ARE DRAIN ESSENTIALS IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION? ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS AFFECTING THE POSTOPERATIVE DRAINAGE.

OBJECTIVE: The routine drain placement following renal transplantation is currently under debate. Its benefit is uncertain and may cause complications, particularly infectious ones. Some renal transplant patients have low-productive drains, that might be unnecessary. The objective of this study is to bring to light factors influencing drain volume in kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All kidney transplant patients in Tours between 2019 and 2020 were included. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed: patients with low-productive redons (quantification less than 100 mL/24h,) and patients with productive redons (≥100 mL/24h). Univariate and multivariate analyses by logistic regression were performed to look for risk factors associated with productive drainage. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were included (67 in the low-productive group and 122 in the productive group). The results in the productive group showed a significantly higher proportion of retransplantation (p=0.015), overweight (p=0.012), low residual diuresis (p=0.041), and a significantly lower proportion of preemptive transplantation (p=0.008) and peritoneal dialysis (p=0,037). After an adjustment, the following variables remained significantly associated with greater drainage: overweight (OR= 2.42. p = 0.014 ; CI95% [1.2-4.94]) ; retransplantation (OR = 3.98. p = 0.027 ; IC95% [1.27-15.45]), and preemptive transplant (OR= 0.22. p = 0.013 ; CI95% [0.06-0.7]). CONCLUSION: The non-implementation of a redon in renal transplantation could be considered, in a selected population of non-overweight patients, with significant residual diuresis for a first transplantation which should be preemptive. This could lead to a randomized controlled trial to determine the real benefits of a routine drain replacement in kidney transplantation.

Relevance of Tacrolimus Trough Concentration and Hepatitis E virus Genetic Changes in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Chronic Hepatitis E.

Introduction: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) can cause chronic infection (≥3 months) and cirrhosis in immunocompromised patients, especially kidney transplant recipients. Low alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and high HEV intrahost diversity have previously been associated with evolution toward chronicity in these patients. We hypothesized that additional clinical and viral factors could be associated with the risk of chronic HEV infection. Methods: We investigated a series of 27 kidney transplant recipients with HEV infection, including 20 patients with chronic hepatitis E. Results: High tacrolimus trough concentration at diagnosis was the most relevant marker associated with chronic hepatitis E (9.2 vs. 6.4 ng/ml, P = 0.04). Most HEV genetic changes selected during HEV infection were compartmentalized between plasma and feces. Conclusion: This compartmentalization highlights the diversity and complexity of HEV replication compartments. Tacrolimus trough concentration at diagnosis of HEV infection could allow an early identification of patients at high risk of chronic hepatitis E and guide treatment initiation.

Assessment of epidemiology and outcomes of adult patients with kidney-limited thrombotic microangiopathies.

Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are usually associated with hematological features (RH-TMA). The epidemiology of TMA limited to kidneys (RL-TMA) is unclear Therefore, patients with TMA and native kidney biopsies were identified during 2009-2022 in 20 French hospitals and results evaluated. RL-TMA was present in 341/757 (45%) patients and associated with lower creatinine levels (median 184 vs 346 µmol/L) than RH-TMA. RL-TMA resulted from virtually all identified causes, more frequently from anti-VEGF treatment and hematological malignancies but less frequently from shigatoxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), systemic sclerosis, gemcitabine and bacterial infection, and even less frequently when three or more causes/triggers were combined (RL-TMA: 5%; RH-TMA: 12%). RL-TMA was associated with significantly lower major cardiovascular events (10% vs 20%), kidney replacement therapy (23% vs 43%) and death (12% vs 20%) than RH-TMA during follow-up (median 28 months). Atypical HUS (aHUS) was found in 326 patients (RL-TMA: 43%, RH-TMA: 44%). Among the 69 patients with proven complement-mediated aHUS, eculizumab (anti-C5 therapy) was used in 43 (62%) (RL-TMA: 35%; RH-TMA: 71%). Among the 257 other patients with aHUS, including 51% with RL-TMA, eculizumab was used in 29 but with unclear effects of this treatment. Thus, RL-TMA represents a very high proportion of patients with TMA and results from virtually all known causes of TMA and includes 25% of patients with complement-mediated aHUS. Adverse outcomes of RL-TMA are lower compared to RH-TMA but remain significant. Anti-C5 therapy was rarely used in RL-TMA, even in proven complement-mediated aHUS, and its effects remain to be assessed.

Eculizumab dose tapering should take into account the nonlinearity of its pharmacokinetics.

AIMS: Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting complement protein C5 used in renal diseases. As recommended dosing regimen leads to unnecessarily high concentrations in some patients, tailored dosing therapeutic drug monitoring was proposed to reduce treatment cost. The objectives of the present work were (i) to investigate the target-mediated elimination of eculizumab and (ii) whether a pharmacokinetic model integrating a nonlinear elimination allows a better prediction of eculizumab concentrations than a linear model. METHODS: We analysed 377 eculizumab serum concentrations from 44 patients treated for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy with a population pharmacokinetic approach. Critical concentrations (below which a non-log-linear decline of concentration over time is evidenced) were computed to estimate the relevance of the target-mediated elimination. Simulations of dosing regimens were then performed to predict probabilities of target attainment (i.e. trough >100 mg/L). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of eculizumab was nonlinear and followed a mixture of first-order (CL = 1.318 mL/day/kg) and Michaelis-Menten elimination (Vmax = 26.07 mg/day, Km = 24.06 mg/L). Volume of distribution (72.39 mL/kg) and clearance were weight-dependent. Critical concentrations (Vmax/CL) ranged from 144.7 to 759.7 mg/L and were inversely related to body weight (P = .013). Nonlinearity was thus noticeable at therapeutic concentrations. Simulations predicted that 1200 mg of eculizumab every 21 days would allow 85% and 76% of patients to maintain a therapeutic exposure, for 50 or 90 kg body weight, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study investigates the nonlinear elimination of eculizumab and discusses the importance of accounting for eculizumab target-mediated elimination in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Albumin influences leucocyte FcRn expression in the early days of kidney transplantation.

FcRn, a receptor originally known for its involvement in IgG and albumin transcytosis and recycling, is also important in the establishment of the innate and adaptive immune response. Dysregulation of the immune response has been associated with variations in FcRn expression, as observed in cancer. Recently, a link between autophagy and FcRn expression has been demonstrated. Knowing that autophagy is strongly involved in the development of reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation and that albuminemia is transiently decreased in the first 2 weeks after transplantation, we investigated variations in FcRn expression after kidney transplantation. We monitored FcRn levels by flow cytometry in leukocytes from 25 renal transplant patients and considered parameters such as albumin concentrations, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, serum IgG levels, and ischaemia/reperfusion time. Two groups of patients could be distinguished according to their increased or non-increased FcRn expression levels between days 2 and 6 (d2-d6) post-transplantation. Leukocyte FcRn expression at d2-d6 was correlated with albumin concentrations at d0-d2. These results suggest that albumin concentrations at d0-d2 influence FcRn expression at d2-d6, raising new questions about the mechanisms underlying these original observations.