Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation for the early diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cortical excitability in patients with corticobasal degeneration (CBD) and to find a reliable diagnostic technique for differentiating CBD from Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Using a paired transcranial magnetic stimulation technique, we studied motor cortex excitability at rest in 6 patients with clinically probable CBD, 10 patients with PD, and 10 normal subjects. The recovery cycle of the motor evoked potentials was tested by delivering paired magnetic stimulation over the hand area of the motor cortex at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from 1 to 17ms. RESULTS: In patients with CBD, paired magnetic stimuli delivered at short ISIs invariably elicited enlarged test MEPs. At ISIs of 1-10ms, the conditioned test MEPs were significantly larger in patients with CBD than in control subjects; and at ISIs of 1, 2, 4, and 6ms,they were also larger in patients with CBD than in patients with PD. At the other ISIs tested, patients and control subjects had similar amplitude conditioned test responses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the unusual clinical manifestations of CBD might arise partly from motor cortex disinhibition. Paired magnetic stimulation could be a useful diagnostic test particularly in the early stages of the disease.

Sympathetic skin response asymmetry in early stage idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

Simultaneous bilateral plantar sympathetic skin response (SSR) was studied in 25 patients with early stage idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD), characterized by monolateral motor involvement (Hoehn and Yahr, stage <2) and without clinical evidence of autonomic dysfunctions. Thirteen (mean age: 68.69 +/- 7.70, range 55-76) had extrapyramidal clinical signs only at the left body side, 12 (mean age 66.60 +/- 7.43, range 51-73) at the right body side. A group of 25 healthy, age-matched, subjects were also evaluated. To evoke the responses, trains of 10 electrical pulses were applied at different intensities and frequencies. Only intensities of stimulation > or = 5 times the sensory electrical threshold always assured bilateral plantar responses in all the examined subjects. Amplitude asymmetry between left and right responses was found only in the IPD patients (P < 0.05). The amplitude reduction corresponded to the motor affected side. No analogue latency variation was observed in any group. Independently from the peripheral or central origins of such phenomena, these findings suggest that simultaneous bilateral SSR amplitude evaluation could be useful, in early IPD patients, to demonstrate and to monitor the sympathetic cholinergic dysfunction, despite the lack of autonomic symptoms.

Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

In this study we sought to determine whether a natural condition involving fine discrimination, for example moderately severe myopia, might yield interesting information regarding the binocular interaction expressed by visual evoked potentials (VEPs). We studied ten normal subjects with a mild refraction deficits. Transient VEPs were elicited by monocular and binocular stimulation under conditions of natural and lens-corrected vision. The visual stimulus was a pattern-reversal checkerboard consisting of 15' and 40' checks. VEPs in response to binocular stimulation were compared with monocular VEPs. We plotted the monocular 'better-VEP' and 'worse-VEP' response, since significant differences between individual eye stimulations were present. We found no significant difference between the mean N75 and P100 latencies of the binocular VEP and the better monocular VEP, regardless of the check size used and of natural or corrected vision. Under all stimulus conditions, the mean amplitude of the N75-P100 of the binocular VEPs was also larger than the better monocular VEP response. The difference proved more significant when we stimulated our subjects with smaller squares and left vision uncorrected. The mean P100-N145 amplitude obtained with binocular stimulation was larger than the better monocular VEP response only when using small checks (15') and uncorrected vision. Overlapping latencies are consistent with an earlier hypothesis that monocular and binocular VEPs originate postsynaptically from the binocular neurons in the primary visual cortex. The gain in amplitude achieved by binocular stimulation may depend upon the removal of 'tonic interocular inhibition' and/or on a cortical modulatory mechanism.