Comparison of the efficacy of sunitinib and pazopanib in patients with advanced non-clear renal cell carcinoma.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease group, accounting for approximately 25% of all RCC cases. Due to its rarity and especially heterogeneity, phase III trial data is limited and treatment options generally follow those of clear cell RCC. In the literature, there exists a number of studies with sunitinib, cabozantinib, and everolimus, but data on the efficacy of pazopanib are limited. Our aim in this study was to compare the efficacy of pazopanib and sunitinib, in a multicenter retrospective cohort of non-ccRCC patients. Our study included patients diagnosed with non-ccRCC who received pazopanib or sunitinib treatment as first-line therapy from 22 tertiary hospitals. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rates of pazopanib and sunitinib treatments. Additionally, we investigated prognostic factors in non-ccRCC. PFS and response rates of sunitinib and pazopanib were found to be similar, while a numerical difference was observed in OS. Being 65 years and older, being in the intermediate or poor risk group according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, having liver metastases, presence of a sarcomatoid component, and having de novo metastatic disease were found to be significantly associated with shorter PFS. Pazopanib treatment appears to have similar efficacy in the treatment of non-ccRCC compared to sunitinib. Though randomized controlled trials are lacking and will probably be never be available, we suggest that pazopanib could be a preferred agent like sunitinib and cabozantinib.

Pazopanib and sunitinib treatments show similar progression free survival, overall survival and objective response rate.IMDC risk group, liver metastasis, sarcomatoid component and de novo metastatic disease were determined as prognostic factors.

Prognostic impact of myosteatosis on survival with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myosteatosis has emerged as a promising prognostic biomarker for survival outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. However, recent research has yielded conflicting results on the association between myosteatosis and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between myosteatosis and survival outcomes in patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for studies published until June 10, 2024. This protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (Registration Number: CRD42023466337). We performed the meta-analyses with the generic inverse-variance method with a random effects model. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 1362 patients were included. The pooled analysis showed that patients with myosteatosis had a significantly higher risk of death compared to patients without myosteatosis (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.23-2.12, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed this association was stronger in melanoma patients (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.09-3.94, p = 0.030). Furthermore, patients with myosteatosis had an increased risk of progression or death than those without myosteatosis (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05-1.64, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Myosteatosis is associated with a higher risk of death in ICI-treated patients. Further research in larger cohorts is needed to standardize the definition of myosteatosis as well as the true mechanistic association between myosteatosis and survival in patients treated with ICIs.

Investigating the WNT and TGF-beta pathways alterations and tumor mutant burden in young-onset colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States. Recent epidemiological evidence demonstrates an increasing incidence of young-onset CRC cases, defined as CRC cases in individuals 50 years old or younger. Studies have established that alterations in both the WNT and TGF-Beta signaling pathways have contributed to CRC development. While this is well understood, the comprehensive analysis of WNT and TGF-Beta pathway alterations in young-onset CRC cases has yet to be investigated. Here, we conducted a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of mutations associated with each of the WNT and TGF-Beta signaling pathways according to age (≤ 50 years old versus > 50 years old) utilizing published genomic data from the cBioPortal. Chi-square results demonstrated no significant difference in WNT alterations between young-onset CRC and those > 50 years old. However, across all age groups, WNT alterations were frequently found in rectal cancers. We also found that WNT alterations were associated with better outcomes. The mutations associated with TGF-beta were observed at a higher rate in older CRC patients when compared to those ≤ 50 years old. Additionally, these mutations were found more frequently in colon primaries.

Prognostic Significance of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Trastuzumab Emtansine.

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a mainstay therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, identifying patients who will benefit most remains a challenge due to the lack of reliable biomarkers. The recently developed pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), a novel immune-inflammation marker, could aid in this regard, considering the immunomodulatory effects of T-DM1. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between the PIV and the efficacy of T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive mBC. A total of 122 HER2-positive mBC patients treated with T-DM1 were included. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to determine the optimal PIV threshold value for survival prediction. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analyses were used for univariable and multivariable survival analyses, respectively. The median age was 51 years, and 95.1% of the patients had ECOG PS 0-1. The optimal PIV cutoff value was identified as 338 in ROC analyses (AUC: 0.667, 95% CI: 0.569-0.765, p = 0.002). The multivariate analysis revealed that patients in the high-PIV group had significantly shorter OS (HR: 2.332; 95% CI: 1.408-3.861; p = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.423; 95% CI: 1.585-3.702; p < 0.001) than patients in the low-PIV group. Additionally, both ORR and DCR were significantly lower in the high-PIV group (36.6% vs. 61.3%, p = 0.011; 56.1% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.027). Our findings suggest that pre-treatment PIV may be a novel prognostic biomarker for HER2-positive mBC patients receiving T-DM1. A low PIV level is associated with more favorable outcomes. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the potential utility of PIV in aiding treatment decisions.

The impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (low) status on the efficacy of first line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer.

The fact that the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low group, historically classified as HER2 negative in breast cancer histology, benefited from HER2-targeted treatments similarly to the HER2-positive group indicates that this group has a distinct histology from the HER2-0 group. The effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, which are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, in this newly defined histological subgroup remains a topic of debate. In our study, we examined the impact of HER2 status on the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Our study is a retrospective, multicenter, real-world data analysis. One hundred sixty patients were included in the study. The relationship between HER2 status and other clinical-pathological features, as well as progression-free survival, was examined. Median follow-up was 20.33 ±â€…0.98 months. The mPFS could not be reached. All patients exhibited positive estrogen receptor expression. Among the patients, 111 (69.4%) were categorized as HER2-0, and 49 (30.6%) as HER2-low. The 24-month progression-free survival rates were similar between HER2-0 and HER2-low patients (60.6% vs 65.3%, hormone receptor: 1.18, CI: 0.67-2.20, P = .554). We established that the mPFS achieved with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer is unaffected by HER2 status.

Sacituzumab govitecan vs. chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis on safety outcomes.

Aim: There is limited data available regarding the comparison of Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs. chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.Materials & methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety profile of SG vs. chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) clinical trials.Results: The pooled odds ratio for outcomes such as grade 3-4 and all grade neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia and other non-hematological adverse events showed a higher risk for patients receiving SG. No statistically significant differences were reported in terms of grade 3-4 fatigue, all grade nausea, febrile neutropenia and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events.Conclusion: Our data, coupled with a statistically and clinically meaningful survival benefit, support the use of SG for mBC.

[Box: see text].

Impact of opioid analgesics on survival in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the effects of concurrent opioid analgesic (OA) use with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: In this observational retrospective study, we included advanced cancer patients who received ICIs at Hacettepe University Hospital's Department of Medical Oncology between June 2018 and January 2023. RESULTS: Our study included 375 recurrent or metastatic cancer patients treated with ICIs in the first, second line, or beyond. There were no significant differences between the OA-treated and OA-untreated groups regarding median age, age group, gender, primary tumor location, ICI type, or the presence of baseline liver and lung metastases. However, the OA-treated group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of patients who had received three or more prior treatments before initiating ICIs (p = 0.015). OA-Untreatment was significantly correlated with prolonged mPFS (6.83 vs. 4.30 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.79, p < 0.001) and mOS (17.05 vs. 7.68 months, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates an association between the concurrent use of OAs and reduced OS and PFS in patients treated with ICIs. While OA treatment serves as a surrogate marker for higher disease burden, it may also suggest a potential biological relationship between opioids and immunotherapy efficacy.

Real-world evaluation of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: a retrospective multi-center study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a significant global health concern due to high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite therapeutic advances, the prognosis for advanced or recurrent cases remains challenging. Nivolumab obtained approval for recurrent or metastatic HNC based on the Phase III CheckMate 141 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal HNC. DESIGN: In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed 124 patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC who received nivolumab in the second-line setting and beyond. Data were collected from 20 different cancer centers across Turkey. The effectiveness and safety of the treatment and survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Nivolumab exhibited favorable clinical responses, yielding an objective response rate of 29.9% and a disease control rate of 55.7%. Safety assessments revealed a generally well-tolerated profile, with no instances of treatment discontinuation or mortality due to side effects. Survival analysis disclosed a median overall survival (OS) of 11.8 (95% CI 8.4-15.2) months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG-PS ≥ 1 (HR: 1.64, p = 0.045), laryngeal location (HR: 0.531, p = 0.024), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3.5 (HR: 1.97, p = 0.007) were independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC in real-world settings. Further studies are needed on factors affecting response to treatment and survival outcomes.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in the second- or later-line treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Türkiye: a retrospective multicenter non-interventional registry study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in the second-line (2L) or later-line (LL) treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-life setting in Türkiye. METHODS: This study was designed as a national, multi-center, retrospective study. The study population was evaluated in two groups for the line of nivolumab therapy: those receiving nivolumab in the 2L (Group 2L) and third-line (3L) or LL (Group 3L/LL). Efficacy was evaluated based on one-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Safety was evaluated based on treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and nivolumab discontinuation rate. RESULTS: Of 244 patients, 52.9% were in Group 2L and 47.1% were in Group 3L/LL. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not differ between the groups. In Group 2L and Group 3L/LL, one-year OS and PFS rates were 60.8% and 61.4% (p = 0.592) and 31.2% and 21.3% (p = 0.078), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 34.7% in Group 2L and 27.3% in Group 3L/LL (p = 0.262). The percentage of patients reporting at least one AE in Groups 2L and 3L/LL was 34.9% and 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.169). Fatigue was the most common (16.4%) treatment-related AE in each group. The groups were comparable regarding the AE frequency. Nivolumab was discontinued in 61 patients in Group 2L and 53 patients in Group 3L/LL, with the most common reason being disease progression (57.4% and 66.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nivolumab is safe and effective in the 2L or 3L/LL treatment of locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC and associated with acceptable AEs in real-life setting.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer (around 85% of all lung cancers). Patients with NSCLC are usually diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages. When cancer cells spread to other areas from where they first formed, it is called metastatic cancer. Surgery may not be a treatment option for such patients. Currently, immunotherapeutic agents are used in the treatment of NSCLC. Nivolumab is one of the approved immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, who have failed after receiving chemotherapy. Our study explored the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in real-life setting in Türkiye. Nivolumab effectiveness was evaluated by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. OS indicates the proportion of patients who are still alive at a given time after diagnosis or treatment initiation. PFS refers to "the length of time during and after cancer treatment that a person lives with the disease but does not get worse." In the present study, one-year OS for 244 patients who received nivolumab was 61.1% and one-year PFS was 26.4%. Nivolumab safety was evaluated based on the frequency of adverse events observed during nivolumab therapy. Of the patients 38.9% had at least one side effect, with fatigue being the most common (16.4%). Our results support the earlier studies and showed that nivolumab was a safe and effective agent and is associated with acceptable side effects.

Prognostic Significance of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) Score in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer remains a leading cause of death globally, necessitating the identification of prognostic biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score, based on readily available blood tests and clinical features, has emerged as a prognostic tool, although its performance across variable clinical scenarios is not thoroughly delineated. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess the association between RMH score and survival in cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search across Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to 15 February 2024. We performed a meta-analysis with the generic inverse variance method with a random-effects model and reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Nineteen studies encompassing 127,230 patients were included. A higher RMH score was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.87-2.33, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.48-2.18, p < 0.001). This association was consistent across various subgroups, including study population (clinical trial vs. real-world cohort), geographic region, and tumor type. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis, including over a hundred thousand patients, demonstrates a negative association between a higher RMH score and survival in cancer patients. The RMH score holds promise as a readily available prognostic tool across diverse cancer types and clinical settings. Future research should focus on validating and refining this score to aid clinical decision-making.

Datopotamab deruxtecan: A novel antibody drug conjugate for triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the breast cancer subtype with least favorable outcome because of the lack of effective treatment options and its molecular features. Recently, ADCs have dramatically changed the breast cancer treatment landscape; the anti-TROP2 ADC Sacituzumab Govitecan has been approved for treatment of previously treated, metastatic TNBC patients. The novel ADC Datopotecan-deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) has recently shown encouraging results for TNBC. In the current paper, we summarize and discuss available data regarding this TROP-2 directed agent mechanism of action and pharmacologic activity, we describe first results on efficacy and safety of the drug and report characteristics, inclusion criteria and endpoints of the main ongoing clinical trials.

Albumin-myosteatosis gauge as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia and myosteatosis have been associated with a poor prognosis for several cancers. The albumin-myosteatosis gauge (AMG) is a novel integrated measure proposed to assess myosteatosis along with serum albumin level as a surrogate of systemic inflammation and malnutrition. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of AMG in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Patients with advanced PDAC treated with chemotherapy between 2013 and 2022 were evaluated. Skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD) and skeletal muscle index (SMI) were calculated using computed tomography at the level of the L3 vertebra. The AMG was defined as albumin x SMD and expressed as an arbitrary unit (AU). Patients were first categorized by sex-specific quartiles and then dichotomized at the sex-specific median value of the AMG. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included. The median age (interquartile range) was 62 (54-67), and 128 (65.3%) were male. With regard to AMG, 142.86 and 114.15 AU were identified as cutoff values for males and females, respectively. In multivariable analyses, lower AMG values (G1-G2 vs. G3-G4) (HR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.21, p = 0.003), higher ECOG performance score (> 0 vs. 0) (HR: 1.51, 95% CI 1.10-2.06, p = 0.009) and metastatic disease (vs. locally advanced) (HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.27-2.79, p = 0.001) were associated with OS. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest the prognostic value of AMG in patients with advanced PDAC undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess potential predictive role of AMG in guiding treatment selection.

Effect of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha expression on survival in patients with metastatic cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with first-line chemotherapy and bevacizumab.

This study addresses the gap in understanding the prognostic relevance of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) expression in metastatic cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-based therapy. A retrospective multicenter study (n = 34) explored HIF-1 alpha expression via immunohistochemistry in patients treated with platinum chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly lower in the HIF-1 alpha low score group compared to the high score group (4.9 vs 12.9 months, P = 0.014). Similarly, the median overall survival (OS) was significantly reduced in the HIF-1 alpha low score group (8.3 vs 20.4 months, P = 0.006). This study, the first of its kind, highlights the prognostic significance of HIF-1 alpha expression in metastatic cervical SCC patients treated with bevacizumab-based therapy.

Unveiling cancer risk in ANCA-associated vasculitis: result from the Turkish Vasculitis Study Group (TRVaS).

To investigate cancer incidence in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), compare it with the age/sex-specific cancer risk of the Turkish population, and explore independent risk factors associated with cancer. This multicenter, incidence case-control study was conducted using the TRVaS registry. AAV patients without cancer history before AAV diagnosis were included. Demographic and AAV-related data of patients with and without an incident cancer were compared. Standardized cancer incidence rates were calculated using age-/sex-specific 2017 Turkish National Cancer Registry data for cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers). Cox regression was performed to find factors related to incident cancers in AAV patients. Of 461 AAV patients (236 [51.2%] male), 19 had incident cancers after 2022.8 patient-years follow-up. Median (IQR) disease duration was 3.4 (5.5) years, and 58 (12.6%) patients died [7 with cancer and one without cancer (log-rank, p = 0.04)]. Cancer-diagnosed patients were older, mostly male, and more likely to have anti-PR3-ANCA positivity. The cumulative cyclophosphamide dose was similar in patients with and without cancer. Overall cancer risk in AAV was 2.1 (SIR) ((1.3-3.2), p = 0.004); lung and head-neck [primary target sites for AAV] cancers were the most common. In Cox regression, male sex and ≥ 60 years of age at AAV diagnosis were associated with increased cancer risk, while receiving rituximab was associated with decreased cancer risk. Cancer risk was 2.1 times higher in AAV patients than the age-/sex-specific cancer risk of the Turkish population population, despite a high rate of rituximab use and lower dose of cyclophosphamide doses. Vigilance in cancer screening for AAV patients covering lung, genitourinary, and head-neck regions, particularly in males and the elderly, is vital.

Immunotherapy use in older adults with cancer with frailty: A young SIOG review paper.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a treatment option in most tumor types and improved survival in patients with cancer in the last decade. Older patients with cancer are underrepresented in the pivotal clinical trials with ICIs. Older patients with cancer often have significant comorbidities and geriatric syndromes like frailty, which can complicate cancer care and treatment decisions. Frailty is among the most prevalent geriatric syndromes in patients with cancer and could lead to inferior survival and a higher risk of complications in patients treated with chemotherapy. However, the effect of frailty on the efficacy and safety of ICIs is understudied. This review focuses on the available evidence regarding the association between frailty and ICI efficacy and safety. Although the survival benefits of ICIs have generally been shown to be independent of age, the available real-world data has generally suggested higher rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment discontinuation in older patients. While international organizations recommend conducting a comprehensive geriatric assessment CGA to assess and address frailty before the start of anti-cancer therapies, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or higher is frequently used in clinical practice as synonymous with frailty, albeit with significant limitations. The available data has generally demonstrated diminished ICI efficacy in patients with an ECOG 2 or higher compared to patients with better performance status, while the incidence of high-grade irAEs were similar. Whilst evidence regarding outcomes with ICI in older patients and in those with sub-optimal performance status is growing, there is very limited data specifically evaluating the role of frailty with ICIs. These studies found a shortened overall survival, yet no evidence of a lower response rate to ICIs. These patients experienced more AEs, but they did not necessarily have a higher incidence of irAEs.

Sirolimus experience in adult patients with vascular malformations.

AIM: Sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, inhibits cell growth and proliferation by controlling ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis in vascular anomalies and cancers. However, most sirolimus studies on vascular anomalies were conducted in the pediatric population, with limited data in adults. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of sirolimus in adult patients with vascular malformation, a subtype of vascular anomaly. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult vascular malformation patients aged over 16, treated at Hacettepe University Cancer Institute from January 2013 to September 2022. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded. The primary outcome was the efficacy of sirolimus evaluated by response and disease control rates. The disease control rate was defined as the cumulative percentage of complete or partial responses, along with stable disease. The secondary endpoint was toxicity and safety. RESULTS: 38 patients with a median age of 21 (IQR: 18-33) were recruited. Prior to sirolimus treatment, 57.9% of patients had undergone other therapeutic interventions, predominantly sclerotherapy and surgery. The median follow-up time during sirolimus treatment was 18.5 (IQR: 11.3-74.5) months. The disease control rate was 92.1% (35/38). Head-neck localization was associated with better response rates (p = .001). Sirolimus was generally well tolerated and grade 1 or 2 oral mucositis (n = 4) and skin rash (n = 3) were the most common side effects. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found sirolimus was efficacious and well tolerated in adult patients with vascular malformation.

Sonographic Measurements of Rectus Femoris Muscle Thickness Strongly Predict Neutropenia in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy.

The objective of this study was to explore the possible association between low skeletal muscle mass (SMM)-assessed by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US)-and hematologic toxicity in cancer patients. A prospective cohort study was conducted in cancer patients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy between 2018 and 2020 and who had baseline abdominal CT including L3 level for measuring SMM. Regional muscle measurements were carried out using US. A total of 65 patients (14 males, 51 females) were included. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis identified threshold values of 18.0 mm [AUC (area under the curve) = 0.765] for females and 20.0 mm (AUC = 0.813) for males, predicting severe neutropenia. Using these cut-offs, females with low rectus femoris (RF) thickness (<18.0 mm) had a significantly higher incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia (50.0% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.005), and males with low RF values (<20.0 mm) had a higher incidence (80.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.063). A regression analysis, irrespective of age, gender, and body mass index, revealed that only low RF muscle thickness increased the risk of grade 3-4 neutropenia by 9.210 times (95% CI = 2.401-35.326, p = 0.001). Utilizing US to measure RF muscle thickness aids in identifying cancer patients at an elevated risk of developing neutropenia. Needless to say, US can serve as a convenient and easily accessible tool for assessing low SMM, providing repeat point-of-care evaluations in clinical practice.

The efficacy of palbociclib and ribociclib in the first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer in male patients: a Turkish oncology group (TOG) study.

INTRODUCTION: Male breast cancer, comprising approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases, often leads to the exclusion of male patients as a criterion in clinical trials. While the efficacy of Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors has been established in metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR +) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2 -) breast cancer in women, limited data exist on their effectiveness in male patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib or ribociclib in male patients with breast cancer. METHODS: This study is a multicenter, retrospective study. We included male patients with HR + and HER2-metastatic breast cancer who received palbociclib or ribociclib as first-line treatment. Our primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR), and drug-related adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 46 male patients from 27 institutions were enrolled. The median age at initiation of CDK 4/6 inhibitors was 63.64 ± 13.69 years, with a median follow-up of 21.33 (95% CI 14.92-27.74) months. The ORR were 84% for palbociclib and 76.2% for ribociclib. The mPFS for the entire cohort was 28.06 months (95% CI 18.70-37.42). No significant difference in PFS was observed between palbociclib and ribociclib (mPFS: 24.46 months (95% CI 11.51-37.42) vs 28.33 months (95% CI 14.77-41.88), respectively, p = 0.211). No new adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that palbociclib and ribociclib are effective and safe options for first-line treatment in male patients with HR + /HER2 - metastatic breast cancer. However, further prospective studies are warranted to establish their efficacy in this population.