Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 19(1): 219, 2019 07 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31269915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Serious bacterial infections (SBI) are a significant cause of mortality worldwide. Parental concern and clinician's gut feeling that there is something wrong has been associated with increased likelihood of developing SBI in primary care studies. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic value of parental concern and gut feeling at the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. METHODS: This prospective observational study included children with fever attending the emergency department of Children's Clinical University hospital in Riga between October 2017 and July 2018. Data were collected via parental and clinician questionnaires. "Gut feeling" was defined as intuitive feeling that the child may have a serious illness, and "Sense of reassurance" as a feeling that the child has a self-limiting illness. "Parental concern" was defined as impression that this illness is different from previous illnesses. SBI included bacterial meningitis, sepsis, bacteraemia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, appendicitis, bacterial gastroenteritis, and osteomyelitis. Pearson's Chi-Squared test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare the variables between children with and without SBI. Positive likelihood ratio was calculated for "gut feeling", "sense of reassurance", and parental concern. RESULTS: The study included 162 patients aged 2 months to 17.8 years. Forty-six patients were diagnosed with SBI. "Sense of reassurance" expressed by all clinicians was associated with lower likelihood of SBI (positive likelihood ratio 8.8, 95% confidence interval 2.2-34.8). "Gut feeling" was not significantly predictive of the patient being diagnosed with SBI (positive likelihood ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.9-5.1), The prognostic rule-in value of parental concern was insignificant (positive likelihood ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.7). CONCLUSION: Sense of reassurance was useful in ruling out SBI. Parental concern was not significantly predictive of SBI.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Intuición/fisiología , Padres/psicología , Pediatras/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Infecciones Bacterianas/psicología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Preescolar , Intervalos de Confianza , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Fiebre/microbiología , Humanos , Lactante , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA