Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Prehosp Disaster Med ; 36(3): 295-300, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33632360

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the usability of the age value listed on the labels on children's clothes in the age-based weight estimation method recommended by the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guidelines. MATERIAL-METHOD: This prospective, cross-sectional study was organized in Antalya Training and Research Hospital Emergency Department. Children aged between 1-12 years were included in the study. The weight measurements of the children were obtained based on the age-related criteria on the labels of their clothes. The estimated values were compared with the real values of the cases measured on the scale. RESULTS: One-thousand ninety-four cases were included, the mean age of cases in age-based measurements was 6.25 years, which was 6.5 years in label-based measurements. Average weights measured 25.75kg according to age-based measurements, 26.5kg according to label-based measurements, and 26.0kg on the scales, and showed no statistical difference (P <.0001). It was estimated that 741 (67.7%) of age-based measurements and 775 (70.8%) of label-based measurements were within (±)10% values within the normal measurement limits and no significant difference was measured. CONCLUSION: In the emergency department and prehospital setting, children with an unknown age and that need resuscitation and interventional procedures for stabilization, and have no time for weight estimation, checking the age on clothing label (ACL) instead of the actual age (AA) can be safely used for the age-dependent weight calculation formula recommended by the PALS guide.


Asunto(s)
Vestuario , Urgencias Médicas , Peso Corporal , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Acad Emerg Med ; 24(10): 1297-1298, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28672064
4.
Emerg Med Int ; 2017: 6248687, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28357139

RESUMEN

We assessed the effect of focused point of care ultrasound (POCUS) used for critical nontraumatic hypotensive patients presenting to the emergency department of our hospital on the clinical decisions of the physicians and whether it led to the modification of the treatment modality. This prospective clinical study was conducted at the Emergency Department of Antalya Training and Research Hospital. Nontraumatic patients aged 18 and older who presented to our emergency department and whose systolic blood pressure was <100 mmHg or shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) was >1 were included in the study. While the most probable preliminary diagnosis established by the physician before POCUS was consistent with the definitive diagnosis in 60.6% (n = 109) of 180 patients included in the study, it was consistent with the definitive diagnosis in 85.0% (n = 153) of the patients after POCUS (p < 0.001). POCUS performed for critical hypotensive patients presenting to the emergency department is an appropriate diagnostic tool that can be used to enable the physicians to make the accurate preliminary diagnosis and start the appropriate treatment in a short time.

5.
J Emerg Med ; 52(5): 702-706, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28284770

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A subluxation of the radial head (SRH) is a clinical condition that commonly occurs in children under 6 years of age. History and physical examination findings typically include a child who presents with an elbow held in extension and with forearm pronation, after having suffered significant longitudinal traction on the arm, or after a fall on an outstretched hand. The diagnosis is often clinically obvious. The injury responds dramatically to closed reduction, and usually no imaging is required. However, cases with atypical presentations and patients who do not respond favorably to a reduction maneuver present clinical challenges, because the initial diagnosis of SRH may seem to be questionable or erroneous. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can assist decision-making and clinical management for these patients. CASE REPORTS: We report three cases of SRH that were diagnosed and managed with POCUS in the emergency department. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: POCUS can assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with clinical suspicion of SRH, especially in cases of atypical presentations or cases in which the mechanism of injury is unknown. It is also an extremely valuable tool in determining postprocedure reduction success.


Asunto(s)
Desviación Ósea/diagnóstico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Radio (Anatomía)/anomalías , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Desviación Ósea/terapia , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pediatría/métodos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/normas , Radio (Anatomía)/lesiones
6.
Acad Emerg Med ; 24(5): 578-586, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28171688

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Early and accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) with ultrasound (US) can minimize the morbidity and mortality of the patients. In this regard, US can help emergency physicians (EPs) in the diagnosing process and clinical decision making for AA. Therefore, we primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of point-of-care US (POCUS) in clinical decision making of EPs for the diagnostic evaluation for AA in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: The study sample consisted of patients aged > 18 years who presented to the ED with abdominal pain and underwent diagnostic evaluation for AA. All patients were examined initially with POCUS by EPs and then with radiology-performed US (RADUS) by radiologists. Pre- and post-POCUS median diagnostic certainty values (MDCVs) for AA were determined with visual analog scale (VAS) scores (0 = not present, 100 = certainly present) by POCUS performers. Definitive diagnoses were determined by surgery, pathologic evaluation of appendectomy specimens, or clinical follow-up results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for POCUS and RADUS together with pre- and post-POCUS VAS scores for MDCVs were compared. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were included into the final analysis and 169 (64%) had a diagnosis of AA. The sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of US examinations were 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 87.2%-95.8%), 95.8% (89.5%-98.8%), 21.9 (8.4-57.2), and 0.08 (0.05-0.1) for POCUS and 76.9% (69.8-83%), 97.8% (84.9-99.7%), 36.4 (9.25-144.3), and 0.24 (0.18-0.31) for RADUS, respectively. Pre-POCUS and post-POCUS VAS scores for MDCVs were 60 (interquartile range [IQR] = 50-65) and 95 (IQR = 20-98), respectively (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasonography, when performed in ED for the diagnosis of AA, has high sensitivity and specificity and had a positive impact on the clinical decision making of EPs.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(9): 1850-4, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27358042

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to detect the value of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for diagnosing a nail bed injury and fracture of distal phalanx in patients presenting with distal finger trauma to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Patients, 18 to 65 years old, presenting with a blunt trauma of distal finger and diagnosed with subungual hematoma were eligible for the study. Subungual hematoma extending over more than 50%, fracture of distal phalanx, and disruption of periungual tissue or nail integrity were accepted as the indications for nail bed inspection. All the study patients underwent POCUS to detect the existence of a distal phalanx fracture or nail bed injury. X-ray was also obtained from all the patients. RESULTS: Nail bed was visualized in 45 patients. Squeezing and crush injury were the most reported trauma mechanism in study patients (66.7%). The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in detecting nail bed injury were 93.4% (95% CI, 80%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 74%-100%), respectively. The sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 79%-100%), and specificity was 98.4% (95% CI, 91%-100%) for distal phalanx fracture. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasound is a promising tool in detecting the nail bed injury and distal phalanx fractures in patients presented with distal finger trauma. Further studies with bigger sample size are needed to reveal the diagnostic ability of POCUS before using it regularly in the ED.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Traumatismos de los Dedos/diagnóstico , Uñas/lesiones , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Uñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
8.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(5): 866-70, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26935225

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is an easily available and noninvasive tool without radiation exposure that is also gaining a broad range of use in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of POCUS in the diagnosis of shoulder dislocation by comparing with plain radiography. METHODS: This prospective observational study with a convenience sampling was conducted in emergency departments of 2 hospitals. Patients older than 15 years with possible shoulder dislocation during the physical examination composed the study population. All the study patients underwent POCUS evaluation to detect a shoulder dislocation or fracture before radiography, and the POCUS procedure was also achieved after the reduction attempt. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of study subjects was 33.9±15 years, and 80.6% (n=83) of them were male. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in identifying dislocation were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 48%-100%), respectively. POCUS also confirmed reduction in 93 of 94 patients with a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 96%-100%). POCUS has a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 63%-100%) for excluding a shoulder fracture but a specificity of 84.2% (95% CI, 75%-91%). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasonography is an effective tool to either rule in or rule out shoulder dislocation in the emergency setting. Furthermore, it is a robust sensitive tool for excluding fractures but with false-positive results.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Luxación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
9.
Acad Emerg Med ; 23(6): 674-8, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26938140

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare intravenous morphine and intravenous acetaminophen (paracetamol) for pain treatment in patients presenting to the emergency department with sciatica. METHODS: Patients, between the ages of 21 and 65 years, suffering from pain in the sciatic nerve distribution and a positive straight leg-raise test composed the study population. Study patients were assigned to one of three intravenous interventions: morphine (0.1 mg/kg), acetaminophen (1 g), or placebo. Physicians, nurses, and patients were blinded to the study drug. Changes in pain intensity were measured at 15 and 30 minutes using a visual analog scale. Rescue drug (fentanyl) use and adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS: Three-hundred patients were randomized. The median change in pain intensity between treatment arms at 30 minutes were as follows: morphine versus acetaminophen 25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20 to 29 mm), morphine versus placebo 41 mm (95% CI = 37 to 45 mm), and acetaminophen versus placebo 16 mm (95% CI = 12 to 20 mm). Eighty percent of the patients in the placebo group (95% CI = 63.0% to 99%), 18% of the patients in the acetaminophen group (95% CI = 10.7% to 28.5%), and 6% of those in the morphine group (95% CI = 2.0% to 13.2%) required a rescue drug. Adverse effects were similar between the morphine and acetaminophen groups. CONCLUSION: Morphine and acetaminophen are both effective for treating sciatica at 30 minutes. However, morphine is superior to acetaminophen.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Ciática/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Dimensión del Dolor
10.
Cephalalgia ; 36(2): 179-84, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25944813

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Migraine is a leading headache etiology that frequently presents to the emergency department (ED). In the present study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of dexketoprofen in aborting migraine headaches in the ED. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in an ED of a tertiary care hospital using allocation concealment. Patients were allocated into two arms to receive the study drug; 50 mg dexketoprofen in 50 ml saline and 50 ml saline as placebo. Change in pain intensity was measured by the visual analog scale at baseline, both at 30 and 45 minutes after the study medication was administered. Rescue medication requirement and pain relapse were also recorded by a telephone follow-up at 48 hours. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients (112 in each group) were included into the final analysis. Mean age of the study participants was 37 ± 11 (SD) and 25% (n = 56) of them were male. The median pain improvement at 45 minutes for patients receiving dexketoprofen was 55 (IQR: 49 to 60) and 30 (IQR: 25 to 35) for those receiving placebo. The mean difference between the two groups at 45 minutes was 21.4 (95% CI: 14.4. to 28.5). Rescue drugs were needed in 22.3% of patients who received dexketoprofen compared to 55.4% in patients who received placebo (dif: 33.1%; 95% CI: 20% to 45%). There were no adverse events reported in either group during the study period. CONCLUSION: Intravenous dexketoprofen is superior to placebo in relieving migraine headaches in the ED. It may be a suitable therapy with minimum side effects in patients presenting with a migraine headache to the ED.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Cetoprofeno/análogos & derivados , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Trometamina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Cetoprofeno/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos
11.
J Med Biochem ; 35(3): 347-353, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28356887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After the introduction of modern laboratory instruments and information systems, preanalytic phase is the new field of battle. Errors in preanalytical phase account for approximately half of total errors in clinical laboratory. The objective of this study was to share an experience of an education program that was believed to be successful in decreasing the number of rejected samples received from the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: An education program about laboratory procedures, quality requirements in the laboratory, patient and health-care worker safety was planned by the quality team to be performed on 36 people who were responsible for sample collection in the ED. A questionary which included 11 questions about the preanalytic phase was applied to all the attendees before and after training. The number of rejected samples per million was discovered with right proportion account over the number of accepted and rejected samples to laboratory after and before the training period. RESULTS: Most of the attendees were nurses (n: 22/55%), with over 12 years of experience in general and 2-4 years experience in the ED. Knowledge level of the attendees was calculated before training as 58.9% and after training as 91.8%. While the total rate of sample rejection before training was 2.35% (sigma value 3.37-3.50), the rate after training was 1.56% (sigma value 3.62-3.75). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the knowledge of staff has a direct positive impact on the preanalytic phase. The application of a pre-test was observed to be a feasible tool to shape group specific education programs.

12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(47): e1852, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26632681

RESUMEN

Shoulder joint is the most common joint requiring reduction by emergency physicians. Successful reduction is based on the overcoming of resistance of the shoulder muscles. Pain is the most important factor in resistance increase and sedation; analgesia and, in certain cases, intra-articular anesthesia are preferred for reduction. The external rotation (ER) method can provide successful reduction without causing an increase in muscle resistance if applied slowly and gently. The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine the usefulness of the ERWOSA method in the reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations (AASDs).This was a retrospective descriptive study. The records of patients admitted to the emergency department with anterior shoulder dislocation between 2009 and 2011 were reviewed for demographic data, sedation, analgesia, and discharge times. Patients were then divided into ERWOSA (n = 80) and external rotation and sedation-analgesia (ERASA, n = 59) groups, with regard to the application of SA (sedation-analgesia). The study data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 software for Windows. Numerical data were presented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical data as rates.A total of 139 patients were included in the study. The patients' average age was 35 ± 14 years, 108 (77.7%) were male. Successful reduction rates for 59 male and 21 female patients in the ERWOSA group were 83% and 66.7% (78.7% total success), respectively. Successful reduction rates for 49 male and 10 female patients in the ERASA group were 87.7% and 90% (88.1% total success), respectively. The length of stay of the ERWOSA and ERASA groups in emergency services were found to be significantly different, with 55 ± 17 and 118 ± 23 minutes for each group, respectively. There were no complications.The ER method can be used in reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations without sedation and analgesia, if applied slowly enough to overcome the resistance of shoulder muscles. The ERWOSA method causes both a significant decrease in the length of stay of patients in the emergency department results in negating the possibility of adverse drug effects. In busy emergency departments, male patients with anterior shoulder dislocation are particularly suitable candidates for ERWOSA.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Anestesia/métodos , Manipulación Ortopédica/métodos , Luxación del Hombro/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotación , Articulación del Hombro , Adulto Joven
13.
J Travel Med ; 22(6): 361-7, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26201833

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the incidence and status of urgent medical conditions, the attitudes of health professionals who encounter such conditions, the adequacy of medical kits and training of cabin crew in data-received-company aircrafts suggested by Aerospace Medical Association, and the demographic data of patients. METHODS: Data were collected from medical records of a major flight company from 2011 through 2013. All patients with complete records were included in the study. Numerical variables were defined as median and interquartiles (IQR) for median, while categorical variables were defined as numbers and percentage. RESULTS: During the study period, 10,100,000 passengers were carried by the company flights, with 1,312 (0.013%) demands for urgent medical support (UMS). The median age of the passengers who requested UMS was 45 years (IQR: 29-62). Females constituted 698 (53.2%) among the patients, and 721 (55%) patients were evaluated by medical professionals found among passengers. The most common nontraumatic complaints resulting in requests for UMS were flight anxiety (311 patients, 23.7%) and dyspnea (145 patients, 11%). The most common traumatic complaint was burns (221 patients, 16.8%) resulting from trauma during flight. A total of 22 (1.67%) emergency landings occurred for which the most frequent reasons were epilepsy (22.7%) and death (18.2%). Deaths during flights were recorded in 13 patients, whose median age was 77 years (IQR: 69-82), which was significantly higher compared to the age of patients requiring UMS (p < 0.0001). A total of 592 (45%) patients did not require any treatment for UMS. Medical kits and training were found to be sufficient according to the symptomatic treatments. CONCLUSION: Most of the urgent cases encountered during flights can be facilitated with basic medical support. "Traumatic emergency procedures inflight medical care" would be useful for additional training. Medical professionals as passengers are significantly involved in encountered emergency situations. Adding automated external defibrillator and pulse oximetry to recommended kits and training can help facilitate staff decisions such as emergency landings and tele-assistance.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Aeroespacial/estadística & datos numéricos , Viaje en Avión/estadística & datos numéricos , Primeros Auxilios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita/epidemiología , Disnea/epidemiología , Urgencias Médicas , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 18(5): 397-404, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23188600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the clinically important change in diagnostic accuracy and physical examination in the morphine vs. placebo group. METHODS: Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose intravenous morphine or placebo in a blinded fashion. Primary outcome measure was to determine if there was a clinically important change in diagnostic accuracy and physical examination in the morphine vs. placebo group. RESULTS: 80 subjects (39 were assigned to morphine and 41 to placebo) were included in the final analysis. Clinically important diagnostic accuracy rate was found to be 80% in the morphine group (31/39) and 78% in the placebo group (32/41), with a difference rate of 2% (95% CI -7% to 13%, p=0.9802. There was a statistically significant change in abdominal rigidity finding (15%) in morphine group in all of the abdominal physical examinations findings; however there was no change in placebo group (0%). The difference between two groups was also statistically significant (95% CI 2.3% to 30.5%, p= 0.031). CONCLUSION: Administration of opioid analgesia is safe and does not seem to impair clinical diagnostic accuracy in elderly patients with acute undifferentiated abdominal pain. Nevermore, opioids may change the physical examination findings such as abdominal rigidity.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 15(4): 390-5, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19669971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Motorcycle accidents are one of the major causes of traumatic injuries and deaths. The purpose of this study was to analyze the features of the victims presenting with motorcycle-related injuries. METHODS: This study was conducted prospectively from July 1 to September 30, 2005 at the Emergency Department (ED) of Akdeniz University Hospital. RESULTS: During the study period, 142 patients presented to the ED with motorcycle-related injuries. Sixteen patients were excluded from the analysis because their forms were incomplete and four were still under treatment in the hospital. Of the 122 injured, 72 (59.0%) were discharged and 40 (32.8%) were admitted. Only 11 patients declared use of a helmet. Median length of stay in the hospital was five days. CONCLUSION: Motorcycle accidents result in more serious injuries than motor vehicle accidents due to the limited safety precautions and the difference in injury mechanism. The frequency of accidents, higher admission rates, longer periods of admissions, and higher total hospital costs highlight motorcycle accidents as a major public health issue and an economical burden. To prevent accidents, compliance with the legal requirements should be regularly audited. Studies should be done to increase motorcycle safety precautions, and education programs should be organized for motorcyclists. The effects of these interventions should be analyzed.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Motocicletas , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Prospectivos , Turquía , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad
16.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 15(4): 214-7, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19078817

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tourists are exposed to traditional health problems of the host country, such as trauma and the exacerbation of previously existing illnesses during their travels. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical characteristics of tourist patients and any predictors of hospital admission. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This retrospective observational study was carried out in the tertiary care hospital emergency department (ED) of a Mediterranean destination city, Antalya, Turkey. Hospital data from all tourist patients presenting or transferred to the ED between August 2003 and September 2004 were evaluated. Tourist patients were defined as all non-Turkish citizens. RESULTS: A total of 961 tourist patients was studied, of whom 295 (31%) were admitted and 666 (69%) were discharged. Fifteen patients died in the hospital, 49 critically ill patients were transferred back to their home country, and 153 patients underwent a surgical intervention. The most common discharge diagnoses were trauma (405, 42%), nonspecific symptoms (106, 11%), and circulatory disorders (108, 11%). Admitted tourist patients were significantly older than those discharged; however, there were no differences in sex among the groups. Applying a logistic regression model, age, tachycardia, mode of arrival, and triage category were all found to be significant predictors of admission, but only the initial Glasgow Coma Scale was found to be a significant predictor of mortality. In total, 347 patients were from European Union (EU) countries, and 614 were from non-EU countries. A significant difference was found between the EU and non-EU patient groups according to age, mortality, admission rate, exposure to trauma, ED length of stay, hospital length of stay. Tourist patients from EU countries were older, had higher mortality, lesser trauma exposure, longer ED, and hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: EDs can be expected to manage tourist patients presenting for traumatic injuries and circulatory disorders. Clinical differences relating to patients' nationality might help in the development of targeted patient education and injury-prevention programs. Emergency physicians and the tourism industry should recognize the challenges of caring for this growing and aged patient population.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Registros Médicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Turquía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA