between 1999 and 2008 was analyzed using SRTR data. In addition to a general summary, we have included a more detailed analysis of liver transplantation for hepatitis C, retransplantation and SLK transplantation.

Cross-tolerance of recipient-derived transforming growth factor-beta dendritic cells.

Administration of donor-derived immature dendritic cells (DC) treated with transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) to prevent allograft rejection is not applicable for clinical use. We therefore attempted to explore the use of recipient-derived DC pulsed with donor antigens via the indirect pathway (cross-priming). DC were propagated from C3H (H2(k)) bone marrow (BM) using granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). TGF-beta (0.2 ng/mL) was added at the initiation of culture. The resultant TGF-beta DC were pulsed with B10 (H2(b)) splenocyte lysate. Expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II was not affected, while CD40, CD80, and CD86 costimulatory molecules on DC were significantly inhibited by treatment with TGF-beta. C3H DC pulsed with B10 antigens stimulated a proliferative response in C3H T cells which was inhibited when DC were treated with TGF-beta, and the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) activity was also inhibited. This observation correlated with reduced interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and increased IL-10 production. A single injection of TGF-beta DC prolonged allograft survival (median survival time [MST] 18 days vs 10 days in no-DC treatment control; P < .05). These data indicated that an approach utilizing recipient DC as a "vaccine" strategy is possible.

Survival of liver transplant patients coinfected with HIV and HCV is adversely impacted by recurrent hepatitis C.

Although liver transplantation (LTx) in HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been successful, some have reported poorer outcomes in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here we discuss the impact of recurrent HCV on 27 HIV-positive patients who underwent LTx. HIV infection was well controlled post-transplantation. Survival in HIV-positive/HCV-positive patients was shorter compared to a cohort of HIV-negative/HCV-positive patients matched in age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and time of transplant, with cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival of 66.7%, 55.6% and 33.3% versus 75.7%, 71.6% and 71.6%, respectively, although not significantly (p = 0.07), and there was a higher likelihood of developing cirrhosis or dying from an HCV-related complication in coinfected subjects (RR = 2.6, 95% CI, 1.06-6.35; p = 0.03). Risk factors for poor survival included African-American race (p = 0.02), MELD score > 20 (p = 0.05), HAART intolerance postLTx (p = 0.01), and postLTx HCV RNA > 30000000 IU/mL (p = 0.00). Recurrent HCV in 18 patients was associated with eight deaths, including three from fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Among surviving coinfected recipients, five are alive at least 3 years after LTx, and of 15 patients treated with interferon-alpha/ribavirin, six (40%) are HCV RNA negative, including four with sustained virological response. Hepatitis C is a major cause of graft loss and patient mortality in coinfected patients undergoing LTx.

Immunosuppression: evolution in practice and trends, 1994-2004.

Over the last 10 years, there have been important changes in immunosuppression management and strategies for solid-organ transplantation, characterized by the use of new immunosuppressive agents and regimens. An organ-by-organ review of OPTN/SRTR data showed several important trends in immunosuppression practice. There is an increasing trend toward the use of induction therapy with antibodies, which was used for most kidney, pancreas after kidney (PAK), simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients in 2004 (72-81%) and for approximately half of all intestine, heart and lung recipients. The highest usage of the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil combination as discharge regimen was reported for SPK (72%) and PAK (64%) recipients. Maintenance of the original discharge regimen through the first 3 years following transplantation varied significantly by organ and drug. The usage of calcineurin inhibitors for maintenance therapy was characterized by a clear transition from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. Corticosteroids were administered to the majority of patients; however, steroid-avoidance and steroid-withdrawal protocols have become increasingly common. The percentage of patients treated for acute rejection during the first year following transplantation has continued to decline, reaching 13% for those who received a kidney in 2003, 48% of which cases were treated with antibodies.

Reversal of acute cellular rejection after renal transplantation with Campath-1H.

Between September 2002 and February 2004, 40 kidney transplant (27 from deceased and 13 from living donors) recipients (25 male and 15 female, aged 50.3 +/- 15.1 years) were treated with Campath 1H (C 1H; 30 mg/dose IV) for biopsy-proven steroid-resistant rejection (SRR) or rejections equal to or worse than Banff 1B. All transplantations occurred between August 2001 and May 2003. All patients had received antibody preconditioning (RATG 5 mg/kg, n = 34; C 1H 60 mg, n = 4; C 1H 30 mg, n = 2) preoperatively and were treated with Tacrolimus monotherapy (target level 10 ng/ml) postoperatively and subsequent spaced weaning. Elevated creatinine levels at follow-up were evaluated by renal transplant biopsy. Rejection was treated with steroids, reversal of weaning, addition of sirolimus, and/or antibody treatment, depending on grade of rejection. The mean duration of follow-up was 453 +/- 163 days after C 1H administration. Twenty-nine patients received C 1H for SRR and 11 patients for Banff 1B or worse rejections; 26 patients received more than 1 dose of C 1H. Graft survival was 62.5% (25 patients); 6 of the 15 allografts (40%) that failed had presented with rejections because of noncompliance. Graft survival in compliant patients with SRR or rejections equal to or worse than Banff 1B was 73.5% (25 of 34). Fourteen patients (35%) had infectious complications, of whom 2 patients (5%) died. C 1H is an effective agent for SRR and Banff 1B or worse rejections, with 95% patient survival and 73.5% graft survival (in compliant patients). The number of doses of 30 mg C 1H should be restricted to two, as there is a high incidence of potentially fatal infectious complications.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided pancreas allograft biopsy: a single-center experience.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided pancreas allograft biopsy is the preferred technique for evaluating pancreas allograft rejection. Experience from large centers has shown it to be safe and effective. We report our experience with 120 percutaneous allograft biopsies performed at a single center. Biopsy tissue was obtained in 54 patients. Thirty-three patients received simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants, 14 received isolated pancreas transplants, and 7 received a pancreas transplant after kidney transplantation. Biopsies were performed by pancreas transplantation surgeons with the assistance of radiologists under ultrasound guidance using an Acuson XP 128/10 ultrasound machine. One hundred twenty allograft biopsies were performed in 54 patients. Twenty-seven (50%) patients underwent multiple biopsies. In 102 (85%) biopsies the specimens were adequate for examination. Eighteen (15%) biopsy samples had no pancreatic tissue and showed surrounding fat and small bowel. 1 (1.8%) patient bleeding developed that required transfusion of 3 units of packed red blood cells, but no surgical intervention was necessary. One (1.8%) patient had a pancreatic fistula, which healed with nonoperative management. Biochemical evidence of pancreatitis was noted in 5 (9.2%) patients, but none of these patients had clinical signs of pancreatitis. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided pancreas allograft biopsy is a safe procedure with a low complication rate and a high tissue yield for histopathologic examination.

Synergistic effect of cold and warm ischemia time on postoperative graft function and outcome in human liver transplantation.

Prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) during graft preservation and warm ischemia time (WIT) during rewarming time have been reported to cause postoperative graft dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the effects of both CIT and WIT in combination on patient and graft survivals are not yet defined. The aim of this study was to determine whether simultaneously prolonged CIT and WIT were associated with early graft outcomes after clinical OLT. For analysis of liver graft survival within 90 days of OLT and postoperative graft function, 186 consecutive OLT cases were divided into four groups as follows: group A, CIT < 12 hours and WIT < 45 minutes; group B, CIT > 12 hours and WIT < 45 minutes; group C, CIT < 12 hours and WIT > 45 minutes; and group D, CIT > 12 hours and WIT > 45 minutes. The graft loss rates were 5.4% in group A, 9.8% in group B, 11.1% in group C, and 42.9% in group D. The mean highest aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value after OLT in group D (3352.3 +/- 569.4 U/L) was significantly greater than those in groups A (1411.7 +/- 169.2 U/L) and B (1931.3 +/- 362.6 U/L). The simultaneously prolonged cold and warm ischemia times significantly caused hepatic allograft injury and failure, suggesting some cumulative effects of CIT and WIT on postoperative graft function.

Application of recipient-derived dendritic cells to induce donor-specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness.

Administration of donor-derived immature dendritic cells (DC) treated with NF-kappaB oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODN) prevents allograft rejection. We attempted to explore the use of recipient-derived DC pulsed with donor antigens, in which the donor antigens were presented to host T cells via an indirect pathway (cross-priming). Expression of CD40, CD80, and CD86 on DC was significantly inhibited by treatment with NF-kappaB ODN, whereas MHC class I and II were minimally affected. Normal C3H DC pulsed with B10 antigens stimulated proliferative responses and donor-specific CTL activity in C3H T cells, both of which were, however, markedly inhibited when DC were treated with NF-kappaB ODN. This manipulation was associated with reduced IFN-gamma and increased IL-10 production in the supernate, suggesting a Th2 bias. More frequent apoptotic T cells were observed in cultures with NF-kappaB ODN DC. In contrast to administration of normal DC pulsed with donor antigens that accelerated rejection of B10 cardiac allografts (median survival time [MST] 7 days versus 10 days in no-DC treatment control, P < .05), a single injection of 2 x 10(6) NF-kappaB ODN DC significantly prolonged allograft survival (MST 50 days, P < .05 compared with no-DC treatment control). The anti-donor CTL activity in infiltrating T cells isolated from cardiac grafts in recipients that received NF-kappaB ODN DC was significantly suppressed. These data indicate that vaccination with immature DC, propagated from recipient BM is an attractive approach to induce T-cell hyporesponsiveness.

Clostridium difficile colitis in patients after kidney and pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Limited data exist about Clostridium difficile colitis (CDC) in solid organ transplant patients. Between 1/1/99 and 12/31/02, 600 kidney and 102 pancreas-kidney allograft recipients were transplanted. Thirty-nine (5.5%) of these patients had CDC on the basis of clinical and laboratory findings. Of these 39 patients, 35 have information available for review. CDC developed at a median of 30 days after transplantation, and the patients undergoing pancreas-kidney transplantation had a slightly higher incidence of CDC than recipients of kidney alone (7.8% vs. 4.5%, P>0.05). All but one patient presented with diarrhea. Twenty-four patients (64.9%) were diagnosed in the hospital, and CDC occurred during first hospitalization in 14 patients (40%). Treatment was with oral metronidazole (M) in 33 patients (94%) and M+oral vancomycin (M+V) in 2 patients. Eight patients had recurrent CDC, which occurred at a median of 30 days (range 15-314) after the first episode. Two patients (5.7%) developed fulminant CDC, presented with toxic megacolon, and underwent colectomy. One of them died; the other patient survived after colectomy. CDC should be considered as a diagnosis in transplant patients with history of diarrhea after antibiotic use, and should be treated aggressively before the infection becomes complicated.

Recurrent hepatitis C in liver allografts: prospective assessment of diagnostic accuracy, identification of pitfalls, and observations about pathogenesis.

RATIONALE AND DESIGN: The accuracy of a prospective histopathologic diagnosis of rejection and recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) was determined in 48 HCV RNA-positive liver allograft recipients enrolled in an "immunosuppression minimization protocol" between July 29, 2001 and January 24, 2003. Prospective entry of all pertinent treatment, laboratory, and histopathology results into an electronic database enabled a retrospective analysis of the accuracy of histopathologic diagnoses and the pathophysiologic relationship between recurrent HCV and rejection. RESULTS: Time to first onset of acute rejection (AR) (mean, 107 days; median, 83 days; range, 7-329 days) overlapped with the time to first onset of recurrent HCV (mean, 115 days; median, 123 days; range, 22-315 days), making distinction between the two difficult. AR and chronic rejection (CR) with and without co-existent HCV showed overlapping but significantly different liver injury test profiles. One major and two minor errors occurred (positive predictive values for AR = 91%; recurrent HCV = 100%); all involved an overdiagnosis of AR in the context of recurrent HCV. Retrospective analysis of the mistakes showed that major errors can be avoided altogether and the impact of unavoidable minor errors can be minimized by strict adherence to specific histopathologic criteria, close clinicopathologic correlation including examination of HCV RNA levels, and a conservative approach to the use of additional immunosuppression. In addition, histopathologic diagnoses of moderate and severe AR and CR were associated with relatively low HCV RNA levels, whereas relatively high HCV RNA levels were associated with a histopathologic diagnosis of hepatitis alone, particularly the cholestatic variant of HCV. CONCLUSIONS: Liver allograft biopsy interpretation can rapidly and accurately distinguish between recurrent HCV and AR/CR. In addition, the histopathologic observations suggest that the immune mechanism responsible for HCV clearance overlap with those leading to significant rejection.