Increased risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with COVID-19 pneumonia in comparison to influenza pneumonia: insights from the National Inpatient Sample database.

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), primarily a respiratory virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, induces a hypercoagulable state. Previous studies comparing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with influenza pneumonia revealed a higher risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, these studies have not adequately accounted for the severity and acuity of the presenting viral pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective study, we rigorously adjusted for critical illness using a nationally representative dataset to investigate whether COVID-19 pneumonia is independently linked to a higher risk of PE and DVT. Results: After comprehensive multivariate adjustment, our findings demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia maintained significantly higher odds of developing acute inpatient PE [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.16-2.86; P<0.01] and DVT (aOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.41-1.96; P<0.01) during the early pandemic compared to patients with influenza pneumonia. Furthermore, we identified congenital heart disease and malnutrition as novel risk factors for acute PE in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the higher prevalence of acute inpatient PE over DVT in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may support a "thrombus in situ" mechanism of SARS-CoV-2-mediated pulmonary thrombosis. Consequently, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for PE, even in the absence of DVT, among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and should follow evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management.

Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in the United States: A Propensity-score Matched Analysis of a Large National Database.

Patients with cirrhosis that are hospitalized with COVID-19 infection have been found to have worse outcomes. No comparative study has been conducted between gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with cirrhosis who are diagnosed with COVID-19. We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to perform a retrospective analysis of 24, 050 patients diagnosed with cirrhosis and COVID-19. The identified patients were separated into variceal bleeding, nonvariceal bleeding, and no (or neither) GI bleeding groups. After performing propensity sample matching and multivariate analysis of mortality, we found no significant differences in mortality among the three groups. However, the variceal bleed group had a shorter length of stay (5.67 days lower than the no-bleed group). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with intervention was associated with reduced mortality in the variceal and nonvariceal bleeding groups. Acute kidney injury was a strong predictor of mortality in both bleeding groups. A native American race was found to be associated with higher mortality in the nonvariceal bleeding group. Our study suggests that there are various pathophysiological processes among the three groups, with no significant mortality differences with cirrhosis complications of GI bleeding.

Impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes during delivery admissions: a nationwide analysis with clinical implications.

Background: The available literature indicates a link between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and a heightened probability of experiencing negative outcomes for both the pregnant patient and the developing fetus. We compared clinical outcomes of pregnant patients with or without COVID-19 hospitalized during delivery. Methods: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes and was adjusted for patient-related, hospital-related, and illness severity indicators. Results: We identified a total of 3,447,771 pregnant patients admitted between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020; 1.3% (n = 46,050) had COVID-19. COVID-19-positive patients had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (0.15% vs 0.05%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-14.25, P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (0.9% vs 0.05%, aOR 14.2, 95% CI 10.7-18.76, P < 0.001), vasopressor use (0.26% vs 0.14%, aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.02, P = 0.01), and perinatal maternal complications like preeclampsia (9.66% vs 7.04%, aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.2-1.39, P < 0.001) and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome (0.53% vs 0.26%, aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.43-2.61, P < 0.001) than COVID-19-negative patients. Discussion: Clinicians should be aware of the heightened risk of complications in pregnant patients with COVID-19 and consider strategies to mitigate them.

Outcomes of COVID-19 Disease in Comparison with Influenza in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Nationwide Research Network in the United States.

COVID-19 infection has worse outcomes in immunocompromised individuals. This includes those with diabetes mellitus, cancer, chronic autoimmune diseases requiring immunomodulatory therapy, and solid-organ transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression. Using the National Inpatient Sample Database, this study retrospectively compared 14,915 renal transplant recipients who were hospitalized with either COVID-19 or Influenza virus infection in the US at any point between 1st January 2020 and 31st December 2020. We found that compared to renal transplant recipients with influenza infection, recipients with COVID-19 infection were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support and develop acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. COVID-19 patients also had significantly longer length of hospital stay. Renal transplant recipients with COVID-19 had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to recipients with influenza infection (14.09% vs 2.61%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.73 [95% CI (5.74-16.52)], P < .001). Our study clearly demonstrates the severe outcomes of high mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients with COVID-19. Further research should be undertaken to focus on the key areas noted to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.

Outcomes of COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations in Geriatric Patients with Dementia in the United States: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Previous studies have convincingly demonstrated the negative impact of dementia on overall health outcomes. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is burgeoning evidence suggesting a possible association between dementia and adverse outcomes, however the relationship has not been conclusively established. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 816,960 hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged 65 or older from the 2020 national inpatient sample. The cohort was bifurcated into patients with dementia (n = 180,845) and those without (n = 636,115). Multivariate regression and propensity score matched analyses (PSM) assessed in-hospital mortality and complications. We observed that COVID-19 patients with dementia had a notably higher risk of in-hospital mortality (23.1% vs. 18.6%; aOR = 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.2]). This elevated risk persisted even after PSM. Interestingly, dementia patients had a reduced risk of several acute in-hospital complications, including liver failure and sudden cardiac arrest. Nevertheless, they had longer hospital stays and lower total hospital charges. Our findings conclusively demonstrate that dementia patients face a heightened risk of mortality when hospitalized with COVID-19 but are less likely to experience certain complications. This complexity underscores the urgent need for individualized care strategies for this vulnerable group.

Assessing 30-day readmissions and outcomes in acute heart failure patients with concurrent COVID-19: A nationwide study during the 2020 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (HF) is a significant cause of readmission and mortality, particularly within 30 days post-discharge. The interplay between COVID-19 and HF is still being studied. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized The National Readmission Database to examine outcomes and predictors among patients with COVID-19 and concomitant acute HF between January 1, 2020, and November 31, 2020. 53,336 index hospitalizations and 8,158 readmissions were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day all-cause readmission rate. Predictor variables included patient demographics, medical comorbidities and discharge disposition. RESULTS: The primary outcome was 21.2 %. COVID-19 infection was the most predominant all-cause reason for acute HF readmission (24.7 %). Hypertensive heart disease with chronic kidney disease was the most prevalent cardiac cause (7.7 %). Mortality rate during index hospitalization was significantly higher compared to readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The highlighted prevalent complications, comorbidities, and demographics driving readmissions offer valuable insights to improve outcomes in this population.

Trends in utilisation of palliative care services in COVID-19 patients and their impact on hospital resources in the USA: insights from the national inpatient sample.

OBJECTIVES: Poor prognosis and lack of effective therapeutic options have made palliative care an integral part of the management of severe COVID-19. However, clinical studies on the role of palliative care in severe COVID-19 patients are lacking. The objective of our study was to evaluate the utility of palliative care in intubated COVID-19 patients and its impact on in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: Rate of palliative care consult, patient-level variables (age, sex, race, income, insurance type), hospital-level variables (region, type, size) and in-hospital outcome variables (mortality, cost, disposition, complications) were recorded. RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed 263 855 intubated COVID-19 patients using National Inpatient Sample database from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. 65 325 (24.8%) patients received palliative care consult. Factors associated with an increased rate of palliative care consults included: female gender (p<0.001), older age (p<0.001), Caucasian race (p<0.001), high household income (p<0.001), Medicare insurance (p<0.001), admission to large-teaching hospitals (p<0.001), patients with underlying comorbidities, development of in-hospital complications and the need for intensive care procedures. Patients receiving palliative consults had shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (p<0.001) and no difference in hospitalisation cost (p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care utilisation rate in intubated COVID-19 patients was reflective of disease severity and disparities in healthcare access. Palliative care may help reduce hospital LOS. Our findings also highlight importance of improving access to palliative care services and its integration into the multidisciplinary management of severe COVID-19 patients.

Impact of COVID-19 on Pregnancy Outcomes across Trimesters in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge regarding the association between trimester-specific changes during pregnancy and COVID-19 infection is limited. We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to investigate trimester-specific outcomes among hospitalized pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 3,447,771 pregnant women identified, those with COVID-19 exhibited higher in-hospital mortality rates in their third trimester compared with those without the virus. Notably, rates of mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, and perinatal complications (preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, and preterm birth) were significantly elevated across all trimesters for COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 was found to be more prevalent among low-income, Hispanic pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that COVID-19 during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of maternal mortality and complications, particularly in the third trimester. Furthermore, we observed significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in both COVID-19 prevalence and pregnancy outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for equitable healthcare strategies to improve care for diverse and socioeconomically marginalized groups, ultimately aiming to reduce adverse COVID-19-associated maternal and fetal outcomes.

COVID-19 Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Hospitalized Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.

Background: There is no uniformity in the available literature concerning the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) viral illness on people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: We conducted an analysis using the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalized patients with and without IBD. Results: Of 1,050,040 patients admitted with COVID-19, 5,750 (0.5%) also had IBD. The group with COVID-19 and IBD had higher percentages of females and White individuals and a greater prevalence of chronic lung disease, peripheral vascular disease, and liver disease. However, after accounting for confounding variables, there was no significant difference in mortality rates, length of hospital stays, or hospitalization costs between the two groups. Conclusion: According to our findings, the presence of IBD does not appear to elevate the risk of COVID-19 complications.

COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients in the United States: A propensity matched analysis of national inpatient sample.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal-related hospitalization, with significant morbidity and mortality. SARS-COV-2 virus can access the pancreas via angiotensin-converting enzymes and can cause direct and indirect injury to the pancreatic parenchyma. The objective of this study to understand clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with and without pancreatitis utilizing National Inpatient Sample database. METHODS: We utilized the United States National Inpatient Sample database to study clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection (a total of 1,659,040 hospitalized patients with 10,075 (0.6 %) with pancreatitis) between January 1 to December 31, 2020, along with propensity matching. RESULTS: While after propensity matching, we did not find a statistical difference in in-hospital mortality amongst COVID-19 patients with pancreatitis compared to COVID-19 patients without pancreatitis (13.2 % vs 10.3 %, adjusted odds ratio: 0.7 [95 % CI 0.5-1], p = 0.11). Patients with COVID-19 and pancreatitis had more episodes of septic shock, higher incidence of acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. We also found an increased prevalence of NASH cirrhosis, alcohol liver cirrhosis, and a lesser incidence of pulmonary embolisms in the COVID-19 with pancreatitis cohort. CONCLUSION: Worse in-hospital outcomes, including increased incidence of septic shock, acute kidney injury, and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection and pancreatitis, emphasize the need for more research to understand the effect of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized patients with pancreatitis and in the role of vaccination to improve long term outcome in this patient population.

Gender parity in high impact neurology journals.

Background: Although female representation has been growing among physicians, women continue to be underrepresented in neurology, particularly regarding academic research in authorship and leadership. Analyzing recent trends in high-impact neurology journals highlights the underrepresentation of women and helps explore barriers to female representation in academic neurology. Methods and results: Journal Citation Reports (JCR) for 2021 was used to screen neurology journals for selection. The first 15 journals with the highest impact factors (JIF) were included. 15,404 total articles in neurology were examined for gender distribution of editorial staff and authorship with the highest total citations from January 1st, 2018 to October 31st, 2021. Gender was classified using biographical information from public and personal media sources. Genderize.io was used in cases of ambiguity, predicting gender at probability of ≥95%. Our data demonstrated that these journals only had 13% female editor-in-chiefs and 35% female editorial staff. The data further demonstrated that females accounted for 39% of first authors and 26% for last authors. During the four years examined males continued to account for the vast majority of both first and last authors for publications accepted and journal editorial staff members. Conclusion: Women are significantly under-represented in the field of neurological research in leadership positions as editor-in-chiefs, editorial board members as well as first or senior authors in top neurology medical journals. With continued underrepresentation of women occupying leading publishing roles, parity with men is still a work in progress. Additional work is needed to identify and address barriers to academic advancement for women physicians in academic neurology.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for COVID-19 and Influenza among Cardiac Transplant Recipients in the United States.

COVID-19 infections can lead to worse outcomes in an immunocompromised population with multiple comorbidities, e.g., heart transplant patients. We used the National Inpatient Sample database to compare heart transplant outcomes in patients with COVID-19 vs. influenza. A total of 2460 patients were included in this study: heart transplant with COVID-19 (n = 1155, 47.0%) and heart transplant with influenza (n = 1305, 53.0%) with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality (n = 120) was significantly higher for heart transplant patients infected with COVID-19 compared to those infected with influenza (9.5% vs. 0.8%, adjusted OR: 51.6 [95% CI 4.3-615.9], p = 0.002) along with significantly higher rates of mechanical ventilation, acute heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and higher mean total hospitalization cost compared to the influenza group. More studies are needed on the role of vaccination and treatment to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

COVID-19 Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Hospitalized in the United States During the Early Pandemic: Analysis of In-Hospital Mortality, Clinical Outcomes, and Racial Disparities.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been linked to severe consequences among hospitalized patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension (PH), as evidenced by a limited number of studies. Our retrospective study employed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to evaluate in-hospital mortality and various clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with and without PH. This study included all patients ages 18 years and above who were hospitalized in the United States from January 1,2020 to December 31, 2020 with a COVID-19 diagnosis. The patients were then divided into 2 cohorts based on their PH status. After multivariate adjustment, we discovered that COVID-19 patients with PH experienced considerably higher in-hospital mortality, longer hospital stays, and higher costs of hospitalization when compared to COVID-19 patients without PH. Moreover, we observed an increased dependence on invasive and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation among COVID-19 patients with PH, indicating more severe respiratory failure. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 patients with PH had a heightened risk of acute pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction while hospitalized. Lastly, among COVID-19 patients with PH, Hispanic and Native American patients demonstrated a persistently higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared to other racial groups. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study of outcomes for COVID-19 patients with PH. The observed inpatient mortality appears to be driven by in-hospital complications, particularly pulmonary embolism. Given the substantial mortality and complications associated with COVID-19 and PH, we advocate for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the implementation of aggressive nonpharmacological preventive measures.

COVID-19 and HIV: Clinical Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients in the United States.

The concurrence of HIV and COVID-19 yields unique challenges and considerations for healthcare providers, patients living with HIV, and healthcare systems at-large. Persons living with HIV may face a higher risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection and experiencing worse clinical outcomes compared to those without. Notably, COVID-19 may have a disproportionate impact on historically disadvantaged populations, including African Americans and those stratified in a lower socio-economic status. Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we compared patients with a diagnosis of both HIV and COVID-19 and those who exclusively had a diagnosis of COVID-19. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intubation rate and vasopressor use; acute MI, acute kidney injury (AKI); AKI requiring hemodialysis (HD); venous thromboembolism (VTE); septic shock and cardiac arrest; length of stay; financial burden on healthcare; and resource utilization. A total of 1,572,815 patients were included in this study; a COVID-19-positive sample that did not have HIV (n = 1,564,875, 99.4%) and another sample with HIV and COVID-19 (n = 7940, 0.56%). Patients with COVID-19 and HIV did not have a significant difference in mortality compared to COVID-19 alone (10.2% vs. 11.3%, respectively, p = 0.35); however, that patient cohort did have a significantly higher rate of AKI (33.6% vs. 28.6%, aOR: 1.26 [95% CI 1.13-1.41], p < 0.001). Given the complex interplay between HIV and COVID-19, more prospective studies investigating the factors such as the contribution of viral burden, CD4 cell count, and the details of patients' anti-retroviral therapeutic regimens should be pursued.

July effect in clinical outcomes of esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed at teaching hospitals in the United States.

Background: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a common procedure used for both diagnosis and treatment, but carries risks such as bleeding and perforation. The "July effect"-described as increased complication rates during the transition of new trainees-has been studied in other procedures, but has not been thoroughly evaluated for EGD. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database for 2016 to 2018 to compare outcomes in EGD performed between July to September and April to June. Results: Approximately 0.91 million patients in the study received EGD between July to September (49.35%) and April to June (50.65%), with no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, race, income, or insurance status. Of the 911,235 patients, 19,280 died during the study period following EGD, 2.14% (July-September) vs 1.95% (April-June), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.09 (P < 0.01). The adjusted total hospitalization charge was $2052 higher in July-September ($81,597) vs April to June ($79,023) (P < 0.005). The mean length of stay was 6.8 days (July-September) vs 6.6 days (April-June) (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study are reassuring as the July effect on inpatient outcomes for EGDs was not significantly different according to our study. We recommend seeking prompt treatment and improving new trainee training and interspecialty communication for better patient outcomes.

Thirty-Day readmissions among COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the early pandemic in the United States: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are core indicators of the quality of health care provision. OBJECTIVE: To understand factors associated with 30-day, all-cause hospital readmission rate for patients with COVID-19 in the United States during the early pandemic by utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database. METHODS: This retrospective study characterized the 30-day, all-cause hospital readmission rate for patients with COVID-19 in the United States during the early pandemic by utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database. RESULTS: The 30-day, all-cause hospital readmission rate in this population was 3.2%. We found the most common diagnoses at readmission to be sepsis, acute kidney injury, and pneumonia. Chronic alcoholic liver cirrhosis and congestive heart failure were prominent predictors of readmission among patients with COVID-19. Moreover, we found that younger patients and patients from economically disadvantaged backgrounds were at higher risk of 30-day readmission. Acute complications during index hospitalization, including acute coronary syndrome, congestive heart failure, acute kidney injury, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy, also increased the risk of 30-day readmission for patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our study, we advise clinicians to promptly recognize patients with COVID-19 who are at high risk of readmission, and to subsequently manage their underlying comorbidities, to institute timely discharge planning, and to allocate resources to underprivileged patients in order to decrease the risk of 30-day hospital readmissions.

COVID-19 and Clostridioides difficile Coinfection Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients in the United States: An Insight from National Inpatient Database.

The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has been increasing compared to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels. The COVID-19 infection and CDI relationship can be affected by gut dysbiosis and poor antibiotic stewardship. As the COVID-19 pandemic transitions into an endemic stage, it has become increasingly important to further characterize how concurrent infection with both conditions can impact patient outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2020 NIS Healthcare Cost Utilization Project (HCUP) database with a total of 1,659,040 patients, with 10,710 (0.6%) of those patients with concurrent CDI. We found that patients with concurrent COVID-19 and CDI had worse outcomes compared to patients without CDI including higher in-hospital mortality (23% vs. 13.4%, aOR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.12-1.5, p = 0.01), rates of in-hospital complications such as ileus (2.7% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001), septic shock (21.0% vs. 7.2%, aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 2.1-2.6, p < 0.001), length of stay (15.1 days vs. 8 days, p < 0.001) and overall cost of hospitalization (USD 196,012 vs. USD 91,162, p < 0.001). Patients with concurrent COVID-19 and CDI had increased morbidity and mortality, and added significant preventable burden on the healthcare system. Optimizing hand hygiene and antibiotic stewardship during in-hospital admissions can help to reduce worse outcomes in this population, and more efforts should be directly made to reduce CDI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection.

Comparing Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 and Influenza-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in patients with COVID-19 and Influenza, with only small number of studies comparing these two viral illnesses in the setting of ARDS. Given the pathogenic differences in the two viruses, this study shows trends in national hospitalization and outcomes associated with COVID-19- and Influenza-related ARDS. To evaluate and compare the risk factors and rates of the adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS (C-ARDS) relative to Influenza-related ARDS (I-ARDS), we utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2020. Our sample includes 106,720 patients hospitalized with either C-ARDS or I-ARDS between January and December 2020, of which 103,845 (97.3%) had C-ARDS and 2875 (2.7%) had I-ARDS. Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 3.2, 95% CI 2.5-4.2, p < 0.001), longer mean length of stay (18.7 days vs. 14.5 days, p < 0.001), higher likelihood of requiring vasopressors (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 2.5-4.2) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.1) in C-ARDS patients. Our study shows that COVID-19-related ARDS patients had a higher rate of complications, including higher in-hospital mortality and a higher need for vasopressors and invasive mechanical ventilation relative to Influenza-related ARDS; however, it also showed an increased utilization of mechanical circulatory support and non-invasive ventilation in Influenza-related ARDS. It emphasizes the need for early detection and management of COVID-19.

COVID-19 and Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction Clinical Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients in the United States.

Heart failure exacerbations impart significant morbidity and mortality, however, large- scale studies assessing outcomes in the setting of concurrent coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) are limited. We utilized National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to compare clinical outcomes in patients admitted with acute congestive heart failure exacerbation (CHF) with and without COVID-19 infection. A total of 2,101,980 patients (Acute CHF without COVID-19 (n = 2,026,765 (96.4%) and acute CHF with COVID-19 (n = 75,215, 3.6%)) were identified. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to compared outcomes and were adjusted for age, sex, race, income level, insurance status, discharge quarter, Elixhauser co-morbidities, hospital location, teaching status and bed size. Patients with acute CHF and COVID-19 had higher in-hospital mortality compared to patients with acute CHF alone (25.78% vs. 5.47%, adjust OR (aOR) 6.3 (95% CI 6.05-6.62, p < 0.001)) and higher rates of vasopressor use (4.87% vs. 2.54%, aOR 2.06 (95% CI 1.86-2.27, p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (31.26% vs. 17.14%, aOR 2.3 (95% CI 2.25-2.44, p < 0.001)), sudden cardiac arrest (5.73% vs. 2.88%, aOR 1.95 (95% CI 1.79-2.12, p < 0.001)), and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis (5.56% vs. 2.94%, aOR 1.92 (95% CI 1.77-2.09, p < 0.001)). Moreover, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (26.87% vs. 24.5%, adjusted OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.16-1.36, p < 0.001)) with increased incidence of vasopressor use, sudden cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock as compared to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Furthermore, elderly patients and patients with African-American and Hispanic descents had higher in-hospital mortality. Acute CHF with COVID-19 is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and end organ dysfunction such as kidney failure and cardiac arrest.

Vasculitis Leading to Gangrene: An Early Presentation in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient.

Vasculitis is a late complication in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is seen in RA patients with long-standing disease. Rheumatoid vasculitis affects small-to-medium-sized vessels. In a few patients, vasculitis develops early in the course of the disease. Here, we report the case of a 32-year-old female who presented with gangrene in the second and third digits of the right foot and gangrene in the second digit of the left foot. She was on hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate for one year since the diagnosis of RA. The patient then developed Raynaud's phenomenon and blackish discoloration of toes. She was started on pulse methylprednisolone, aspirin, nifedipine, and pentoxifylline. As no improvement was seen, intravenous cyclophosphamide was started. There was no improvement even after starting cyclophosphamide, and the gangrene further worsened. Eventually, after consulting the surgical team, it was decided to amputate the digits. The second digits in both feet were subsequently amputated. Hence, a physician should always be careful in checking for signs of vasculitis in RA patients early in the course of the disease as well.