RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a widespread microorganism related to gastric adenocarcinoma (AC). In contrast, it has been reported that an inverse association exists between H. pylori infection and esophageal carcinoma. The mechanisms underlying this supposedly protective effect remain controversial. AIM: To determine the prevalence of H. pylori infection in esophageal carcinoma patients, we performed a retrospective observational study of esophageal tumors diagnosed in our hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the prevalence of H. pylori infection in a cohort of patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma. Concomitant or previous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage was also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients with esophageal carcinoma (69 males, 77.5%), with a mean age of 66 years (range, 26-93 years) were included. AC was the most frequent pathological variant (n = 47, 52.8%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (n = 37, 41.6%). Fourteen ACs (29.8%) originated in the gastroesophageal junction and 33 (70.2%) in the esophageal body. Overall, 54 patients (60.7%) presented at stages III and IV. Previous H. pylori infection occurred only in 4 patients (4.5%), 3 with AC (6.3% of all ACs) and 1 with squamous cell carcinoma (2.7% of all squamous cell tumors). All patients with previous H. pylori infection had stage III-IV. Only one patient had received prior H. pylori eradication therapy, whereas 86 (96.6%) had received previous or concomitant PPI treatment. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients, and after histologic evaluation of paraffin-embedded primary tumors, we found a very low prevalence of previous H. pylori infection. We also reviewed the medical history of the patients, concluding that the majority had received or were on PPI treatment. The minimal prevalence of H. pylori infection found in this cohort of patients with esophageal carcinoma suggests a protective role.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/microbiología , Masculino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Helicobacter pylori/patogenicidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/microbiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/microbiología , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
Introduction: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in developed countries and entails high resources use and costs for health systems. The risk of suffering future cardiovascular (CV) events and the consequent resources use is higher in those patients who have already had a previous cardiovascular event. The objective of the study was to determine the average annual cost of patients with a new or recurrent atherosclerotic CV event during the 2 years after the event. Methodology: Retrospective observational study of electronic medical records of patients from the BIG-PAC® database (7 integrated health areas of 7 Autonomous Communities; n = 1.8 million). Patients with a new or recurrent episode of ASCVD (angina, acute myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease) between 1-Jan-2017 and 31-Dec-2018 were included. The resources use within two years of the diagnosis was estimated in order to estimate the average cost of patient follow-up. Results: A total of 26,976 patients with an ASCVD episode were identified during the recruitment period; Out of them, 6,798 had a recurrent event during the follow-up period and 2,414 died. The average costs per patient were 11,171 during the first year and 9,944 during the second year. Discussion: Patients with ASCVD represent a significant economic burden for the health system and for society. Despite the perception that drug costs in the follow-up of chronic patients imply a high percentage of the costs, these accounted for only one tenth of the total amount. Implementing preventive programs and increasing the control of cardiovascular risk factors may have a significant social and health impact by helping to reduce mortality and costs for the Spanish National Health System. The costs derived from pharmacological treatments were obtained from the NHS pricing nomenclator database (https://www.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/nomenclator.do).
RESUMEN
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent cause of secondary hypertension (HT), and is associated with a higher cardiometabolic risk than essential HT. However, PA remains underdiagnosed, probably due to several difficulties clinicians usually find in performing its diagnosis and subtype classification. The aim of this consensus is to provide practical recommendations focused on the prevalence and the diagnosis of PA and the clinical implications of aldosterone excess, from a multidisciplinary perspective, in a nominal group consensus approach by experts from the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN), Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), Spanish Radiology Society (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC(ML)), Spanish Society of Anatomic-Pathology, Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC).
Asunto(s)
Hiperaldosteronismo , Humanos , Consenso , Hiperaldosteronismo/diagnóstico , Hiperaldosteronismo/terapia , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/terapia , Hipertensión/etiología , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with a higher cardiometabolic risk than essential hypertension. The aim of this consensus is to provide practical clinical recommendations for its surgical and medical treatment, pathology study and biochemical and clinical follow-up, as well as for the approach in special situations like advanced age, pregnancy and chronic kidney disease, from a multidisciplinary perspective, in a nominal group consensus approach of experts from the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN), Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), Spanish Radiology Society (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC(ML)), Spanish Society of Anatomic-Pathology and Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC).
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Hiperaldosteronismo , Hiperaldosteronismo/terapia , Hiperaldosteronismo/diagnóstico , Hiperaldosteronismo/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipertensión/terapia , Femenino , Adrenalectomía , Embarazo , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Post-COVID-19 interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a new entity that frequently causes pulmonary fibrosis and can become chronic. We performed a single-center parallel-group open-label pilot randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A (CsA) in the development of ILD in the medium term among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive CsA plus standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary composite outcome was the percentage of patients without ILD 3 months after diagnosis of pneumonia and not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (response without requiring IMV). The key secondary composite outcomes were the percentage of patients who achieve a response requiring IMV or irrespective of the need for IMV, and adverse events. A total of 33 patients received at least one dose of CsA plus standard of care (n = 17) or standard of care alone (n = 16). No differences were found between the groups in the percentage of patients who achieved a response without requiring IMV or a response requiring IMV. A higher percentage of patients achieved a response irrespective of the need for IMV in the CsA plus standard of care group although the RR was almost significant 2.833 (95% CI, 0.908-8.840; p = 0.057). No differences were found between the groups for adverse events. In hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, we were unable to demonstrate that CsA achieved a significant effect in preventing the development of ILD. (EU Clinical Trials Register; EudraCT Number: 2020-002123-11; registration date: 08/05/2020).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Humanos , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Proyectos Piloto , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atheroesclerosis cardiovascular disease. However, its use has not been described in hyperlipidemia associated with lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK tyrosin kinasa inhibitor approved as treatment for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Hiperlipidemias , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Hiperlipidemias/inducido químicamente , Hiperlipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico , Lactamas Macrocíclicas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and dyslipidemia are associated to a higher risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, use of healthcare resources and costs. In Spain, the evidence about the administration of lipid-lowering treatments in clinical practice, and their clinical effectiveness in patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and patients with FH is scarce. Therefore, a multidisciplinary working group of cardiologists, family physicians, internal medicine specialists and neurologists was gathered for the Reality study. The aim of this study is to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and concomitant medication of patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The use of healthcare resources and costs associated to the management of these diseases after their diagnosis were also considered. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective study, based on the BIG-PAC® database, which includes the electronic medical registries (EMRs) of 1.8 million people from 7 Autonomous Communities in Spain (including public primary care centers and hospitals). The study includes patients who had a new or recurrent episode of ASCVD during the recruitment period (from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2018). The index date will be defined as the date of the ASCVD event, and the follow-up period will be 24 months. According to their first diagnosis in the database, patients will be classified as ASCVD (5 groups: stable/unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral arterial disease) or FH. Discussion: This study aims to analyze the treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources of ASCVD and FH in Spain. The prevalence of these disorders will also be estimated. Due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases, it is expected that our study will provide useful information for healthcare systems and decision makers to improve the management of these disabling diseases.
RESUMEN
Smoking remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Because of its clear influence on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, it is an important factor in internal medicine consultations. Although the rate of smoking cessation has been increasing in recent years, there is a percentage of patients who continue to smoke because they are unable or unwilling to quit, despite having tried existing pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. For this group of patients there are strategies based on interventions aimed at reducing the negative effects of smoking without the need for complete cessation. In this review it is shown that due to the absence of combustion of organic matter in conventional cigarettes, snus, e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products generate significantly lower levels of toxic substances.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Tabaco sin Humo , Humanos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Tabaco sin Humo/efectos adversos , Uso de TabacoRESUMEN
Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) require immediate treatment with anticoagulants such as acenocoumarol. This multicentre randomised clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of a dosing pharmacogenetic algorithm versus a standard-of-care dose adjustment at the beginning of acenocoumarol treatment. We included 144 patients with VTE. On the day of recruitment, a blood sample was obtained for genotyping (CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, VKORC1, CYP4F2, APOE). Dose adjustment was performed on day 3 or 4 after the start of treatment according to the assigned group and the follow-up was at 12 weeks. The principal variable was the percentage of patients with an international normalised ratio (INR) within the therapeutic range on day 7. Thirty-four (47.2%) patients had an INR within the therapeutic range at day 7 after the start of treatment in the genotype-guided group compared with 14 (21.9%) in the control group (p = 0.0023). There were no significant differences in the time to achieve a stable INR, the number of INRs within the range in the first 6 weeks and at the end of study. Our results suggest the use of a pharmacogenetic algorithm for patients with VTE could be useful in achieving target INR control in the first days of treatment.
RESUMEN
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) of the lower limbs is a common condition with considerable global burden. Some country-specific studies suggest low levels of public awareness. To our knowledge public awareness of PAD has never been assessed simultaneously in several countries worldwide. Patients and methods: This was an international, general public, internet-based quantitative survey assessing vascular health and disease understanding. Questionnaires included 23 closed-ended multiple-choice, Likert scale and binary choice questions. Data were collected from 9,098 survey respondents from nine countries in Europe, North and Latin America during May-June 2018. Results: Overall, familiarity with PAD was low (57% of respondents were "not at all familiar", and 9% were "moderately" or "very familiar"). Knowledge about PAD health consequences was limited, with 55% of all respondents not being aware of limb consequences of PAD. There were disparities in PAD familiarity levels between countries; highest levels of self-reported awareness were in Germany and Poland where 13% reported to be "very" or "moderately" familiar with PAD, and lowest in Scandinavian countries (5%, 3% and 2% of respondents in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, respectively). There were disparities in awareness according to age. Respondents aged 25-34 were most familiar with PAD, with 12% stating that they were "moderately" or "very" familiar with the condition, whereas those aged 18-24 were the least familiar with PAD (7% "moderately" or "very" familiar with PAD). In the 45-54, 55-64 and 65+ age groups, 9% said they were "moderately" or "very" familiar with the term. There was no important gender-based difference in PAD familiarity. Conclusions: On an international level, public self-reported PAD awareness is low, even though PAD is a common condition with considerable burden. Campaigns to increase PAD awareness are needed to reduce delays in diagnosis and to motivate people to control PAD risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Concienciación , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente) , Alemania , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of glucocorticoids in the treatment of cytokine storm that occurs in patients with severe COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids regimens have been proposed. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that includes patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and compares admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization in three groups of patients: no glucocorticoids treatment, use of glucocorticoids doses equivalent to less than 250â¯mg of prednisone daily and use of equivalent doses greater than or equal to 250â¯mg of prednisone daily. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, using the propensity index as a covariant. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients enrolled in the study, 67 (25.9%) had an unfavorable evolution, dying or requiring ICU admission. Comparative analyzes between different glucocorticoids treatments and the association with ICU admission or death were: glucocorticoids treatment (any dose) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.71 [0.30-1.66]), treatment with glucocorticoids (≥250â¯mg prednisone daily) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.35 [0.11-1.08]) and glucocorticoids treatment (≥250â¯mg prednisone daily) versus patients with glucocorticoids doses <250â¯mg prednisone daily or without glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.30 [0.10-0.88]). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids pulses with equivalent doses of prednisone greater than or equal to 250â¯mg have a more favorable evolution (less mortality and less admission to ICU).
INTRODUCCIÓN: Se han comunicado varios trabajos donde se ha demostrado un efecto beneficioso de los glucocorticoides como tratamiento de la tormenta de citocinas que se asocia a los cuadros graves por SARS-CoV-2, plateándose diferentes pautas de glucocorticoides. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluye pacientes con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 y compara el ingreso en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) o fallecimiento durante la hospitalización en 3 grupos de pacientes: sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides, uso de dosis diarias de glucocorticoides equivalentes menores a 250â¯mg de prednisona y dosis diarias equivalentes mayores o iguales a 250â¯mg de prednisona. Se realizó un análisis multivariante mediante regresión logística, utilizando el índice de propensión como covariante. RESULTADOS: De los 259 pacientes incorporados al estudio 67 (25,9%) tuvieron una evolución desfavorable, falleciendo o precisando ingreso en UCI. Los análisis comparativos entre diferentes tratamientos con glucocorticoides, y la asociación con ingreso en UCI o fallecimiento fueron: tratamiento con glucocorticoides (cualquier dosis) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,71 [0,301,66]), tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250â¯mg de prednisona al día) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,35 [0,111,08]) y tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250â¯mg de prednisona al día) versus pacientes con dosis de glucocorticoidesâ¯<â¯250â¯mg de prednisona o sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,30 [0,100,88]). CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados de este estudio muestran que los paciente con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con pulsos con glucocorticoides con dosis equivalentes de prednisona mayor o igual de 250â¯mg tienen una evolución más favorable (menos mortalidad e ingreso en UCI).
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of glucocorticoids in the treatment of cytokine storm that occurs in patients with severe COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids regimens have been proposed. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that includes patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and compares admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization in three groups of patients: no glucocorticoids treatment, use of glucocorticoids doses equivalent to less than 250mg of prednisone daily and use of equivalent doses greater than or equal to 250mg of prednisone daily. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, using the propensity index as a covariant. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients enrolled in the study, 67 (25.9%) had an unfavorable evolution, dying or requiring ICU admission. Comparative analyzes between different glucocorticoids treatments and the association with ICU admission or death were: glucocorticoids treatment (any dose) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.71 [0.30-1.66]), treatment with glucocorticoids (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.35 [0.11-1.08]) and glucocorticoids treatment (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus patients with glucocorticoids doses <250mg prednisone daily or without glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.30 [0.10-0.88]). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids pulses with equivalent doses of prednisone greater than or equal to 250mg have a more favorable evolution (less mortality and less admission to ICU).
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient blood management (PBM) performs multidisciplinary strategies to optimize red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Orthogeriatric share care models (surgeon and geriatrician manage the patient together from admission) have the goal of improving outcomes in hip fracture patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted. Patients aged ≥70 years undergoing hip fracture (HF) surgery were consecutively included. When admitted on the orthogeriatric service a PBM protocol was applied based on: perioperative antithrombotic management, intravenous iron sucrose administration and restrictive transfusion criteria. Risk factors, clinical and functional effects of transfusion and its requirements were assessed to audit our model. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients participated (women, 78.8%; median age, 86 (82-90) years). 210 patients (54.8%) were transfused. Age (ORâ¯=â¯1.055, 95% CI 1.017-1.094; pâ¯=â¯0.004) and Hemoglobin (Hb) level on admission (ORâ¯=â¯0.497, 95% CI 0.413-0.597; pâ¯<â¯0.001) were found to be significant risk factors for transfusion. Transfusion increased length of stay (bâ¯=â¯1.37, 95% CI 0.543-2.196; pâ¯=â¯0.001) but did not have an effect on other variables. DISCUSSION: The PBM program established within an orthogeriatric service showed positive outcomes in terms of clinical complications, mortality, delirium or functional recovery in transfused patients, whereas it did not impact on shorter length of stay. The risk of transfusion on admission was predicted with the lower Hb levels on admission, along with the age of the patients. New measurements as homogenous restrictive transfusion criteria, a single-unit RBC transfusion and the assessment of the intravenous iron efficacy are need to be applied as a result of the high transfusion requirements.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/organización & administración , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
The REACH registry allows the degree of control of risk factors associated with atherothrombosis to be evaluated. Although 90% were taking at least one antihypertensive agent, hypertension was controlled in only 42.9% of the patients with vascular disease. This inadequate control may have multiple causes but the main factors are probably clinical inertia, lack of treatment adherence and the absence of combination therapies. Among patients with vascular disease, the percentage of those with good diabetes mellitus control was acceptable. The proportion of subjects with healthy cholesterol levels was suboptimal, even though 71.3% were receiving statins. The percentage of active smokers was 12% in the group of patients with vascular disease. More than 80% of the total population was taking at least one antiplatelet agent. Although the use of these agents is widespread in secondary prevention and that of lipid-lowering drugs is increasing, blood pressure and cholesterol goals are not being achieved in most patients with established vascular disease. In the REACH study, a substantial percentage of patients are not achieving adequate control of cardiovascular risk factors and are not receiving the treatments recommended in clinical practice guidelines.