A weekly combination of carboplatin and irinotecan for previously untreated extensive disease small-cell lung cancer, results of a minimum follow-up of 3 years: a multi-center Phase II trial JMTO LC02-02.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a weekly combination of carboplatin and irinotecan regimen for patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated extensive disease small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2, were enrolled in this trial. Carboplatin area under the curve of two and irinotecan (50 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued up to a maximum of six cycles. The expected response rate was 85%, and this regimen was considered sufficiently positive if >45 responses were observed in the 55 patients. RESULTS: Between December 2003 and September 2006, 56 patients were enrolled and 55 patients were eligible. Of 55 patients, 6 complete remissions and 37 partial remissions were achieved, and the response rate was 78.2% (95% confidence interval: 64.6-87.9). Major Grade 3 or more toxicities were leukocytopenia 3, neutropenia 15, anemia 7, infection 5, diarrhea 3, anorexia 7, nausea 6 and pneumothorax 1. The median survival was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval: 11.8-18.5) and the median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval: 4.9-7.4). CONCLUSIONS: This Phase II trial of a weekly combination of carboplatin and irinotecan for extensive disease small-cell lung cancer was not positive for a response rate that is considered to be worthy of further Phase III trial.

A phase I study of amrubicin and fixed dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in relapsed small cell lung cancer: Japan multinational trial organization LC0303.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of amrubicin (AMR) with a fixed dose of irinotecan (CPT-11). METHODS: Patients having pathologically proven small cell lung cancer (SCLC) relapsed after one or two chemotherapies, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible for the study. CPT-11 was delivered as 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. AMR was delivered on day 1. Doses of AMR were level 1: 80 mg/m2, level 2: 90 mg/m2, and level 3: 100 mg/m2. Dose elevation was determined using the modified continuous reassessment method. Tolerability was assessed after the first cycle. Another two cycles were conducted when disease progression or unacceptable toxicities were not observed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (mean age: 66.3 years) were enrolled. A total of 40 courses were conducted. Grade 3/4 toxicities of the first cycle were leukocytopenia: 11 (61%, grade 3/4: 8/3); neutropenia: 15 (83%, grade 3/4: 6/9); and thrombocytopenia: three (17%, grade 3/4: 2/1). Other grade 3 toxicities observed were febrile neutropenia, one; infection, three; diarrhea, one; and dyspnea, one. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in two of six patients at level 2 (neutropenia and febrile neutropenia) and in one of six at level 3 (thrombocytopenia and infection). The maximum tolerated dose was level 3, and so, the recommended dose for phase II trials was judged to be 90 mg/m2. Objective response was obtained in four of eight patients who were able to evaluate responses. Median survival time was 13 months, with 68% at 1-year survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: This combination was well tolerated and showed encouraging activities in SCLC. Randomized phase II trials are being planned in chemonaive SCLC.

Quality-of-life evaluation for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison between vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in a randomized trial: Japan Multinational Trial Organization LC00-03 (BRI LC03-01).

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel (VGD) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer showed no difference in overall survival (median survival time: 13.6 versus 14.1 months) between the two treatment groups. We report here the results of quality-of-life (QOL) study initiated in the mid-course of this randomized trial. METHODS: The patients themselves assessed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Lung (FACT-L), FACT-Taxane and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spirituality (FACIT-Sp) QOL instruments at baseline and 6, 12 and 18 weeks after the treatment. The primary endpoint was a comparison of total QOL score for each assessment instrument between the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients from the trial (VGD, 34; PC, 34) who submitted baseline questionnaires and at least one questionnaire over the course of treatment were eligible. Longitudinal analysis showed a significant difference in slope of the FACT-Taxane score (p = 0.004) between treatment regimens over time, but no difference was found in FACT-L score (p = 0.311) and FACIT-Sp score (p = 0.466) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The significant difference in slope of FACT-Taxane score favored the VGD regimen. These data should be considered in treatment decision-making for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00242983.

Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The previous individual patient data meta-analyses of chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed that adding sequential or concomitant chemotherapy to radiotherapy improved survival. The NSCLC Collaborative Group performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials directly comparing concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Systematic searches for trials were undertaken, followed by central collection, checking, and reanalysis of updated individual patient data. Results from trials were combined using the stratified log-rank test to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, cumulative incidences of locoregional and distant progression, and acute toxicity. RESULTS: Of seven eligible trials, data from six trials were received (1,205 patients, 92% of all randomly assigned patients). Median follow-up was 6 years. There was a significant benefit of concomitant radiochemotherapy on overall survival (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95; P = .004), with an absolute benefit of 5.7% (from 18.1% to 23.8%) at 3 years and 4.5% at 5 years. For progression-free survival, the HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.01; P = .07). Concomitant treatment decreased locoregional progression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95; P = .01); its effect was not different from that of sequential treatment on distant progression (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.25; P = .69). Concomitant radiochemotherapy increased acute esophageal toxicity (grade 3-4) from 4% to 18% with a relative risk of 4.9 (95% CI, 3.1 to 7.8; P < .001). There was no significant difference regarding acute pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION: Concomitant radiochemotherapy, as compared with sequential radiochemotherapy, improved survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, primarily because of a better locoregional control, but at the cost of manageable increased acute esophageal toxicity.

Interstitial lung disease in gefitinib-treated Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer - a retrospective analysis: JMTO LC03-02.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, high incidences of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and ILD-related deaths have been reported among gefitinib-treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the efficacy of gefitinib, the incidence of ILD and risk factors for ILD in these patients. FINDINGS: We obtained patient data retrospectively using questionnaires sent to 22 institutions. We asked for demographic and clinical data on NSCLC patients for whom gefitinib treatment had begun between July 2002 and February 2003. Data from a total of 526 patients were analyzed. The patient characteristics were as follows: 64% male, 69% with adenocarcinoma, 61% with a performance score of 0-1, and 5% with concurrent interstitial pneumonitis. The objective response proportion was 80/439 (18.2%; 95% CI: 14.7-22.0). ILD developed in 17 patients (3.2%; 95% CI 1.9-5.1%), of whom 7 died. According to multivariate analysis, female sex, history of prior chemotherapy, low absolute neutrophil count before gefitinib treatment, and adenocarcinoma histology were associated with response to gefitinib treatment. None of the factors we evaluated were associated with the development of ILD. CONCLUSION: The results of this study are consistent with previously published values for treatment response proportions and incidence of ILD during gefitinib treatment in Japanese patients. Future studies should be aimed at identifying factors indicating that a patient has a high probability of receiving benefit from gefitinib and a low risk of developing ILD.

Serum osteopontin levels are highly prognostic for survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from JMTO LC 0004.

BACKGROUND: The Japan-Multinational Trial Organization (JMTO) lung cancer (LC) 0003 was a prospective randomized phase III trial investigating advanced non-small cell lung cancer comparing paclitaxel (P) plus carboplatin (C) versus vinorelbine (V), gemcitabine (G) followed by docetaxel (D). This trial was conducted with Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 0003 using a common arm of PC. An analysis of SWOG 0003 samples showed that low osteopontin (OPN) plasma levels were highly prognostic for a better outcome. We performed an independent investigation to validate these results using samples from Japanese patients enrolled in the JMTO LC 0004, a correlative study associated with JMTO LC 0003. METHODS: A total of 20 ml of blood was collected before treatment from patients enrolled in JMTO LC 0003. Serum concentrations of OPN and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Effects of OPN and bFGF levels on tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were examined. RESULTS: Seventy-one samples were obtained, including 32 specimens from the PC arm and 39 from the VGD arm. There were no significant relationships between either OPN or bFGF levels with patient characteristics. In an analysis of clinical outcome, low OPN levels correlated with better OS and progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.97; p = 0.037, HR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.70; p = 0.001, respectively) and high bFGF levels correlated with better OS (HR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90; p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Consistent with the findings from SWOG 0003, low OPN serum levels were significantly associated with a favorable prognosis in the JMTO LC 0004. Additionally, high bFGF levels were associated with improved survival.

Japanese-US common-arm analysis of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a model for assessing population-related pharmacogenomics.

PURPOSE To explore whether population-related pharmacogenomics contribute to differences in patient outcomes between clinical trials performed in Japan and the United States, given similar study designs, eligibility criteria, staging, and treatment regimens. METHODS We prospectively designed and conducted three phase III trials (Four-Arm Cooperative Study, LC00-03, and S0003) in advanced-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer, each with a common arm of paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Genomic DNA was collected from patients in LC00-03 and S0003 who received paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 6). Genotypic variants of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, NR1I2-206, ABCB1, ERCC1, and ERCC2 were analyzed by pyrosequencing or by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results were assessed by Cox model for survival and by logistic regression for response and toxicity. Results Clinical results were similar in the two Japanese trials, and were significantly different from the US trial, for survival, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and anemia. There was a significant difference between Japanese and US patients in genotypic distribution for CYP3A4*1B (P = .01), CYP3A5*3C (P = .03), ERCC1 118 (P < .0001), ERCC2 K751Q (P < .001), and CYP2C8 R139K (P = .01). Genotypic associations were observed between CYP3A4*1B for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.94; P = .04) and ERCC2 K751Q for response (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.83; P = .02). For grade 4 neutropenia, the HR for ABCB1 3425C-->T was 1.84 (95% CI, 0.77 to 4.48; P = .19). CONCLUSION Differences in allelic distribution for genes involved in paclitaxel disposition or DNA repair were observed between Japanese and US patients. In an exploratory analysis, genotype-related associations with patient outcomes were observed for CYP3A4*1B and ERCC2 K751Q. This common-arm approach facilitates the prospective study of population-related pharmacogenomics in which ethnic differences in antineoplastic drug disposition are anticipated.

Pretreatment neutrophil count as an independent prognostic factor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of Japan Multinational Trial Organisation LC00-03.

We examined the impact of pretreatment neutrophil count on survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 388 chemo-naïve patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC from a randomised controlled trial were evaluated. The effects of pretreatment peripheral blood neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on survival were examined using the proportional hazards regression model to estimate hazard ratios after adjustment for covariates. The optimal cut-off value was determined by proportional hazards regression analysis with the minimum P-value approach and shrinkage procedure. After adjustment for prognostic factors, the pretreatment elevated neutrophil count was statistically significantly associated with short overall (P=0.0008) and progression-free survival (P=0.024), whereas no association was found between prognosis and lymphocyte or monocyte count. The cut-off value selected for neutrophil count was 4500 mm(-3) (corrected hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-2.54). The median survival time was 19.3 months (95%CI, 16.5-21.4) for the low-neutrophil group (4500 mm(-3), n=204) and was 10.2 months (95%CI, 8.0-12.3) for the high-neutrophil group (4500 mm(-3), n=184). We confirmed that pretreatment elevated neutrophil count is an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving modern chemotherapy. Neutrophil count is easily measured at low cost, and it may be a useful indicator of patient prognosis.

Vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-containing two-drug combinations improve survival and cancer-related symptoms in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, survival benefit is modest and platinum-containing regimens cause substantial toxic effects. We did a prospective randomised open-label phase III study to compare an experimental platinum-free, triplet, sequential regimen of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel with the standard platinum-containing, doublet regimen paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Between March, 2001, and April, 2005, patients with stage IIIB (positive pleural effusion) or IV NSCLC, performance status 0 to 1, and adequate organ function, were randomly assigned to experimental treatment or to standard treatment. Randomisation was done centrally by use of a dynamic balancing algorithm. Patients were stratified by weight loss, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and disease stage. Patients in the experimental group were scheduled to receive intravenous vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for three cycles, followed by intravenous docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every 21 days for three cycles. Patients in the standard group were scheduled to receive intravenous paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)) plus carboplatin (area under the curve=6) for 3 h on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, response, and toxic effects. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00079287. FINDINGS: Of the 401 patients enrolled and randomised in the trial, five patients in the experimental group and three in the standard group were ineligible for analysis; thus 196 patients in the experimental group and 197 in the standard group were included in analyses. Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups with regard to major prognostic factors. Median overall survival was 13.6 months (range 12.0-16.4) in the experimental group versus 14.1 months (11.9-17.5) in the standard group (p=0.97). 49 of 196 patients (25%) in the experimental group had a partial response compared with 73 of 197 patients (37%) in the standard group (p=0.012). There were no complete responses. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.9-6.3) in the experimental group compared with 5.8 months (5.3-6.1) in the standard group (p=0.74). The incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia was lower in the experimental group than in the standard group, although the incidence of pulmonary toxic effects was higher. INTERPRETATION: Although platinum-containing regimens remain the standard treatment for advanced NSCLC, non-platinum regimens could provide equivalent efficacy with a different toxicity profile.

Phase II study of amrubicin, 9-amino-anthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) study.

PURPOSE: We conducted a multicenter phase II study of amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, to evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Entry requirements included cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, stage III or IV, no prior therapy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. Amrubicin was given by daily intravenous injection at 45 mg/m2/day for three consecutive days, repeated at 3 week intervals. Each patient received at least three treatment cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled in this study. Of the 62 registered patients, 60 were eligible and assessable for efficacy, and 59 for toxicity. Overall response rate was 18.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5 to 30.4%) and median survival time was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 10.4 months). Major toxicity was myelosuppression, with incidences of grade 3 or 4 toxicity of 78.0% for neutropenia, 54.2% for leukopenia, 30.5% for anemia, and 28.8% for thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological toxicities with a greater than 50% incidence were anorexia (69.5%), nausea/vomiting (55.9%), and alopecia (75.9%), but were relatively mild, with grade 3 toxicities observed in only one patient each (1.7%). CONCLUSION: Amrubicin was an active, well-tolerated agent in the treatment of NSCLC.

[An early phase II clinical study of YM 294 (rhlL-11) in patients with solid tumors and malignant lymphoma].

An early phase II study was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of YM 294 on chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors and malignant lymphoma. The response rates which were judged as having good or excellent efficacy by the investigators were 66.7% in all groups with 25 microg/kg or more, and the increase in nadir platelet counts and decrease in platelet transfusions were observed. Adverse reactions were fever, edema, abnormal electrocardiogram and weight gain. All adverse reactions as well as abnormal changes in laboratory values for which the casual relationship with the study drug could not be excluded were resolved and proved to be not serious. The results of this study suggest the efficacy of YM 294 at 25 microg/kg or more for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors and malignant lymphoma. It was considered that a study should be performed to assess the efficacy and safety of YM 294 using a dose of 25 microg/kg or more in the future.

Phase II study of weekly irinotecan and carboplatin for refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

We designed a phase II study of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin for refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and assessed the response rate, survival, and toxicity. Twenty-nine patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC were entered onto the trial. The median time off chemotherapy was 3.5 months (range: 0.8-12.9). Patients were treated at 4-week intervals using CPT-11 (50 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15) plus carboplatin (AUC = 2 mg/ml min, intravenously on days 1, 8, 15). All patients were assessable for toxicity and survival; 28 patients were assessable for response. There were nine partial responses (PRs). Overall response rate was 31.0% (95% CI: 15.3-50.8%). The median time to progression was 3.5 months. Median survival time was 6.1 months. Major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 52 and 21% of patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 diarrhea was observed in 7%. There was one treatment-related death due to febrile neutropenia and sepsis. This combination of CPT-11 and carboplatin seems to be active second-line regimen with acceptable toxicity against small cell lung cancer.

Phase I studies of nogitecan hydrochloride for Japanese.

BACKGROUND: SmithKline Beecham synthesized camptothecin analogs and identified nogitecan hydrochloride (topotecan) with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity and less toxicity than camptothecin. Because preclinical and overseas clinical data indicated the antitumor effect of nogitecan hydrochloride with a 5-day repeat-dose schedule, we carried out phase I studies in Japan to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effect of nogitecan hydrochloride. METHODS: Phase I studies of nogitecan hydrochloride given by single and 5-day repeat dosing were carried out in patients with various solid tumors at 15 medical institutions in Japan. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed for both single and 5-day repeated dosing. RESULTS: The dose-limiting factor (DLF) was reversible leucopenia, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was higher than 22.5 mg/m2 in the single-dose study. In the 5-day repeat-dose study, the DLF was also reversible leucopenia, and the MTD was estimated to be 1.5 mg/m2 per day. The plasma concentration of nogitecan hydrochloride increased with increasing dose, and the half-life after single dosing ranged from 3 to 5h. There was no evidence of accumulation or delayed excretion during 5-day repeat dosing. CONCLUSION: Based on these results and the finding that there were responders among patients treated at 1.5 mg/m2 per day by 5-day repeat dosing in overseas studies, 5-day repeat dosing of 1.2mg/m2 per day, one dose level lower than the MTD, was selected for phase II studies in Japan.