Pharmacokinetics of Ganaplacide and Lumefantrine in Adults, Adolescents, and Children with Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Treated with Ganaplacide Plus Lumefantrine Solid Dispersion Formulation: Analysis of Data from a Multinational Phase 2 Study.

The novel antimalarial ganaplacide combined with lumefantrine solid dispersion formulation (LUM-SDF) was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in adults, adolescents, and children in a multinational, prospective, randomized, active-controlled Phase II study conducted between August 2017 and June 2021 (EudraCT 2020-003284-25, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03167242). Pharmacokinetic data from that study are reported here. The trial comprised three parts: a run-in part in 12 adult/adolescent patients treated with a single dose of ganaplacide 200 mg plus LUM-SDF 960 mg assessed potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between ganaplacide and lumefantrine; in Part A, adult/adolescent patients received one of the six ganaplacide-LUM-SDF regimens or artemether-lumefantrine; and in Part B, three dose regimens identified in Part A, and artemether-lumefantrine, were assessed in children aged 2 to <12 years, with body weight ≥10 kg. A rich blood sampling schedule was used for all 12 patients in the PK run-in part and a subset of patients (N = 32) in Part A, with sparse sampling for remaining patients in Parts A (N = 275) and B (N = 159). Drug concentrations were determined by a validated protein precipitation and reverse phase liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection method. Parameters including AUCinf, AUClast, AUC0-t, Cmax, and tmax were reported where possible, using non-compartmental analysis. In the PK run-in part, there was no notable increase in ganaplacide or lumefantrine exposure when co-administered. In Parts A and B, ganaplacide exposures increased with dose, but lumefantrine exposure was numerically under dose-proportional. Lumefantrine exposure was higher with ganaplacide-LUM-SDF than with artemether-lumefantrine, although high variability was observed. Ganaplacide and lumefantrine exposures (Cmax and AUC0-24 h) were comparable across age and body weight groups. Drug exposures needed for efficacy were achieved using the dose regimen 400 mg ganaplacide plus lumefantrine 960 mg once daily for 3 days under fasted conditions.

A randomized, open-label two-period crossover pilot study to evaluate the relative bioavailability in the fed state of atovaquone-proguanil (Atoguanil™) versus atovaquone-proguanil hydrochloride (Malarone®) in healthy adult participants.

Atoguanil™ is a novel complex of atovaquone (ATV) and proguanil (PG) with enhanced ATV bioavailability compared to Malarone®. This pilot study assessed whether the relative bioavailability (Frel) of ATV, PG, and the primary PG metabolite cycloguanil (CG) following a single oral dose in the fed state of Atoguanil was similar to Malarone despite a 50% lower ATV dose. This open-label, single-dose, randomized 2-period, 2-treatment, balanced crossover study was conducted between 17th November 2021 and 18th March 2022. Eligible participants (aged 18-55 years) were randomized (1:1) in period 1 to Atoguanil (ATV/PG 500/348 mg) or Malarone (ATV/PG hydrochloride 1000/400 mg) administered following a high-fat, high caloric meal. After a 24-day washout period, participants crossed treatment arms. For the doses tested, Frel was assumed similar if 90%CIs were between 80 and 125% for the geometric mean ratio of the least square mean differences for each exposure parameter. In 15 evaluable participants, Frel was similar for ATV Cmax (93.6% [90%CI 83.6, 104.9]) but not AUC0-inf (77.8% [67.4, 89.8]), for PG AUC0-inf (95.6% [92.1, 99.2]) but not Cmax (82.4% [75.8, 89.5]), and for both CG Cmax (100.8% [95.0, 107.0]) and AUC0-inf (102.9% [98.4, 107.7]). Nine adverse events occurred; all were of mild severity and not considered treatment related. At the doses tested, ATV Frel was lower following Atoguanil versus Malarone based on AUC0-inf, though when adjusted for dose Frel increased by 156%. Both drugs were well tolerated with no safety concerns. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04866602 (April 26th, 2021).

Clinical and population-based study design considerations to accelerate the investigation of new antiretrovirals during pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant women are routinely excluded from clinical trials, leading to the absence or delay in even the most basic pharmacokinetic (PK) information needed for dosing in pregnancy. When available, pregnancy PK studies use a small sample size, resulting in limited safety information. We discuss key study design elements that may enhance the timely availability of pregnancy data, including the role and timing of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate pregnancy safety; efficacy and safety outcome measures; stand-alone protocols, platform trials, single arm studies, sample size and the effect that follow-up time during gestation has on analysis interpretations; and observational studies. DISCUSSION: Pregnancy PK should be studied during drug development, after dosing in non-pregnant persons is established (unless non-clinical or other data raise pregnancy concerns). RCTs should evaluate the safety during pregnancy of priority new HIV agents that are likely to be used by large numbers of females of childbearing age. Key endpoints for pregnancy safety studies include birth outcomes (prematurity, small for gestational age and stillbirth) and neonatal death, with traditional adverse events and infant growth also measured (congenital anomalies are best studied through surveillance). We recommend that viral efficacy be studied as a secondary endpoint of pregnancy RCTs, once PK studies confirm adequate drug exposure in pregnancy. RCTs typically use a stand-alone protocol for new agents. In contrast, master protocols using a platform design can add agents over time, possibly speeding safety data ascertainment. To speed accrual, stand-alone pregnancy trial protocols can include pre-specified starting rules based upon adequate PK levels in pregnancy; and seamless master protocols or platform trials can include a pregnancy PK and safety component. When RCTs are unethical or cost-prohibitive, observational studies should be conducted, preferably using target trial emulation to avoid bias. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy PK needs to be obtained earlier in drug evaluation. Timely RCTs are needed to understand safety in pregnancy for high-priority new HIV agents. RCTs that enrol pregnant women should focus on outcomes unique to pregnancy, and observational studies should focus on questions that RCTs are not equipped to answer.

A phase I ascending single-dose study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of bosutinib (SKI-606) in healthy adult subjects.

PURPOSE: Bosutinib (SKI-606), a dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is in clinical development for the treatment of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). To support clinical development, we conducted a dose-escalation and food-effect evaluation of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of bosutinib in healthy adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose, sequential-group study of oral bosutinib. Subjects randomly received bosutinib 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg with food; 200 and 400 mg without food; or placebo. Plasma concentrations were determined by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Non-compartmental PK analyses were performed, and power models assessed dose linearity. RESULTS: Of 55 enrolled subjects, 33 (81%) subjects had adverse events (AEs) after receiving bosutinib. Common AEs included diarrhea (39%), nausea (29%), and headache (22%). Bosutinib 200-600 mg with food was safe and well tolerated. Bosutinib exposures (C (max) and AUC) were linear and dose proportional from 200 to 800 mg with food. Absorption was relatively slow; median time to C (max) was 6 h. Apparent volume of distribution (V (z)/F) was 131-214 L/kg, mean apparent clearance (CL/F) was 2.25-3.81 L/h/kg, and mean terminal elimination half-life (t (1/2)) was 32-39 h. Preliminary food effect assessment showed that exposure to bosutinib increased by ~2.52-fold (P = 0.002) for C (max) and ~2.28-fold (P = 0.002) for AUC when 200 mg bosutinib was administered with food compared with administration under fasting conditions; administration of 400 mg bosutinib with food increased AUC by ~1.5-fold (P = 0.037). Approximately 1% of administered dose was excreted in urine. CONCLUSIONS: Bosutinib 200-600 mg with food was safe and well tolerated. Under fed conditions, bosutinib exposures were linear and dose proportional, and C (max) increased by ~1.5-fold. The t (1/2) supported a once-daily dosing regimen.